Search (134 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005) 0.06 
    0.06367376 = product of:
  0.15918438 = sum of:
    0.07412276 = weight(_text_:20 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07412276 = score(doc=4890,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14381489 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052318756 = queryNorm
        0.5154039 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
    0.085061625 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.085061625 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18321137 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052318756 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    12. 3.2001 11:34:20
    20. 1.2007 17:02:22
  2. Rostaing, H.; Barts, N.; Léveillé, V.: Bibliometrics: representation instrument of the multidisciplinary positioning of a scientific area : Implementation for an Advisory Scientific Committee (2007) 0.04 
    0.036659826 = product of:
  0.09164956 = sum of:
    0.034941804 = weight(_text_:20 in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034941804 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14381489 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052318756 = queryNorm
        0.24296375 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
    0.056707755 = weight(_text_:22 in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056707755 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18321137 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052318756 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    30.12.2007 11:22:39
    Source
    ¬La interdisciplinariedad y la transdisciplinariedad en la organización del conocimiento científico : actas del VIII Congreso ISKO-España, León, 18, 19 y 20 de Abril de 2007 : Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in the organization of scientific knowledge. Ed.: B. Rodriguez Bravo u. M.L Alvite Diez
  3. Raan, A.F.J. van: Statistical properties of bibliometric indicators : research group indicator distributions and correlations (2006) 0.03 
    0.034541603 = product of:
  0.08635401 = sum of:
    0.026206354 = weight(_text_:20 in 5275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026206354 = score(doc=5275,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14381489 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052318756 = queryNorm
        0.18222281 = fieldWeight in 5275, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5275)
    0.060147658 = weight(_text_:22 in 5275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060147658 = score(doc=5275,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18321137 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052318756 = queryNorm
        0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 5275, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5275)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:20:22
  4. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.03 
    0.034541603 = product of:
  0.08635401 = sum of:
    0.026206354 = weight(_text_:20 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026206354 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14381489 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052318756 = queryNorm
        0.18222281 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
    0.060147658 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060147658 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18321137 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052318756 = queryNorm
        0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    This article challenges recent research (Evans, 2008) reporting that the concentration of cited scientific literature increases with the online availability of articles and journals. Using Thomson Reuters' Web of Science, the present article analyses changes in the concentration of citations received (2- and 5-year citation windows) by papers published between 1900 and 2005. Three measures of concentration are used: the percentage of papers that received at least one citation (cited papers); the percentage of papers needed to account for 20%, 50%, and 80% of the citations; and the Herfindahl-Hirschman index (HHI). These measures are used for four broad disciplines: natural sciences and engineering, medical fields, social sciences, and the humanities. All these measures converge and show that, contrary to what was reported by Evans, the dispersion of citations is actually increasing.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  5. Leydesdorff, L.: Can networks of journal-journal citations be used as indicators of change in the social sciences? (2003) 0.03 
    0.027494866 = product of:
  0.068737164 = sum of:
    0.026206354 = weight(_text_:20 in 4460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026206354 = score(doc=4460,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14381489 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052318756 = queryNorm
        0.18222281 = fieldWeight in 4460, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4460)
    0.042530812 = weight(_text_:22 in 4460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042530812 = score(doc=4460,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18321137 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052318756 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4460, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4460)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    10. 3.1997 20:31:13
    6.11.2005 19:02:22
  6. Leydesdorff, L.; Sun, Y.: National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan : university-industry-government versus international coauthorship relations (2009) 0.03 
