Search (201 results, page 2 of 11)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Leydesdorff, L.; Sun, Y.: National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan : university-industry-government versus international coauthorship relations (2009) 0.02
    0.015437335 = product of:
      0.038593337 = sum of:
        0.02172764 = product of:
          0.04345528 = sum of:
            0.04345528 = weight(_text_:l in 2761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04345528 = score(doc=2761,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 2761, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2761)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.016865695 = product of:
          0.03373139 = sum of:
            0.03373139 = weight(_text_:22 in 2761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03373139 = score(doc=2761,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2761, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2761)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:07:20
  2. He, Z.-L.: International collaboration does not have greater epistemic authority (2009) 0.02
    0.015437335 = product of:
      0.038593337 = sum of:
        0.02172764 = product of:
          0.04345528 = sum of:
            0.04345528 = weight(_text_:l in 3122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04345528 = score(doc=3122,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 3122, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3122)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.016865695 = product of:
          0.03373139 = sum of:
            0.03373139 = weight(_text_:22 in 3122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03373139 = score(doc=3122,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3122, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3122)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    26. 9.2009 11:22:05
  3. Della Mea, V.; Demartini, G.; Di Gaspero, L.; Mizzaro, S.: Measuring retrieval effectiveness with Average Distance Measure (ADM) (2006) 0.01
    0.014101264 = product of:
      0.07050632 = sum of:
        0.07050632 = sum of:
          0.019808484 = weight(_text_:h in 774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.019808484 = score(doc=774,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041494254 = queryNorm
              0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 774, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=774)
          0.050697833 = weight(_text_:l in 774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.050697833 = score(doc=774,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041494254 = queryNorm
              0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 774, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=774)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 57(2006) H.8, S.433-443
  4. Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006) 0.01
    0.013522692 = product of:
      0.03380673 = sum of:
        0.011319133 = product of:
          0.022638267 = sum of:
            0.022638267 = weight(_text_:h in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022638267 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.022487596 = product of:
          0.04497519 = sum of:
            0.04497519 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04497519 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    4.12.2006 12:12:22
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 57(2006) H.8, S.401-406
  5. Kretschmer, H.; Kretschmer, T.: Well-ordered collaboration structures of co-author pairs in journals (2006) 0.01
    0.012660796 = product of:
      0.03165199 = sum of:
        0.024577528 = weight(_text_:u in 25) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024577528 = score(doc=25,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 25, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=25)
        0.007074459 = product of:
          0.014148918 = sum of:
            0.014148918 = weight(_text_:h in 25) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014148918 = score(doc=25,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 25, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=25)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Vom Wandel der Wissensorganisation im Informationszeitalter: Festschrift für Walther Umstätter zum 65. Geburtstag, hrsg. von P. Hauke u. K. Umlauf
  6. Parthey, H.: Strukturwandel der bibliometrischen Profile wissenschaftlicher Institutionen im 20. Jahrhundert (2006) 0.01
    0.012660796 = product of:
      0.03165199 = sum of:
        0.024577528 = weight(_text_:u in 27) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024577528 = score(doc=27,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 27, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=27)
        0.007074459 = product of:
          0.014148918 = sum of:
            0.014148918 = weight(_text_:h in 27) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014148918 = score(doc=27,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 27, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=27)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Vom Wandel der Wissensorganisation im Informationszeitalter: Festschrift für Walther Umstätter zum 65. Geburtstag, hrsg. von P. Hauke u. K. Umlauf
  7. Meho, L.I.; Rogers, Y.: Citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of human-computer interaction researchers : a comparison of Scopus and Web of Science (2008) 0.01
    0.012553424 = product of:
      0.03138356 = sum of:
        0.017328814 = product of:
          0.034657627 = sum of:
            0.034657627 = weight(_text_:h in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034657627 = score(doc=2352,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.3361869 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.014054747 = product of:
          0.028109495 = sum of:
