-
Száva-Kováts, E.: Indirect-collective referencing (ICR) in the elite journal literature of physics : I: a literature science study on the journal level (2001)
0.01
0.011757423 = product of:
0.023514846 = sum of:
0.023514846 = product of:
0.047029693 = sum of:
0.047029693 = weight(_text_:i in 5180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047029693 = score(doc=5180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16122356 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04274526 = queryNorm
0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 5180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5180)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Glänzel, W.: Coauthorship patterns and trends in the sciences (1980-1998) : a bibliometric study with implications for database indexing and search strategies (2002)
0.01
0.011757423 = product of:
0.023514846 = sum of:
0.023514846 = product of:
0.047029693 = sum of:
0.047029693 = weight(_text_:i in 810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047029693 = score(doc=810,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16122356 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04274526 = queryNorm
0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 810, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=810)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The present study aims at describing both the common and the distinguishing features of coauthorship trends and patterns in selected science fields. The relation between coauthorship schemes and other bibliometric features, such as publication activity and citation impact are analyzed. I show that, while copublication activity has grown considerably, the extent of coauthorship and its relation with productivity and citation impact largely varies among fields. Besides universally valid tendencies, subject specific features can be found.
-
Bookstein, A.; Moed, H.; Yitzahki, M.: Measures of international collaboration in scientific literature : part II (2006)
0.01
0.011757423 = product of:
0.023514846 = sum of:
0.023514846 = product of:
0.047029693 = sum of:
0.047029693 = weight(_text_:i in 989) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047029693 = score(doc=989,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16122356 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04274526 = queryNorm
0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 989, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=989)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper continues the attempt of Part I to develop a coherent family of measures of influence between classes of documents, for example, language or nationality classes, as indicated by citation choice. In this paper we focus on situations in which there is some ambiguity as to how to assign items to a class. For simplicity, we change our focus from citations to co-authorship patterns, restricting most of our discussion to papers with two authors. Like the earlier paper, we propose very simple models of the citation decision, and base our measures on the parameters that appear in the model.
-
Shan, S.: On the generalized Zipf distribution : part I (2005)
0.01
0.011757423 = product of:
0.023514846 = sum of:
0.023514846 = product of:
0.047029693 = sum of:
0.047029693 = weight(_text_:i in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047029693 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16122356 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04274526 = queryNorm
0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Schreiber, M.: ¬A case study of the modified Hirsch index hm accounting for multiple coauthors (2009)
0.01
0.011757423 = product of:
0.023514846 = sum of:
0.023514846 = product of:
0.047029693 = sum of:
0.047029693 = weight(_text_:i in 2858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047029693 = score(doc=2858,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16122356 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04274526 = queryNorm
0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 2858, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2858)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- J.E. Hirsch (2005) introduced the h-index to quantify an individual's scientific research output by the largest number h of a scientist's papers, that received at least h citations. This so-called Hirsch index can be easily modified to take multiple coauthorship into account by counting the papers fractionally according to (the inverse of) the number of authors. I have worked out 26 empirical cases of physicists to illustrate the effect of this modification. Although the correlation between the original and the modified Hirsch index is relatively strong, the arrangement of the datasets is significantly different depending on whether they are put into order according to the values of either the original or the modified index.
-
Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006)
0.01
0.011582785 = product of:
0.02316557 = sum of:
0.02316557 = product of:
0.04633114 = sum of:
0.04633114 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04633114 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14968662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04274526 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 4.12.2006 12:12:22
-
Rostaing, H.; Barts, N.; Léveillé, V.: Bibliometrics: representation instrument of the multidisciplinary positioning of a scientific area : Implementation for an Advisory Scientific Committee (2007)
0.01
0.011582785 = product of:
0.02316557 = sum of:
0.02316557 = product of:
0.04633114 = sum of:
0.04633114 = weight(_text_:22 in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04633114 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14968662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04274526 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30.12.2007 11:22:39
-
Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.: Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science (2009)
0.01
0.010237833 = product of:
0.020475665 = sum of:
0.020475665 = product of:
0.04095133 = sum of:
0.04095133 = weight(_text_:22 in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04095133 = score(doc=2734,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14968662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04274526 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Collaboration is a major research policy objective, but does it deliver higher quality research? This study uses citation analysis to examine the Web of Science (WoS) Information Science & Library Science subject category (IS&LS) to ascertain whether, in general, more highly cited articles are more highly collaborative than other articles. It consists of two investigations. The first investigation is a longitudinal comparison of the degree and proportion of collaboration in five strata of citation; it found that collaboration in the highest four citation strata (all in the most highly cited 22%) increased in unison over time, whereas collaboration in the lowest citation strata (un-cited articles) remained low and stable. Given that over 40% of the articles were un-cited, it seems important to take into account the differences found between un-cited articles and relatively highly cited articles when investigating collaboration in IS&LS. The second investigation compares collaboration for 35 influential information scientists; it found that their more highly cited articles on average were not more highly collaborative than their less highly cited articles. In summary, although collaborative research is conducive to high citation in general, collaboration has apparently not tended to be essential to the success of current and former elite information scientists.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 12:43:51
-
Burrell, Q.L.: Predicting future citation behavior (2003)
0.01
0.010134937 = product of:
0.020269874 = sum of:
0.020269874 = product of:
0.04053975 = sum of:
0.04053975 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04053975 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14968662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04274526 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 29. 3.2003 19:22:48
-
Brooks, T.A.: How good are the best papers of JASIS? (2000)
0.01
0.010077791 = product of:
0.020155583 = sum of:
0.020155583 = product of:
0.040311165 = sum of:
0.040311165 = weight(_text_:i in 4593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040311165 = score(doc=4593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16122356 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04274526 = queryNorm
0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 4593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4593)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Top by numbers of citations: (1) Saracevic, T. et al.: A study of information seeking and retrieving I-III (1988); (2) Bates, M.: Information search tactics (1979); (3) Cooper, W.S.: On selecting a measure of retrieval effectiveness (1973); (4) Marcus, R.S.: A experimental comparison of the effectiveness of computers and humans as search intermediaries (1983); (4) Fidel, R.: Online searching styles (1984)
-
Alvarez, P.; Escalona, I.; Pulgarin, A.: What is wrong with obsolescence? (2000)
0.01
0.010077791 = product of:
0.020155583 = sum of:
0.020155583 = product of:
0.040311165 = sum of:
0.040311165 = weight(_text_:i in 4858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040311165 = score(doc=4858,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16122356 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04274526 = queryNorm
0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 4858, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4858)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Menczer, F.: Lexical and semantic clustering by Web links (2004)
0.01
0.010077791 = product of:
0.020155583 = sum of:
0.020155583 = product of:
0.040311165 = sum of:
0.040311165 = weight(_text_:i in 3090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040311165 = score(doc=3090,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16122356 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04274526 = queryNorm
0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 3090, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3090)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Recent Web-searching and -mining tools are combining text and link analysis to improve ranking and crawling algorithms. The central assumption behind such approaches is that there is a correiation between the graph structure of the Web and the text and meaning of pages. Here I formalize and empirically evaluate two general conjectures drawing connections from link information to lexical and semantic Web content. The link-content conjecture states that a page is similar to the pages that link to it, and the link-cluster conjecture that pages about the same topic are clustered together. These conjectures are offen simply assumed to hold, and Web search tools are built an such assumptions. The present quantitative confirmation sheds light an the connection between the success of the latest Web-mining techniques and the small world topology of the Web, with encouraging implications for the design of better crawling algorithms.
-
Samoylenko, I.; Chao, T.-C.; Liu, W.-C.; Chen, C.-M.: Visualizing the scientific world and its evolution (2006)
0.01
0.010077791 = product of:
0.020155583 = sum of:
0.020155583 = product of:
0.040311165 = sum of:
0.040311165 = weight(_text_:i in 5911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040311165 = score(doc=5911,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16122356 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04274526 = queryNorm
0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 5911, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5911)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Marshakova-Shaikevich, I.: Bibliometric maps of field of science (2005)
0.01
0.010077791 = product of:
0.020155583 = sum of:
0.020155583 = product of:
0.040311165 = sum of:
0.040311165 = weight(_text_:i in 1069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040311165 = score(doc=1069,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16122356 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04274526 = queryNorm
0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 1069, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1069)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Arencibia-Jorge, R.; Barrios-Almaguer, I.; Fernández-Hernández, S.; Carvajal-Espino, R.: Applying successive H indices in the institutional evaluation : a case study (2008)
0.01
0.010077791 = product of:
0.020155583 = sum of:
0.020155583 = product of:
0.040311165 = sum of:
0.040311165 = weight(_text_:i in 1348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040311165 = score(doc=1348,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16122356 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04274526 = queryNorm
0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 1348, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1348)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Schreiber, M.: Fractionalized counting of publications for the g-Index (2009)
0.01
0.010077791 = product of:
0.020155583 = sum of:
0.020155583 = product of:
0.040311165 = sum of:
0.040311165 = weight(_text_:i in 3125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040311165 = score(doc=3125,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16122356 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04274526 = queryNorm
0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 3125, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3125)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- L. Egghe ([2008]) studied the h-index (Hirsch index) and the g-index, counting the authorship of cited articles in a fractional way. But his definition of the gF-index for the case that the article count is fractionalized yielded values that were close to or even larger than the original g-index. Here I propose an alternative definition by which the g-index is modified in such a way that the resulting gm-index is always smaller than the original g-index. Based on the interpretation of the g-index as the highest number of articles of a scientist that received on average g or more citations, in the specification of the new gm-index the articles are counted fractionally not only for the rank but also for the average.
-
Leydesdorff, L.: Can networks of journal-journal citations be used as indicators of change in the social sciences? (2003)
0.01
0.008687089 = product of:
0.017374178 = sum of:
0.017374178 = product of:
0.034748357 = sum of:
0.034748357 = weight(_text_:22 in 4460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034748357 = score(doc=4460,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14968662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04274526 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4460, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4460)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6.11.2005 19:02:22
-
Asonuma, A.; Fang, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Reflections on the age distribution of Japanese scientists (2006)
0.01
0.008687089 = product of:
0.017374178 = sum of:
0.017374178 = product of:
0.034748357 = sum of:
0.034748357 = weight(_text_:22 in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034748357 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14968662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04274526 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:26:24
-
Haycock, L.A.: Citation analysis of education dissertations for collection development (2004)
0.01
0.008687089 = product of:
0.017374178 = sum of:
0.017374178 = product of:
0.034748357 = sum of:
0.034748357 = weight(_text_:22 in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034748357 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14968662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04274526 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.01
0.008687089 = product of:
0.017374178 = sum of:
0.017374178 = product of:
0.034748357 = sum of:
0.034748357 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034748357 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14968662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04274526 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
