Search (21 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Leydesdorff, L.: Theories of citation? (1999) 0.06
    0.05575326 = product of:
      0.16725978 = sum of:
        0.16725978 = weight(_text_:specialist in 5130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16725978 = score(doc=5130,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.51558185 = fieldWeight in 5130, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5130)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Citations support the communication of specialist knowledge by allowing authors and readers to make specific selections in several contexts at the same time. In the interactions between the social network of authors and the network of their reflexive communications, a sub textual code of communication with a distributed character has emerged. Citation analysis reflects on citation practices. Reference lists are aggregated in scientometric analysis using one of the available contexts to reduce the complexity: geometrical representations of dynamic operations are reflected in corresponding theories of citation. The specific contexts represented in the modern citation can be deconstructed from the perspective of the cultural evolution of scientific communication
  2. Neth, M.: Citation analysis and the Web (1998) 0.05
    0.050983604 = product of:
      0.15295081 = sum of:
        0.15295081 = sum of:
          0.10679861 = weight(_text_:librarians in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10679861 = score(doc=108,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04866305 = queryNorm
              0.48993918 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
          0.0461522 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0461522 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04866305 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Citation analysis has long been used by librarians as an important tool of collection development and the advent of Internet technology and especially the WWW adds a new facet to the role played by citation analysis. One of the reasons why librarians create WWW homepages is to provide users with further sources of interest or reference and to do this libraries include links from their own homepages to other information sources. Reports current research on the analysis of WWW pages as an introduction to an examination of the homepages of 25 art libraries to determine what sites are most often included. The types of linked sites are analyzed based on 3 criteria: location, focus and evidence that the link was evaluated before the connection was establisheds
    Date
    10. 1.1999 16:22:37
  3. Kreider, J.: ¬The correlation of local citation data with citation data from Journal Citation Reports (1999) 0.05
    0.050558083 = product of:
      0.15167424 = sum of:
        0.15167424 = sum of:
          0.112115204 = weight(_text_:librarians in 102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.112115204 = score(doc=102,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04866305 = queryNorm
              0.5143291 = fieldWeight in 102, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=102)
          0.03955903 = weight(_text_:22 in 102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03955903 = score(doc=102,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04866305 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 102, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=102)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    University librarians continue to face the difficult task of determining which journals remain crucial for their collections during these times of static financial resources and escalating journal costs. One evaluative tool, Journal Citation Reports (JCR), recently has become available on CD-ROM, making it simpler for librarians to use its citation data as input for ranking journals. But many librarians remain unconvinced that the global citation data from the JCR bears enough correspondence to their local situation to be useful. In this project, I explore the correlation between global citation data available from JCR with local citation data generated specifically for the University of British Columbia, for 20 subject fields in the sciences and social sciences. The significant correlations obtained in this study suggest that large research-oriented university libraries could consider substituting global citation data for local citation data when evaluating their journals, with certain cautions.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  4. Nkereuwem, E.E.: Accrediting knowledge : the ranking of library and information science journals (1997) 0.02
    0.018685868 = product of:
      0.056057602 = sum of:
        0.056057602 = product of:
          0.112115204 = sum of:
            0.112115204 = weight(_text_:librarians in 786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.112115204 = score(doc=786,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.5143291 = fieldWeight in 786, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=786)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes how a representative sample of librarians was surveyed to carry out a comparative evaluation of selected journals in library and information science. Respondents were asked to rate each journal on a scale from poor to outstanding (0-10), in terms of their visibility and the quality of articles they publish. Such evaluation should assist librarians in journal selection and in determining the quality of journals to which they send their research papers for publication. Reports the findings of the survey which discovered that some journals such as Library Waves, Assistant Librarian and Library Journal get low ratings because of low visibility and irregular publication. Others such as African Journal of Library Archives and Information Science and Journal of Information Science are rated highly because of familiarity and accessibility. Argues that the results of the study should help librarians determine the quality of journals and will subsequently enhance their utilization and subscription.
