-
Hjerppe, R.: ¬An outline of bibliometrics and citation analysis (1980)
0.02
0.020739196 = product of:
0.04147839 = sum of:
0.04147839 = product of:
0.12443517 = sum of:
0.12443517 = weight(_text_:r in 1115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12443517 = score(doc=1115,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15036309 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.04542337 = queryNorm
0.8275646 = fieldWeight in 1115, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1115)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- r
-
Ravichandra Rao, I.K.; Sahoo, B.B.: Studies and research in informetrics at the Documentation Research and Training Centre (DRTC), ISI Bangalore (2006)
0.02
0.020678028 = product of:
0.041356057 = sum of:
0.041356057 = product of:
0.062034085 = sum of:
0.0153709 = weight(_text_:d in 1512) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0153709 = score(doc=1512,freq=4.0), product of:
0.086298585 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.04542337 = queryNorm
0.178113 = fieldWeight in 1512, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1512)
0.046663187 = weight(_text_:r in 1512) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046663187 = score(doc=1512,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15036309 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.04542337 = queryNorm
0.3103367 = fieldWeight in 1512, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1512)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Contributions of DRTC to informetric studies and research are discussed. A report on recent work - a quantitative country-wise analysis of software literature based on the data from two bibliographic databases i.e. COMPENDEX and INSPEC is presented. The number of countries involved in R & D activities in software in the most productive group is increasing. The research contribution on software is decreasing in developed countries as compared to that in developing and less developed countries. India 's contribution is only 1.1% and it has remained constant over the period of 12 years 1989-2001. The number of countries involved in R&D activities in software has been increasing in the 1990s. It is also noted that higher the budget for higher education, higher the number of publications; and that higher the number of publications, higher the export as well as the domestic consumption of software.
-
Yan, E.: Disciplinary knowledge production and diffusion in science (2016)
0.02
0.020678028 = product of:
0.041356057 = sum of:
0.041356057 = product of:
0.062034085 = sum of:
0.0153709 = weight(_text_:d in 3092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0153709 = score(doc=3092,freq=4.0), product of:
0.086298585 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.04542337 = queryNorm
0.178113 = fieldWeight in 3092, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3092)
0.046663187 = weight(_text_:r in 3092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046663187 = score(doc=3092,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15036309 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.04542337 = queryNorm
0.3103367 = fieldWeight in 3092, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3092)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This study examines patterns of dynamic disciplinary knowledge production and diffusion. It uses a citation data set of Scopus-indexed journals and proceedings. The journal-level citation data set is aggregated into 27 subject areas and these subjects are selected as the unit of analysis. A 3-step approach is employed: the first step examines disciplines' citation characteristics through scientific trading dimensions; the second step analyzes citation flows between pairs of disciplines; and the third step uses egocentric citation networks to assess individual disciplines' citation flow diversity through Shannon entropy. The results show that measured by scientific impact, the subjects of Chemical Engineering, Energy, and Environmental Science have the fastest growth. Furthermore, most subjects are carrying out more diversified knowledge trading practices by importing higher volumes of knowledge from a greater number of subjects. The study also finds that the growth rates of disciplinary citations align with the growth rates of global research and development (R&D) expenditures, thus providing evidence to support the impact of R&D expenditures on knowledge production.
