-
Vaughan, L.; Shaw, D.: Web citation data for impact assessment : a comparison of four science disciplines (2005)
0.04
0.03700975 = sum of:
0.031909004 = product of:
0.12763602 = sum of:
0.12763602 = weight(_text_:author's in 3880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12763602 = score(doc=3880,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34381044 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.0511611 = queryNorm
0.3712395 = fieldWeight in 3880, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3880)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0051007443 = product of:
0.010201489 = sum of:
0.010201489 = weight(_text_:d in 3880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010201489 = score(doc=3880,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09719954 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0511611 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 3880, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3880)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The number and type of Web citations to journal articles in four areas of science are examined: biology, genetics, medicine, and multidisciplinary sciences. For a sample of 5,972 articles published in 114 journals, the median Web citation counts per journal article range from 6.2 in medicine to 10.4 in genetics. About 30% of Web citations in each area indicate intellectual impact (citations from articles or class readings, in contrast to citations from bibliographic services or the author's or journal's home page). Journals receiving more Web citations also have higher percentages of citations indicating intellectual impact. There is significant correlation between the number of citations reported in the databases from the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI, now Thomson Scientific) and the number of citations retrieved using the Google search engine (Web citations). The correlation is much weaker for journals published outside the United Kingdom or United States and for multidisciplinary journals. Web citation numbers are higher than ISI citation counts, suggesting that Web searches might be conducted for an earlier or a more fine-grained assessment of an article's impact. The Web-evident impact of non-UK/USA publications might provide a balance to the geographic or cultural biases observed in ISI's data, although the stability of Web citation counts is debatable.
-
Vaughan, L.; Shaw , D.: Bibliographic and Web citations : what Is the difference? (2003)
0.04
0.03700975 = sum of:
0.031909004 = product of:
0.12763602 = sum of:
0.12763602 = weight(_text_:author's in 5176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12763602 = score(doc=5176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34381044 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.0511611 = queryNorm
0.3712395 = fieldWeight in 5176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5176)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0051007443 = product of:
0.010201489 = sum of:
0.010201489 = weight(_text_:d in 5176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010201489 = score(doc=5176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09719954 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0511611 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 5176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5176)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Vaughn, and Shaw look at the relationship between traditional citation and Web citation (not hyperlinks but rather textual mentions of published papers). Using English language research journals in ISI's 2000 Journal Citation Report - Information and Library Science category - 1209 full length papers published in 1997 in 46 journals were identified. Each was searched in Social Science Citation Index and on the Web using Google phrase search by entering the title in quotation marks, and followed for distinction where necessary with sub-titles, author's names, and journal title words. After removing obvious false drops, the number of web sites was recorded for comparison with the SSCI counts. A second sample from 1992 was also collected for examination. There were a total of 16,371 web citations to the selected papers. The top and bottom ranked four journals were then examined and every third citation to every third paper was selected and classified as to source type, domain, and country of origin. Web counts are much higher than ISI citation counts. Of the 46 journals from 1997, 26 demonstrated a significant correlation between Web and traditional citation counts, and 11 of the 15 in the 1992 sample also showed significant correlation. Journal impact factor in 1998 and 1999 correlated significantly with average Web citations per journal in the 1997 data, but at a low level. Thirty percent of web citations come from other papers posted on the web, and 30percent from listings of web based bibliographic services, while twelve percent come from class reading lists. High web citation journals often have web accessible tables of content.
