Search (119 results, page 5 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Hayer, L.: Lazarsfeld zitiert : eine bibliometrische Analyse (2008) 0.01 
    0.0074199084 = product of:
  0.014839817 = sum of:
    0.014839817 = product of:
      0.029679634 = sum of:
        0.029679634 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029679634 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1534223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04381204 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 6.2008 12:54:12
  2. Meho, L.I.; Rogers, Y.: Citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of human-computer interaction researchers : a comparison of Scopus and Web of Science (2008) 0.01 
    0.0074199084 = product of:
  0.014839817 = sum of:
    0.014839817 = product of:
      0.029679634 = sum of:
        0.029679634 = weight(_text_:22 in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029679634 = score(doc=2352,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1534223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04381204 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This study examines the differences between Scopus and Web of Science in the citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of 22 top human-computer interaction (HCI) researchers from EQUATOR - a large British Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration project. Results indicate that Scopus provides significantly more coverage of HCI literature than Web of Science, primarily due to coverage of relevant ACM and IEEE peer-reviewed conference proceedings. No significant differences exist between the two databases if citations in journals only are compared. Although broader coverage of the literature does not significantly alter the relative citation ranking of individual researchers, Scopus helps distinguish between the researchers in a more nuanced fashion than Web of Science in both citation counting and h-index. Scopus also generates significantly different maps of citation networks of individual scholars than those generated by Web of Science. The study also presents a comparison of h-index scores based on Google Scholar with those based on the union of Scopus and Web of Science. The study concludes that Scopus can be used as a sole data source for citation-based research and evaluation in HCI, especially when citations in conference proceedings are sought, and that researchers should manually calculate h scores instead of relying on system calculations.
  3. Shibata, N.; Kajikawa, Y.; Takeda, Y.; Matsushima, K.: Comparative study on methods of detecting research fronts using different types of citation (2009) 0.01 
    0.0074199084 = product of:
  0.014839817 = sum of:
    0.014839817 = product of:
      0.029679634 = sum of:
        0.029679634 = weight(_text_:22 in 2743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029679634 = score(doc=2743,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1534223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04381204 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2743, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2743)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:52:50
  4. Mukherjee, B.: Do open-access journals in library and information science have any scholarly impact? : a bibliometric study of selected open-access journals using Google Scholar (2009) 0.01 
    0.0074199084 = product of:
  0.014839817 = sum of:
    0.014839817 = product of:
      0.029679634 = sum of:
        0.029679634 = weight(_text_:22 in 2745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029679634 = score(doc=2745,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1534223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04381204 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2745, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2745)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:54:59
  5. Costas, R.; Bordons, M.; Leeuwen, T.N. van; Raan, A.F.J. van: Scaling rules in the science system : Influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of individual researchers (2009) 0.01 
    0.0074199084 = product of:
  0.014839817 = sum of:
    0.014839817 = product of:
      0.029679634 = sum of:
        0.029679634 = weight(_text_:22 in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029679634 = score(doc=2759,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1534223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04381204 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:02:48
  6. Zitt, M.; Lelu, A.; Bassecoulard, E.: Hybrid citation-word representations in science mapping : Portolan charts of research fields? (2011) 0.01 
    0.0074199084 = product of:
  0.014839817 = sum of:
    0.014839817 = product of:
      0.029679634 = sum of:
        0.029679634 = weight(_text_:22 in 4130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029679634 = score(doc=4130,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1534223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04381204 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4130, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4130)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    8. 1.2011 18:22:50
  7. Norris, M.; Oppenheim, C.: ¬The h-index : a broad review of a new bibliometric indicator (2010) 0.01 
    0.0074199084 = product of:
  0.014839817 = sum of:
    0.014839817 = product of:
      0.029679634 = sum of:
        0.029679634 = weight(_text_:22 in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029679634 = score(doc=4147,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1534223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04381204 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    8. 1.2011 19:22:13
  8. Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor : normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science (2011) 0.01 
    0.0074199084 = product of:
  0.014839817 = sum of:
    0.014839817 = product of:
      0.029679634 = sum of:
        0.029679634 = weight(_text_:22 in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029679634 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1534223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04381204 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2011 12:51:07
  9. Liu, D.-R.; Shih, M.-J.: Hybrid-patent classification based on patent-network analysis (2011) 0.01 
    0.0074199084 = product of:
  0.014839817 = sum of:
    0.014839817 = product of:
      0.029679634 = sum of:
        0.029679634 = weight(_text_:22 in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029679634 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1534223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04381204 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2011 13:04:21
  10. Stvilia, B.; Hinnant, C.C.; Schindler, K.; Worrall, A.; Burnett, G.; Burnett, K.; Kazmer, M.M.; Marty, P.F.: Composition of scientific teams and publication productivity at a national science lab (2011) 0.01 
    0.0074199084 = product of:
  0.014839817 = sum of:
    0.014839817 = product of:
      0.029679634 = sum of:
        0.029679634 = weight(_text_:22 in 4191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029679634 = score(doc=4191,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1534223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04381204 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4191, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4191)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2011 13:19:42
  11. Walters, W.H.; Linvill, A.C.: Bibliographic index coverage of open-access journals in six subject areas (2011) 0.01 
    0.0074199084 = product of:
  0.014839817 = sum of:
    0.014839817 = product of:
      0.029679634 = sum of:
        0.029679634 = weight(_text_:22 in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029679634 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1534223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04381204 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    We investigate the extent to which open-access (OA) journals and articles in biology, computer science, economics, history, medicine, and psychology are indexed in each of 11 bibliographic databases. We also look for variations in index coverage by journal subject, journal size, publisher type, publisher size, date of first OA issue, region of publication, language of publication, publication fee, and citation impact factor. Two databases, Biological Abstracts and PubMed, provide very good coverage of the OA journal literature, indexing 60 to 63% of all OA articles in their disciplines. Five databases provide moderately good coverage (22-41%), and four provide relatively poor coverage (0-12%). OA articles in biology journals, English-only journals, high-impact journals, and journals that charge publication fees of $1,000 or more are especially likely to be indexed. Conversely, articles from OA publishers in Africa, Asia, or Central/South America are especially unlikely to be indexed. Four of the 11 databases index commercially published articles at a substantially higher rate than articles published by universities, scholarly societies, nonprofit publishers, or governments. Finally, three databases-EBSCO Academic Search Complete, ProQuest Research Library, and Wilson OmniFile-provide less comprehensive coverage of OA articles than of articles in comparable subscription journals.
