Search (217 results, page 1 of 11)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. ¬Die deutsche Zeitschrift für Dokumentation, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis von 1950 bis 2011 : eine vorläufige Bilanz in vier Abschnitten (2012) 0.05
    0.053946074 = product of:
      0.10789215 = sum of:
        0.10789215 = sum of:
          0.024303526 = weight(_text_:d in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024303526 = score(doc=402,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.086298585 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04542337 = queryNorm
              0.28162137 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.046663187 = weight(_text_:r in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046663187 = score(doc=402,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15036309 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04542337 = queryNorm
              0.3103367 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.036925435 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036925435 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1590649 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04542337 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:35:26
    Footnote
    Besteht aus 4 Teilen: Teil 1: Eden, D., A. Arndt, A. Hoffer, T. Raschke u. P. Schön: Die Nachrichten für Dokumentation in den Jahren 1950 bis 1962 (S.159-163). Teil 2: Brose, M., E. durst, D. Nitzsche, D. Veckenstedt u. R. Wein: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1963-1975 (S.164-170). Teil 3: Bösel, J., G. Ebert, P. Garz,, M. Iwanow u. B. Russ: Methoden und Ergebnisse einer statistischen Auswertung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1976 bis 1988 (S.171-174). Teil 4: Engelage, H., S. Jansen, R. Mertins, K. Redel u. S. Ring: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) / "Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis" (IWP) 1989-2011 (S.164-170).
    Language
    d
    Location
    D
  2. Huang, M.-H.; Huang, W.-T.; Chang, C.-C.; Chen, D. Z.; Lin, C.-P.: The greater scattering phenomenon beyond Bradford's law in patent citation (2014) 0.04
    0.042646095 = product of:
      0.08529219 = sum of:
        0.08529219 = sum of:
          0.0153709 = weight(_text_:d in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0153709 = score(doc=1352,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.086298585 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04542337 = queryNorm
              0.178113 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
          0.032995857 = weight(_text_:r in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032995857 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15036309 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04542337 = queryNorm
              0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
          0.036925435 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036925435 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1590649 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04542337 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Patent analysis has become important for management as it offers timely and valuable information to evaluate R&D performance and identify the prospects of patents. This study explores the scattering patterns of patent impact based on citations in 3 distinct technological areas, the liquid crystal, semiconductor, and drug technological areas, to identify the core patents in each area. The research follows the approach from Bradford's law, which equally divides total citations into 3 zones. While the result suggests that the scattering of patent citations corresponded with features of Bradford's law, the proportion of patents in the 3 zones did not match the proportion as proposed by the law. As a result, the study shows that the distributions of citations in all 3 areas were more concentrated than what Bradford's law proposed. The Groos (1967) droop was also presented by the scattering of patent citations, and the growth rate of cumulative citation decreased in the third zone.
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:11:29
  3. Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Wagner, C.S.: ¬The relative influences of government funding and international collaboration on citation impact (2019) 0.04
    0.04039508 = product of:
      0.08079016 = sum of:
        0.08079016 = sum of:
          0.010868866 = weight(_text_:d in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.010868866 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.086298585 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04542337 = queryNorm
              0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
          0.032995857 = weight(_text_:r in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032995857 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15036309 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04542337 = queryNorm
              0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
          0.036925435 = weight(_text_:22 in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036925435 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1590649 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04542337 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A recent publication in Nature reports that public R&D funding is only weakly correlated with the citation impact of a nation's articles as measured by the field-weighted citation index (FWCI; defined by Scopus). On the basis of the supplementary data, we up-scaled the design using Web of Science data for the decade 2003-2013 and OECD funding data for the corresponding decade assuming a 2-year delay (2001-2011). Using negative binomial regression analysis, we found very small coefficients, but the effects of international collaboration are positive and statistically significant, whereas the effects of government funding are negative, an order of magnitude smaller, and statistically nonsignificant (in two of three analyses). In other words, international collaboration improves the impact of research articles, whereas more government funding tends to have a small adverse effect when comparing OECD countries.