-
Falkingham, L.T.; Reeves, R.: Context analysis : a technique for analysing research in a field, applied to literature on the management of R&D at the section level (1998)
0.04
0.036629327 = product of:
0.07325865 = sum of:
0.07325865 = sum of:
0.024737297 = weight(_text_:d in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024737297 = score(doc=3689,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09719954 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0511611 = queryNorm
0.25450015 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
0.04852136 = weight(_text_:22 in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04852136 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17915745 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0511611 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Context analysis is a new method for appraising a body of publications. the process consists of creating a database of attributes assigned to each paper by the reviewer and then looking for interesting relationships in the data. Assigning the attributes requires an understanding of the subject matter of the papers. Presents findings about one particular research field, Management of R&D at the Section Level. The findings support the view that this body of academic publications does not meet the needs of practitioner R&D managers. Discusses practical aspects of how to apply the method in other fields
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:18:46
-
Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006)
0.04
0.03588768 = product of:
0.07177536 = sum of:
0.07177536 = sum of:
0.016322382 = weight(_text_:d in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016322382 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09719954 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0511611 = queryNorm
0.16792654 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
0.05545298 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05545298 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17915745 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0511611 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 4.12.2006 12:12:22
- Language
- d
-
¬Die deutsche Zeitschrift für Dokumentation, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis von 1950 bis 2011 : eine vorläufige Bilanz in vier Abschnitten (2012)
0.03
0.0344816 = product of:
0.0689632 = sum of:
0.0689632 = sum of:
0.027373467 = weight(_text_:d in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027373467 = score(doc=402,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09719954 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0511611 = queryNorm
0.28162137 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.041589733 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041589733 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17915745 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0511611 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2012 19:35:26
- Footnote
- Besteht aus 4 Teilen: Teil 1: Eden, D., A. Arndt, A. Hoffer, T. Raschke u. P. Schön: Die Nachrichten für Dokumentation in den Jahren 1950 bis 1962 (S.159-163). Teil 2: Brose, M., E. durst, D. Nitzsche, D. Veckenstedt u. R. Wein: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1963-1975 (S.164-170). Teil 3: Bösel, J., G. Ebert, P. Garz,, M. Iwanow u. B. Russ: Methoden und Ergebnisse einer statistischen Auswertung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1976 bis 1988 (S.171-174). Teil 4: Engelage, H., S. Jansen, R. Mertins, K. Redel u. S. Ring: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) / "Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis" (IWP) 1989-2011 (S.164-170).
- Language
- d
- Location
- D
-
Schlögl, C.: Internationale Sichtbarkeit der europäischen und insbesondere der deutschsprachigen Informationswissenschaft (2013)
0.03
0.034359638 = product of:
0.068719275 = sum of:
0.068719275 = sum of:
0.020197917 = weight(_text_:d in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020197917 = score(doc=900,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09719954 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0511611 = queryNorm
0.2077985 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
0.04852136 = weight(_text_:22 in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04852136 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17915745 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0511611 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 14:04:09
- Language
- d
- Location
- D
-
Huang, M.-H.; Huang, W.-T.; Chang, C.-C.; Chen, D. Z.; Lin, C.-P.: The greater scattering phenomenon beyond Bradford's law in patent citation (2014)
0.03
0.029451117 = product of:
0.058902234 = sum of:
0.058902234 = sum of:
0.0173125 = weight(_text_:d in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0173125 = score(doc=1352,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09719954 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0511611 = queryNorm
0.178113 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.041589733 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041589733 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17915745 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0511611 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Patent analysis has become important for management as it offers timely and valuable information to evaluate R&D performance and identify the prospects of patents. This study explores the scattering patterns of patent impact based on citations in 3 distinct technological areas, the liquid crystal, semiconductor, and drug technological areas, to identify the core patents in each area. The research follows the approach from Bradford's law, which equally divides total citations into 3 zones. While the result suggests that the scattering of patent citations corresponded with features of Bradford's law, the proportion of patents in the 3 zones did not match the proportion as proposed by the law. As a result, the study shows that the distributions of citations in all 3 areas were more concentrated than what Bradford's law proposed. The Groos (1967) droop was also presented by the scattering of patent citations, and the growth rate of cumulative citation decreased in the third zone.
