Search (191 results, page 1 of 10)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994) 0.12
    0.121946156 = product of:
      0.18291923 = sum of:
        0.027916465 = weight(_text_:of in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027916465 = score(doc=5666,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
        0.15500277 = sum of:
          0.05601155 = weight(_text_:science in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05601155 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
          0.09899123 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09899123 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
  2. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990) 0.12
    0.11649513 = product of:
      0.1747427 = sum of:
        0.01973992 = weight(_text_:of in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01973992 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
        0.15500277 = sum of:
          0.05601155 = weight(_text_:science in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05601155 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
          0.09899123 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09899123 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:29
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 41(1990) no.5, S.368-375
  3. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : II. Resilience to ambiguity (1990) 0.12
    0.11649513 = product of:
      0.1747427 = sum of:
        0.01973992 = weight(_text_:of in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01973992 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
        0.15500277 = sum of:
          0.05601155 = weight(_text_:science in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05601155 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
          0.09899123 = weight(_text_:22 in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09899123 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:55
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 41(1990) no.5, S.376-386
  4. Mommoh, O.M.: Subject analysis of post-graduate theses in library, archival and information science at Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria (1995/96) 0.09
    0.08778303 = product of:
      0.13167454 = sum of:
        0.029843956 = weight(_text_:of in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029843956 = score(doc=673,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.36569026 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
        0.10183059 = sum of:
          0.045264166 = weight(_text_:science in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.045264166 = score(doc=673,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.3292649 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
          0.056566417 = weight(_text_:22 in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056566417 = score(doc=673,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a bibliometric study of 111 theses accepted by the Department of Library and Information Science, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria, between 1977 and 1992. The analysis was based on year, type and degree awarded, subject, type of library and geographical area. Concludes that the highest number of submissions was 1991, when 108 MLS theses (97,29%) and 3 PhD theses (2,71%) were accepted. Libraries and readers was the most concetrated subject while the academic library was the most discussed type of library
    Source
    Library focus. 13/14(1995/96), S.22-25
  5. Siddiqui, M.A.: ¬A bibliometric study of authorship characteristics in four international information science journals (1997) 0.09
    0.08702059 = product of:
      0.13053088 = sum of:
        0.029306183 = weight(_text_:of in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029306183 = score(doc=853,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
        0.10122469 = sum of:
          0.058799878 = weight(_text_:science in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.058799878 = score(doc=853,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.42772767 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
          0.042424813 = weight(_text_:22 in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042424813 = score(doc=853,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a bibliometric study of the authorship characteristics of articles published in 4 major information science periodicals: JASIS, Information technology and libraries, Journal of information science, and Program. The aim was to determine the details of their authors, such as: sex, occupation, affiliation, geographic distribution, and institutional affiliation. A total of 163 articles published in 1993 and written by 294 authors were analyzed. Results indicate that: men (206 or 70%) publish 3.0 times more articles than women (69 or 23,5%). Schools of library and information science contributed the most authors. The majority of authors came from the USA (148 or 50,3%), with the Midwest region claiming the largest share (110 or 25,0%). Academic libraries (110 or 37,4%) account for the major share of library publication. 12 schools of library and information science, in the USA, contributed 32 authors (50,0%) and assistant professors (25 or 39,1%) publish the most in these library schools. Male school of library and information science authors publish 1,6 times more than their female counterparts
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.3, S.3-23
  6. Li, T.-C.: Reference sources in periodicals : research note (1995) 0.09
    0.08630715 = product of:
      0.12946072 = sum of:
        0.027630134 = weight(_text_:of in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027630134 = score(doc=5092,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
        0.10183059 = sum of:
          0.045264166 = weight(_text_:science in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.045264166 = score(doc=5092,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.3292649 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
          0.056566417 = weight(_text_:22 in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056566417 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a list of 53 periodicals in 22 subject fields which regularly provide bibliographies of theses, research in progress and patents in their particular subject field. The fields of business, economics, history and literature have most periodical listings of dissertations and theses. Also lists 63 periodicals in 25 sub-disciplines which provide rankings or ratings. Rankings and ratings information predominates in the fields of business, sports and games, finance and banking, and library and information science
    Source
    Journal of information; communication; and library science. 2(1995) no.2, S.20-28
  7. Tijssen, R.J.W.; Wijk, E. van: ¬The global science base of information and communication technologies : bibliometric analysis of ICT research papers (1998) 0.07
    0.07408862 = product of:
      0.11113293 = sum of:
        0.02255991 = weight(_text_:of in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02255991 = score(doc=3691,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
        0.088573016 = sum of:
