-
Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.: Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science (2009)
0.01
0.010879767 = product of:
0.021759534 = sum of:
0.021759534 = product of:
0.04351907 = sum of:
0.04351907 = weight(_text_:22 in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04351907 = score(doc=2734,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Collaboration is a major research policy objective, but does it deliver higher quality research? This study uses citation analysis to examine the Web of Science (WoS) Information Science & Library Science subject category (IS&LS) to ascertain whether, in general, more highly cited articles are more highly collaborative than other articles. It consists of two investigations. The first investigation is a longitudinal comparison of the degree and proportion of collaboration in five strata of citation; it found that collaboration in the highest four citation strata (all in the most highly cited 22%) increased in unison over time, whereas collaboration in the lowest citation strata (un-cited articles) remained low and stable. Given that over 40% of the articles were un-cited, it seems important to take into account the differences found between un-cited articles and relatively highly cited articles when investigating collaboration in IS&LS. The second investigation compares collaboration for 35 influential information scientists; it found that their more highly cited articles on average were not more highly collaborative than their less highly cited articles. In summary, although collaborative research is conducive to high citation in general, collaboration has apparently not tended to be essential to the success of current and former elite information scientists.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 12:43:51
-
Burrell, Q.L.: Predicting future citation behavior (2003)
0.01
0.01077042 = product of:
0.02154084 = sum of:
0.02154084 = product of:
0.04308168 = sum of:
0.04308168 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04308168 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 29. 3.2003 19:22:48
-
Neuhaus, C.; Marx, W.; Daniel, H.-W.: ¬The publication and citation impact profiles of Angewandte Chemie and the Journal of the American Chemical Society based on the sections of Chemical Abstracts : a case study on the limitations of the Journal Impact Factor (2009)
0.01
0.010307496 = product of:
0.020614993 = sum of:
0.020614993 = product of:
0.041229986 = sum of:
0.041229986 = weight(_text_:w in 2707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041229986 = score(doc=2707,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.23817536 = fieldWeight in 2707, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2707)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Leydesdorff, L.: Can networks of journal-journal citations be used as indicators of change in the social sciences? (2003)
0.01
0.009231788 = product of:
0.018463576 = sum of:
0.018463576 = product of:
0.036927152 = sum of:
0.036927152 = weight(_text_:22 in 4460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036927152 = score(doc=4460,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4460, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4460)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6.11.2005 19:02:22
-
Asonuma, A.; Fang, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Reflections on the age distribution of Japanese scientists (2006)
0.01
0.009231788 = product of:
0.018463576 = sum of:
0.018463576 = product of:
0.036927152 = sum of:
0.036927152 = weight(_text_:22 in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036927152 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:26:24
-
Haycock, L.A.: Citation analysis of education dissertations for collection development (2004)
0.01
0.009231788 = product of:
0.018463576 = sum of:
0.018463576 = product of:
0.036927152 = sum of:
0.036927152 = weight(_text_:22 in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036927152 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008)
0.01
0.009231788 = product of:
0.018463576 = sum of:
0.018463576 = product of:
0.036927152 = sum of:
0.036927152 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036927152 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 4.2008 19:04:22
-
Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006)
0.01
0.009231788 = product of:
0.018463576 = sum of:
0.018463576 = product of:
0.036927152 = sum of:
0.036927152 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036927152 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26.12.2007 19:22:05
-
Althouse, B.M.; West, J.D.; Bergstrom, C.T.; Bergstrom, T.: Differences in impact factor across fields and over time (2009)
0.01
0.009231788 = product of:
0.018463576 = sum of:
0.018463576 = product of:
0.036927152 = sum of:
0.036927152 = weight(_text_:22 in 2695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036927152 = score(doc=2695,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2695, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2695)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 23. 2.2009 18:22:28
-
Zhang, Y.; Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.: Identification of factors predicting clickthrough in Web searching using neural network analysis (2009)
0.01
0.009231788 = product of:
0.018463576 = sum of:
0.018463576 = product of:
0.036927152 = sum of:
0.036927152 = weight(_text_:22 in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036927152 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 17:49:11
-
Camacho-Miñano, M.-del-Mar; Núñez-Nickel, M.: ¬The multilayered nature of reference selection (2009)
0.01
0.009231788 = product of:
0.018463576 = sum of:
0.018463576 = product of:
0.036927152 = sum of:
0.036927152 = weight(_text_:22 in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036927152 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:05:07
-
Raan, A.F.J. van: Scaling rules in the science system : influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of research groups (2008)
0.01
0.009231788 = product of:
0.018463576 = sum of:
0.018463576 = product of:
0.036927152 = sum of:
0.036927152 = weight(_text_:22 in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036927152 = score(doc=2758,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:03:12
