Search (49 results, page 3 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Shibata, N.; Kajikawa, Y.; Takeda, Y.; Matsushima, K.: Comparative study on methods of detecting research fronts using different types of citation (2009) 0.01
    0.007693157 = product of:
      0.015386314 = sum of:
        0.015386314 = product of:
          0.030772628 = sum of:
            0.030772628 = weight(_text_:22 in 2743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030772628 = score(doc=2743,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045425482 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2743, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2743)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:52:50
  2. Mukherjee, B.: Do open-access journals in library and information science have any scholarly impact? : a bibliometric study of selected open-access journals using Google Scholar (2009) 0.01
    0.007693157 = product of:
      0.015386314 = sum of:
        0.015386314 = product of:
          0.030772628 = sum of:
            0.030772628 = weight(_text_:22 in 2745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030772628 = score(doc=2745,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045425482 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2745, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2745)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:54:59
  3. Costas, R.; Bordons, M.; Leeuwen, T.N. van; Raan, A.F.J. van: Scaling rules in the science system : Influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of individual researchers (2009) 0.01
    0.007693157 = product of:
      0.015386314 = sum of:
        0.015386314 = product of:
          0.030772628 = sum of:
            0.030772628 = weight(_text_:22 in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030772628 = score(doc=2759,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045425482 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:02:48
  4. Umstätter, W.: Szientometrische Verfahren (2004) 0.01
    0.0072885007 = product of:
      0.014577001 = sum of:
        0.014577001 = product of:
          0.029154003 = sum of:
            0.029154003 = weight(_text_:w in 2920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029154003 = score(doc=2920,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045425482 = queryNorm
                0.16841541 = fieldWeight in 2920, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2920)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Glänzel, W.; Debackere, K.: Messen von Wissenschaftlicher Kommunikation und Forschungsleistung : Möglichkeiten und Beschränkungen bibliometrischer Methoden (2005) 0.01
    0.0072885007 = product of:
      0.014577001 = sum of:
        0.014577001 = product of:
          0.029154003 = sum of:
            0.029154003 = weight(_text_:w in 3770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029154003 = score(doc=3770,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045425482 = queryNorm
                0.16841541 = fieldWeight in 3770, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3770)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Stock, W.G.; Weber, S.: Facets of informetrics : Preface (2006) 0.01
    0.0072885007 = product of:
      0.014577001 = sum of:
        0.014577001 = product of:
          0.029154003 = sum of:
            0.029154003 = weight(_text_:w in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029154003 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045425482 = queryNorm
                0.16841541 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    According to Jean M. Tague-Sutcliffe "informetrics" is "the study of the quantitative aspects of information in any form, not just records or bibliographies, and in any social group, not just scientists" (Tague-Sutcliffe, 1992, 1). Leo Egghe also defines "informetrics" in a very broad sense. "(W)e will use the term' informetrics' as the broad term comprising all-metrics studies related to information science, including bibliometrics (bibliographies, libraries,...), scientometrics (science policy, citation analysis, research evaluation,...), webometrics (metrics of the web, the Internet or other social networks such as citation or collaboration networks), ..." (Egghe, 2005b,1311). According to Concepcion S. Wilson "informetrics" is "the quantitative study of collections of moderatesized units of potentially informative text, directed to the scientific understanding of information processes at the social level" (Wilson, 1999, 211). We should add to Wilson's units of text also digital collections of images, videos, spoken documents and music. Dietmar Wolfram divides "informetrics" into two aspects, "system-based characteristics that arise from the documentary content of IR systems and how they are indexed, and usage-based characteristics that arise how users interact with system content and the system interfaces that provide access to the content" (Wolfram, 2003, 6). We would like to follow Tague-Sutcliffe, Egghe, Wilson and Wolfram (and others, for example Björneborn & Ingwersen, 2004) and call this broad research of empirical information science "informetrics". Informetrics includes therefore all quantitative studies in information science. If a scientist performs scientific investigations empirically, e.g. on information users' behavior, on scientific impact of academic journals, on the development of the patent application activity of a company, on links of Web pages, on the temporal distribution of blog postings discussing a given topic, on availability, recall and precision of retrieval systems, on usability of Web sites, and so on, he or she contributes to informetrics. We see three subject areas in information science in which such quantitative research takes place, - information users and information usage, - evaluation of information systems, - information itself, Following Wolfram's article, we divide his system-based characteristics into the "information itself "-category and the "information system"-category. Figure 1 is a simplistic graph of subjects and research areas of informetrics as an empirical information science.
  7. Wettlauf der Wissenschaft (2004) 0.01
    0.0061545256 = product of:
      0.012309051 = sum of:
        0.012309051 = product of:
          0.024618102 = sum of:
            0.024618102 = weight(_text_:22 in 2495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024618102 = score(doc=2495,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045425482 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2495, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2495)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Online Mitteilungen. 2004, Nr.79, S.22-23 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 57(2004) H.2]
  8. Tonta, Y.; Ünal, Y.: Scatter of journals and literature obsolescence reflected in document delivery requests (2005) 0.01
    0.0061545256 = product of:
      0.012309051 = sum of:
        0.012309051 = product of:
          0.024618102 = sum of:
            0.024618102 = weight(_text_:22 in 3271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024618102 = score(doc=3271,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045425482 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3271, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3271)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 3.2005 10:54:22
  9. Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003) 0.01
    0.0061545256 = product of:
      0.012309051 = sum of:
        0.012309051 = product of:
          0.024618102 = sum of:
            0.024618102 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024618102 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045425482 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9. 7.2006 10:22:35