          0.0320066 = weight(_text_:science in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0320066 = score(doc=3691,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
          0.056566417 = weight(_text_:22 in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056566417 = score(doc=3691,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    International bibliographic databases and related biblimetric indicators together provide an analytical framework and appropriate measure to cover both the 'supply side' - research capabilities and outputs - and 'demand side' - collaboration, diffusion and citation impact - related to information and communication technologies (ICT) research. Presents results of such a bibliometric study describing macro level features of this ICT knowledge base
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:26:54
  8. Zhang, Y.: ¬The impact of Internet-based electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science : a citation analysis (1998) 0.07
    0.07271207 = product of:
      0.1090681 = sum of:
        0.02442182 = weight(_text_:of in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02442182 = score(doc=2808,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
        0.084646285 = sum of:
          0.03464816 = weight(_text_:science in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03464816 = score(doc=2808,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.25204095 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
          0.04999812 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04999812 = score(doc=2808,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Internet based electronic resources are growing dramatically but there have been no empirical studies evaluating the impact of e-sources, as a whole, on formal scholarly communication. reports results of an investigation into how much e-sources have been used in formal scholarly communication, using a case study in the area of Library and Information Science (LIS) during the period 1994 to 1996. 4 citation based indicators were used in the study of the impact measurement. Concludes that, compared with the impact of print sources, the impact of e-sources on formal scholarly communication in LIS is small, as measured by e-sources cited, and does not increase significantly by year even though there is observable growth of these impact across the years. It is found that periodical format is related to the rate of citing e-sources, articles are more likely to cite e-sources than are print priodical articles. However, once authors cite electronic resource, there is no significant difference in the number of references per article by periodical format or by year. Suggests that, at this stage, citing e-sources may depend on authors rather than the periodical format in which authors choose to publish
    Date
    30. 1.1999 17:22:22
    Source
    Journal of information science. 24(1998) no.4, S.241-254
  9. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996) 0.07
    0.06613006 = product of:
      0.09919508 = sum of:
        0.03276531 = weight(_text_:of in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03276531 = score(doc=7659,freq=30.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.4014868 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
              5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                30.0 = termFreq=30.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
        0.066429764 = sum of:
          0.02400495 = weight(_text_:science in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02400495 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
          0.042424813 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042424813 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    It is possible, using ISI's Journal Citation Report (JCR), to calculate average impact factors (AIF) for LCR's subject categories but it can be more useful to know the global Impact Factor (GIF) of a subject category and compare the 2 values. Reports results of a study to compare the relationships between AIFs and GIFs of subjects, based on the particular case of the average impact factor of a subfield versus the impact factor of this subfield as a whole, the difference being studied between an average of quotients, denoted as AQ, and a global average, obtained as a quotient of averages, and denoted as GQ. In the case of impact factors, AQ becomes the average impact factor of a field, and GQ becomes its global impact factor. Discusses a number of applications of this technique in the context of informetrics and scientometrics
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170
  10. Tonta, Y.: Scholarly communication and the use of networked information sources (1996) 0.06
    0.06352667 = product of:
      0.09529 = sum of:
        0.01891706 = weight(_text_:of in 6389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01891706 = score(doc=6389,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.23179851 = fieldWeight in 6389, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6389)
        0.07637294 = sum of:
          0.033948127 = weight(_text_:science in 6389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033948127 = score(doc=6389,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.24694869 = fieldWeight in 6389, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6389)
          0.042424813 = weight(_text_:22 in 6389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042424813 = score(doc=6389,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6389, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6389)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the use of networked information sources in scholarly communication. Networked information sources are defined broadly to cover: documents and images stored on electronic network hosts; data files; newsgroups; listservs; online information services and electronic periodicals. Reports results of a survey to determine how heavily, if at all, networked information sources are cited in scholarly printed periodicals published in 1993 and 1994. 27 printed periodicals, representing a wide range of subjects and the most influential periodicals in their fields, were identified through the Science Citation Index and Social Science Citation Index Journal Citation Reports. 97 articles were selected for further review and references, footnotes and bibliographies were checked for references to networked information sources. Only 2 articles were found to contain such references. Concludes that, although networked information sources facilitate scholars' work to a great extent during the research process, scholars have yet to incorporate such sources in the bibliographies of their published articles
    Source
    IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.3, S.240-245
  11. Voveriene, O.; Trumpiene, A.: Bibliometrics, scientometrics and informetrics : their relationship and interactions (1994) 0.05
    0.051445797 = product of:
      0.077168696 = sum of:
        0.03190453 = weight(_text_:of in 625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03190453 = score(doc=625,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 625, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=625)
        0.045264166 = product of:
          0.09052833 = sum of:
