-
Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013)
0.07
0.07204164 = product of:
0.28816655 = sum of:
0.28816655 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.28816655 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38455155 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0453587 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Content
- Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
-
Boyack; K.W.; Börner, K.: Indicator-assisted evaluation and funding of research : visualizing the influence of grants on the number and citation counts of research papers (2003)
0.05
0.048512544 = product of:
0.19405018 = sum of:
0.19405018 = weight(_text_:assisted in 1471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19405018 = score(doc=1471,freq=4.0), product of:
0.30640912 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
0.0453587 = queryNorm
0.6333042 = fieldWeight in 1471, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1471)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This article reports research an analyzing and visualizing the impact of governmental funding an the amount and citation counts of research publications. For the first time, grant and publication data appear interlinked in one map. We start with an overview of related work and a discussion of available techniques. A concrete example- grant and publication data from Behavioral and Social Science Research, one of four extramural research programs at the National Institute an Aging (NIA)-is analyzed and visualized using the Vxlnsight® visualization tool. The analysis also illustrates current existing problems related to the quality and existence of data, data analysis, and processing. The article concludes with a list of recommendations an how to improve the quality of grant-publication maps and a discussion of research challenges for indicator-assisted evaluation and funding of research.
-
Craven, T.C.: Determining authorship of Web pages (2006)
0.04
0.040020805 = product of:
0.16008322 = sum of:
0.16008322 = weight(_text_:assisted in 1498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16008322 = score(doc=1498,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30640912 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
0.0453587 = queryNorm
0.52244925 = fieldWeight in 1498, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1498)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Assignability of authors to Web pages using either normal browsing procedures or browsing assisted by simple automatic extraction was investigated. Candidate strings for 1000 pages were extracted automatically from title elements, meta-tags, and address-like and copyright-like passages; 539 of the pages produced at least one candidate: 310 candidates from titles, 66 from meta-tags, 91 from address-like passages, and 259 from copyright-like passages. An assistant attempted to identify personal authors for 943 pages by examining the pages themselves and related pages; this added 90 pages with authors to the pages from which no candidate strings were extracted. Specific problems are noted and some refinements to the extraction methods are suggested.
-
Coleman, A.: Self-archiving and the copyright transfer agreements of ISI-ranked library and information science journals : analytic advantages (2007)
0.02
0.015494664 = product of:
0.061978657 = sum of:
0.061978657 = product of:
0.12395731 = sum of:
0.12395731 = weight(_text_:instructions in 72) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12395731 = score(doc=72,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31902805 = queryWeight, product of:
7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
0.0453587 = queryNorm
0.38854676 = fieldWeight in 72, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=72)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- A study of Thomson-Scientific ISI ranked Library and Information Science (LIS) journals (n=52) is reported. The study examined the stances of publishers as expressed in the Copyright Transfer Agreements (CTAs) of the journals toward self-archiving, the practice of depositing digital copies of one's works in an Open Archives Initiative (OAI)-compliant open access repository. Sixty-two percent (32) do not make their CTAs available on the open Web; 38% (20) do. Of the 38% that do make CTAs available, two are open access journals. Of the 62% that do not have a publicly available CTA, 40% are silent about self-archiving. Even among the 20 journal CTAs publicly available there is a high level of ambiguity. Closer examination augmented by publisher policy documents on copyright, self-archiving, and instructions to authors reveals that only five, 10% of the ISI-ranked LIS journals in the study, actually prohibit self-archiving by publisher rule. Copyright is a moving target, but publishers appear to be acknowledging that copyright and open access can co-exist in scholarly journal publishing. The ambivalence of LIS journal publishers provides unique opportunities to members of the community. Authors can self-archive in open access archives. A societyled, global scholarly communication consortium can engage in the strategic building of the LIS information commons. Aggregating OAI-compliant archives and developing disciplinary-specific library services for an LIS commons has the potential to increase the field's research impact and visibility. It may also ameliorate its own scholarly communication and publishing systems and serve as a model for others.
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Moya-Anegón, F. de; Guerrero-Bote, V.P.: Journal maps, interactive overlays, and the measurement of interdisciplinarity on the basis of Scopus data (1996-2012) (2015)
0.02
0.015494664 = product of:
0.061978657 = sum of:
0.061978657 = product of:
0.12395731 = sum of:
0.12395731 = weight(_text_:instructions in 1814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12395731 = score(doc=1814,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31902805 = queryWeight, product of:
7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
0.0453587 = queryNorm
0.38854676 = fieldWeight in 1814, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.033448 = idf(docFreq=105, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1814)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Using Scopus data, we construct a global map of science based on aggregated journal-journal citations from 1996-2012 (N of journals?=?20,554). This base map enables users to overlay downloads from Scopus interactively. Using a single year (e.g., 2012), results can be compared with mappings based on the Journal Citation Reports at the Web of Science (N?=?10,936). The Scopus maps are more detailed at both the local and global levels because of their greater coverage, including, for example, the arts and humanities. The base maps can be interactively overlaid with journal distributions in sets downloaded from Scopus, for example, for the purpose of portfolio analysis. Rao-Stirling diversity can be used as a measure of interdisciplinarity in the sets under study. Maps at the global and the local level, however, can be very different because of the different levels of aggregation involved. Two journals, for example, can both belong to the humanities in the global map, but participate in different specialty structures locally. The base map and interactive tools are available online (with instructions) at http://www.leydesdorff.net/scopus_ovl.
