Search (279 results, page 1 of 14)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Falkingham, L.T.; Reeves, R.: Context analysis : a technique for analysing research in a field, applied to literature on the management of R&D at the section level (1998) 0.06
    0.06025981 = product of:
      0.12051962 = sum of:
        0.12051962 = sum of:
          0.07727864 = weight(_text_:r in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07727864 = score(doc=3689,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045593463 = queryNorm
              0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
          0.04324099 = weight(_text_:22 in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04324099 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15966053 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045593463 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Context analysis is a new method for appraising a body of publications. the process consists of creating a database of attributes assigned to each paper by the reviewer and then looking for interesting relationships in the data. Assigning the attributes requires an understanding of the subject matter of the papers. Presents findings about one particular research field, Management of R&D at the Section Level. The findings support the view that this body of academic publications does not meet the needs of practitioner R&D managers. Discusses practical aspects of how to apply the method in other fields
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:18:46
  2. Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014) 0.05
    0.04678875 = product of:
      0.0935775 = sum of:
        0.0935775 = sum of:
          0.04415922 = weight(_text_:r in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04415922 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045593463 = queryNorm
              0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
          0.049418278 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049418278 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15966053 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045593463 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:05:18
  3. ¬Die deutsche Zeitschrift für Dokumentation, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis von 1950 bis 2011 : eine vorläufige Bilanz in vier Abschnitten (2012) 0.04
    0.041950814 = product of:
      0.08390163 = sum of:
        0.08390163 = sum of:
          0.046837922 = weight(_text_:r in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046837922 = score(doc=402,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045593463 = queryNorm
              0.3103367 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.037063707 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037063707 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15966053 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045593463 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:35:26
    Footnote
    Besteht aus 4 Teilen: Teil 1: Eden, D., A. Arndt, A. Hoffer, T. Raschke u. P. Schön: Die Nachrichten für Dokumentation in den Jahren 1950 bis 1962 (S.159-163). Teil 2: Brose, M., E. durst, D. Nitzsche, D. Veckenstedt u. R. Wein: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1963-1975 (S.164-170). Teil 3: Bösel, J., G. Ebert, P. Garz,, M. Iwanow u. B. Russ: Methoden und Ergebnisse einer statistischen Auswertung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1976 bis 1988 (S.171-174). Teil 4: Engelage, H., S. Jansen, R. Mertins, K. Redel u. S. Ring: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) / "Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis" (IWP) 1989-2011 (S.164-170).
  4. Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003) 0.04
    0.039396457 = product of:
      0.078792915 = sum of:
        0.078792915 = sum of:
          0.054083776 = weight(_text_:r in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.054083776 = score(doc=5171,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045593463 = queryNorm
              0.358346 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
          0.024709139 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024709139 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15966053 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045593463 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Ahlgren, Jarneving, and. Rousseau review accepted procedures for author co-citation analysis first pointing out that since in the raw data matrix the row and column values are identical i,e, the co-citation count of two authors, there is no clear choice for diagonal values. They suggest the number of times an author has been co-cited with himself excluding self citation rather than the common treatment as zeros or as missing values. When the matrix is converted to a similarity matrix the normal procedure is to create a matrix of Pearson's r coefficients between data vectors. Ranking by r and by co-citation frequency and by intuition can easily yield three different orders. It would seem necessary that the adding of zeros to the matrix will not affect the value or the relative order of similarity measures but it is shown that this is not the case with Pearson's r. Using 913 bibliographic descriptions form the Web of Science of articles form JASIS and Scientometrics, authors names were extracted, edited and 12 information retrieval authors and 12 bibliometric authors each from the top 100 most cited were selected. Co-citation and r value (diagonal elements treated as missing) matrices were constructed, and then reconstructed in expanded form. Adding zeros can both change the r value and the ordering of the authors based upon that value. A chi-squared distance measure would not violate these requirements, nor would the cosine coefficient. It is also argued that co-citation data is ordinal data since there is no assurance of an absolute zero number of co-citations, and thus Pearson is not appropriate. The number of ties in co-citation data make the use of the Spearman rank order coefficient problematic.
