-
Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013)
0.07
0.07232265 = product of:
0.2892906 = sum of:
0.2892906 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2892906 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3860516 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04553563 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Content
- Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
-
Tüür-Fröhlich, T.: Closed vs. Open Access : Szientometrische Untersuchung dreier sozialwissenschaftlicher Zeitschriften aus der Genderperspektive (2011)
0.05
0.046331644 = product of:
0.18532658 = sum of:
0.18532658 = weight(_text_:sozialer in 4505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18532658 = score(doc=4505,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3303262 = queryWeight, product of:
7.2542357 = idf(docFreq=84, maxDocs=44218)
0.04553563 = queryNorm
0.5610411 = fieldWeight in 4505, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.2542357 = idf(docFreq=84, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4505)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Der Artikel ist Teil einer größeren Untersuchung zu den Potentialen von Open Access Publishing zur Erhöhung der Publikations- und damit Karrierechancen von Sozialwissenschaftlerinnen. Es werden drei inhaltlich und methodisch ähnliche sozialwissenschaftliche Zeitschriften verglichen: das Open-Access-Journal "Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung" ("FQS") und die zwei Closed-Access-/Hybridjournale "Zeitschrift für qualitative Forschung" und "Sozialer Sinn". Erhoben wird (a) der jeweilige Frauenanteil unter Redaktions- und Beiratsmitgliedern dieser drei Zeitschriften (N=184 insgesamt), (b) aufwändig rekonstruiert und analysiert wird die Genderstruktur der Autorenschaften aller in den drei Zeitschriften zwischen 2000 und 2008 veröffentlichten Beiträge (Totalerhebung, N=1557 insgesamt).
-
Coulter, N.; Monarch, I.; Konda, S.: Software engineering as seen through its research literature : a study in co-word analysis (1998)
0.01
0.013714332 = product of:
0.05485733 = sum of:
0.05485733 = product of:
0.10971466 = sum of:
0.10971466 = weight(_text_:software in 2161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10971466 = score(doc=2161,freq=6.0), product of:
0.18064676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.04553563 = queryNorm
0.6073436 = fieldWeight in 2161, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2161)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This empirical research demonstrates the effectiveness of content analysis to map the research literature of the software engineering discipline. The results suggest that certain research themes in software engineering have remained constant, but with changing thrusts
-
Cobo, M.J.; López-Herrera, A.G.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Herrera, F.: Science mapping software tools : review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools (2011)
0.01
0.013714332 = product of:
0.05485733 = sum of:
0.05485733 = product of:
0.10971466 = sum of:
0.10971466 = weight(_text_:software in 4486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10971466 = score(doc=4486,freq=6.0), product of:
0.18064676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.04553563 = queryNorm
0.6073436 = fieldWeight in 4486, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4486)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Science mapping aims to build bibliometric maps that describe how specific disciplines, scientific domains, or research fields are conceptually, intellectually, and socially structured. Different techniques and software tools have been proposed to carry out science mapping analysis. The aim of this article is to review, analyze, and compare some of these software tools, taking into account aspects such as the bibliometric techniques available and the different kinds of analysis.
-
Ravichandra Rao, I.K.; Sahoo, B.B.: Studies and research in informetrics at the Documentation Research and Training Centre (DRTC), ISI Bangalore (2006)
0.01
0.013278846 = product of:
0.053115383 = sum of:
0.053115383 = product of:
0.106230766 = sum of:
0.106230766 = weight(_text_:software in 1512) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.106230766 = score(doc=1512,freq=10.0), product of:
0.18064676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.04553563 = queryNorm
0.58805794 = fieldWeight in 1512, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1512)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Contributions of DRTC to informetric studies and research are discussed. A report on recent work - a quantitative country-wise analysis of software literature based on the data from two bibliographic databases i.e. COMPENDEX and INSPEC is presented. The number of countries involved in R & D activities in software in the most productive group is increasing. The research contribution on software is decreasing in developed countries as compared to that in developing and less developed countries. India 's contribution is only 1.1% and it has remained constant over the period of 12 years 1989-2001. The number of countries involved in R&D activities in software has been increasing in the 1990s. It is also noted that higher the budget for higher education, higher the number of publications; and that higher the number of publications, higher the export as well as the domestic consumption of software.