    0.027494866 = product of:
  0.068737164 = sum of:
    0.026206354 = weight(_text_:20 in 2761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026206354 = score(doc=2761,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14381489 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052318756 = queryNorm
        0.18222281 = fieldWeight in 2761, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2761)
    0.042530812 = weight(_text_:22 in 2761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042530812 = score(doc=2761,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18321137 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052318756 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2761, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2761)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:07:20
  7. Hayer, L.: Lazarsfeld zitiert : eine bibliometrische Analyse (2008) 0.02 
    0.02291239 = product of:
  0.057280976 = sum of:
    0.021838628 = weight(_text_:20 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021838628 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14381489 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052318756 = queryNorm
        0.15185234 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
    0.03544235 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03544235 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18321137 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052318756 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    22. 6.2008 12:54:12
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 61(2008) H.2, S.14-20
  8. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.02 
    0.022683103 = product of:
  0.11341551 = sum of:
    0.11341551 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11341551 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18321137 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052318756 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  9. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.02 
    0.02004922 = product of:
  0.100246094 = sum of:
    0.100246094 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.100246094 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18321137 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052318756 = queryNorm
        0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  10. Wettlauf der Wissenschaft (2004) 0.02 
    0.018329913 = product of:
  0.04582478 = sum of:
    0.017470902 = weight(_text_:20 in 2495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017470902 = score(doc=2495,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14381489 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052318756 = queryNorm
        0.12148187 = fieldWeight in 2495, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2495)
    0.028353877 = weight(_text_:22 in 2495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028353877 = score(doc=2495,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18321137 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052318756 = queryNorm
        0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2495, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2495)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    "Jahrzehntelang galt die USA als Platzhirsch in der Forschungswelt. Egal ob es um Patente oder Nobelpreise ging, ihre Adressaten lebten und arbeiteten zumeist in Nordamerika. Jüngste Zahlen zeigen aber, dass diese Vormachtstellung am Bröckeln ist und Europa und vor allem Asien aufholen. Die globale US-Dominanz könnte zumindest im wissenschaftlichen Bereich bald der Vergangenheit angehören. Während in Österreich gerade die Forschungsförderung restrukturiert wird, machen sich die USA trotz rekordverdächtiger Förderbudgets Sorgen um ihre wissenschaftliche Schlagkraft. Nach einem Artikel in der NewYork Times büsst die USA ihre Führungsrolle in Forschung und Entwicklung zusehends ein. Zwar kommen weiterhin die meisten Patente aus Nordamerika, doch sank deren Anteil an den weltweit angemeldeten Patenten von 60,2% (1980) auf 51,8% (2003). Besonders erfolgreich in diesem Feld sind die asiatischen Ländern, allen voran Japan, das seinen Anteil in den letzten 20 Jahren beinahe verdoppeln konnte. Auch bei den wissenschaftlichen Publikationen holt die nicht englischsprachige WeIt auf. So sank zum Beispiel der Anteil US-amerikanischer Autoren bei Physical Reviewvon über 60% in den 80er Jahren auf unter 30% im letzten Jahr. Auch hier holen besonders Forscher aus Asien stark auf. Allein China reicht jedes Jahr über 1.000 Beiträge bei Physical Review ein, sagt Martin Blume, Herausgeber der Zeitschriften der American Physical Society. Der Anteil der USA an den jährlich vergebenen Nobelpreisen sank in den letzten 30 Jahren ebenfalls deutlich auf knapp über 50%. Asien holt auf: Während Europa die amerikanische Führungsrolle eher vorsichtig herausfordert, hat sich in Asien ein regelrechter Boom entwickelt. Die Zahl der abgeschlossenen naturwissenschaftlichen und techni schen Doktorate verdoppelte sich in Asien in nur zehn Jahren, während die Abschlüsse in Europa und den USA stagnieren oder sogar zurückgehen. Steigender Lebensstandard in den Zentren aller Weltregionen und mobilitätsfeindliche Einreisebestimmungen als Folge des "Kriegs gegen den Terror" führen auch dazu, dass Jungwissenschaftler aus China, Indien oder Taiwan nach Abschluss ihrer Ausbildung in den USA verstärkt in ihre Heimatregion zurückkehren. Die amerikanische Wirtschaft reagiert auf diesen Trend zunehmend mit der Auslagerung von Forschungseinrichtungen in diese Länder. In Zeiten der Globalisierung zeigt sich daran aber auch die Schwäche nationalstaatlich orientierter Statistiken."
