-
Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005)
0.15
0.1534976 = product of:
0.3069952 = sum of:
0.3069952 = sum of:
0.22480638 = weight(_text_:200 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22480638 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
0.050551776 = queryNorm
0.76785505 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
0.082188815 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.082188815 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050551776 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2007 17:02:22
- Source
- Aslib proceedings. 57(2005) no.3, S.200-
-
Juchem, K.: ¬Der Bibliotheksdienst in szientometrischer Analyse (2002)
0.03
0.032784265 = product of:
0.06556853 = sum of:
0.06556853 = product of:
0.13113706 = sum of:
0.13113706 = weight(_text_:200 in 1213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13113706 = score(doc=1213,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
0.050551776 = queryNorm
0.44791543 = fieldWeight in 1213, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1213)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Der BIBLIOTHEKSDIENST Ist das Organ der Bundesvereinigung Deutscher Bibliotheksverbände (BDB) und wird von der Zentral- und Landesbibliothek Berlin herausgegeben. Er ist eine Fachzeitschrift mit Mitteilungen und Berichten aus allen Bereichen der Bibliotheksarbeit. Der BIBLIOTHEKSDIENST erscheint monatlich (11mal im Jahr), die durchschnittliche Seitenzahl (im DIN A5-Format) beträgt 2.250 pro Jahrgang, wovon rund 200 bis 300 Seiten auf Anzeigen entfallen. Mit einer verkauften Auflage von 4.000 Exemplaren hat er eine große Reichweite in der deutschen Bibliothekswelt. 90% der Abonnenten leben in Deutschland, 10% im Ausland. Der Bezieherkreis setzt sich aus Bibliothekaren und verwandten Berufsgruppen (50%), aus Bibliotheken (40%) und Institutionen des Informationswesens (10%) zusammen. Der BIBLIOTHEKSDIENST erscheint als Printorgan, mit einer Verzögerung von drei Monaten werden die Artikel zusätzlich digital (http://bibliotheksdienst.zib.de) zur Verfügung gestellt. Wie werden die Beiträge des BIBLIOTHEKSDIENST rezipiert? Wo steht der BIBLIOTHEKSDIENST In der wissenschaftlichen Kommunikation?
-
Ball, R.: Wissenschaftskommunikation im Wandel : die Verwendung von Fragezeichen im Titel von wissenschaftlichen Zeitschriftenbeiträgen in der Medizin, den Lebenswissenschaften und in der Physik von 1966 bis 2005 (2007)
0.03
0.032784265 = product of:
0.06556853 = sum of:
0.06556853 = product of:
0.13113706 = sum of:
0.13113706 = weight(_text_:200 in 635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13113706 = score(doc=635,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
0.050551776 = queryNorm
0.44791543 = fieldWeight in 635, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=635)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Die Titel wissenschaftlicher Veröffentlichungen sind von besonderer Bedeutung. Wir haben fast 20 Millionen wissenschaftliche Artikel untersucht und den Anteil von Artikeln mit einem Fragezeichen am Ende des Titels im Laufe der letzten 40 Jahre analysiert. Unsere Studie beschränkte sich auf die Disziplinen Physik, Lebenswissenschaften und Medizin. Dabei haben wir eine deutliche Zunahme der Fragezeichen-Artikel von 50 Prozent auf mehr als 200 Prozent feststellten können. Vor diesem Hintergrund werden im vorliegenden Beitrag die grundsätzlichen Funktionen und Strukturen der Titel wissenschaftlicher Publikationen untersucht. Wir gehen davon aus, dass Marketing-Aspekte die entscheidenden Beweggründe sind für die zunehmende Nutzung von Fragezeichen-Titeln bei wissenschaftlichen Publikationen.
-
Abt, H.A.; Garfield, E.: Is the relationship between numbers of references and paper lengths the same for all sciences? (2002)
0.03
0.028100798 = product of:
0.056201596 = sum of:
0.056201596 = product of:
0.11240319 = sum of:
0.11240319 = weight(_text_:200 in 5223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11240319 = score(doc=5223,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
0.050551776 = queryNorm
0.38392752 = fieldWeight in 5223, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5223)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- It has been shown in the physical sciences that a paper's length is related to its number of references in a linear manner. Abt and Garfield here look at the life and social sciences with the thought that if the relation holds the citation counts will provide a measure of relative importance across these disciplines. In the life sciences 200 research papers from 1999-2000 were scanned in each of 10 journals to produce counts of 1000 word normalized pages. In the social sciences an average of 70 research papers in nine journals were scanned for the two-year period. Papers of average length in the various sciences have the same average number of references within plus or minus 17%. A look at the 30 to 60 papers over the two years in 18 review journals indicates twice the references of research papers of the same length.