    Date
    9. 7.2006 10:22:35
  5. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996) 0.04
    0.03509156 = product of:
      0.07018312 = sum of:
        0.07018312 = sum of:
          0.033119414 = weight(_text_:r in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033119414 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045593463 = queryNorm
              0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
          0.037063707 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037063707 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15966053 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045593463 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170
  6. Asonuma, A.; Fang, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Reflections on the age distribution of Japanese scientists (2006) 0.04
    0.03509156 = product of:
      0.07018312 = sum of:
        0.07018312 = sum of:
          0.033119414 = weight(_text_:r in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033119414 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045593463 = queryNorm
              0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
          0.037063707 = weight(_text_:22 in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037063707 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15966053 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045593463 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:26:24
  7. Raan, A.F.J. van: Scaling rules in the science system : influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of research groups (2008) 0.04
    0.03509156 = product of:
      0.07018312 = sum of:
        0.07018312 = sum of:
          0.033119414 = weight(_text_:r in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033119414 = score(doc=2758,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045593463 = queryNorm
              0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
          0.037063707 = weight(_text_:22 in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037063707 = score(doc=2758,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15966053 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045593463 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:03:12
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Costas, R., M. Bordons u. T.N. van Leeuwen u.a.: Scaling rules in the science system: Influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of individual researchers. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.740-753.
  8. Huang, M.-H.; Huang, W.-T.; Chang, C.-C.; Chen, D. Z.; Lin, C.-P.: The greater scattering phenomenon beyond Bradford's law in patent citation (2014) 0.04
    0.03509156 = product of:
      0.07018312 = sum of:
        0.07018312 = sum of:
          0.033119414 = weight(_text_:r in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033119414 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045593463 = queryNorm
              0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
          0.037063707 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037063707 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15966053 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045593463 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Patent analysis has become important for management as it offers timely and valuable information to evaluate R&D performance and identify the prospects of patents. This study explores the scattering patterns of patent impact based on citations in 3 distinct technological areas, the liquid crystal, semiconductor, and drug technological areas, to identify the core patents in each area. The research follows the approach from Bradford's law, which equally divides total citations into 3 zones. While the result suggests that the scattering of patent citations corresponded with features of Bradford's law, the proportion of patents in the 3 zones did not match the proportion as proposed by the law. As a result, the study shows that the distributions of citations in all 3 areas were more concentrated than what Bradford's law proposed. The Groos (1967) droop was also presented by the scattering of patent citations, and the growth rate of cumulative citation decreased in the third zone.
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:11:29
  9. Ntuli, H.; Inglesi-Lotz, R.; Chang, T.; Pouris, A.: Does research output cause economic growth or vice versa? : evidence from 34 OECD countries (2015) 0.04
    0.03509156 = product of:
      0.07018312 = sum of:
        0.07018312 = sum of:
          0.033119414 = weight(_text_:r in 2132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033119414 = score(doc=2132,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045593463 = queryNorm
              0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 2132, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2132)
          0.037063707 = weight(_text_:22 in 2132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037063707 = score(doc=2132,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15966053 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045593463 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2132, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2132)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8. 7.2015 22:00:42
  10. Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Wagner, C.S.: ¬The relative influences of government funding and international collaboration on citation impact (2019) 0.04
    0.03509156 = product of:
      0.07018312 = sum of:
        0.07018312 = sum of:
          0.033119414 = weight(_text_:r in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033119414 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045593463 = queryNorm
              0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
          0.037063707 = weight(_text_:22 in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037063707 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15966053 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045593463 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A recent publication in Nature reports that public R&D funding is only weakly correlated with the citation impact of a nation's articles as measured by the field-weighted citation index (FWCI; defined by Scopus). On the basis of the supplementary data, we up-scaled the design using Web of Science data for the decade 2003-2013 and OECD funding data for the corresponding decade assuming a 2-year delay (2001-2011). Using negative binomial regression analysis, we found very small coefficients, but the effects of international collaboration are positive and statistically significant, whereas the effects of government funding are negative, an order of magnitude smaller, and statistically nonsignificant (in two of three analyses). In other words, international collaboration improves the impact of research articles, whereas more government funding tends to have a small adverse effect when comparing OECD countries.
