Search (1399 results, page 69 of 70)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Bagrow, J.P.; Rozenfeld, H.D.; Bollt, E.M.; Ben-Avraham, D.: How famous is a scientist? : famous to those who know us (2004) 0.00
    0.0017627061 = product of:
      0.0035254122 = sum of:
        0.0035254122 = product of:
          0.010576236 = sum of:
            0.010576236 = weight(_text_:a in 2497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010576236 = score(doc=2497,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.053039093 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045999072 = queryNorm
                0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 2497, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2497)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Following a recent idea, to measure fame by the number of \Google hits found in a search on the WWW, we study the relation between fame (\Google hits) and merit (number of papers posted on an electronic archive) for a random group of scientists in condensed matter and statistical physics. Our findings show that fame and merit in science are linearly related, and that the probability distribution for a certain level of fame falls off exponentially. This is in sharp contrast with the original findings about WW II ace pilots, for which fame is exponentially related to merit (number of downed planes), and the probability of fame decays in power-law fashion. Other groups in our study show similar patterns of fame as for ace pilots.
  2. Bibliometrische Analysen - ein Beitrag für ein gerechtes Notensystem in der Forschung? : Konferenz in Jülich (2004) 0.00
    0.0017019383 = product of:
      0.0034038767 = sum of:
        0.0034038767 = product of:
          0.005105815 = sum of:
            0.0027027638 = weight(_text_:a in 2296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0027027638 = score(doc=2296,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.053039093 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045999072 = queryNorm
                0.050957955 = fieldWeight in 2296, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2296)
            0.0024030511 = weight(_text_:s in 2296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0024030511 = score(doc=2296,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05001192 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045999072 = queryNorm
                0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 2296, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2296)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    BuB. 56(2004) H.2, S.101
    Type
    a
  3. Glänzel, W.; Debackere, K.: Messen von Wissenschaftlicher Kommunikation und Forschungsleistung : Möglichkeiten und Beschränkungen bibliometrischer Methoden (2005) 0.00
    0.0017019383 = product of:
      0.0034038767 = sum of:
        0.0034038767 = product of:
          0.005105815 = sum of:
            0.0027027638 = weight(_text_:a in 3770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0027027638 = score(doc=3770,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.053039093 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045999072 = queryNorm
                0.050957955 = fieldWeight in 3770, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3770)
            0.0024030511 = weight(_text_:s in 3770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0024030511 = score(doc=3770,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05001192 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045999072 = queryNorm
                0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 3770, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3770)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 58(2005) H.2, S.9-20
    Type
    a
  4. First International Conference on the Evaluation of Research Technology and Development (1995) 0.00
    0.0016992139 = product of:
      0.0033984277 = sum of:
        0.0033984277 = product of:
          0.010195283 = sum of:
            0.010195283 = weight(_text_:s in 415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010195283 = score(doc=415,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05001192 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045999072 = queryNorm
                0.20385705 = fieldWeight in 415, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=415)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Scientometrics. 34(1995) no.3, S.317-539
    Type
    s
  5. Proceedings of the Workshop on 'Bibliometric Standards' (1996) 0.00
    0.0016992139 = product of:
      0.0033984277 = sum of:
        0.0033984277 = product of:
          0.010195283 = sum of:
            0.010195283 = weight(_text_:s in 5072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010195283 = score(doc=5072,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05001192 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045999072 = queryNorm
                0.20385705 = fieldWeight in 5072, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5072)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Scientometrics. 35(1996) no.2, S.167-290
    Type
    s
  6. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators : performance at the national, regional and institutional level, Antwerp, Belgium, October 5-7, 1995 (1996) 0.00
    0.0016992139 = product of:
      0.0033984277 = sum of:
        0.0033984277 = product of:
          0.010195283 = sum of:
            0.010195283 = weight(_text_:s in 6901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010195283 = score(doc=6901,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05001192 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045999072 = queryNorm
                0.20385705 = fieldWeight in 6901, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6901)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Scientometrics. 37(1996) no.2, S.191-380
    Type
    s
  7. Boyce, B.R.; Meadow, C.T.; Kraft, D.H.: Measurement in information science (1994) 0.00
    0.0016992139 = product of:
      0.0033984277 = sum of:
        0.0033984277 = product of:
          0.010195283 = sum of:
            0.010195283 = weight(_text_:s in 4822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010195283 = score(doc=4822,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05001192 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045999072 = queryNorm
                0.20385705 = fieldWeight in 4822, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4822)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez in: JASIS 47(1996) no.3, S.257-258 (V. Raghavan)
    Pages
    XVII,283 S
  8. Stock, W.G.: Wissenschaftsevaluation : die Bewertung wissenschaftlicher Forschung und Lehre (1994) 0.00
    0.0016020341 = product of:
      0.0032040682 = sum of:
        0.0032040682 = product of:
          0.0096122045 = sum of:
            0.0096122045 = weight(_text_:s in 242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0096122045 = score(doc=242,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05001192 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045999072 = queryNorm
                0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 242, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=242)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    126 S
  9. Bhavnani, S.K.; Wilson, C.S.: Information scattering (2009) 0.00
    0.0015766122 = product of:
      0.0031532245 = sum of:
        0.0031532245 = product of:
          0.009459673 = sum of:
            0.009459673 = weight(_text_:a in 3816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009459673 = score(doc=3816,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.053039093 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045999072 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 3816, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3816)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Information scattering is an often observed phenomenon related to information collections where there are a few sources that have many items of relevant information about a topic, while most sources have only a few. This entry discusses the original discovery of the phenomenon, the types of information scattering observed across many different information collections, methods that have been used to analyze the phenomenon, explanations for why and how information scattering occurs, and how these results have informed the design of systems and search strategies. The entry concludes with future challenges related to building computational models to more precisely describe the process of information scatter, and algorithms which help users to gather highly scattered information.