-
Marion, L.S.; McCain, K.W.: Contrasting views of software engineering journals : author cocitation choices and indexer vocabulary assignments (2001)
0.01
0.013093118 = product of:
0.05237247 = sum of:
0.05237247 = product of:
0.10474494 = sum of:
0.10474494 = weight(_text_:software in 5767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10474494 = score(doc=5767,freq=14.0), product of:
0.18064676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.04553563 = queryNorm
0.5798329 = fieldWeight in 5767, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5767)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- We explore the intellectual subject structure and research themes in software engineering through the identification and analysis of a core journal literature. We examine this literature via two expert perspectives: that of the author, who identified significant work by citing it (journal cocitation analysis), and that of the professional indexer, who tags published work with subject terms to facilitate retrieval from a bibliographic database (subject profile analysis). The data sources are SCISEARCH (the on-line version of Science Citation Index), and INSPEC (a database covering software engineering, computer science, and information systems). We use data visualization tools (cluster analysis, multidimensional scaling, and PFNets) to show the "intellectual maps" of software engineering. Cocitation and subject profile analyses demonstrate that software engineering is a distinct interdisciplinary field, valuing practical and applied aspects, and spanning a subject continuum from "programming-in-the-smalI" to "programming-in-the-large." This continuum mirrors the software development life cycle by taking the operating system or major application from initial programming through project management, implementation, and maintenance. Object orientation is an integral but distinct subject area in software engineering. Key differences are the importance of management and programming: (1) cocitation analysis emphasizes project management and systems development; (2) programming techniques/languages are more influential in subject profiles; (3) cocitation profiles place object-oriented journals separately and centrally while the subject profile analysis locates these journals with the programming/languages group
-
Nicholls, P.T.: Empirical validation of Lotka's law (1986)
0.01
0.012338899 = product of:
0.049355596 = sum of:
0.049355596 = product of:
0.09871119 = sum of:
0.09871119 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09871119 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15945803 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04553563 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.01
0.012338899 = product of:
0.049355596 = sum of:
0.049355596 = product of:
0.09871119 = sum of:
0.09871119 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09871119 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15945803 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04553563 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987)
0.01
0.012338899 = product of:
0.049355596 = sum of:
0.049355596 = product of:
0.09871119 = sum of:
0.09871119 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09871119 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15945803 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04553563 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
-
Cobo, M.J.; López-Herrera, A.G.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Herrera, F.: SciMAT: A new science mapping analysis software tool (2012)
0.01
0.01200004 = product of:
0.04800016 = sum of:
0.04800016 = product of:
0.09600032 = sum of:
0.09600032 = weight(_text_:software in 373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09600032 = score(doc=373,freq=6.0), product of:
0.18064676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.04553563 = queryNorm
0.53142565 = fieldWeight in 373, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=373)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This article presents a new open-source software tool, SciMAT, which performs science mapping analysis within a longitudinal framework. It provides different modules that help the analyst to carry out all the steps of the science mapping workflow. In addition, SciMAT presents three key features that are remarkable in respect to other science mapping software tools: (a) a powerful preprocessing module to clean the raw bibliographical data, (b) the use of bibliometric measures to study the impact of each studied element, and (c) a wizard to configure the analysis.