-
Nicholls, P.T.: Empirical validation of Lotka's law (1986)
0.01
0.0122909555 = product of:
0.049163822 = sum of:
0.049163822 = product of:
0.098327644 = sum of:
0.098327644 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098327644 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15883844 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0453587 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.01
0.0122909555 = product of:
0.049163822 = sum of:
0.049163822 = product of:
0.098327644 = sum of:
0.098327644 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098327644 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15883844 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0453587 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987)
0.01
0.0122909555 = product of:
0.049163822 = sum of:
0.049163822 = product of:
0.098327644 = sum of:
0.098327644 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098327644 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15883844 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0453587 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
-
Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998)
0.01
0.010863772 = product of:
0.043455087 = sum of:
0.043455087 = product of:
0.08691017 = sum of:
0.08691017 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08691017 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15883844 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0453587 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:22:35
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.01
0.010863772 = product of:
0.043455087 = sum of:
0.043455087 = product of:
0.08691017 = sum of:
0.08691017 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08691017 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15883844 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0453587 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994)
0.01
0.010754585 = product of:
0.04301834 = sum of:
0.04301834 = product of:
0.08603668 = sum of:
0.08603668 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08603668 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15883844 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0453587 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
-
Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990)
0.01
0.010754585 = product of:
0.04301834 = sum of:
0.04301834 = product of:
0.08603668 = sum of:
0.08603668 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08603668 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15883844 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0453587 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:55:29
-
Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : II. Resilience to ambiguity (1990)
0.01
0.010754585 = product of:
0.04301834 = sum of:
0.04301834 = product of:
0.08603668 = sum of:
0.08603668 = weight(_text_:22 in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08603668 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15883844 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0453587 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:55:55
-
Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005)
0.01
0.009218216 = product of:
0.036872864 = sum of:
0.036872864 = product of:
0.07374573 = sum of:
0.07374573 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07374573 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15883844 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0453587 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 20. 1.2007 17:02:22
-
Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014)
0.01
0.009218216 = product of:
0.036872864 = sum of:
0.036872864 = product of:
0.07374573 = sum of:
0.07374573 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07374573 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15883844 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0453587 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 18. 3.2014 19:13:22
-
Raan, A.F.J. van: Statistical properties of bibliometric indicators : research group indicator distributions and correlations (2006)
0.01
0.006518264 = product of:
0.026073055 = sum of:
0.026073055 = product of:
0.05214611 = sum of:
0.05214611 = weight(_text_:22 in 5275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05214611 = score(doc=5275,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15883844 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0453587 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 5275, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5275)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 16:20:22
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.01
0.006518264 = product of:
0.026073055 = sum of:
0.026073055 = product of:
0.05214611 = sum of:
0.05214611 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05214611 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15883844 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0453587 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
-
Li, T.-C.: Reference sources in periodicals : research note (1995)
0.01
0.0061454778 = product of:
0.024581911 = sum of:
0.024581911 = product of:
0.049163822 = sum of:
0.049163822 = weight(_text_:22 in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049163822 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15883844 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0453587 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Presents a list of 53 periodicals in 22 subject fields which regularly provide bibliographies of theses, research in progress and patents in their particular subject field. The fields of business, economics, history and literature have most periodical listings of dissertations and theses. Also lists 63 periodicals in 25 sub-disciplines which provide rankings or ratings. Rankings and ratings information predominates in the fields of business, sports and games, finance and banking, and library and information science
-
Pichappan, P.; Sangaranachiyar, S.: Ageing approach to scientific eponyms (1996)
0.01
0.0061454778 = product of:
0.024581911 = sum of:
0.024581911 = product of:
0.049163822 = sum of:
0.049163822 = weight(_text_:22 in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049163822 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15883844 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0453587 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Footnote
- Report presented at the 16th National Indian Association of Special Libraries and Information Centres Seminar Special Interest Group Meeting on Informatrics in Bombay, 19-22 Dec 94
-
Mommoh, O.M.: Subject analysis of post-graduate theses in library, archival and information science at Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria (1995/96)
0.01
0.0061454778 = product of:
0.024581911 = sum of:
0.024581911 = product of:
0.049163822 = sum of:
0.049163822 = weight(_text_:22 in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049163822 = score(doc=673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15883844 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0453587 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Library focus. 13/14(1995/96), S.22-25
