Search (139 results, page 2 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.01
    0.011046042 = product of:
      0.044184167 = sum of:
        0.044184167 = product of:
          0.088368334 = sum of:
            0.088368334 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.088368334 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16150339 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046119716 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  2. Klein, A.: Von der Schneeflocke zur Lawine : Möglichkeiten der Nutzung freier Zitationsdaten in Bibliotheken (2017) 0.01
    0.010965035 = product of:
      0.04386014 = sum of:
        0.04386014 = product of:
          0.08772028 = sum of:
            0.08772028 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 4002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08772028 = score(doc=4002,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.17378467 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046119716 = queryNorm
                0.5047642 = fieldWeight in 4002, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4002)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Zitationen spielen eine wichtige Rolle im wissenschaftlichen Diskurs, in der Recherchepraxis sowie im Bereich der Bibliometrie. In jüngster Zeit gibt es zunehmend Initiativen, die Zitationen als Open Data zur freien Nachnutzung verfügbar machen. Der Beitrag beschreibt den Stand der Entwicklung dieser Initiativen und zeigt, dass in nächster Zeit eine kritische Masse von Daten entstehen könnte, aus denen sich gerade für Bibliotheken neue Perspektiven ergeben. Als konkrete Möglichkeit zur Partizipation für Bibliotheken wird das DFG-Projekt Linked Open Citation Database (LOC-DB) vorgestellt.
  3. Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994) 0.01
    0.010935023 = product of:
      0.043740094 = sum of:
        0.043740094 = product of:
          0.08748019 = sum of:
            0.08748019 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08748019 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16150339 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046119716 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
  4. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990) 0.01
    0.010935023 = product of:
      0.043740094 = sum of:
        0.043740094 = product of:
          0.08748019 = sum of:
            0.08748019 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08748019 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16150339 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046119716 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:29
  5. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : II. Resilience to ambiguity (1990) 0.01
    0.010935023 = product of:
      0.043740094 = sum of:
        0.043740094 = product of:
          0.08748019 = sum of:
            0.08748019 = weight(_text_:22 in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08748019 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16150339 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046119716 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:55
  6. May, M.: Bibliometrie - ein Aufgabengebiet von Bibliotheken? (2014) 0.01
    0.010231901 = product of:
      0.040927604 = sum of:
        0.040927604 = product of:
          0.08185521 = sum of:
            0.08185521 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 2578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08185521 = score(doc=2578,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17378467 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046119716 = queryNorm
                0.47101513 = fieldWeight in 2578, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2578)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliometrie zur Evaluation wissenschaftlicher Leistung gewinnt zunehmend an Bedeutung. Vor allem für Hochschulleitungen sind bibliometrische Indices zur Leistungsbeurteilung ihrer Wissenschaftler attraktiv. Die Wissenschaftler hingegen stehen den bibliometrischen Analysen skeptisch gegenüber und nehmen die Indices nur zögerlich an, wie die geringe Nutzung auf ihren Homepages im Internet zeigt. Für Bibliotheken ergibt sich eine neue Aufgabe. Sie sollten sich als Partner beider Gruppen positionieren und durch aktive Beratung ihre Kompetenz auf diesem Feld einbringen.
  7. Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005) 0.01
    0.009372877 = product of:
      0.037491508 = sum of:
        0.037491508 = product of:
          0.074983016 = sum of:
            0.074983016 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.074983016 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16150339 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046119716 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2007 17:02:22
  8. Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014) 0.01
    0.009372877 = product of:
      0.037491508 = sum of:
        0.037491508 = product of:
          0.074983016 = sum of:
            0.074983016 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.074983016 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16150339 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046119716 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    18. 3.2014 19:13:22
  9. Dederke, J.; Hirschmann, B.; Johann, D.: ¬Der Data Citation Index von Clarivate : Eine wertvolle Ressource für die Forschung und für Bibliotheken? (2022) 0.01
    0.009043808 = product of:
      0.036175232 = sum of:
        0.036175232 = product of:
          0.072350465 = sum of:
            0.072350465 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 50) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.072350465 = score(doc=50,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17378467 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046119716 = queryNorm
                0.41632247 = fieldWeight in 50, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=50)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  10. Raan, A.F.J. van: Statistical properties of bibliometric indicators : research group indicator distributions and correlations (2006) 0.01
    0.0066276253 = product of:
      0.026510501 = sum of:
        0.026510501 = product of:
          0.053021003 = sum of:
            0.053021003 = weight(_text_:22 in 5275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053021003 = score(doc=5275,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16150339 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046119716 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 5275, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5275)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:20:22
  11. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.01
    0.0066276253 = product of:
      0.026510501 = sum of:
        0.026510501 = product of:
          0.053021003 = sum of:
            0.053021003 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053021003 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16150339 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046119716 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  12. Kahl, M.: Zitatenanalyse mit den Journal Citation Reports des Institute for Scientific Information : ein Hilfsmittel für die Zeitschriftenauswahl in wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken? (1995) 0.01