            0.028109495 = weight(_text_:22 in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028109495 = score(doc=2352,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This study examines the differences between Scopus and Web of Science in the citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of 22 top human-computer interaction (HCI) researchers from EQUATOR - a large British Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration project. Results indicate that Scopus provides significantly more coverage of HCI literature than Web of Science, primarily due to coverage of relevant ACM and IEEE peer-reviewed conference proceedings. No significant differences exist between the two databases if citations in journals only are compared. Although broader coverage of the literature does not significantly alter the relative citation ranking of individual researchers, Scopus helps distinguish between the researchers in a more nuanced fashion than Web of Science in both citation counting and h-index. Scopus also generates significantly different maps of citation networks of individual scholars than those generated by Web of Science. The study also presents a comparison of h-index scores based on Google Scholar with those based on the union of Scopus and Web of Science. The study concludes that Scopus can be used as a sole data source for citation-based research and evaluation in HCI, especially when citations in conference proceedings are sought, and that researchers should manually calculate h scores instead of relying on system calculations.
    Object
    h-index
  8. Leydesdorff, L.: How are new citation-based journal indicators adding to the bibliometric toolbox? (2009) 0.01
    0.012086797 = product of:
      0.06043398 = sum of:
        0.06043398 = sum of:
          0.0169787 = weight(_text_:h in 2929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0169787 = score(doc=2929,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041494254 = queryNorm
              0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 2929, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2929)
          0.04345528 = weight(_text_:l in 2929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04345528 = score(doc=2929,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041494254 = queryNorm
              0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 2929, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2929)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The launching of Scopus and Google Scholar, and methodological developments in social-network analysis have made many more indicators for evaluating journals available than the traditional impact factor, cited half-life, and immediacy index of the ISI. In this study, these new indicators are compared with one another and with the older ones. Do the various indicators measure new dimensions of the citation networks, or are they highly correlated among themselves? Are they robust and relatively stable over time? Two main dimensions are distinguished - size and impact - which together shape influence. The h-index combines the two dimensions and can also be considered as an indicator of reach (like Indegree). PageRank is mainly an indicator of size, but has important interactions with centrality measures. The Scimago Journal Ranking (SJR) indicator provides an alternative to the journal impact factor, but the computation is less easy.
  9. Schreiber, M.: Fractionalized counting of publications for the g-Index (2009) 0.01
    0.012086797 = product of:
      0.06043398 = sum of:
        0.06043398 = sum of:
          0.0169787 = weight(_text_:h in 3125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0169787 = score(doc=3125,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041494254 = queryNorm
              0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 3125, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3125)
          0.04345528 = weight(_text_:l in 3125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04345528 = score(doc=3125,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041494254 = queryNorm
              0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 3125, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3125)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    L. Egghe ([2008]) studied the h-index (Hirsch index) and the g-index, counting the authorship of cited articles in a fractional way. But his definition of the gF-index for the case that the article count is fractionalized yielded values that were close to or even larger than the original g-index. Here I propose an alternative definition by which the g-index is modified in such a way that the resulting gm-index is always smaller than the original g-index. Based on the interpretation of the g-index as the highest number of articles of a scientist that received on average g or more citations, in the specification of the new gm-index the articles are counted fractionally not only for the rank but also for the average.
  10. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.01
    0.010142018 = product of:
      0.025355045 = sum of:
        0.00848935 = product of:
          0.0169787 = sum of:
            0.0169787 = weight(_text_:h in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0169787 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.016865695 = product of:
          0.03373139 = sum of:
            0.03373139 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03373139 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03
  11. De Bellis, N.: Bibliometrics and citation analysis : from the Science citation index to cybermetrics (2008) 0.01
    0.010128636 = product of:
      0.02532159 = sum of:
        0.019662023 = weight(_text_:u in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019662023 = score(doc=3585,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.14471136 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
        0.0056595667 = product of:
          0.011319133 = sum of:
            0.011319133 = weight(_text_:h in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011319133 = score(doc=3585,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIS 61(2010) no.1, S.205-207 (Jeppe Nicolaisen) Weitere Rez. in: Mitt VÖB 63(2010) H.1/2, S.134-135 (J. Gorraiz u. M. Wieland): "Das Buch entwickelte sich aus einem mehrjährigen Forschungsprojekt mit dem Ziel, den schwer verständlichen quantitativen Kern der Bibliometrie in einem für primär italienische Bibliothekare leichteren historischen und philosophischen Kontext zu vermitteln, wie der Autor im Vorwort erklärt. Dank einer Empfehlung von Eugene Garfield steht dieses Werk nun auch in englischer Übersetzung einer internationalen Leserschaft zur Verfügung. Die über 400 Seiten lange Monografie von de Bellis gibt in acht Kapiteln einen detaillierten und sehr präzisen Überblick über die Bibliometrie und die Zitationsanalyse, ihre Natur und Entwicklung, ihre Kontroverse und Prognose. . . . Das Buch von de Bellis ist sehr empfehlenswert für alle die beabsichtigen, sich mit dieser neuen Wissenschaft zu beschäftigen. Es endet mit folgendem Statement: "Scientometricians have to learn to live in a multidimensional world". Und genau hier liegt die Herausforderung und Schönheit dieses Metiers."