    Date
    8. 1.2019 18:22:45
  4. Liu, D.-R.; Shih, M.-J.: Hybrid-patent classification based on patent-network analysis (2011) 0.03
    0.033662565 = product of:
      0.06732513 = sum of:
        0.06732513 = sum of:
          0.00905739 = weight(_text_:d in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.00905739 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.086298585 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04542337 = queryNorm
              0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
          0.027496547 = weight(_text_:r in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027496547 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15036309 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04542337 = queryNorm
              0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
          0.0307712 = weight(_text_:22 in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0307712 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1590649 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04542337 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 13:04:21
  5. Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014) 0.03
    0.031076131 = product of:
      0.062152263 = sum of:
        0.062152263 = product of:
          0.09322839 = sum of:
            0.043994475 = weight(_text_:r in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043994475 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15036309 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04542337 = queryNorm
                0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
            0.049233917 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049233917 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1590649 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04542337 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:05:18
  6. Haustein, S.; Tunger, D.: Sziento- und bibliometrische Verfahren (2013) 0.03
    0.028789606 = product of:
      0.057579212 = sum of:
        0.057579212 = product of:
          0.086368814 = sum of:
            0.031375717 = weight(_text_:d in 730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031375717 = score(doc=730,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.086298585 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04542337 = queryNorm
                0.36357164 = fieldWeight in 730, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=730)
            0.054993093 = weight(_text_:r in 730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054993093 = score(doc=730,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15036309 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04542337 = queryNorm
                0.36573532 = fieldWeight in 730, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=730)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    d
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. Handbuch zur Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft und -praxis. 6., völlig neu gefaßte Ausgabe. Hrsg. von R. Kuhlen, W. Semar u. D. Strauch. Begründet von Klaus Laisiepen, Ernst Lutterbeck, Karl-Heinrich Meyer-Uhlenried
  7. Ntuli, H.; Inglesi-Lotz, R.; Chang, T.; Pouris, A.: Does research output cause economic growth or vice versa? : evidence from 34 OECD countries (2015) 0.02
    0.023307098 = product of:
      0.046614196 = sum of:
        0.046614196 = product of:
          0.06992129 = sum of:
            0.032995857 = weight(_text_:r in 2132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032995857 = score(doc=2132,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15036309 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04542337 = queryNorm
                0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 2132, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2132)
            0.036925435 = weight(_text_:22 in 2132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036925435 = score(doc=2132,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1590649 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04542337 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2132, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2132)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8. 7.2015 22:00:42
  8. Yan, E.: Disciplinary knowledge production and diffusion in science (2016) 0.02
    0.020678028 = product of:
      0.041356057 = sum of:
        0.041356057 = product of:
          0.062034085 = sum of:
            0.0153709 = weight(_text_:d in 3092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0153709 = score(doc=3092,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.086298585 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04542337 = queryNorm
                0.178113 = fieldWeight in 3092, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3092)
            0.046663187 = weight(_text_:r in 3092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046663187 = score(doc=3092,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15036309 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04542337 = queryNorm
                0.3103367 = fieldWeight in 3092, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3092)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This study examines patterns of dynamic disciplinary knowledge production and diffusion. It uses a citation data set of Scopus-indexed journals and proceedings. The journal-level citation data set is aggregated into 27 subject areas and these subjects are selected as the unit of analysis. A 3-step approach is employed: the first step examines disciplines' citation characteristics through scientific trading dimensions; the second step analyzes citation flows between pairs of disciplines; and the third step uses egocentric citation networks to assess individual disciplines' citation flow diversity through Shannon entropy. The results show that measured by scientific impact, the subjects of Chemical Engineering, Energy, and Environmental Science have the fastest growth. Furthermore, most subjects are carrying out more diversified knowledge trading practices by importing higher volumes of knowledge from a greater number of subjects. The study also finds that the growth rates of disciplinary citations align with the growth rates of global research and development (R&D) expenditures, thus providing evidence to support the impact of R&D expenditures on knowledge production.