    0.0063306657 = product of:
      0.025322663 = sum of:
        0.025322663 = product of:
          0.050645325 = sum of:
            0.050645325 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050645325 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17378467 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046119716 = queryNorm
                0.29142573 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  13. Juchem, K.: ¬Der Bibliotheksdienst in szientometrischer Analyse (2002) 0.01
    0.0063306657 = product of:
      0.025322663 = sum of:
        0.025322663 = product of:
          0.050645325 = sum of:
            0.050645325 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 1213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050645325 = score(doc=1213,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17378467 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046119716 = queryNorm
                0.29142573 = fieldWeight in 1213, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1213)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Der BIBLIOTHEKSDIENST Ist das Organ der Bundesvereinigung Deutscher Bibliotheksverbände (BDB) und wird von der Zentral- und Landesbibliothek Berlin herausgegeben. Er ist eine Fachzeitschrift mit Mitteilungen und Berichten aus allen Bereichen der Bibliotheksarbeit. Der BIBLIOTHEKSDIENST erscheint monatlich (11mal im Jahr), die durchschnittliche Seitenzahl (im DIN A5-Format) beträgt 2.250 pro Jahrgang, wovon rund 200 bis 300 Seiten auf Anzeigen entfallen. Mit einer verkauften Auflage von 4.000 Exemplaren hat er eine große Reichweite in der deutschen Bibliothekswelt. 90% der Abonnenten leben in Deutschland, 10% im Ausland. Der Bezieherkreis setzt sich aus Bibliothekaren und verwandten Berufsgruppen (50%), aus Bibliotheken (40%) und Institutionen des Informationswesens (10%) zusammen. Der BIBLIOTHEKSDIENST erscheint als Printorgan, mit einer Verzögerung von drei Monaten werden die Artikel zusätzlich digital (http://bibliotheksdienst.zib.de) zur Verfügung gestellt. Wie werden die Beiträge des BIBLIOTHEKSDIENST rezipiert? Wo steht der BIBLIOTHEKSDIENST In der wissenschaftlichen Kommunikation?
  14. Li, T.-C.: Reference sources in periodicals : research note (1995) 0.01
    0.006248585 = product of:
      0.02499434 = sum of:
        0.02499434 = product of:
          0.04998868 = sum of:
            0.04998868 = weight(_text_:22 in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04998868 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16150339 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046119716 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a list of 53 periodicals in 22 subject fields which regularly provide bibliographies of theses, research in progress and patents in their particular subject field. The fields of business, economics, history and literature have most periodical listings of dissertations and theses. Also lists 63 periodicals in 25 sub-disciplines which provide rankings or ratings. Rankings and ratings information predominates in the fields of business, sports and games, finance and banking, and library and information science
  15. Pichappan, P.; Sangaranachiyar, S.: Ageing approach to scientific eponyms (1996) 0.01
    0.006248585 = product of:
      0.02499434 = sum of:
        0.02499434 = product of:
          0.04998868 = sum of:
            0.04998868 = weight(_text_:22 in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04998868 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16150339 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046119716 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Report presented at the 16th National Indian Association of Special Libraries and Information Centres Seminar Special Interest Group Meeting on Informatrics in Bombay, 19-22 Dec 94
  16. Mommoh, O.M.: Subject analysis of post-graduate theses in library, archival and information science at Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria (1995/96) 0.01
    0.006248585 = product of:
      0.02499434 = sum of:
        0.02499434 = product of:
          0.04998868 = sum of:
            0.04998868 = weight(_text_:22 in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04998868 = score(doc=673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16150339 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046119716 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Library focus. 13/14(1995/96), S.22-25
  17. Chongde, W.; Zhe, W.: Evaluation of the models for Bradford's law (1998) 0.01
    0.006248585 = product of:
      0.02499434 = sum of:
        0.02499434 = product of:
          0.04998868 = sum of:
            0.04998868 = weight(_text_:22 in 3688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04998868 = score(doc=3688,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16150339 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046119716 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3688, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3688)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:12:28
  18. Tijssen, R.J.W.; Wijk, E. van: ¬The global science base of information and communication technologies : bibliometric analysis of ICT research papers (1998) 0.01
    0.006248585 = product of:
      0.02499434 = sum of:
        0.02499434 = product of:
          0.04998868 = sum of:
            0.04998868 = weight(_text_:22 in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04998868 = score(doc=3691,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16150339 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046119716 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:26:54
  19. Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006) 0.01
    0.006248585 = product of:
      0.02499434 = sum of:
        0.02499434 = product of:
          0.04998868 = sum of:
            0.04998868 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04998868 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16150339 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046119716 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    4.12.2006 12:12:22
  20. Rostaing, H.; Barts, N.; Léveillé, V.: Bibliometrics: representation instrument of the multidisciplinary positioning of a scientific area : Implementation for an Advisory Scientific Committee (2007) 0.01
    0.006248585 = product of:
      0.02499434 = sum of:
        0.02499434 = product of:
          0.04998868 = sum of:
            0.04998868 = weight(_text_:22 in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04998868 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16150339 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046119716 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    30.12.2007 11:22:39

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 111
  • d 27
  • ro 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 134
  • el 3
  • m 3
  • s 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…