  12. Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: Multiple publication on a single research study: does it pay? : The influence of number of research articles on total citation counts in biomedicine (2007) 0.01
    0.010072331 = product of:
      0.050361652 = sum of:
        0.050361652 = sum of:
          0.014148918 = weight(_text_:h in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.014148918 = score(doc=444,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041494254 = queryNorm
              0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
          0.036212735 = weight(_text_:l in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036212735 = score(doc=444,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041494254 = queryNorm
              0.2195706 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  13. Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: Universality of citation distributions : a validation of Radicchi et al.'s relative indicator cf = c/c0 at the micro level using data from chemistry (2009) 0.01
    0.010072331 = product of:
      0.050361652 = sum of:
        0.050361652 = sum of:
          0.014148918 = weight(_text_:h in 2954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.014148918 = score(doc=2954,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041494254 = queryNorm
              0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 2954, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2954)
          0.036212735 = weight(_text_:l in 2954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036212735 = score(doc=2954,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041494254 = queryNorm
              0.2195706 = fieldWeight in 2954, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2954)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  14. Lee, W.M.: Publication trends of doctoral students in three fields from 1965-1995 (2000) 0.01
    0.009761425 = product of:
      0.04880712 = sum of:
        0.04880712 = product of:
          0.09761424 = sum of:
            0.09761424 = weight(_text_:lee in 4383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09761424 = score(doc=4383,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24718519 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.3949033 = fieldWeight in 4383, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4383)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  15. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.01
    0.008995038 = product of:
      0.04497519 = sum of:
        0.04497519 = product of:
          0.08995038 = sum of:
            0.08995038 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08995038 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  16. Egghe, L.: Expansion of the field of informetrics : the second special issue (2006) 0.01
    0.008691057 = product of:
      0.04345528 = sum of:
        0.04345528 = product of:
          0.08691056 = sum of:
            0.08691056 = weight(_text_:l in 7119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08691056 = score(doc=7119,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.52696943 = fieldWeight in 7119, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7119)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  17. Egghe, L.: Expansion of the field of informetrics : origins and consequences (2005) 0.01
    0.008691057 = product of:
      0.04345528 = sum of:
        0.04345528 = product of:
          0.08691056 = sum of:
            0.08691056 = weight(_text_:l in 1910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08691056 = score(doc=1910,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.52696943 = fieldWeight in 1910, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1910)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  18. Harries, G.; Wilkinson, D.; Price, L.; Fairclough, R.; Thelwall, M.: Hyperlinks as a data source for science mapping : making sense of it all (2005) 0.01
    0.008691057 = product of:
      0.04345528 = sum of:
        0.04345528 = product of:
          0.08691056 = sum of:
            0.08691056 = weight(_text_:l in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08691056 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.52696943 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  19. Ball, R.: Wissenschaftsindikatoren im Zeitalter digitaler Wissenschaft (2007) 0.01
    0.0084516825 = product of:
      0.021129206 = sum of:
        0.007074459 = product of:
          0.014148918 = sum of:
            0.014148918 = weight(_text_:h in 875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014148918 = score(doc=875,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 875, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=875)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.014054747 = product of:
          0.028109495 = sum of:
            0.028109495 = weight(_text_:22 in 875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028109495 = score(doc=875,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 875, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=875)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    23.12.2007 19:22:21
    Source
    B.I.T.online. 10(2007) H.2, S.xxx-xxx
  20. Naumann, U.: Irrläufer einer missverstandenen Szientometrie (2006) 0.01
    0.00834189 = product of:
      0.04170945 = sum of:
        0.04170945 = weight(_text_:u in 23) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04170945 = score(doc=23,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.30697915 = fieldWeight in 23, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=23)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Vom Wandel der Wissensorganisation im Informationszeitalter: Festschrift für Walther Umstätter zum 65. Geburtstag, hrsg. von P. Hauke u. K. Umlauf

Authors

Languages

  • e 162
  • d 39

Types

  • a 196
  • m 4
  • el 3
  • r 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…