  9. Schlögl, C.: Internationale Sichtbarkeit der europäischen und insbesondere der deutschsprachigen Informationswissenschaft (2013) 0.02
    0.020337466 = product of:
      0.040674932 = sum of:
        0.040674932 = product of:
          0.061012395 = sum of:
            0.017932717 = weight(_text_:d in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017932717 = score(doc=900,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.086298585 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04542337 = queryNorm
                0.2077985 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
            0.043079678 = weight(_text_:22 in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043079678 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1590649 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04542337 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2013 14:04:09
    Language
    d
    Location
    D
  10. Costas, R.; Zahedi, Z.; Wouters, P.: ¬The thematic orientation of publications mentioned on social media : large-scale disciplinary comparison of social media metrics with citations (2015) 0.02
    0.019422583 = product of:
      0.038845167 = sum of:
        0.038845167 = product of:
          0.058267746 = sum of:
            0.027496547 = weight(_text_:r in 2598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027496547 = score(doc=2598,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15036309 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04542337 = queryNorm
                0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 2598, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2598)
            0.0307712 = weight(_text_:22 in 2598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0307712 = score(doc=2598,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1590649 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04542337 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2598, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2598)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  11. Rotolo, D.; Leydesdorff, L.: Matching Medline/PubMed data with Web of Science: A routine in R language (2015) 0.02
    0.019177351 = product of:
      0.038354702 = sum of:
        0.038354702 = product of:
          0.057532053 = sum of:
            0.010868866 = weight(_text_:d in 2224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010868866 = score(doc=2224,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.086298585 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04542337 = queryNorm
                0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 2224, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2224)
            0.046663187 = weight(_text_:r in 2224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046663187 = score(doc=2224,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15036309 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04542337 = queryNorm
                0.3103367 = fieldWeight in 2224, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2224)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    We present a novel routine, namely medlineR, based on the R language, that allows the user to match data from Medline/PubMed with records indexed in the ISI Web of Science (WoS) database. The matching allows exploiting the rich and controlled vocabulary of medical subject headings (MeSH) of Medline/PubMed with additional fields of WoS. The integration provides data (e.g., citation data, list of cited reference, list of the addresses of authors' host organizations, WoS subject categories) to perform a variety of scientometric analyses. This brief communication describes medlineR, the method on which it relies, and the steps the user should follow to perform the matching across the two databases. To demonstrate the differences from Leydesdorff and Opthof (Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(5), 1076-1080), we conclude this artcle by testing the routine on the MeSH category "Burgada syndrome."
  12. Shelton, R.D.; Leydesdorff, L.: Publish or patent : bibliometric evidence for empirical trade-offs in national funding strategies (2012) 0.02
    0.017231692 = product of:
      0.034463383 = sum of:
        0.034463383 = product of:
          0.051695075 = sum of:
            0.012809083 = weight(_text_:d in 70) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012809083 = score(doc=70,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.086298585 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04542337 = queryNorm
                0.1484275 = fieldWeight in 70, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=70)
            0.038885992 = weight(_text_:r in 70) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038885992 = score(doc=70,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15036309 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04542337 = queryNorm
                0.25861394 = fieldWeight in 70, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=70)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Multivariate linear regression models suggest a trade-off in allocations of national research and development (R&D). Government funding and spending in the higher education sector encourage publications as a long-term research benefit. Conversely, other components such as industrial funding and spending in the business sector encourage patenting. Our results help explain why the United States trails the European Union in publications: The focus in the United States is on industrial funding-some 70% of its total R&D investment. Likewise, our results also help explain why the European Union trails the United States in patenting, since its focus on government funding is less effective than industrial funding in predicting triadic patenting. Government funding contributes negatively to patenting in a multiple regression, and this relationship is significant in the case of triadic patenting. We provide new forecasts about the relationships of the United States, the European Union, and China for publishing; these results suggest much later dates for changes than previous forecasts because Chinese growth has been slowing down since 2003. Models for individual countries might be more successful than regression models whose parameters are averaged over a set of countries because nations can be expected to differ historically in terms of the institutional arrangements and funding schemes.
