-
¬Die deutsche Zeitschrift für Dokumentation, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis von 1950 bis 2011 : eine vorläufige Bilanz in vier Abschnitten (2012)
0.07
0.066905126 = product of:
0.13381025 = sum of:
0.13381025 = sum of:
0.04262501 = weight(_text_:j in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04262501 = score(doc=402,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14308962 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.2978903 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.054577794 = weight(_text_:p in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054577794 = score(doc=402,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1619138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.33707932 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.03660744 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03660744 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15769506 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/iwp.2012.63.issue-3/iwp-2012-0037/iwp-2012-0037.xml?format=INT.
- Date
- 22. 7.2012 19:35:26
- Footnote
- Besteht aus 4 Teilen: Teil 1: Eden, D., A. Arndt, A. Hoffer, T. Raschke u. P. Schön: Die Nachrichten für Dokumentation in den Jahren 1950 bis 1962 (S.159-163). Teil 2: Brose, M., E. durst, D. Nitzsche, D. Veckenstedt u. R. Wein: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1963-1975 (S.164-170). Teil 3: Bösel, J., G. Ebert, P. Garz,, M. Iwanow u. B. Russ: Methoden und Ergebnisse einer statistischen Auswertung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1976 bis 1988 (S.171-174). Teil 4: Engelage, H., S. Jansen, R. Mertins, K. Redel u. S. Ring: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) / "Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis" (IWP) 1989-2011 (S.164-170).
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.06
0.059331443 = product of:
0.11866289 = sum of:
0.11866289 = product of:
0.17799433 = sum of:
0.08037449 = weight(_text_:j in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08037449 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14308962 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.09761984 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09761984 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15769506 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987)
0.06
0.059331443 = product of:
0.11866289 = sum of:
0.11866289 = product of:
0.17799433 = sum of:
0.08037449 = weight(_text_:j in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08037449 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14308962 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.09761984 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09761984 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15769506 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
-
Albarrán, P.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: References made and citations received by scientific articles (2011)
0.05
0.0526701 = product of:
0.1053402 = sum of:
0.1053402 = sum of:
0.030140433 = weight(_text_:j in 4185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030140433 = score(doc=4185,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14308962 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 4185, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4185)
0.038592324 = weight(_text_:p in 4185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038592324 = score(doc=4185,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1619138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 4185, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4185)
0.03660744 = weight(_text_:22 in 4185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03660744 = score(doc=4185,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15769506 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4185, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4185)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article studies massive evidence about references made and citations received after a 5-year citation window by 3.7 million articles published in 1998 to 2002 in 22 scientific fields. We find that the distributions of references made and citations received share a number of basic features across sciences. Reference distributions are rather skewed to the right while citation distributions are even more highly skewed: The mean is about 20 percentage points to the right of the median, and articles with a remarkable or an outstanding number of citations represent about 9% of the total. Moreover, the existence of a power law representing the upper tail of citation distributions cannot be rejected in 17 fields whose articles represent 74.7% of the total. Contrary to the evidence in other contexts, the value of the scale parameter is above 3.5 in 13 of the 17 cases. Finally, power laws are typically small, but capture a considerable proportion of the total citations received.
-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Abdoli, M.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: Why are coauthored academic articles more cited : higher quality or larger audience? (2023)
0.04
0.04389175 = product of:
0.0877835 = sum of:
0.0877835 = sum of:
0.025117027 = weight(_text_:j in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025117027 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14308962 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
0.03216027 = weight(_text_:p in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03216027 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1619138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
0.030506201 = weight(_text_:22 in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030506201 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15769506 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 18:11:50
-
Pichappan, P.; Sangaranachiyar, S.: Ageing approach to scientific eponyms (1996)
0.03
0.03342212 = product of:
0.06684424 = sum of:
0.06684424 = product of:
0.10026635 = sum of:
0.051456433 = weight(_text_:p in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051456433 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1619138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.31780142 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
0.04880992 = weight(_text_:22 in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04880992 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15769506 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Report presented at the 16th National Indian Association of Special Libraries and Information Centres Seminar Special Interest Group Meeting on Informatrics in Bombay, 19-22 Dec 94
-
Ohly, P.: Dimensions of globality : a bibliometric analysis (2016)
0.03
0.03342212 = product of:
0.06684424 = sum of:
0.06684424 = product of:
0.10026635 = sum of:
0.051456433 = weight(_text_:p in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051456433 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1619138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.31780142 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
0.04880992 = weight(_text_:22 in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04880992 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15769506 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2019 11:22:31
-
Frandsen, T.F.; Nicolaisen, J.: ¬The ripple effect : citation chain reactions of a nobel prize (2013)
0.03
0.026410818 = product of:
0.052821636 = sum of:
0.052821636 = product of:
0.079232454 = sum of:
0.04262501 = weight(_text_:j in 654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04262501 = score(doc=654,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14308962 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.2978903 = fieldWeight in 654, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=654)
0.03660744 = weight(_text_:22 in 654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03660744 = score(doc=654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15769506 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=654)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper explores the possible citation chain reactions of a Nobel Prize using the mathematician Robert J. Aumann as a case example. The results show that the award of the Nobel Prize in 2005 affected not only the citations to his work, but also affected the citations to the references in his scientific oeuvre. The results indicate that the spillover effect is almost as powerful as the effect itself. We are consequently able to document a ripple effect in which the awarding of the Nobel Prize ignites a citation chain reaction to Aumann's scientific oeuvre and to the references in its nearest citation network. The effect is discussed using innovation decision process theory as a point of departure to identify the factors that created a bandwagon effect leading to the reported observations.