    Type
    a
  10. White, H.D.: Bibliometric overview of information science (2009) 0.00
    0.0015604416 = product of:
      0.0031208831 = sum of:
        0.0031208831 = product of:
          0.009362649 = sum of:
            0.009362649 = weight(_text_:a in 3753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009362649 = score(doc=3753,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.053039093 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045999072 = queryNorm
                0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 3753, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3753)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This entry presents an account of the core concerns of information science through such means as definitional sketches, identification of themes, historical notes, and bibliometric evidence, including a citation-based map of 121 prominent information scientists of the twentieth century. The attempt throughout is to give concrete and pithy descriptions, to provide numerous specific examples, and to take a critical view of certain received language and ideas in library and information science.
    Type
    a
  11. Hertzel, D.H.: Bibliometric research: history (2009) 0.00
    0.0015604416 = product of:
      0.0031208831 = sum of:
        0.0031208831 = product of:
          0.009362649 = sum of:
            0.009362649 = weight(_text_:a in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009362649 = score(doc=3807,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.053039093 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045999072 = queryNorm
                0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Hertzel marshals a vast amount of information on the origins and development of one of the core areas of information science research-bibliometrics, or, as it is also known, informetrics. The study of the statistical properties of the domain of recorded information is a large field with an extensive body of research results.
    Type
    a
  12. Lamb, I.; Larson, C.: Shining a light on scientific data : building a data catalog to foster data sharing and reuse (2016) 0.00
    0.001510891 = product of:
      0.003021782 = sum of:
        0.003021782 = product of:
          0.009065346 = sum of:
            0.009065346 = weight(_text_:a in 3195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009065346 = score(doc=3195,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.053039093 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045999072 = queryNorm
                0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 3195, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3195)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The scientific community's growing eagerness to make research data available to the public provides libraries - with our expertise in metadata and discovery - an interesting new opportunity. This paper details the in-house creation of a "data catalog" which describes datasets ranging from population-level studies like the US Census to small, specialized datasets created by researchers at our own institution. Based on Symfony2 and Solr, the data catalog provides a powerful search interface to help researchers locate the data that can help them, and an administrative interface so librarians can add, edit, and manage metadata elements at will. This paper will outline the successes, failures, and total redos that culminated in the current manifestation of our data catalog.