            0.09052833 = weight(_text_:science in 625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09052833 = score(doc=625,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.6585298 = fieldWeight in 625, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=625)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Considers aspects of scientific methodology by which a new subject field attains the status of a branch of a science. Discusses recent developments of metrics in the science of science and library and information science. Presents definitions of librametrics, bibliometrics, scientometrics and informetrics and examines the relationships of the last 3 with each other and with science of science, library science and information science
  12. Wouters, P.: ¬The signs of science (1998) 0.05
    0.049496856 = product of:
      0.07424528 = sum of:
        0.03190453 = weight(_text_:of in 1023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03190453 = score(doc=1023,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 1023, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1023)
        0.04234075 = product of:
          0.0846815 = sum of:
            0.0846815 = weight(_text_:science in 1023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0846815 = score(doc=1023,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.61599827 = fieldWeight in 1023, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1023)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Since the 'Science Citation Index' emerged within the system of scientific communication in 1964, an intense controversy about its character has been raging: in what sense can citation analysis be trusted? This debate can be characterized as the confrontation of different perspectives on science. Discusses the citation representation of science: the way the citation creates a new reality of as well as in the world of science; the main features of this reality; and some implications for science and science policy
    Footnote
    Paper presented at the 6th conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Jerusalem, 16-19 June 1997
  13. Egghe, L.: Little science, big science and beyond (1994) 0.05
    0.045498233 = product of:
      0.06824735 = sum of:
        0.01973992 = weight(_text_:of in 6883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01973992 = score(doc=6883,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 6883, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6883)
        0.04850743 = product of:
          0.09701486 = sum of:
            0.09701486 = weight(_text_:science in 6883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09701486 = score(doc=6883,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.7057147 = fieldWeight in 6883, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6883)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the quality of bibliometrics, informetrics and scientometrics research, intradisciplinary communication and science policy
  14. Persson, O.; Melin, G.: Equalization, growth and integration of science (1996) 0.04
    0.04411773 = product of:
      0.06617659 = sum of:
        0.031528432 = weight(_text_:of in 6698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031528432 = score(doc=6698,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.38633084 = fieldWeight in 6698, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6698)
        0.03464816 = product of:
          0.06929632 = sum of:
            0.06929632 = weight(_text_:science in 6698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06929632 = score(doc=6698,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.5040819 = fieldWeight in 6698, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6698)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a study of the production of scientific papers, coauthorships and R&D expenditures in the OECD countries. Discusses the distribution of papers in the journal 'Science' by OECD country in comparison with 'Science Citation Index' papers as a whole and compares these to the distribution of R&D investments
  15. Nisonger, T.E.: JASIS and library and information science journal rankings : a review and analysis of the last half-century (1999) 0.04
    0.04411773 = product of:
      0.06617659 = sum of:
        0.031528432 = weight(_text_:of in 4317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031528432 = score(doc=4317,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.38633084 = fieldWeight in 4317, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4317)
        0.03464816 = product of:
          0.06929632 = sum of:
            0.06929632 = weight(_text_:science in 4317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06929632 = score(doc=4317,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.5040819 = fieldWeight in 4317, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4317)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes: The 50th Anniversary of the Journal of the American Society for Information Science. Pt.1: The Journal, its society, and the future of print
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.11, S.1004-1019
  16. Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998) 0.04
    0.04273204 = product of:
      0.06409806 = sum of:
        0.014099943 = weight(_text_:of in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014099943 = score(doc=3690,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.17277241 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
        0.04999812 = product of:
          0.09999624 = sum of:
            0.09999624 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09999624 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:22:35
  17. Scharnhorst, A.: Citation - networks, science landscapes and evolutionary strategies (1998) 0.04
    0.04260654 = product of:
      0.06390981 = sum of:
        0.02960988 = weight(_text_:of in 5126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02960988 = score(doc=5126,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 5126, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5126)
        0.03429993 = product of:
          0.06859986 = sum of:
            0.06859986 = weight(_text_:science in 5126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06859986 = score(doc=5126,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.49901563 = fieldWeight in 5126, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5126)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The construction of virtual science landscapes based on citation networks and the strategic use of the information therein shed new light on the issues of the evolution of the science system and possibilities for control. Leydesdorff's approach to citation theory described in his 1998 article (see this issue of LISA) takes into account the dual layered character of communication networks and the second order nature of the science system. This perspective may help to sharpen the awareness of scientists and science policy makers for possible feedback loops within actions and activities in the science system, and probably nonlinear phenomena resulting therefrom. Sketches an additional link to geometrically oriented evolutionary theories and uses a specific landscape concept as a framework for some comments
    Footnote
    Contribution to a thematic issue devoted to 'Theories of citation?