-
Schlögl, C.: Internationale Sichtbarkeit der europäischen und insbesondere der deutschsprachigen Informationswissenschaft (2013)
0.02
0.020337466 = product of:
0.040674932 = sum of:
0.040674932 = product of:
0.061012395 = sum of:
0.017932717 = weight(_text_:d in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017932717 = score(doc=900,freq=4.0), product of:
0.086298585 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.04542337 = queryNorm
0.2077985 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
0.043079678 = weight(_text_:22 in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043079678 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1590649 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04542337 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 14:04:09
- Language
- d
- Location
- D
-
Schramm, R.: Kerninformationen mittels formaler Bewertungskritierien (1996)
0.02
0.019495433 = product of:
0.038990866 = sum of:
0.038990866 = product of:
0.058486298 = sum of:
0.014491823 = weight(_text_:d in 6258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014491823 = score(doc=6258,freq=2.0), product of:
0.086298585 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.04542337 = queryNorm
0.16792654 = fieldWeight in 6258, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6258)
0.043994475 = weight(_text_:r in 6258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043994475 = score(doc=6258,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15036309 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.04542337 = queryNorm
0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 6258, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6258)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- d
-
Costas, R.; Bordons, M.; Leeuwen, T.N. van; Raan, A.F.J. van: Scaling rules in the science system : Influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of individual researchers (2009)
0.02
0.019422583 = product of:
0.038845167 = sum of:
0.038845167 = product of:
0.058267746 = sum of:
0.027496547 = weight(_text_:r in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027496547 = score(doc=2759,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15036309 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.04542337 = queryNorm
0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
0.0307712 = weight(_text_:22 in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0307712 = score(doc=2759,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1590649 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04542337 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:02:48
-
Costas, R.; Zahedi, Z.; Wouters, P.: ¬The thematic orientation of publications mentioned on social media : large-scale disciplinary comparison of social media metrics with citations (2015)
0.02
0.019422583 = product of:
0.038845167 = sum of:
0.038845167 = product of:
0.058267746 = sum of:
0.027496547 = weight(_text_:r in 2598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027496547 = score(doc=2598,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15036309 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.04542337 = queryNorm
0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 2598, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2598)
0.0307712 = weight(_text_:22 in 2598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0307712 = score(doc=2598,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1590649 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04542337 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2598, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2598)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Rotolo, D.; Leydesdorff, L.: Matching Medline/PubMed data with Web of Science: A routine in R language (2015)
0.02
0.019177351 = product of:
0.038354702 = sum of:
0.038354702 = product of:
0.057532053 = sum of:
0.010868866 = weight(_text_:d in 2224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010868866 = score(doc=2224,freq=2.0), product of:
0.086298585 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.04542337 = queryNorm
0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 2224, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2224)
0.046663187 = weight(_text_:r in 2224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046663187 = score(doc=2224,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15036309 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.04542337 = queryNorm
0.3103367 = fieldWeight in 2224, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2224)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- We present a novel routine, namely medlineR, based on the R language, that allows the user to match data from Medline/PubMed with records indexed in the ISI Web of Science (WoS) database. The matching allows exploiting the rich and controlled vocabulary of medical subject headings (MeSH) of Medline/PubMed with additional fields of WoS. The integration provides data (e.g., citation data, list of cited reference, list of the addresses of authors' host organizations, WoS subject categories) to perform a variety of scientometric analyses. This brief communication describes medlineR, the method on which it relies, and the steps the user should follow to perform the matching across the two databases. To demonstrate the differences from Leydesdorff and Opthof (Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(5), 1076-1080), we conclude this artcle by testing the routine on the MeSH category "Burgada syndrome."
-
Shelton, R.D.; Leydesdorff, L.: Publish or patent : bibliometric evidence for empirical trade-offs in national funding strategies (2012)
0.02
0.017231692 = product of:
0.034463383 = sum of:
0.034463383 = product of:
0.051695075 = sum of:
0.012809083 = weight(_text_:d in 70) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012809083 = score(doc=70,freq=4.0), product of:
0.086298585 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.04542337 = queryNorm
0.1484275 = fieldWeight in 70, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=70)
0.038885992 = weight(_text_:r in 70) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038885992 = score(doc=70,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15036309 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.04542337 = queryNorm
0.25861394 = fieldWeight in 70, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=70)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Multivariate linear regression models suggest a trade-off in allocations of national research and development (R&D). Government funding and spending in the higher education sector encourage publications as a long-term research benefit. Conversely, other components such as industrial funding and spending in the business sector encourage patenting. Our results help explain why the United States trails the European Union in publications: The focus in the United States is on industrial funding-some 70% of its total R&D investment. Likewise, our results also help explain why the European Union trails the United States in patenting, since its focus on government funding is less effective than industrial funding in predicting triadic patenting. Government funding contributes negatively to patenting in a multiple regression, and this relationship is significant in the case of triadic patenting. We provide new forecasts about the relationships of the United States, the European Union, and China for publishing; these results suggest much later dates for changes than previous forecasts because Chinese growth has been slowing down since 2003. Models for individual countries might be more successful than regression models whose parameters are averaged over a set of countries because nations can be expected to differ historically in terms of the institutional arrangements and funding schemes.