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:11:29
-
Nicholls, P.T.: Empirical validation of Lotka's law (1986)
0.03
0.02772649 = product of:
0.05545298 = sum of:
0.05545298 = product of:
0.11090596 = sum of:
0.11090596 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11090596 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17915745 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0511611 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.03
0.02772649 = product of:
0.05545298 = sum of:
0.05545298 = product of:
0.11090596 = sum of:
0.11090596 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11090596 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17915745 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0511611 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987)
0.03
0.02772649 = product of:
0.05545298 = sum of:
0.05545298 = product of:
0.11090596 = sum of:
0.11090596 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11090596 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17915745 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0511611 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
-
Ahlgren, P.; Järvelin, K.: Measuring impact of twelve information scientists using the DCI index (2010)
0.03
0.02707569 = product of:
0.05415138 = sum of:
0.05415138 = product of:
0.21660551 = sum of:
0.21660551 = weight(_text_:author's in 3593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21660551 = score(doc=3593,freq=4.0), product of:
0.34381044 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.0511611 = queryNorm
0.63001436 = fieldWeight in 3593, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3593)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The Discounted Cumulated Impact (DCI) index has recently been proposed for research evaluation. In the present work an earlier dataset by Cronin and Meho (2007) is reanalyzed, with the aim of exemplifying the salient features of the DCI index. We apply the index on, and compare our results to, the outcomes of the Cronin-Meho (2007) study. Both authors and their top publications are used as units of analysis, which suggests that, by adjusting the parameters of evaluation according to the needs of research evaluation, the DCI index delivers data on an author's (or publication's) lifetime impact or current impact at the time of evaluation on an author's (or publication's) capability of inviting citations from highly cited later publications as an indication of impact, and on the relative impact across a set of authors (or publications) over their lifetime or currently.
-
Danell, R.: Can the quality of scientific work be predicted using information on the author's track record? (2011)
0.03
0.02707569 = product of:
0.05415138 = sum of:
0.05415138 = product of:
0.21660551 = sum of:
0.21660551 = weight(_text_:author's in 4131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21660551 = score(doc=4131,freq=4.0), product of:
0.34381044 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.0511611 = queryNorm
0.63001436 = fieldWeight in 4131, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4131)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Many countries are moving towards research policies that emphasize excellence; consequently; they develop evaluation systems to identify universities, research groups, and researchers that can be said to be "excellent." Such active research policy strategies, in which evaluations are used to concentrate resources, are based on an unsubstantiated assumption that researchers' track records are indicative of their future research performance. In this study, information on authors' track records (previous publication volume and previous citation rate) is used to predict the impact of their articles. The study concludes that, to a certain degree, the impact of scientific work can be predicted using information on how often an author's previous publications have been cited. The relationship between past performance and the citation rate of articles is strongest at the high end of the citation distribution. The implications of these results are discussed in the context of a cumulative advantage process.
-
H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008)
0.03
0.026915759 = product of:
0.053831518 = sum of:
0.053831518 = sum of:
0.012241785 = weight(_text_:d in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012241785 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09719954 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0511611 = queryNorm
0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.041589733 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041589733 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17915745 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0511611 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 4.2008 19:04:22
- Language
- d
-
Ajiferuke, I.; Lu, K.; Wolfram, D.: ¬A comparison of citer and citation-based measure outcomes for multiple disciplines (2010)
0.03
0.026915759 = product of:
0.053831518 = sum of:
0.053831518 = sum of:
0.012241785 = weight(_text_:d in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012241785 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09719954 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0511611 = queryNorm
0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
0.041589733 = weight(_text_:22 in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041589733 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17915745 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0511611 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 28. 9.2010 12:54:22
-
Hicks, D.; Wang, J.: Coverage and overlap of the new social sciences and humanities journal lists (2011)
0.03
0.026915759 = product of:
0.053831518 = sum of:
0.053831518 = sum of:
0.012241785 = weight(_text_:d in 4192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012241785 = score(doc=4192,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09719954 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0511611 = queryNorm
0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 4192, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4192)