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Sun, Y.: National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan : university-industry-government versus international coauthorship relations (2009)
0.01
0.009231788 = product of:
0.018463576 = sum of:
0.018463576 = product of:
0.036927152 = sum of:
0.036927152 = weight(_text_:22 in 2761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036927152 = score(doc=2761,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2761, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2761)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:07:20
-
He, Z.-L.: International collaboration does not have greater epistemic authority (2009)
0.01
0.009231788 = product of:
0.018463576 = sum of:
0.018463576 = product of:
0.036927152 = sum of:
0.036927152 = weight(_text_:22 in 3122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036927152 = score(doc=3122,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3122, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3122)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26. 9.2009 11:22:05
-
Raan, A.F.J. van; Noyons, E.C.M.: Discovery of patterns of scientific and technological development and knowledge transfer (2002)
0.01
0.009110626 = product of:
0.018221252 = sum of:
0.018221252 = product of:
0.036442503 = sum of:
0.036442503 = weight(_text_:w in 3603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036442503 = score(doc=3603,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 3603, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3603)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Gaining insight from research information (CRIS2002): Proceedings of the 6th International Conference an Current Research Information Systems, University of Kassel, August 29 - 31, 2002. Eds: W. Adamczak u. A. Nase
-
Chen, C.: CiteSpace II : detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature (2006)
0.01
0.007693157 = product of:
0.015386314 = sum of:
0.015386314 = product of:
0.030772628 = sum of:
0.030772628 = weight(_text_:22 in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030772628 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 16:11:05
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: How is science cited on the Web? : a classification of google unique Web citations (2007)
0.01
0.007693157 = product of:
0.015386314 = sum of:
0.015386314 = product of:
0.030772628 = sum of:
0.030772628 = weight(_text_:22 in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030772628 = score(doc=586,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Although the analysis of citations in the scholarly literature is now an established and relatively well understood part of information science, not enough is known about citations that can be found on the Web. In particular, are there new Web types, and if so, are these trivial or potentially useful for studying or evaluating research communication? We sought evidence based upon a sample of 1,577 Web citations of the URLs or titles of research articles in 64 open-access journals from biology, physics, chemistry, and computing. Only 25% represented intellectual impact, from references of Web documents (23%) and other informal scholarly sources (2%). Many of the Web/URL citations were created for general or subject-specific navigation (45%) or for self-publicity (22%). Additional analyses revealed significant disciplinary differences in the types of Google unique Web/URL citations as well as some characteristics of scientific open-access publishing on the Web. We conclude that the Web provides access to a new and different type of citation information, one that may therefore enable us to measure different aspects of research, and the research process in particular; but to obtain good information, the different types should be separated.
-
Ball, R.: Wissenschaftsindikatoren im Zeitalter digitaler Wissenschaft (2007)
0.01
0.007693157 = product of:
0.015386314 = sum of:
0.015386314 = product of:
0.030772628 = sum of:
0.030772628 = weight(_text_:22 in 875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030772628 = score(doc=875,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 875, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=875)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 23.12.2007 19:22:21
-
Hayer, L.: Lazarsfeld zitiert : eine bibliometrische Analyse (2008)
0.01
0.007693157 = product of:
0.015386314 = sum of:
0.015386314 = product of:
0.030772628 = sum of:
0.030772628 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030772628 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2008 12:54:12
-
Meho, L.I.; Rogers, Y.: Citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of human-computer interaction researchers : a comparison of Scopus and Web of Science (2008)
0.01
0.007693157 = product of:
0.015386314 = sum of:
0.015386314 = product of:
0.030772628 = sum of:
0.030772628 = weight(_text_:22 in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030772628 = score(doc=2352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This study examines the differences between Scopus and Web of Science in the citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of 22 top human-computer interaction (HCI) researchers from EQUATOR - a large British Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration project. Results indicate that Scopus provides significantly more coverage of HCI literature than Web of Science, primarily due to coverage of relevant ACM and IEEE peer-reviewed conference proceedings. No significant differences exist between the two databases if citations in journals only are compared. Although broader coverage of the literature does not significantly alter the relative citation ranking of individual researchers, Scopus helps distinguish between the researchers in a more nuanced fashion than Web of Science in both citation counting and h-index. Scopus also generates significantly different maps of citation networks of individual scholars than those generated by Web of Science. The study also presents a comparison of h-index scores based on Google Scholar with those based on the union of Scopus and Web of Science. The study concludes that Scopus can be used as a sole data source for citation-based research and evaluation in HCI, especially when citations in conference proceedings are sought, and that researchers should manually calculate h scores instead of relying on system calculations.