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 16:21:09
-
Schlögl, C.: Internationale Sichtbarkeit der europäischen und insbesondere der deutschsprachigen Informationswissenschaft (2013)
0.03
0.025957506 = product of:
0.051915012 = sum of:
0.051915012 = product of:
0.077872515 = sum of:
0.03516384 = weight(_text_:j in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03516384 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14308962 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
0.04270868 = weight(_text_:22 in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04270868 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15769506 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Eine englische Version dieses Beitrags erscheint unter dem Titel "International visibility of European and in particular German language publications in library and information science" im Tagungsband des 13. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2013). Vgl.: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/iwp.2013.64.issue-1/iwp-2013-0001/iwp-2013-0001.xml?format=INT.
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 14:04:09
-
Huang, M.-H.; Huang, W.-T.; Chang, C.-C.; Chen, D. Z.; Lin, C.-P.: The greater scattering phenomenon beyond Bradford's law in patent citation (2014)
0.03
0.02506659 = product of:
0.05013318 = sum of:
0.05013318 = product of:
0.07519977 = sum of:
0.038592324 = weight(_text_:p in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038592324 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1619138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.03660744 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03660744 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15769506 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:11:29
-
Kronegger, L.; Mali, F.; Ferligoj, A.; Doreian, P.: Classifying scientific disciplines in Slovenia : a study of the evolution of collaboration structures (2015)
0.03
0.02506659 = product of:
0.05013318 = sum of:
0.05013318 = product of:
0.07519977 = sum of:
0.038592324 = weight(_text_:p in 1639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038592324 = score(doc=1639,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1619138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 1639, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1639)
0.03660744 = weight(_text_:22 in 1639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03660744 = score(doc=1639,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15769506 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1639, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1639)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 21. 1.2015 14:55:22
-
Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.: Mendeley readership counts : an investigation of temporal and disciplinary differences (2016)
0.03
0.02506659 = product of:
0.05013318 = sum of:
0.05013318 = product of:
0.07519977 = sum of:
0.038592324 = weight(_text_:p in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038592324 = score(doc=3211,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1619138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
0.03660744 = weight(_text_:22 in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03660744 = score(doc=3211,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15769506 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16.11.2016 11:07:22
-
Newby, G.B.; Greenberg, J.; Jones, P.: Open source software development and Lotka's law : bibliometric patterns in programming (2003)
0.02
0.022910919 = product of:
0.045821838 = sum of:
0.045821838 = product of:
0.06873275 = sum of:
0.030140433 = weight(_text_:j in 5140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030140433 = score(doc=5140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14308962 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 5140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5140)
0.038592324 = weight(_text_:p in 5140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038592324 = score(doc=5140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1619138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 5140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5140)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Albarrán, P.; Perianes-Rodríguez, A.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: Differences in citation impact across countries (2015)
0.02
0.022910919 = product of:
0.045821838 = sum of:
0.045821838 = product of:
0.06873275 = sum of:
0.030140433 = weight(_text_:j in 1665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030140433 = score(doc=1665,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14308962 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 1665, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1665)
0.038592324 = weight(_text_:p in 1665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038592324 = score(doc=1665,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1619138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 1665, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1665)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Tang, L.; Shapira, P.; Youtie, J.: Is there a clubbing effect underlying Chinese research citation increases? (2015)
0.02
0.022910919 = product of:
0.045821838 = sum of:
0.045821838 = product of:
0.06873275 = sum of:
0.030140433 = weight(_text_:j in 2169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030140433 = score(doc=2169,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14308962 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 2169, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2169)
0.038592324 = weight(_text_:p in 2169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038592324 = score(doc=2169,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1619138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 2169, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2169)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Crespo, J.A.; Herranz, N.; Li, Y.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: ¬The effect on citation inequality of differences in citation practices at the web of science subject category level (2014)
0.02
0.022753103 = product of:
0.045506205 = sum of:
0.045506205 = product of:
0.068259306 = sum of:
0.025117027 = weight(_text_:j in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025117027 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14308962 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
0.04314228 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04314228 = score(doc=1291,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15769506 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article studies the impact of differences in citation practices at the subfield, or Web of Science subject category level, using the model introduced in Crespo, Li, and Ruiz-Castillo (2013a), according to which the number of citations received by an article depends on its underlying scientific influence and the field to which it belongs. We use the same Thomson Reuters data set of about 4.4 million articles used in Crespo et al. (2013a) to analyze 22 broad fields. The main results are the following: First, when the classification system goes from 22 fields to 219 subfields the effect on citation inequality of differences in citation practices increases from ?14% at the field level to 18% at the subfield level. Second, we estimate a set of exchange rates (ERs) over a wide [660, 978] citation quantile interval to express the citation counts of articles into the equivalent counts in the all-sciences case. In the fractional case, for example, we find that in 187 of 219 subfields the ERs are reliable in the sense that the coefficient of variation is smaller than or equal to 0.10. Third, in the fractional case the normalization of the raw data using the ERs (or subfield mean citations) as normalization factors reduces the importance of the differences in citation practices from 18% to 3.8% (3.4%) of overall citation inequality. Fourth, the results in the fractional case are essentially replicated when we adopt a multiplicative approach.