  13. Ajiferuke, I.; Lu, K.; Wolfram, D.: ¬A comparison of citer and citation-based measure outcomes for multiple disciplines (2010) 0.02
    0.015931435 = product of:
      0.03186287 = sum of:
        0.03186287 = product of:
          0.0477943 = sum of:
            0.010868866 = weight(_text_:d in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010868866 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.086298585 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04542337 = queryNorm
                0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
            0.036925435 = weight(_text_:22 in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036925435 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1590649 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04542337 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    28. 9.2010 12:54:22
  14. Hicks, D.; Wang, J.: Coverage and overlap of the new social sciences and humanities journal lists (2011) 0.02
    0.015931435 = product of:
      0.03186287 = sum of:
        0.03186287 = product of:
          0.0477943 = sum of:
            0.010868866 = weight(_text_:d in 4192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010868866 = score(doc=4192,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.086298585 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04542337 = queryNorm
                0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 4192, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4192)
            0.036925435 = weight(_text_:22 in 4192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036925435 = score(doc=4192,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1590649 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04542337 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4192, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4192)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 13:21:28
  15. Jovanovic, M.: ¬Eine kleine Frühgeschichte der Bibliometrie (2012) 0.02
    0.015931435 = product of:
      0.03186287 = sum of:
        0.03186287 = product of:
          0.0477943 = sum of:
            0.010868866 = weight(_text_:d in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010868866 = score(doc=326,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.086298585 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04542337 = queryNorm
                0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
            0.036925435 = weight(_text_:22 in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036925435 = score(doc=326,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1590649 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04542337 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:23:32
    Language
    d
  16. Li, J.; Shi, D.: Sleeping beauties in genius work : when were they awakened? (2016) 0.02
    0.015931435 = product of:
      0.03186287 = sum of:
        0.03186287 = product of:
          0.0477943 = sum of:
            0.010868866 = weight(_text_:d in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010868866 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.086298585 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04542337 = queryNorm
                0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
            0.036925435 = weight(_text_:22 in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036925435 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1590649 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04542337 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 14:13:32
  17. Costas, R.; Perianes-Rodríguez, A.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: On the quest for currencies of science : field "exchange rates" for citations and Mendeley readership (2017) 0.02
    0.015538066 = product of:
      0.031076131 = sum of:
        0.031076131 = product of:
          0.046614196 = sum of:
            0.021997238 = weight(_text_:r in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021997238 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15036309 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04542337 = queryNorm
                0.14629413 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
            0.024616959 = weight(_text_:22 in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024616959 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1590649 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04542337 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  18. Mutz, R.; Daniel, H.-D.: What is behind the curtain of the Leiden Ranking? (2015) 0.01
    0.014621574 = product of:
      0.029243149 = sum of:
        0.029243149 = product of:
          0.043864723 = sum of:
            0.010868866 = weight(_text_:d in 2171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010868866 = score(doc=2171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.086298585 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04542337 = queryNorm
                0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 2171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2171)
            0.032995857 = weight(_text_:r in 2171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032995857 = score(doc=2171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15036309 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04542337 = queryNorm
                0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 2171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2171)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  19. Shi, D.; Rousseau, R.; Yang, L.; Li, J.: ¬A journal's impact factor is influenced by changes in publication delays of citing journals (2017) 0.01
    0.014621574 = product of:
      0.029243149 = sum of:
        0.029243149 = product of:
          0.043864723 = sum of:
            0.010868866 = weight(_text_:d in 3441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010868866 = score(doc=3441,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.086298585 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04542337 = queryNorm
                0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 3441, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3441)
            0.032995857 = weight(_text_:r in 3441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032995857 = score(doc=3441,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15036309 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04542337 = queryNorm
                0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 3441, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3441)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  20. Schlögl, C.; List, R,: Vergleiche von Zitaten, Downloads und Lesehäufigkeiten : am Beispiel von zwei Volkswirtschaftslehre-Zeitschriften (2018) 0.01
    0.014621574 = product of:
      0.029243149 = sum of:
        0.029243149 = product of:
          0.043864723 = sum of:
            0.010868866 = weight(_text_:d in 4236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010868866 = score(doc=4236,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.086298585 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04542337 = queryNorm
                0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 4236, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4236)
            0.032995857 = weight(_text_:r in 4236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032995857 = score(doc=4236,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15036309 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04542337 = queryNorm
                0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 4236, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4236)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    d

Languages

  • e 180
  • d 37

Types

  • a 210
  • el 8
  • m 4
  • s 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…