Search (334 results, page 3 of 17)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Stock, W.G.: Wissenschaftsevaluation : die Bewertung wissenschaftlicher Forschung und Lehre (1994) 0.01
    0.009414398 = product of:
      0.018828796 = sum of:
        0.018828796 = product of:
          0.037657592 = sum of:
            0.037657592 = weight(_text_:m in 242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037657592 = score(doc=242,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08560495 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034400932 = queryNorm
                0.4398997 = fieldWeight in 242, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=242)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    m
  2. Egghe, L.: On the law of Zipf-Mandelbrot for multi-word phrases (1999) 0.01
    0.009414398 = product of:
      0.018828796 = sum of:
        0.018828796 = product of:
          0.037657592 = sum of:
            0.037657592 = weight(_text_:m in 3058) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037657592 = score(doc=3058,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.08560495 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034400932 = queryNorm
                0.4398997 = fieldWeight in 3058, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3058)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article studies the probabilities of the occurence of multi-word (m-word) phrases (m=2,3,...) in relation to the probabilities of occurence of the single words. It is well known that, in the latter case, the lae of Zipf is valid (i.e., a power law). We prove that in the case of m-word phrases (m>=2), this is not the case. We present 2 independent proof of this
  3. Kurtz, M.; Bollen, J.: Usage bibliometrics (2010) 0.01
    0.009414398 = product of:
      0.018828796 = sum of:
        0.018828796 = product of:
          0.037657592 = sum of:
            0.037657592 = weight(_text_:m in 4206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037657592 = score(doc=4206,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08560495 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034400932 = queryNorm
                0.4398997 = fieldWeight in 4206, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4206)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Li, T.-C.: Reference sources in periodicals : research note (1995) 0.01
    0.009321703 = product of:
      0.018643405 = sum of:
        0.018643405 = product of:
          0.03728681 = sum of:
            0.03728681 = weight(_text_:22 in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03728681 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1204662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034400932 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a list of 53 periodicals in 22 subject fields which regularly provide bibliographies of theses, research in progress and patents in their particular subject field. The fields of business, economics, history and literature have most periodical listings of dissertations and theses. Also lists 63 periodicals in 25 sub-disciplines which provide rankings or ratings. Rankings and ratings information predominates in the fields of business, sports and games, finance and banking, and library and information science
  5. Pichappan, P.; Sangaranachiyar, S.: Ageing approach to scientific eponyms (1996) 0.01
    0.009321703 = product of:
      0.018643405 = sum of:
        0.018643405 = product of:
          0.03728681 = sum of:
            0.03728681 = weight(_text_:22 in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03728681 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1204662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034400932 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Report presented at the 16th National Indian Association of Special Libraries and Information Centres Seminar Special Interest Group Meeting on Informatrics in Bombay, 19-22 Dec 94
  6. Mommoh, O.M.: Subject analysis of post-graduate theses in library, archival and information science at Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria (1995/96) 0.01
    0.009321703 = product of:
      0.018643405 = sum of:
        0.018643405 = product of:
          0.03728681 = sum of:
            0.03728681 = weight(_text_:22 in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03728681 = score(doc=673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1204662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034400932 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library focus. 13/14(1995/96), S.22-25
  7. Chongde, W.; Zhe, W.: Evaluation of the models for Bradford's law (1998) 0.01
    0.009321703 = product of:
      0.018643405 = sum of:
        0.018643405 = product of:
          0.03728681 = sum of:
            0.03728681 = weight(_text_:22 in 3688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03728681 = score(doc=3688,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1204662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034400932 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3688, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3688)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:12:28
  8. Tijssen, R.J.W.; Wijk, E. van: ¬The global science base of information and communication technologies : bibliometric analysis of ICT research papers (1998) 0.01
    0.009321703 = product of:
      0.018643405 = sum of:
        0.018643405 = product of:
          0.03728681 = sum of:
            0.03728681 = weight(_text_:22 in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03728681 = score(doc=3691,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1204662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034400932 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:26:54
  9. Rostaing, H.; Barts, N.; Léveillé, V.: Bibliometrics: representation instrument of the multidisciplinary positioning of a scientific area : Implementation for an Advisory Scientific Committee (2007) 0.01
    0.009321703 = product of:
      0.018643405 = sum of:
        0.018643405 = product of:
          0.03728681 = sum of:
            0.03728681 = weight(_text_:22 in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03728681 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1204662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034400932 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30.12.2007 11:22:39
  10. Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014) 0.01
    0.009321703 = product of:
      0.018643405 = sum of:
        0.018643405 = product of:
          0.03728681 = sum of:
            0.03728681 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03728681 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1204662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034400932 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:05:18
  11. Ohly, P.: Dimensions of globality : a bibliometric analysis (2016) 0.01
    0.009321703 = product of:
      0.018643405 = sum of:
        0.018643405 = product of:
          0.03728681 = sum of:
            0.03728681 = weight(_text_:22 in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03728681 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1204662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034400932 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2019 11:22:31