0.041589733 = weight(_text_:22 in 4192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041589733 = score(doc=4192,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17915745 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0511611 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4192, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4192)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 13:21:28
-
Jovanovic, M.: ¬Eine kleine Frühgeschichte der Bibliometrie (2012)
0.03
0.026915759 = product of:
0.053831518 = sum of:
0.053831518 = sum of:
0.012241785 = weight(_text_:d in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012241785 = score(doc=326,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09719954 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0511611 = queryNorm
0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
0.041589733 = weight(_text_:22 in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041589733 = score(doc=326,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17915745 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0511611 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2012 19:23:32
- Language
- d
-
Li, J.; Shi, D.: Sleeping beauties in genius work : when were they awakened? (2016)
0.03
0.026915759 = product of:
0.053831518 = sum of:
0.053831518 = sum of:
0.012241785 = weight(_text_:d in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012241785 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09719954 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0511611 = queryNorm
0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
0.041589733 = weight(_text_:22 in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041589733 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17915745 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0511611 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 14:13:32
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Wagner, C.S.: ¬The relative influences of government funding and international collaboration on citation impact (2019)
0.03
0.026915759 = product of:
0.053831518 = sum of:
0.053831518 = sum of:
0.012241785 = weight(_text_:d in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012241785 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09719954 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0511611 = queryNorm
0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
0.041589733 = weight(_text_:22 in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041589733 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17915745 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0511611 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A recent publication in Nature reports that public R&D funding is only weakly correlated with the citation impact of a nation's articles as measured by the field-weighted citation index (FWCI; defined by Scopus). On the basis of the supplementary data, we up-scaled the design using Web of Science data for the decade 2003-2013 and OECD funding data for the corresponding decade assuming a 2-year delay (2001-2011). Using negative binomial regression analysis, we found very small coefficients, but the effects of international collaboration are positive and statistically significant, whereas the effects of government funding are negative, an order of magnitude smaller, and statistically nonsignificant (in two of three analyses). In other words, international collaboration improves the impact of research articles, whereas more government funding tends to have a small adverse effect when comparing OECD countries.
- Date
- 8. 1.2019 18:22:45
-
Mukherjee, B.: Do open-access journals in library and information science have any scholarly impact? : a bibliometric study of selected open-access journals using Google Scholar (2009)
0.02
0.0245426 = product of:
0.0490852 = sum of:
0.0490852 = sum of:
0.0144270845 = weight(_text_:d in 2745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0144270845 = score(doc=2745,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09719954 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0511611 = queryNorm
0.1484275 = fieldWeight in 2745, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2745)
0.034658115 = weight(_text_:22 in 2745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034658115 = score(doc=2745,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17915745 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0511611 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2745, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2745)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Using 17 fully open-access journals published uninterruptedly during 2000 to 2004 in the field of library and information science, the present study investigates the impact of these open-access journals in terms of quantity of articles published, subject distribution of the articles, synchronous and diachronous impact factor, immediacy index, and journals' and authors' self-citation. The results indicate that during this 5-year publication period, there are as many as 1,636 articles published by these journals. At the same time, the articles have received a total of 8,591 Web citations during a 7-year citation period. Eight of 17 journals have received more than 100 citations. First Monday received the highest number of citations; however, the average number of citations per article was the highest in D-Lib Magazine. The value of the synchronous impact factor varies from 0.6989 to 1.0014 during 2002 to 2005, and the diachronous impact factor varies from 1.472 to 2.487 during 2000 to 2004. The range of the immediacy index varies between 0.0714 and 1.395. D-Lib Magazine has an immediacy index value above 0.5 in all the years whereas the immediacy index value varies from year to year for the other journals. When the citations of sample articles were analyzed according to source, it was found that 40.32% of the citations came from full-text articles, followed by 33.35% from journal articles. The percentage of journals' self-citation was only 6.04%.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 17:54:59
-
Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998)
0.02
0.024506986 = product of:
0.049013972 = sum of:
0.049013972 = product of:
0.098027945 = sum of:
0.098027945 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098027945 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17915745 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0511611 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:22:35