-
Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998)
0.01
0.010906149 = product of:
0.043624595 = sum of:
0.043624595 = product of:
0.08724919 = sum of:
0.08724919 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08724919 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15945803 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04553563 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:22:35
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.01
0.010906149 = product of:
0.043624595 = sum of:
0.043624595 = product of:
0.08724919 = sum of:
0.08724919 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08724919 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15945803 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04553563 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994)
0.01
0.010796537 = product of:
0.043186147 = sum of:
0.043186147 = product of:
0.08637229 = sum of:
0.08637229 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08637229 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15945803 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04553563 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
-
Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990)
0.01
0.010796537 = product of:
0.043186147 = sum of:
0.043186147 = product of:
0.08637229 = sum of:
0.08637229 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08637229 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15945803 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04553563 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:55:29
-
Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : II. Resilience to ambiguity (1990)
0.01
0.010796537 = product of:
0.043186147 = sum of:
0.043186147 = product of:
0.08637229 = sum of:
0.08637229 = weight(_text_:22 in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08637229 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15945803 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04553563 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:55:55
-
Newby, G.B.; Greenberg, J.; Jones, P.: Open source software development and Lotka's law : bibliometric patterns in programming (2003)
0.01
0.010285749 = product of:
0.041142996 = sum of:
0.041142996 = product of:
0.08228599 = sum of:
0.08228599 = weight(_text_:software in 5140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08228599 = score(doc=5140,freq=6.0), product of:
0.18064676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.04553563 = queryNorm
0.4555077 = fieldWeight in 5140, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5140)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Newby, Greenberg, and Jones analyze programming productivity of open source software by counting registered developers contributions found in the Linux Software Map and in Scourceforge. Using seven years of data from a subset of the Linux directory tree LSM data provided 4503 files with 3341 unique author names. The distribution follows Lotka's Law with an exponent of 2.82 as verified by the Kolmolgorov-Smirnov one sample goodness of fit test. Scourceforge data is broken into developers and administrators, but when both were used as authors the Lotka distribution exponent of 2.55 produces the lowest error. This would not be significant by the K-S test but the 3.54% maximum error would indicate a fit and calls into question the appropriateness of K-S for large populations of authors.
-
Garfield, E.; Paris, S.W.; Stock, W.G.: HistCite(TM) : a software tool for informetric analysis of citation linkage (2006)
0.01
0.009797992 = product of:
0.03919197 = sum of:
0.03919197 = product of:
0.07838394 = sum of:
0.07838394 = weight(_text_:software in 79) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07838394 = score(doc=79,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18064676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.04553563 = queryNorm
0.43390724 = fieldWeight in 79, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=79)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- HistCite(TM) is a software tool for analyzing and visualizing direct citation linkages between scientific papers. Its inputs are bibliographic records (with cited references) from "Web of Knowledge" or other sources. Its outputs are various tables and graphs with informetric indicators about the knowledge domain under study. As an example we analyze informetrically the literature about Alexius Meinong, an Austrian philosopher and psychologist. The article shortly discusses the informetric functionality of "Web of Knowledge" and shows broadly the possibilities that HistCite offers to its users (e.g. scientists, scientometricans and science journalists).
-
Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005)
0.01
0.009254174 = product of:
0.037016697 = sum of:
0.037016697 = product of:
0.074033394 = sum of:
0.074033394 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074033394 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15945803 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04553563 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 20. 1.2007 17:02:22
-
Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014)
0.01
0.009254174 = product of:
0.037016697 = sum of:
0.037016697 = product of:
0.074033394 = sum of:
0.074033394 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074033394 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15945803 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04553563 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 18. 3.2014 19:13:22
-
Kopcsa, A.; Schiebel, E.: Science and technology mapping : a new iteration model for representing multidimensional relationships (1998)
0.01
0.00839828 = product of:
0.03359312 = sum of:
0.03359312 = product of:
0.06718624 = sum of:
0.06718624 = weight(_text_:software in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06718624 = score(doc=326,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18064676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.04553563 = queryNorm
0.3719205 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Much effort has been done to develop more objective quantitative methods to analyze and integrate survey information for understanding research trends and research structures. Co-word analysis is one class of techniques that exploits the use of co-occurences of items in written information. However, there are some bottlenecks in using statistical methods to produce mappings of reduced information in a comfortable manner. On one hand, often used statistical software for PCs has restrictions for the amount for calculable data; on the other hand, the results of the mufltidimensional scaling routines are not quite satisfying. Therefore, this article introduces a new iteration model for the calculation of co-word maps that eases the problem. The iteration model is for positioning the words in the two-dimensional plane due to their connections to each other, and its consists of a quick and stabile algorithm that has been implemented with software for personal computers. A graphic module represents the data in well-known 'technology maps'
