Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[1970 TO 1980}
  1. Rao, I.K.: ¬The distribution of scientific productivity and social change (1978) 0.03
    0.02967508 = product of:
      0.08902524 = sum of:
        0.07356817 = weight(_text_:wide in 8) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07356817 = score(doc=8,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18785246 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.3916274 = fieldWeight in 8, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8)
        0.015457064 = product of:
          0.04637119 = sum of:
            0.04637119 = weight(_text_:29 in 8) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04637119 = score(doc=8,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042397358 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 8, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Results in the literature concerning the probability that an author publishes r articles in time t are reexamined, and it is found that a negative binomial distribution bits scientific productivity data (by the chi-squared goodness-of-fit-test) better than many other distribution such as geometric, logarithmic, zeta, cumulative advantage, etc. It is shown analytically that the nagative binomial distribution describes a pattern of scientific productivity under the 'success-breeds-success' condition in a wide variety of social circumstances
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 29(1978), S.111-122