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.03
0.027396271 = product of:
0.054792542 = sum of:
0.054792542 = product of:
0.109585084 = sum of:
0.109585084 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.109585084 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050551776 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.02
0.024215112 = product of:
0.048430223 = sum of:
0.048430223 = product of:
0.096860446 = sum of:
0.096860446 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.096860446 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050551776 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Brown, C.: ¬The evolution of preprints in the scholarly communication of physicists and astronomers (2001)
0.02
0.023417331 = product of:
0.046834663 = sum of:
0.046834663 = product of:
0.093669325 = sum of:
0.093669325 = weight(_text_:200 in 5184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.093669325 = score(doc=5184,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
0.050551776 = queryNorm
0.31993958 = fieldWeight in 5184, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5184)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.3, S.187-200
-
Meho, L.I.; Yang, K.: Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty : Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)
0.02
0.023417331 = product of:
0.046834663 = sum of:
0.046834663 = product of:
0.093669325 = sum of:
0.093669325 = weight(_text_:200 in 620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.093669325 = score(doc=620,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
0.050551776 = queryNorm
0.31993958 = fieldWeight in 620, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=620)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The Institute for Scientific Information's (ISI, now Thomson Scientific, Philadelphia, PA) citation databases have been used for decades as a starting point and often as the only tools for locating citations and/or conducting citation analyses. The ISI databases (or Web of Science [WoS]), however, may no longer be sufficient because new databases and tools that allow citation searching are now available. Using citations to the work of 25 library and information science (LIS) faculty members as a case study, the authors examine the effects of using Scopus and Google Scholar (GS) on the citation counts and rankings of scholars as measured by WoS. Overall, more than 10,000 citing and purportedly citing documents were examined. Results show that Scopus significantly alters the relative ranking of those scholars that appear in the middle of the rankings and that GS stands out in its coverage of conference proceedings as well as international, non-English language journals. The use of Scopus and GS, in addition to WoS, helps reveal a more accurate and comprehensive picture of the scholarly impact of authors. The WoS data took about 100 hours of collecting and processing time, Scopus consumed 200 hours, and GS a grueling 3,000 hours.
-
Barjak, F.; Li, X.; Thelwall, M.: Which factors explain the Web impact of scientists' personal homepages? (2007)
0.02
0.018733865 = product of:
0.03746773 = sum of:
0.03746773 = product of:
0.07493546 = sum of:
0.07493546 = weight(_text_:200 in 73) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07493546 = score(doc=73,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
0.050551776 = queryNorm
0.25595167 = fieldWeight in 73, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=73)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.2, S.200-211
-
Raan, A.F.J. van: Statistical properties of bibliometric indicators : research group indicator distributions and correlations (2006)
0.01
0.014529068 = product of:
0.029058136 = sum of:
0.029058136 = product of:
0.058116272 = sum of:
0.058116272 = weight(_text_:22 in 5275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058116272 = score(doc=5275,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050551776 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 5275, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5275)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 16:20:22
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.01
0.014529068 = product of:
0.029058136 = sum of:
0.029058136 = product of:
0.058116272 = sum of:
0.058116272 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058116272 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050551776 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
-
Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006)
0.01
0.0136981355 = product of:
0.027396271 = sum of:
0.027396271 = product of:
0.054792542 = sum of:
0.054792542 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054792542 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050551776 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 4.12.2006 12:12:22
-
Rostaing, H.; Barts, N.; Léveillé, V.: Bibliometrics: representation instrument of the multidisciplinary positioning of a scientific area : Implementation for an Advisory Scientific Committee (2007)
0.01
0.0136981355 = product of:
0.027396271 = sum of:
0.027396271 = product of:
0.054792542 = sum of:
0.054792542 = weight(_text_:22 in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054792542 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050551776 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30.12.2007 11:22:39
-
Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.: Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science (2009)
0.01
0.012107556 = product of:
0.024215112 = sum of:
0.024215112 = product of:
0.048430223 = sum of:
0.048430223 = weight(_text_:22 in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048430223 = score(doc=2734,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050551776 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Collaboration is a major research policy objective, but does it deliver higher quality research? This study uses citation analysis to examine the Web of Science (WoS) Information Science & Library Science subject category (IS&LS) to ascertain whether, in general, more highly cited articles are more highly collaborative than other articles. It consists of two investigations. The first investigation is a longitudinal comparison of the degree and proportion of collaboration in five strata of citation; it found that collaboration in the highest four citation strata (all in the most highly cited 22%) increased in unison over time, whereas collaboration in the lowest citation strata (un-cited articles) remained low and stable. Given that over 40% of the articles were un-cited, it seems important to take into account the differences found between un-cited articles and relatively highly cited articles when investigating collaboration in IS&LS. The second investigation compares collaboration for 35 influential information scientists; it found that their more highly cited articles on average were not more highly collaborative than their less highly cited articles. In summary, although collaborative research is conducive to high citation in general, collaboration has apparently not tended to be essential to the success of current and former elite information scientists.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 12:43:51
-
Burrell, Q.L.: Predicting future citation behavior (2003)
0.01
0.011985868 = product of:
0.023971736 = sum of:
0.023971736 = product of:
0.047943473 = sum of:
0.047943473 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047943473 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050551776 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 29. 3.2003 19:22:48
-
Leydesdorff, L.: Can networks of journal-journal citations be used as indicators of change in the social sciences? (2003)
0.01
0.010273602 = product of:
0.020547204 = sum of:
0.020547204 = product of:
0.041094407 = sum of:
0.041094407 = weight(_text_:22 in 4460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041094407 = score(doc=4460,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050551776 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4460, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4460)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6.11.2005 19:02:22
-
Asonuma, A.; Fang, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Reflections on the age distribution of Japanese scientists (2006)
0.01
0.010273602 = product of:
0.020547204 = sum of:
0.020547204 = product of:
0.041094407 = sum of:
0.041094407 = weight(_text_:22 in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041094407 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050551776 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:26:24
-
Haycock, L.A.: Citation analysis of education dissertations for collection development (2004)
0.01
0.010273602 = product of:
0.020547204 = sum of:
0.020547204 = product of:
0.041094407 = sum of:
0.041094407 = weight(_text_:22 in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041094407 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050551776 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.01
0.010273602 = product of:
0.020547204 = sum of:
0.020547204 = product of:
0.041094407 = sum of:
0.041094407 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041094407 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050551776 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
-
H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008)
0.01
0.010273602 = product of:
0.020547204 = sum of:
0.020547204 = product of:
0.041094407 = sum of:
0.041094407 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041094407 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050551776 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 4.2008 19:04:22