-
Milman, B.L.: Individual co-citation clusters as nuclei of complete and dynamic informetric models of scientific and technological areas (1994)
0.02
0.017058503 = product of:
0.034117006 = sum of:
0.034117006 = product of:
0.05117551 = sum of:
0.012680344 = weight(_text_:d in 37) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012680344 = score(doc=37,freq=2.0), product of:
0.086298585 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.04542337 = queryNorm
0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 37, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=37)
0.038495164 = weight(_text_:r in 37) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038495164 = score(doc=37,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15036309 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.04542337 = queryNorm
0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 37, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=37)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Describes the construction of improved informetric models of individual scientific and technological areas on the basis of individual co citation clusters. The developed methodology of replenishment of research front with accidently absent papers describes the model more completely. Proposes the simple method of cluster 'dynamization' for the study of evolution of research area. The transition under consideration from co citation clusters to lexical maps of papers and patents enables the monitoring of the relationshuip between R and D in a given technological area. Provides the example from modern chemical engineering of Pressure-Swing Adsorption
-
Joshi, A.N.; Maheshwarappa, B.S.: Studies in scientific productivity : a review of literature (1996)
0.02
0.017058503 = product of:
0.034117006 = sum of:
0.034117006 = product of:
0.05117551 = sum of:
0.012680344 = weight(_text_:d in 405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012680344 = score(doc=405,freq=2.0), product of:
0.086298585 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.04542337 = queryNorm
0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 405, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=405)
0.038495164 = weight(_text_:r in 405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038495164 = score(doc=405,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15036309 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.04542337 = queryNorm
0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 405, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=405)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Refers to the many changes in the research process in the post Second World War period, including the increased involvement of government and industry in establishing R&D laboratories, and by way of grant to universities. Discusses concepts, types, and problems in measuring scientific productivity, reviewing studies since 1926. Examines theoretical developments in relation to the frequency distribution of Lotka's Law of Scientific Productivity. The various studies are mainly non-comparable and inconclusive owing to substantial differences in the analytical methods applied. Poits out the need for methodological standardisation and coordination of research efforts in this area through empirical validation and generalisation of bibliometric models
-
Debackere, K.; Clarysse, B.: Advanced bibliometric methods to model the relationship between entry behavior and networking in emerging technological communities (1998)
0.02
0.017058503 = product of:
0.034117006 = sum of:
0.034117006 = product of:
0.05117551 = sum of:
0.012680344 = weight(_text_:d in 330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012680344 = score(doc=330,freq=2.0), product of:
0.086298585 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.04542337 = queryNorm
0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 330, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=330)
0.038495164 = weight(_text_:r in 330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038495164 = score(doc=330,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15036309 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.04542337 = queryNorm
0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 330, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=330)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Organizational ecology and social network theory are used to explain entries in technological communities. Using bibliometric data on 411 organizations in the field of plant biotechnology, we test several hypotheses that entry is not only influenced by the density of the field, but also by the structure of the R&D network within the community. The empirical findings point to the usefulness of bibliometric data in mapping change and evolution in technological communities, as well as to the effects of networking on entry behavior
-
Schlögl, C.: Informationskompetenz am Beispiel einer szientometrischen Untersuchung zum Informationsmanagement (2000)
0.02
0.017058503 = product of:
0.034117006 = sum of:
0.034117006 = product of:
0.05117551 = sum of:
0.012680344 = weight(_text_:d in 5485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012680344 = score(doc=5485,freq=2.0), product of:
0.086298585 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.04542337 = queryNorm
0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 5485, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5485)
0.038495164 = weight(_text_:r in 5485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038495164 = score(doc=5485,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15036309 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.04542337 = queryNorm
0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 5485, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5485)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- d
- Source
- Informationskompetenz - Basiskompetenz in der Informationsgesellschaft: Proceedings des 7. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2000), Hrsg.: G. Knorz u. R. Kuhlen