    Date
    8. 1.2019 18:22:45
  11. Hjerppe, R.: ¬An outline of bibliometrics and citation analysis (1980) 0.03
    0.031225283 = product of:
      0.062450565 = sum of:
        0.062450565 = product of:
          0.12490113 = sum of:
            0.12490113 = weight(_text_:r in 1115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12490113 = score(doc=1115,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045593463 = queryNorm
                0.8275646 = fieldWeight in 1115, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1115)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    r
  12. Ball, R.: Wissenschaftsindikatoren im Zeitalter digitaler Wissenschaft (2007) 0.03
    0.029242966 = product of:
      0.058485933 = sum of:
        0.058485933 = sum of:
          0.027599512 = weight(_text_:r in 875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027599512 = score(doc=875,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045593463 = queryNorm
              0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 875, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=875)
          0.030886423 = weight(_text_:22 in 875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030886423 = score(doc=875,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15966053 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045593463 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 875, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=875)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    23.12.2007 19:22:21
  13. Costas, R.; Bordons, M.; Leeuwen, T.N. van; Raan, A.F.J. van: Scaling rules in the science system : Influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of individual researchers (2009) 0.03
    0.029242966 = product of:
      0.058485933 = sum of:
        0.058485933 = sum of:
          0.027599512 = weight(_text_:r in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027599512 = score(doc=2759,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045593463 = queryNorm
              0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
          0.030886423 = weight(_text_:22 in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030886423 = score(doc=2759,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15966053 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045593463 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:02:48
  14. Liu, D.-R.; Shih, M.-J.: Hybrid-patent classification based on patent-network analysis (2011) 0.03
    0.029242966 = product of:
      0.058485933 = sum of:
        0.058485933 = sum of:
          0.027599512 = weight(_text_:r in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027599512 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045593463 = queryNorm
              0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
          0.030886423 = weight(_text_:22 in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030886423 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15966053 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045593463 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 13:04:21
  15. Costas, R.; Zahedi, Z.; Wouters, P.: ¬The thematic orientation of publications mentioned on social media : large-scale disciplinary comparison of social media metrics with citations (2015) 0.03
    0.029242966 = product of:
      0.058485933 = sum of:
        0.058485933 = sum of:
          0.027599512 = weight(_text_:r in 2598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027599512 = score(doc=2598,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045593463 = queryNorm
              0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 2598, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2598)
          0.030886423 = weight(_text_:22 in 2598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030886423 = score(doc=2598,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15966053 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045593463 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2598, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2598)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  16. Cerda-Cosme, R.; Méndez, E.: Analysis of shared research data in Spanish scientific papers about COVID-19 : a first approach (2023) 0.03
    0.029242966 = product of:
      0.058485933 = sum of:
        0.058485933 = sum of:
          0.027599512 = weight(_text_:r in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027599512 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045593463 = queryNorm
              0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
          0.030886423 = weight(_text_:22 in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030886423 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15966053 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045593463 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    21. 3.2023 19:22:02
  17. Nicholls, P.T.: Empirical validation of Lotka's law (1986) 0.02
    0.024709139 = product of:
      0.049418278 = sum of:
        0.049418278 = product of:
          0.098836556 = sum of:
            0.098836556 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098836556 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15966053 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045593463 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419
  18. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.02
    0.024709139 = product of:
      0.049418278 = sum of:
        0.049418278 = product of:
          0.098836556 = sum of:
            0.098836556 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098836556 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15966053 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045593463 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  19. Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987) 0.02
    0.024709139 = product of:
      0.049418278 = sum of:
        0.049418278 = product of:
          0.098836556 = sum of:
            0.098836556 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098836556 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15966053 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045593463 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
  20. Costas, R.; Perianes-Rodríguez, A.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: On the quest for currencies of science : field "exchange rates" for citations and Mendeley readership (2017) 0.02
    0.023394374 = product of:
      0.04678875 = sum of:
        0.04678875 = sum of:
          0.02207961 = weight(_text_:r in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02207961 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045593463 = queryNorm
              0.14629413 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
          0.024709139 = weight(_text_:22 in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024709139 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15966053 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045593463 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 255
  • d 21
  • m 1
  • ro 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 269
  • m 5
  • r 4
  • el 2
  • s 2
  • More… Less…