  12. Zhang, Y.: ¬The impact of Internet-based electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science : a citation analysis (1998) 0.01
    0.008239299 = product of:
      0.016478598 = sum of:
        0.016478598 = product of:
          0.032957196 = sum of:
            0.032957196 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032957196 = score(doc=2808,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1204662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034400932 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 1.1999 17:22:22
  13. Crespo, J.A.; Herranz, N.; Li, Y.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: ¬The effect on citation inequality of differences in citation practices at the web of science subject category level (2014) 0.01
    0.008239299 = product of:
      0.016478598 = sum of:
        0.016478598 = product of:
          0.032957196 = sum of:
            0.032957196 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032957196 = score(doc=1291,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1204662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034400932 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article studies the impact of differences in citation practices at the subfield, or Web of Science subject category level, using the model introduced in Crespo, Li, and Ruiz-Castillo (2013a), according to which the number of citations received by an article depends on its underlying scientific influence and the field to which it belongs. We use the same Thomson Reuters data set of about 4.4 million articles used in Crespo et al. (2013a) to analyze 22 broad fields. The main results are the following: First, when the classification system goes from 22 fields to 219 subfields the effect on citation inequality of differences in citation practices increases from ?14% at the field level to 18% at the subfield level. Second, we estimate a set of exchange rates (ERs) over a wide [660, 978] citation quantile interval to express the citation counts of articles into the equivalent counts in the all-sciences case. In the fractional case, for example, we find that in 187 of 219 subfields the ERs are reliable in the sense that the coefficient of variation is smaller than or equal to 0.10. Third, in the fractional case the normalization of the raw data using the ERs (or subfield mean citations) as normalization factors reduces the importance of the differences in citation practices from 18% to 3.8% (3.4%) of overall citation inequality. Fourth, the results in the fractional case are essentially replicated when we adopt a multiplicative approach.
  14. Yan, E.: Finding knowledge paths among scientific disciplines (2014) 0.01
    0.008239299 = product of:
      0.016478598 = sum of:
        0.016478598 = product of:
          0.032957196 = sum of:
            0.032957196 = weight(_text_:22 in 1534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032957196 = score(doc=1534,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1204662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034400932 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1534, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1534)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26.10.2014 20:22:22
  15. Zhu, Q.; Kong, X.; Hong, S.; Li, J.; He, Z.: Global ontology research progress : a bibliometric analysis (2015) 0.01
    0.008239299 = product of:
      0.016478598 = sum of:
        0.016478598 = product of:
          0.032957196 = sum of:
            0.032957196 = weight(_text_:22 in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032957196 = score(doc=2590,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1204662 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034400932 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    17. 9.2018 18:22:23
  16. Christoffersen, M.: Identifying core documents with a multiple evidence relevance filter (2004) 0.01
    0.008237598 = product of:
      0.016475197 = sum of:
        0.016475197 = product of:
          0.032950394 = sum of:
            0.032950394 = weight(_text_:m in 6094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032950394 = score(doc=6094,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08560495 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034400932 = queryNorm
                0.38491225 = fieldWeight in 6094, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6094)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. Herfurth, M.: Voraussetzungen und Entwicklungsperspektiven scientometrischer Analysen auf der Grundlage von Datenbanken (1994) 0.01
    0.008237598 = product of:
      0.016475197 = sum of:
        0.016475197 = product of:
          0.032950394 = sum of:
            0.032950394 = weight(_text_:m in 8824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032950394 = score(doc=8824,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08560495 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034400932 = queryNorm
                0.38491225 = fieldWeight in 8824, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8824)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  18. Sellen, M.K.: Bibliometrics : an annotated bibliography 1970-1990 (1993) 0.01
    0.008237598 = product of:
      0.016475197 = sum of:
        0.016475197 = product of:
          0.032950394 = sum of:
            0.032950394 = weight(_text_:m in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032950394 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08560495 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034400932 = queryNorm
                0.38491225 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    m
  19. Garvey, W.D.: Communication: the essence of science : facilitating information exchange among librarians, scientists, engineers and students (1979) 0.01
    0.008237598 = product of:
      0.016475197 = sum of:
        0.016475197 = product of:
          0.032950394 = sum of:
            0.032950394 = weight(_text_:m in 4318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032950394 = score(doc=4318,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08560495 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034400932 = queryNorm
                0.38491225 = fieldWeight in 4318, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4318)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    m
  20. Stock, W.G.: Themenanalytische informetrische Methoden (1990) 0.01
    0.008237598 = product of:
      0.016475197 = sum of:
        0.016475197 = product of:
          0.032950394 = sum of:
            0.032950394 = weight(_text_:m in 5065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032950394 = score(doc=5065,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08560495 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034400932 = queryNorm
                0.38491225 = fieldWeight in 5065, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5065)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Psychologie und Philosophie der Grazer Schule: eine Dokumentation zu Werk und Wirkungsgeschichte. Hrsg.: M. Stock und W.G. Stock

Languages

  • e 299
  • d 31
  • ? 1
  • chi 1
  • m 1
  • ro 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 306
  • m 25
  • el 4
  • s 4
  • b 1
  • r 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…