  5. Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998) 0.02
    0.015540253 = product of:
      0.04662076 = sum of:
        0.04662076 = product of:
          0.09324152 = sum of:
            0.09324152 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09324152 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:22:35
  6. Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994) 0.02
    0.015384067 = product of:
      0.0461522 = sum of:
        0.0461522 = product of:
          0.0923044 = sum of:
            0.0923044 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0923044 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
  7. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990) 0.02
    0.015384067 = product of:
      0.0461522 = sum of:
        0.0461522 = product of:
          0.0923044 = sum of:
            0.0923044 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0923044 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:29
  8. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : II. Resilience to ambiguity (1990) 0.02
    0.015384067 = product of:
      0.0461522 = sum of:
        0.0461522 = product of:
          0.0923044 = sum of:
            0.0923044 = weight(_text_:22 in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0923044 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:55
  9. Meyer, T.; Spencer, J.: ¬A citation analysis study of library science : who cites librarians? (1996) 0.01
    0.008990241 = product of:
      0.026970722 = sum of:
        0.026970722 = product of:
          0.053941444 = sum of:
            0.053941444 = weight(_text_:librarians in 5502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053941444 = score(doc=5502,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.24745665 = fieldWeight in 5502, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5502)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  10. Li, T.-C.: Reference sources in periodicals : research note (1995) 0.01
    0.008790895 = product of:
      0.026372686 = sum of:
        0.026372686 = product of:
          0.052745372 = sum of:
            0.052745372 = weight(_text_:22 in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052745372 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a list of 53 periodicals in 22 subject fields which regularly provide bibliographies of theses, research in progress and patents in their particular subject field. The fields of business, economics, history and literature have most periodical listings of dissertations and theses. Also lists 63 periodicals in 25 sub-disciplines which provide rankings or ratings. Rankings and ratings information predominates in the fields of business, sports and games, finance and banking, and library and information science
  11. Pichappan, P.; Sangaranachiyar, S.: Ageing approach to scientific eponyms (1996) 0.01
    0.008790895 = product of:
      0.026372686 = sum of:
        0.026372686 = product of:
          0.052745372 = sum of:
            0.052745372 = weight(_text_:22 in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052745372 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Report presented at the 16th National Indian Association of Special Libraries and Information Centres Seminar Special Interest Group Meeting on Informatrics in Bombay, 19-22 Dec 94
  12. Mommoh, O.M.: Subject analysis of post-graduate theses in library, archival and information science at Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria (1995/96) 0.01
    0.008790895 = product of:
      0.026372686 = sum of:
        0.026372686 = product of:
          0.052745372 = sum of:
            0.052745372 = weight(_text_:22 in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052745372 = score(doc=673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Library focus. 13/14(1995/96), S.22-25
  13. Chongde, W.; Zhe, W.: Evaluation of the models for Bradford's law (1998) 0.01
    0.008790895 = product of:
      0.026372686 = sum of:
        0.026372686 = product of:
          0.052745372 = sum of:
            0.052745372 = weight(_text_:22 in 3688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052745372 = score(doc=3688,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3688, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3688)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:12:28
  14. Tijssen, R.J.W.; Wijk, E. van: ¬The global science base of information and communication technologies : bibliometric analysis of ICT research papers (1998) 0.01
    0.008790895 = product of:
      0.026372686 = sum of:
        0.026372686 = product of:
          0.052745372 = sum of:
            0.052745372 = weight(_text_:22 in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052745372 = score(doc=3691,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:26:54
  15. Zhang, Y.: ¬The impact of Internet-based electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science : a citation analysis (1998) 0.01
    0.0077701267 = product of:
      0.02331038 = sum of:
        0.02331038 = product of:
          0.04662076 = sum of:
            0.04662076 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04662076 = score(doc=2808,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    30. 1.1999 17:22:22
  16. Haiqi, Z.: ¬The literature of Qigong : publication patterns and subject headings (1997) 0.01
    0.0076920334 = product of:
      0.0230761 = sum of:
        0.0230761 = product of:
          0.0461522 = sum of:
            0.0461522 = weight(_text_:22 in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0461522 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.3, S.38-44
  17. Avramescu, A.: Teoria difuziei informatiei stiintifice (1997) 0.01
    0.0076920334 = product of:
      0.0230761 = sum of:
        0.0230761 = product of:
          0.0461522 = sum of:
            0.0461522 = weight(_text_:22 in 3030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0461522 = score(doc=3030,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3030, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3030)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 16:16:11
  18. Falkingham, L.T.; Reeves, R.: Context analysis : a technique for analysing research in a field, applied to literature on the management of R&D at the section level (1998) 0.01
    0.0076920334 = product of:
      0.0230761 = sum of:
        0.0230761 = product of:
          0.0461522 = sum of:
            0.0461522 = weight(_text_:22 in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0461522 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:18:46
  19. Tonta, Y.: Scholarly communication and the use of networked information sources (1996) 0.01
    0.0065931715 = product of:
      0.019779515 = sum of:
        0.019779515 = product of:
          0.03955903 = sum of:
            0.03955903 = weight(_text_:22 in 6389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03955903 = score(doc=6389,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6389, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6389)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.3, S.240-245
  20. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996) 0.01
    0.0065931715 = product of:
      0.019779515 = sum of:
        0.019779515 = product of:
          0.03955903 = sum of:
            0.03955903 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03955903 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170