  18. Cano, V.: Bibliometric overview of library and information science research in Spain (1999) 0.04
    0.041898698 = product of:
      0.06284805 = sum of:
        0.028199887 = weight(_text_:of in 3770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028199887 = score(doc=3770,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.34554482 = fieldWeight in 3770, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3770)
        0.03464816 = product of:
          0.06929632 = sum of:
            0.06929632 = weight(_text_:science in 3770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06929632 = score(doc=3770,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.5040819 = fieldWeight in 3770, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3770)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reviews 17 years of research in Library and Information Science in Spain. The total production of 2 major Spanish periodical publications were analyzed from 1977-1994 according to productivity variables and thematic content
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.8, S.675-680
  19. Deshpande, M.; Rajyalakshmi, D.: Citation study of dissertations in library and information science (1997) 0.04
    0.041681975 = product of:
      0.06252296 = sum of:
        0.031211555 = weight(_text_:of in 1594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031211555 = score(doc=1594,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.38244802 = fieldWeight in 1594, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1594)
        0.031311408 = product of:
          0.062622815 = sum of:
            0.062622815 = weight(_text_:science in 1594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062622815 = score(doc=1594,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.45553684 = fieldWeight in 1594, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1594)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    A study of 65 dissertations in library and information science, submitted to Nagpur University during the period 1990 to 1994 revealed that the majority of the works are in the field of literature survey and trends in various aspects of library and information science. Citation analyses have been carried out to find the types of cited source materials, subject distribution, authorship pattern and chronological distribution of cited references. The ranked list of periodicals indicated that the 'Annals of library science and documentation' ist the most cited
    Source
    Annals of library science and documentation. 44(1997) no.2, S.41-53
  20. Snyder, H.; Cronin, B.; Davenport, E.: What's the use of citation? : Citation analysis as a literature topic in selected disciplines of the social sciences (1995) 0.04
    0.0414435 = product of:
      0.06216525 = sum of:
        0.03276531 = weight(_text_:of in 1825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03276531 = score(doc=1825,freq=30.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.4014868 = fieldWeight in 1825, product of:
              5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                30.0 = termFreq=30.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1825)
        0.029399939 = product of:
          0.058799878 = sum of:
            0.058799878 = weight(_text_:science in 1825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058799878 = score(doc=1825,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.42772767 = fieldWeight in 1825, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1825)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a study to investigate the place and role of citation analysis in selected disciplines in the social sciences, including library and information science. 5 core library and information science periodicals: Journal of documentation; Library quarterly; Journal of the American Society for Information Science; College and research libraries; and the Journal of information science, were studed to determine the percentage of articles devoted to citation analysis and develop an indictive typology to categorize the major foci of research being conducted under the rubric of citation analysis. Similar analysis was conducted for periodicals in other social sciences disciplines. Demonstrates how the rubric can be used to dertermine how citatiion analysis is applied within library and information science and other disciplines. By isolating citation from bibliometrics in general, this work is differentiated from other, previous studies. Analysis of data from a 10 year sample of transdisciplinary social sciences literature suggests that 2 application areas predominate: the validity of citation as an evaluation tool; and impact or performance studies of authors, periodicals, and institutions
    Source
    Journal of information science. 21(1995) no.2, S.75-85

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 172
  • s 14
  • m 5
  • b 1
  • More… Less…