    Type
    a
  13. Performance measures for government sponsored basic research (1996) 0.00
    0.0014160115 = product of:
      0.002832023 = sum of:
        0.002832023 = product of:
          0.008496068 = sum of:
            0.008496068 = weight(_text_:s in 6695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008496068 = score(doc=6695,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05001192 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045999072 = queryNorm
                0.16988087 = fieldWeight in 6695, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6695)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Scientometrics. 36(1996) no.3, S.281-478
    Type
    s
  14. Proceedings of the sixth conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (1997) 0.00
    0.0014160115 = product of:
      0.002832023 = sum of:
        0.002832023 = product of:
          0.008496068 = sum of:
            0.008496068 = weight(_text_:s in 1037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008496068 = score(doc=1037,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05001192 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045999072 = queryNorm
                0.16988087 = fieldWeight in 1037, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1037)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Scientometrics. 40(1997) no.3, S.357-626
    Type
    s
  15. Proceedings of the sixth conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (1998) 0.00
    0.0014160115 = product of:
      0.002832023 = sum of:
        0.002832023 = product of:
          0.008496068 = sum of:
            0.008496068 = weight(_text_:s in 1038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008496068 = score(doc=1038,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05001192 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045999072 = queryNorm
                0.16988087 = fieldWeight in 1038, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1038)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Scientometrics. 41(1998) nos.1/2, S.5-271
    Type
    s
  16. Garvey, W.D.: Communication: the essence of science : facilitating information exchange among librarians, scientists, engineers and students (1979) 0.00
    0.0014017799 = product of:
      0.0028035599 = sum of:
        0.0028035599 = product of:
          0.008410679 = sum of:
            0.008410679 = weight(_text_:s in 4318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008410679 = score(doc=4318,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05001192 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045999072 = queryNorm
                0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 4318, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4318)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    XII,332 S
  17. Thelwall, M.: Webometrics (2009) 0.00
    0.001351382 = product of:
      0.002702764 = sum of:
        0.002702764 = product of:
          0.008108292 = sum of:
            0.008108292 = weight(_text_:a in 3906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008108292 = score(doc=3906,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.053039093 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045999072 = queryNorm
                0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 3906, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3906)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Webometrics is an information science field concerned with measuring aspects of the World Wide Web (WWW) for a variety of information science research goals. It came into existence about five years after the Web was formed and has since grown to become a significant aspect of information science, at least in terms of published research. Although some webometrics research has focused on the structure or evolution of the Web itself or the performance of commercial search engines, most has used data from the Web to shed light on information provision or online communication in various contexts. Most prominently, techniques have been developed to track, map, and assess Web-based informal scholarly communication, for example, in terms of the hyperlinks between academic Web sites or the online impact of digital repositories. In addition, a range of nonacademic issues and groups of Web users have also been analyzed.
    Type
    a
  18. Herb, U.: Auch Pierre Bourdieu ist ein Indexierungsopfer (2017) 0.00
    0.001351382 = product of:
      0.002702764 = sum of:
        0.002702764 = product of:
          0.008108292 = sum of:
            0.008108292 = weight(_text_:a in 3669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008108292 = score(doc=3669,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.053039093 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045999072 = queryNorm
                0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 3669, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3669)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  19. Wolfram, D.: Applied informetrics for information retrieval research (2003) 0.00
    0.0012015256 = product of:
      0.0024030511 = sum of:
        0.0024030511 = product of:
          0.007209153 = sum of:
            0.007209153 = weight(_text_:s in 4589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007209153 = score(doc=4589,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05001192 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045999072 = queryNorm
                0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 4589, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4589)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    232 S
  20. Gutierres Castanha, R.C.; Hilário, C.M.; Araújo, P.C. de; Cabrini Grácio, M.C.: Citation analysis of North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization (NASKO) Proceedings (2007-2015) (2017) 0.00
    0.0011261515 = product of:
      0.002252303 = sum of:
        0.002252303 = product of:
          0.006756909 = sum of:
            0.006756909 = weight(_text_:a in 3863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006756909 = score(doc=3863,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.053039093 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045999072 = queryNorm
                0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 3863, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3863)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Knowledge Organization (KO) theoretical foundations are still being developed in a continuous process of epistemological, theoretical and methodological consolidation. The remarkable growth of scientific records has stimulated the analysis of this production and the creation of instruments to evaluate the behavior of science became indispensable. We propose the Domain Analysis of KO in North America through the citation analysis of North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization (NASKO) proceedings (2007 - 2015). We present the citation, co-citation and bibliographic coupling analysis to visualize and recognize the researchers that influence the scholarly communication in this domain. The most prolific authors through NASKO conferences are Smiraglia, Tennis, Green, Dousa, Grant Campbell, Pimentel, Beak, La Barre, Kipp and Fox. Regarding their theoretical references, Hjørland, Olson, Smiraglia, and Ranganathan are the authors who most inspired the event's studies. The co-citation network shows the highest frequency is between Olson and Mai, followed by Hjørland and Mai and Beghtol and Mai, consolidating Mai and Hjørland as the central authors of the theoretical references in NASKO. The strongest theoretical proximity in author bibliographic coupling network occurs between Fox and Tennis, Dousa and Tennis, Tennis and Smiraglia, Dousa and Beak, and Pimentel and Tennis, highlighting Tennis as central author, that interconnects the others in relation to KO theoretical references in NASKO. The North American chapter has demonstrated a strong scientific production as well as a high level of concern with theoretical and epistemological questions, gathering researchers from different countries, universities and knowledge areas.
    Type
    a

Languages

Types

  • a 1350
  • m 23
  • el 22
  • s 20
  • r 3
  • x 3
  • b 2
  • More… Less…