  12. Chang, Y.-W.; Huang, M.-H.: ¬A study of the evolution of interdisciplinarity in library and information science : using three bibliometric methods (2012) 0.01 
    0.0074199084 = product of:
  0.014839817 = sum of:
    0.014839817 = product of:
      0.029679634 = sum of:
        0.029679634 = weight(_text_:22 in 4959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029679634 = score(doc=4959,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1534223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04381204 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4959, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4959)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.1, S.22-33
  13. Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.; Wilkinson, D.: Link and co-inlink network diagrams with URL citations or title mentions (2012) 0.01 
    0.0074199084 = product of:
  0.014839817 = sum of:
    0.014839817 = product of:
      0.029679634 = sum of:
        0.029679634 = weight(_text_:22 in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029679634 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1534223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04381204 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    6. 4.2012 18:16:22
  14. Heneberg, P.: Supposedly uncited articles of Nobel laureates and Fields medalists can be prevalently attributed to the errors of omission and commission (2013) 0.01 
    0.0074199084 = product of:
  0.014839817 = sum of:
    0.014839817 = product of:
      0.029679634 = sum of:
        0.029679634 = weight(_text_:22 in 660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029679634 = score(doc=660,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1534223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04381204 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 660, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=660)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:21:46
  15. Lercher, A.: Correlation over time for citations to mathematics articles (2013) 0.01 
    0.0074199084 = product of:
  0.014839817 = sum of:
    0.014839817 = product of:
      0.029679634 = sum of:
        0.029679634 = weight(_text_:22 in 661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029679634 = score(doc=661,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1534223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04381204 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 661, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=661)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:23:35
  16. Schubert, T.; Michels, C.: Placing articles in the large publisher nations : is there a "free lunch" in terms of higher impact? (2013) 0.01 
    0.0074199084 = product of:
  0.014839817 = sum of:
    0.014839817 = product of:
      0.029679634 = sum of:
        0.029679634 = weight(_text_:22 in 669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029679634 = score(doc=669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1534223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04381204 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=669)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:45:49
  17. Liu, S.; Chen, C.: ¬The differences between latent topics in abstracts and citation contexts of citing papers (2013) 0.01 
    0.0074199084 = product of:
  0.014839817 = sum of:
    0.014839817 = product of:
      0.029679634 = sum of:
        0.029679634 = weight(_text_:22 in 671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029679634 = score(doc=671,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1534223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04381204 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 671, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=671)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:50:00
  18. Costas, R.; Zahedi, Z.; Wouters, P.: ¬The thematic orientation of publications mentioned on social media : large-scale disciplinary comparison of social media metrics with citations (2015) 0.01 
    0.0074199084 = product of:
  0.014839817 = sum of:
    0.014839817 = product of:
      0.029679634 = sum of:
        0.029679634 = weight(_text_:22 in 2598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029679634 = score(doc=2598,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1534223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04381204 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2598, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2598)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  19. Moed, H.F.; Halevi, G.: On full text download and citation distributions in scientific-scholarly journals (2016) 0.01 
    0.0074199084 = product of:
  0.014839817 = sum of:
    0.014839817 = product of:
      0.029679634 = sum of:
        0.029679634 = weight(_text_:22 in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029679634 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1534223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04381204 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2016 14:11:17
  20. Kuan, C.-H.; Liu, J.S.: ¬A new approach for main path analysis : decay in knowledge diffusion (2016) 0.01 
    0.0074199084 = product of:
  0.014839817 = sum of:
    0.014839817 = product of:
      0.029679634 = sum of:
        0.029679634 = weight(_text_:22 in 2649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029679634 = score(doc=2649,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1534223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04381204 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2649, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2649)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2016 14:23:00

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 110
  • d 8
  • ro 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 117
  • m 2
  • el 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications