-
Marchionini, G.: Co-evolution of user and organizational interfaces : a longitudinal case study of WWW dissemination of national statistics (2002)
0.06
0.061644223 = sum of:
0.059757568 = product of:
0.3585454 = sum of:
0.3585454 = weight(_text_:arger in 1252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.3585454 = score(doc=1252,freq=2.0), product of:
0.4374273 = queryWeight, product of:
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.041273445 = queryNorm
0.81966853 = fieldWeight in 1252, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1252)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
0.0018866559 = product of:
0.0037733119 = sum of:
0.0037733119 = weight(_text_:s in 1252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0037733119 = score(doc=1252,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044874042 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.041273445 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 1252, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1252)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The data systems, policies and procedures, corporate culture, and public face of an agency or institution make up its organizational interface. This case study describes how user interfaces for the Bureau of Labor Statistics web site evolved over a 5-year period along with the [arger organizational interface and how this co-evolution has influenced the institution itself. Interviews with BLS staff and transaction log analysis are the foci in this analysis that also included user informationseeking studies and user interface prototyping and testing. The results are organized into a model of organizational interface change and related to the information life cycle.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.14, S.1192-1209
-
Nicholls, P.T.: Empirical validation of Lotka's law (1986)
0.05
0.04904821 = product of:
0.09809642 = sum of:
0.09809642 = sum of:
0.008624713 = weight(_text_:s in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008624713 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044874042 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.041273445 = queryNorm
0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
0.08947171 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08947171 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14453258 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041273445 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419
-
Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987)
0.05
0.04904821 = product of:
0.09809642 = sum of:
0.09809642 = sum of:
0.008624713 = weight(_text_:s in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008624713 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044874042 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.041273445 = queryNorm
0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.08947171 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08947171 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14453258 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041273445 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
-
Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994)
0.04
0.044480145 = product of:
0.08896029 = sum of:
0.08896029 = sum of:
0.010672539 = weight(_text_:s in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010672539 = score(doc=5666,freq=4.0), product of:
0.044874042 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.041273445 = queryNorm
0.23783323 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
0.07828775 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07828775 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14453258 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041273445 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
- Pages
- 185 S
-
Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990)
0.04
0.04291719 = product of:
0.08583438 = sum of:
0.08583438 = sum of:
0.0075466237 = weight(_text_:s in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0075466237 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044874042 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.041273445 = queryNorm
0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
0.07828775 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07828775 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14453258 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041273445 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:55:29
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 41(1990) no.5, S.368-375
-
Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : II. Resilience to ambiguity (1990)
0.04
0.04291719 = product of:
0.08583438 = sum of:
0.08583438 = sum of:
0.0075466237 = weight(_text_:s in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0075466237 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044874042 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.041273445 = queryNorm
0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
0.07828775 = weight(_text_:22 in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07828775 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14453258 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041273445 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:55:55
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 41(1990) no.5, S.376-386
-
Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998)
0.04
0.042236507 = product of:
0.084473014 = sum of:
0.084473014 = sum of:
0.0053904457 = weight(_text_:s in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0053904457 = score(doc=3690,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044874042 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.041273445 = queryNorm
0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
0.07908257 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07908257 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14453258 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041273445 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:22:35
- Source
- Scientometrics. 42(1998) no.2, S.259-265
-
Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005)
0.04
0.036786158 = product of:
0.073572315 = sum of:
0.073572315 = sum of:
0.0064685345 = weight(_text_:s in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0064685345 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044874042 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.041273445 = queryNorm
0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
0.06710378 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06710378 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14453258 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041273445 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2007 17:02:22
- Source
- Aslib proceedings. 57(2005) no.3, S.200-
-
Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014)
0.04
0.036786158 = product of:
0.073572315 = sum of:
0.073572315 = sum of:
0.0064685345 = weight(_text_:s in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0064685345 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044874042 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.041273445 = queryNorm
0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
0.06710378 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06710378 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14453258 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041273445 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 18. 3.2014 19:13:22
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.4, S.866-867
-
Ahlgren, P.; Järvelin, K.: Measuring impact of twelve information scientists using the DCI index (2010)
0.03
0.030741004 = sum of:
0.02912387 = product of:
0.17474322 = sum of:
0.17474322 = weight(_text_:author's in 3593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17474322 = score(doc=3593,freq=4.0), product of:
0.27736387 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.041273445 = queryNorm
0.63001436 = fieldWeight in 3593, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3593)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
0.0016171336 = product of:
0.0032342672 = sum of:
0.0032342672 = weight(_text_:s in 3593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0032342672 = score(doc=3593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044874042 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.041273445 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3593)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The Discounted Cumulated Impact (DCI) index has recently been proposed for research evaluation. In the present work an earlier dataset by Cronin and Meho (2007) is reanalyzed, with the aim of exemplifying the salient features of the DCI index. We apply the index on, and compare our results to, the outcomes of the Cronin-Meho (2007) study. Both authors and their top publications are used as units of analysis, which suggests that, by adjusting the parameters of evaluation according to the needs of research evaluation, the DCI index delivers data on an author's (or publication's) lifetime impact or current impact at the time of evaluation on an author's (or publication's) capability of inviting citations from highly cited later publications as an indication of impact, and on the relative impact across a set of authors (or publications) over their lifetime or currently.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.7, S.1424-1439
-
Danell, R.: Can the quality of scientific work be predicted using information on the author's track record? (2011)
0.03
0.030741004 = sum of:
0.02912387 = product of:
0.17474322 = sum of:
0.17474322 = weight(_text_:author's in 4131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17474322 = score(doc=4131,freq=4.0), product of:
0.27736387 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.041273445 = queryNorm
0.63001436 = fieldWeight in 4131, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4131)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
0.0016171336 = product of:
0.0032342672 = sum of:
0.0032342672 = weight(_text_:s in 4131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0032342672 = score(doc=4131,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044874042 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.041273445 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 4131, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4131)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Many countries are moving towards research policies that emphasize excellence; consequently; they develop evaluation systems to identify universities, research groups, and researchers that can be said to be "excellent." Such active research policy strategies, in which evaluations are used to concentrate resources, are based on an unsubstantiated assumption that researchers' track records are indicative of their future research performance. In this study, information on authors' track records (previous publication volume and previous citation rate) is used to predict the impact of their articles. The study concludes that, to a certain degree, the impact of scientific work can be predicted using information on how often an author's previous publications have been cited. The relationship between past performance and the citation rate of articles is strongest at the high end of the citation distribution. The implications of these results are discussed in the context of a cumulative advantage process.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.1, S.50-60
-
He, S.; Spink, A.: ¬A comparison of foreign authorship distribution in JASIST and the Journal of Documentation (2002)
0.03
0.026694102 = sum of:
0.024025967 = product of:
0.1441558 = sum of:
0.1441558 = weight(_text_:author's in 5230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1441558 = score(doc=5230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27736387 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.041273445 = queryNorm
0.51973534 = fieldWeight in 5230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5230)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
0.0026681346 = product of:
0.0053362693 = sum of:
0.0053362693 = weight(_text_:s in 5230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0053362693 = score(doc=5230,freq=4.0), product of:
0.044874042 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.041273445 = queryNorm
0.118916616 = fieldWeight in 5230, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5230)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- He and Spink count the first authors in JASIST and JDoc from 1950 to 1999 whose affiliation is outside the country of origin of each publication and record the time period and the author's geographic location. Foreign authorship in JASIST increased nearly four fold from 1995 to 1999 and the number of represented locations 3.6 times while in the same time period JDoc's foreign authorship doubled and foreign locations increased four fold. The largest foreign location for JDoc is the USA and the largest foreign location for JASIST is the UK. Canada is second on both lists.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 53(2002) no.11, S.953-959
-
Scholarly metrics under the microscope : from citation analysis to academic auditing (2015)
0.03
0.02610254 = product of:
0.05220508 = sum of:
0.05220508 = sum of:
0.007469221 = weight(_text_:s in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007469221 = score(doc=4654,freq=6.0), product of:
0.044874042 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.041273445 = queryNorm
0.1664486 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
0.044735856 = weight(_text_:22 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044735856 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14453258 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041273445 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2017 17:12:50
- Footnote
- Rez. in JASIST 67(2017) no.2, S.537-538 (Ronald Rousseau).
- Pages
- 976 S
- Type
- s
-
Lardy, J.P.; Herzhaft, L.: Bibliometric treatments according to bibliographic errors and data heterogenity : the end-user point of view (1992)
0.03
0.025912624 = sum of:
0.024025967 = product of:
0.1441558 = sum of:
0.1441558 = weight(_text_:author's in 5064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1441558 = score(doc=5064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27736387 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.041273445 = queryNorm
0.51973534 = fieldWeight in 5064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5064)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
0.0018866559 = product of:
0.0037733119 = sum of:
0.0037733119 = weight(_text_:s in 5064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0037733119 = score(doc=5064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044874042 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.041273445 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 5064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5064)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The quality of online and CD-ROM databases is far from satisfactory. Errors are frequently found in listings from online searches. Spelling mistakes are the most common but there are also more misleading errors such as variations of an author's name or absence of homogenity in the content of certain field. Describes breifly a bibliometric study of large amounts of data downloaded from databases to investigate bibliographic errors and data heterogeneity. Recommends that database producers should consider either the implementation of a common format or the recommendations of the Société Française de Bibliométrie
- Pages
- S.547-556
-
Crispo, E.: ¬A new index to use in conjunction with the h-index to account for an author's relative contribution to publications with high impact (2015)
0.03
0.025912624 = sum of:
0.024025967 = product of:
0.1441558 = sum of:
0.1441558 = weight(_text_:author's in 2264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1441558 = score(doc=2264,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27736387 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.041273445 = queryNorm
0.51973534 = fieldWeight in 2264, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2264)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
0.0018866559 = product of:
0.0037733119 = sum of:
0.0037733119 = weight(_text_:s in 2264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0037733119 = score(doc=2264,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044874042 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.041273445 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 2264, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2264)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.11, S.2381-2383
-
Rousseau, R.; Zuccala, A.: ¬A classification of author co-citations : definitions and search strategies (2004)
0.03
0.025617503 = sum of:
0.024269892 = product of:
0.14561935 = sum of:
0.14561935 = weight(_text_:author's in 2266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14561935 = score(doc=2266,freq=4.0), product of:
0.27736387 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.041273445 = queryNorm
0.52501196 = fieldWeight in 2266, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2266)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
0.0013476114 = product of:
0.0026952229 = sum of:
0.0026952229 = weight(_text_:s in 2266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0026952229 = score(doc=2266,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044874042 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.041273445 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2266, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2266)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The term author co-citation is defined and classified according to four distinct forms: the pure first-author co-citation, the pure author co-citation, the general author co-citation, and the special co-authorlco-citation. Each form can be used to obtain one count in an author co-citation study, based an a binary counting rule, which either recognizes the co-citedness of two authors in a given reference list (1) or does not (0). Most studies using author co-citations have relied solely an first-author cocitation counts as evidence of an author's oeuvre or body of work contributed to a research field. In this article, we argue that an author's contribution to a selected field of study should not be limited, but should be based an his/her complete list of publications, regardless of author ranking. We discuss the implications associated with using each co-citation form and show where simple first-author co-citations fit within our classification scheme. Examples are given to substantiate each author co-citation form defined in our classification, including a set of sample Dialog(TM) searches using references extracted from the SciSearch database.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 55(2004) no.6, S.513-529
-
Hyland, K.: Self-citation and self-reference : credibility and promotion in academic publication (2003)
0.03
0.025617503 = sum of:
0.024269892 = product of:
0.14561935 = sum of:
0.14561935 = weight(_text_:author's in 5156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14561935 = score(doc=5156,freq=4.0), product of:
0.27736387 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.041273445 = queryNorm
0.52501196 = fieldWeight in 5156, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5156)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
0.0013476114 = product of:
0.0026952229 = sum of:
0.0026952229 = weight(_text_:s in 5156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0026952229 = score(doc=5156,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044874042 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.041273445 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 5156, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5156)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Hyland examines self referencing practices by analyzing their textual uses in 240 randomly chosen research papers and 800 abstracts across 80 expert selected journals from 1997 and 1998 in eight disciplines, as a key to their author's assumptions as to their own role in the research process and to the practices of their disciplines. Scanned texts produced a corpus of nearly 1.5 million words which was searched using WordPilot for first person pronouns and all mentions of an author's previous work. There were 6,689 instances of self reference in the papers and 459 in the abstracts; on the average 28 cases per paper, 17% of which were self citations. There was one self mention in every two abstracts. Nearly 70% of self reference and mention occurred in humanities and social science papers, but biologists employed the most self citation overall and 12% of hard science citations were found to be self citations. Interviews indicated that self citation was deemed important in establishing authority by fitting oneself into the research framework. Self mention arises in four main contexts: stating the goal or the structure of the paper, explaining a procedure, stating results or a claim, and elaborating an argument.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.3, S.251-259
-
Pichappan, P.; Sangaranachiyar, S.: Ageing approach to scientific eponyms (1996)
0.03
0.025417225 = product of:
0.05083445 = sum of:
0.05083445 = sum of:
0.006098593 = weight(_text_:s in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006098593 = score(doc=80,freq=4.0), product of:
0.044874042 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.041273445 = queryNorm
0.1359047 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
0.044735856 = weight(_text_:22 in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044735856 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14453258 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041273445 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Report presented at the 16th National Indian Association of Special Libraries and Information Centres Seminar Special Interest Group Meeting on Informatrics in Bombay, 19-22 Dec 94
- Source
- IASLIC bulletin. 41(1996) no.1, S.37-38
-
Raan, A.F.J. van: Statistical properties of bibliometric indicators : research group indicator distributions and correlations (2006)
0.03
0.025341906 = product of:
0.05068381 = sum of:
0.05068381 = sum of:
0.0032342672 = weight(_text_:s in 5275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0032342672 = score(doc=5275,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044874042 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.041273445 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 5275, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5275)
0.047449544 = weight(_text_:22 in 5275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047449544 = score(doc=5275,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14453258 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041273445 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 5275, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5275)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 16:20:22
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.3, S.408-430
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.03
0.025341906 = product of:
0.05068381 = sum of:
0.05068381 = sum of:
0.0032342672 = weight(_text_:s in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0032342672 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044874042 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.041273445 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.047449544 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047449544 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14453258 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041273445 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.858-862