-
Zhu, Q.; Kong, X.; Hong, S.; Li, J.; He, Z.: Global ontology research progress : a bibliometric analysis (2015)
0.02
0.022753103 = product of:
0.045506205 = sum of:
0.045506205 = product of:
0.068259306 = sum of:
0.025117027 = weight(_text_:j in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025117027 = score(doc=2590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14308962 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
0.04314228 = weight(_text_:22 in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04314228 = score(doc=2590,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15769506 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
17. 9.2018 18:22:23
-
Cheng, S.; YunTao, P.; JunPeng, Y.; Hong, G.; ZhengLu, Y.; ZhiYu, H.: PageRank, HITS and impact factor for journal ranking (2009)
0.02
0.022560371 = product of:
0.045120742 = sum of:
0.045120742 = product of:
0.06768111 = sum of:
0.03552084 = weight(_text_:j in 2513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03552084 = score(doc=2513,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14308962 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.2482419 = fieldWeight in 2513, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2513)
0.03216027 = weight(_text_:p in 2513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03216027 = score(doc=2513,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1619138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 2513, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2513)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Journal citation measures are one of the most widely used bibliometric tools. The most well-known measure is the ISI Impact Factor, under the standard definition, the impact factor of journal j in a given year is the average number of citations received by papers published in the previous two years of journal j. However, the impact factor has its "intrinsic" limitations, it is a ranking measure based fundamentally on a pure counting of the in-degrees of nodes in the network, and its calculation does not take into account the "impact" or "prestige" of the journals in which the citations appear. Google's PageRank algorithm and Kleinberg's HITS method are webpage ranking algorithm, they compute the scores of webpages based on a combination of the number of hyperlinks that point to the page and the status of pages that the hyperlinks originate from, a page is important if it is pointed to by other important pages. We demonstrate how popular webpage algorithm PageRank and HITS can be used ranking journal, and we compared ISI impact factor, PageRank and HITS for journal ranking, and with PageRank and HITS compute respectively including self-citation and non self-citation, and discussed the merit and shortcomings and the scope of application that the various algorithms are used to rank journal.
-
Min, C.; Ding, Y.; Li, J.; Bu, Y.; Pei, L.; Sun, J.: Innovation or imitation : the diffusion of citations (2018)
0.02
0.022560371 = product of:
0.045120742 = sum of:
0.045120742 = product of:
0.06768111 = sum of:
0.03552084 = weight(_text_:j in 4445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03552084 = score(doc=4445,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14308962 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.2482419 = fieldWeight in 4445, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4445)
0.03216027 = weight(_text_:p in 4445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03216027 = score(doc=4445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1619138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 4445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4445)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Citations in scientific literature are important both for tracking the historical development of scientific ideas and for forecasting research trends. However, the diffusion mechanisms underlying the citation process remain poorly understood, despite the frequent and longstanding use of citation counts for assessment purposes within the scientific community. Here, we extend the study of citation dynamics to a more general diffusion process to understand how citation growth associates with different diffusion patterns. Using a classic diffusion model, we quantify and illustrate specific diffusion mechanisms which have been proven to exert a significant impact on the growth and decay of citation counts. Experiments reveal a positive relation between the "low p and low q" pattern and high scientific impact. A sharp citation peak produced by rapid change of citation counts, however, has a negative effect on future impact. In addition, we have suggested a simple indicator, saturation level, to roughly estimate an individual article's current stage in the life cycle and its potential to attract future attention. The proposed approach can also be extended to higher levels of aggregation (e.g., individual scientists, journals, institutions), providing further insights into the practice of scientific evaluation.
-
Kreider, J.: ¬The correlation of local citation data with citation data from Journal Citation Reports (1999)
0.02
0.022249293 = product of:
0.044498585 = sum of:
0.044498585 = product of:
0.066747874 = sum of:
0.030140433 = weight(_text_:j in 102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030140433 = score(doc=102,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14308962 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 102, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=102)
0.03660744 = weight(_text_:22 in 102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03660744 = score(doc=102,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15769506 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04503219 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 102, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=102)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