-
Nicholls, P.T.: Empirical validation of Lotka's law (1986)
0.02
0.016411306 = product of:
0.032822613 = sum of:
0.032822613 = product of:
0.098467834 = sum of:
0.098467834 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098467834 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1590649 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04542337 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.02
0.016411306 = product of:
0.032822613 = sum of:
0.032822613 = product of:
0.098467834 = sum of:
0.098467834 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098467834 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1590649 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04542337 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987)
0.02
0.016411306 = product of:
0.032822613 = sum of:
0.032822613 = product of:
0.098467834 = sum of:
0.098467834 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098467834 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1590649 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04542337 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
-
Ball, R.; Tunger, D.: Bibliometrische Analysen - Daten, Fakten und Methoden : Grundwissen Bibliometrie für Wissenschaftler, Wissenschaftsmanager, Forschungseinrichtungen und Hochschulen (2005)
0.02
0.016122252 = product of:
0.032244503 = sum of:
0.032244503 = product of:
0.048366755 = sum of:
0.0153709 = weight(_text_:d in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0153709 = score(doc=4992,freq=4.0), product of:
0.086298585 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.04542337 = queryNorm
0.178113 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
0.032995857 = weight(_text_:r in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032995857 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15036309 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.04542337 = queryNorm
0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- d
-
Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.; Daniel, H.D.: Do we need the h index and its variants in addition to standard bibliometric measures? (2009)
0.02
0.015981128 = product of:
0.031962257 = sum of:
0.031962257 = product of:
0.047943383 = sum of:
0.00905739 = weight(_text_:d in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00905739 = score(doc=2861,freq=2.0), product of:
0.086298585 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.04542337 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
0.038885992 = weight(_text_:r in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038885992 = score(doc=2861,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15036309 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.04542337 = queryNorm
0.25861394 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this study, we investigate whether there is a need for the h index and its variants in addition to standard bibliometric measures (SBMs). Results from our recent study (L. Bornmann, R. Mutz, & H.-D. Daniel, 2008) have indicated that there are two types of indices: One type of indices (e.g., h index) describes the most productive core of a scientist's output and informs about the number of papers in the core. The other type of indices (e.g., a index) depicts the impact of the papers in the core. In evaluative bibliometric studies, the two dimensions quantity and quality of output are usually assessed using the SBMs number of publications (for the quantity dimension) and total citation counts (for the impact dimension). We additionally included the SBMs into the factor analysis. The results of the newly calculated analysis indicate that there is a high intercorrelation between number of publications and the indices that load substantially on the factor Quantity of the Productive Core as well as between total citation counts and the indices that load substantially on the factor Impact of the Productive Core. The high-loading indices and SBMs within one performance dimension could be called redundant in empirical application, as high intercorrelations between different indicators are a sign for measuring something similar (or the same). Based on our findings, we propose the use of any pair of indicators (one relating to the number of papers in a researcher's productive core and one relating to the impact of these core papers) as a meaningful approach for comparing scientists.
-
H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008)
0.02
0.015931435 = product of:
0.03186287 = sum of:
0.03186287 = product of:
0.0477943 = sum of:
0.010868866 = weight(_text_:d in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010868866 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.086298585 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.04542337 = queryNorm
0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.036925435 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036925435 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1590649 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04542337 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 4.2008 19:04:22
- Language
- d
-
Ajiferuke, I.; Lu, K.; Wolfram, D.: ¬A comparison of citer and citation-based measure outcomes for multiple disciplines (2010)
0.02
0.015931435 = product of:
0.03186287 = sum of:
0.03186287 = product of:
0.0477943 = sum of:
0.010868866 = weight(_text_:d in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010868866 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.086298585 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.04542337 = queryNorm
0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
0.036925435 = weight(_text_:22 in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036925435 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1590649 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04542337 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 28. 9.2010 12:54:22