    Source
    Online Mitteilungen. 2004, Nr.79, S.22-23 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 57(2004) H.2]
  11. Tonta, Y.; Ünal, Y.: Scatter of journals and literature obsolescence reflected in document delivery requests (2005) 0.02 
    0.018329913 = product of:
  0.04582478 = sum of:
    0.017470902 = weight(_text_:20 in 3271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017470902 = score(doc=3271,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14381489 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052318756 = queryNorm
        0.12148187 = fieldWeight in 3271, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3271)
    0.028353877 = weight(_text_:22 in 3271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028353877 = score(doc=3271,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18321137 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052318756 = queryNorm
        0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3271, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3271)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    20. 3.2005 10:54:22
  12. ¬The Web of knowledge : Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (2000) 0.01 
    0.012353794 = product of:
  0.061768968 = sum of:
    0.061768968 = weight(_text_:20 in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061768968 = score(doc=461,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14381489 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052318756 = queryNorm
        0.4295033 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    3. 2.1997 20:43:21
    20. 4.2002 18:28:13
  13. Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006) 0.01 
    0.011341551 = product of:
  0.056707755 = sum of:
    0.056707755 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056707755 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18321137 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052318756 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    4.12.2006 12:12:22
  14. Burrell, Q.L.: Fitting Lotka's law : some cautionary observations on a recent paper by Newby et al. (2003) (2004) 0.01 
    0.010482541 = product of:
  0.052412707 = sum of:
    0.052412707 = weight(_text_:20 in 6235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052412707 = score(doc=6235,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14381489 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052318756 = queryNorm
        0.36444563 = fieldWeight in 6235, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6235)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    21. 7.2006 20:21:41
  15. Stock, W.G.: Eugene Garfield und die Folgen : der Weg der Fußnote bis in die Wissenschaftspolitik (2002) 0.01 
    0.010482541 = product of:
  0.052412707 = sum of:
    0.052412707 = weight(_text_:20 in 472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052412707 = score(doc=472,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14381489 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052318756 = queryNorm
        0.36444563 = fieldWeight in 472, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=472)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    20. 4.2002 18:31:33
  16. Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.: Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science (2009) 0.01 
    0.01002461 = product of:
  0.050123047 = sum of:
    0.050123047 = weight(_text_:22 in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050123047 = score(doc=2734,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18321137 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052318756 = queryNorm
        0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Collaboration is a major research policy objective, but does it deliver higher quality research? This study uses citation analysis to examine the Web of Science (WoS) Information Science & Library Science subject category (IS&LS) to ascertain whether, in general, more highly cited articles are more highly collaborative than other articles. It consists of two investigations. The first investigation is a longitudinal comparison of the degree and proportion of collaboration in five strata of citation; it found that collaboration in the highest four citation strata (all in the most highly cited 22%) increased in unison over time, whereas collaboration in the lowest citation strata (un-cited articles) remained low and stable. Given that over 40% of the articles were un-cited, it seems important to take into account the differences found between un-cited articles and relatively highly cited articles when investigating collaboration in IS&LS. The second investigation compares collaboration for 35 influential information scientists; it found that their more highly cited articles on average were not more highly collaborative than their less highly cited articles. In summary, although collaborative research is conducive to high citation in general, collaboration has apparently not tended to be essential to the success of current and former elite information scientists.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 12:43:51
  17. Burrell, Q.L.: Predicting future citation behavior (2003) 0.01 
    0.009923857 = product of:
  0.049619284 = sum of:
    0.049619284 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049619284 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18321137 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052318756 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    29. 3.2003 19:22:48
  18. Rowlands, I.: Journal diffusion factors : a new approach to measuring research influence (2002) 0.01 
    0.009883035 = product of:
  0.049415175 = sum of:
    0.049415175 = weight(_text_:20 in 693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049415175 = score(doc=693,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14381489 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052318756 = queryNorm
        0.34360263 = fieldWeight in 693, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=693)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    12. 3.2001 11:34:20
    20. 1.2007 19:15:10
  19. Janes, J.: Categorical relationships : chi-square (2001) 0.01 
    0.008735451 = product of:
  0.043677256 = sum of:
    0.043677256 = weight(_text_:20 in 1182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043677256 = score(doc=1182,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14381489 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052318756 = queryNorm
        0.30370468 = fieldWeight in 1182, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1182)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    23.10.1996 20:02:10
  20. Cronin, B.: Semiotics and evaluative bibliometrics (2000) 0.01 
    0.008735451 = product of:
  0.043677256 = sum of:
    0.043677256 = weight(_text_:20 in 4542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043677256 = score(doc=4542,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14381489 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052318756 = queryNorm
        0.30370468 = fieldWeight in 4542, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4542)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 3.1997 20:31:13

Authors

Languages

  • e 118
  • d 15
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 130
  • r 2
  • el 1
  • m 1
  • s 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes