Search (131 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013) 0.30 
    0.2975944 = product of:
  0.6943869 = sum of:
    0.2314623 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2314623 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.30888104 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036433198 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
    0.2314623 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2314623 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.30888104 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036433198 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
    0.2314623 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2314623 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.30888104 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036433198 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
  2. Luukkonen, T.: Why has Latour's theory of citation been ignored by the bibliometric community? : Discussion od sociological interpretations of citation analysis (1997) 0.02 
    0.023541965 = product of:
  0.16479374 = sum of:
    0.16479374 = weight(_text_:interpretations in 406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16479374 = score(doc=406,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26062825 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036433198 = queryNorm
        0.63229424 = fieldWeight in 406, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=406)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  3. Egghe, L.: Zipfian and Lotkaian continuous concentration theory (2005) 0.02 
    0.017656473 = product of:
  0.12359531 = sum of:
    0.12359531 = weight(_text_:interpretations in 3678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12359531 = score(doc=3678,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26062825 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036433198 = queryNorm
        0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 3678, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3678)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    In this article concentration (i.e., inequality) aspects of the functions of Zipf and of Lotka are studied. Since both functions are power laws (i.e., they are mathematically the same) it suffices to develop one concentration theory for power laws and apply it twice for the different interpretations of the laws of Zipf and Lotka. After a brief repetition of the functional relationships between Zipf's law and Lotka's law, we prove that Price's law of concentration is equivalent with Zipf's law. A major part of this article is devoted to the development of continuous concentration theory, based an Lorenz curves. The Lorenz curve for power functions is calculated and, based an this, some important concentration measures such as the ones of Gini, Theil, and the variation coefficient. Using Lorenz curves, it is shown that the concentration of a power law increases with its exponent and this result is interpreted in terms of the functions of Zipf and Lotka.
  4. Sugimoto, C.R.; Work, S.; Larivière, V.; Haustein, S.: Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics : A review of the literature (2017) 0.02 
    0.017656473 = product of:
  0.12359531 = sum of:
    0.12359531 = weight(_text_:interpretations in 3781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12359531 = score(doc=3781,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26062825 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036433198 = queryNorm
        0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 3781, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3781)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Social media has become integrated into the fabric of the scholarly communication system in fundamental ways, principally through scholarly use of social media platforms and the promotion of new indicators on the basis of interactions with these platforms. Research and scholarship in this area has accelerated since the coining and subsequent advocacy for altmetrics-that is, research indicators based on social media activity. This review provides an extensive account of the state-of-the art in both scholarly use of social media and altmetrics. The review consists of 2 main parts: the first examines the use of social media in academia, reviewing the various functions these platforms have in the scholarly communication process and the factors that affect this use. The second part reviews empirical studies of altmetrics, discussing the various interpretations of altmetrics, data collection and methodological limitations, and differences according to platform. The review ends with a critical discussion of the implications of this transformation in the scholarly communication system.
  5. Maharana, B.; Nayak, K.; Sahu, N.K.: Scholarly use of web resources in LIS research : a citation analysis (2006) 0.01 
    0.014713728 = product of:
  0.10299609 = sum of:
    0.10299609 = weight(_text_:interpretations in 53) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10299609 = score(doc=53,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26062825 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036433198 = queryNorm
        0.3951839 = fieldWeight in 53, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=53)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The essential purpose of this paper is to measure the amount of web resources used for scholarly contributions in the area of library and information science (LIS) in India. It further aims to make an analysis of the nature and type of web resources and studies the various standards for web citations. Design/methodology/approach - In this study, the result of analysis of 292 web citations spread over 95 scholarly papers published in the proceedings of the National Conference of the Society for Information Science, India (SIS-2005) has been reported. All the 292 web citations were scanned and data relating to types of web domains, file formats, styles of citations, etc., were collected through a structured check list. The data thus obtained were systematically analyzed, figurative representations were made and appropriate interpretations were drawn. Findings - The study revealed that 292 (34.88 per cent) out of 837 were web citations, proving a significant correlation between the use of Internet resources and research productivity of LIS professionals in India. The highest number of web citations (35.6 per cent) was from .edu/.ac type domains. Most of the web resources (46.9 per cent) cited in the study were hypertext markup language (HTML) files. Originality/value - The paper is the result of an original analysis of web citations undertaken in order to study the dependence of LIS professionals in India on web sources for their scholarly contributions. This carries research value for web content providers, authors and researchers in LIS.
  6. Nicholls, P.T.: Empirical validation of Lotka's law (1986) 0.01 
    0.0056413664 = product of:
  0.039489564 = sum of:
    0.039489564 = product of:
      0.07897913 = sum of:
        0.07897913 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07897913 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12758285 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036433198 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419
  7. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.01 
    0.0056413664 = product of:
  0.039489564 = sum of:
    0.039489564 = product of:
      0.07897913 = sum of:
        0.07897913 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07897913 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12758285 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036433198 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  8. Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987) 0.01 
    0.0056413664 = product of:
  0.039489564 = sum of:
    0.039489564 = product of:
      0.07897913 = sum of:
        0.07897913 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07897913 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12758285 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036433198 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
  9. Marx, W.: Wie mißt man Forschungsqualität? : der Science Citation Index - ein Maßstab für die Bewertung (1996) 0.01 
    0.0053916327 = product of:
  0.037741426 = sum of:
    0.037741426 = product of:
      0.07548285 = sum of:
        0.07548285 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 5036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07548285 = score(doc=5036,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17639054 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036433198 = queryNorm
            0.42793027 = fieldWeight in 5036, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5036)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Ein überfordertes Gutachter-System, knapper fließende Forschungsgelder sowie die starke Faszination von Ranglisten bewirken zunehmend den Einsatz bibliometrischer Methoden zur Messung von Forschungsqualität. Grundlage der meisten Bewertungen ist der Science Citation Index, der nun auch in der Version als Online-Datenbank für umfangreiche Analysen genutzt werden kann. Erweiterungen der Retrievalsprache beim Host STN International ermöglichen statistische Analysen, die bisher nur dem SCI-Hersteller und wenigen Spezialisten vorbehalten waren. Voraussetzung für eine sinnvolle Anwendung sind vor allem die Wahl geeigneter Selektionskriterien sowie die sorgfältige Interpretation der Ergebnisse im Rahmen der Grenzen dieser Methoden
  10. Schramm, R.: Kerninformationen mittels formaler Bewertungskritierien (1996) 0.01 
    0.0053916327 = product of:
  0.037741426 = sum of:
    0.037741426 = product of:
      0.07548285 = sum of:
        0.07548285 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 6258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07548285 = score(doc=6258,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17639054 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036433198 = queryNorm
            0.42793027 = fieldWeight in 6258, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6258)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Die Ermittlung von Kerninformationen mittels informetrischer Methoden erfordert die Nutzung formaler Bewertungskriterien wie Publikationshäufigkeit, Zitierhäufigkeit und Patentfamiliengröße. Es werden die Zeitabhängigkeit, die Austauschbarkeit und die Voraussetzungen für die Anwendung der formalen Bewertungskriterien erläutert.
  11. Dorsch, I.; Haustein, S.: Bibliometrie (2023) 0.01 
    0.0053916327 = product of:
  0.037741426 = sum of:
    0.037741426 = product of:
      0.07548285 = sum of:
        0.07548285 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07548285 = score(doc=789,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17639054 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036433198 = queryNorm
            0.42793027 = fieldWeight in 789, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=789)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Die Bibliometrie ist eine sozialwissenschaftliche Disziplin, die historisch gesehen auf drei Entwicklungen fußt: die positivistisch-funktionalistische Philosophie, soziale Fakten objektiv untersuchen zu können; die Entwicklung von Zitationsindizes und -analyse, um Forschungsleistung zu messen; und die Entdeckung mathematischer Gesetzmäßigkeiten, die die Anwendung von Indikatoren in der Wissenschaftsevaluation ermöglichten.
  12. Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998) 0.00 
    0.0049863104 = product of:
  0.03490417 = sum of:
    0.03490417 = product of:
      0.06980834 = sum of:
        0.06980834 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06980834 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12758285 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036433198 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:22:35
  13. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.00 
    0.0049863104 = product of:
  0.03490417 = sum of:
    0.03490417 = product of:
      0.06980834 = sum of:
        0.06980834 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06980834 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12758285 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036433198 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  14. Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994) 0.00 
    0.0049361954 = product of:
  0.034553368 = sum of:
    0.034553368 = product of:
      0.069106735 = sum of:
        0.069106735 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069106735 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12758285 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036433198 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
  15. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990) 0.00 
    0.0049361954 = product of:
  0.034553368 = sum of:
    0.034553368 = product of:
      0.069106735 = sum of:
        0.069106735 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069106735 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12758285 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036433198 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:29
  16. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : II. Resilience to ambiguity (1990) 0.00 
    0.0049361954 = product of:
  0.034553368 = sum of:
    0.034553368 = product of:
      0.069106735 = sum of:
        0.069106735 = weight(_text_:22 in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069106735 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12758285 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036433198 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:55
  17. Kahl, M.: Zitatenanalyse mit den Journal Citation Reports des Institute for Scientific Information : ein Hilfsmittel für die Zeitschriftenauswahl in wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken? (1995) 0.00 
    0.0047176788 = product of:
  0.03302375 = sum of:
    0.03302375 = product of:
      0.0660475 = sum of:
        0.0660475 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0660475 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17639054 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036433198 = queryNorm
            0.37443897 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Die Häufigkeit von Zitierungen wissenschaftlicher Publikationen kann in erster Näherung als Maßstab für ihre inhaltliche Qualität gelten. Die Journal Citation Reports (JCR) des ISI ordnen über die Auszählung von Referenzen aus mehreren tausend Fachzeitschriften durch diverse bibliometrische Indikatoren Zeitschriften einen bestimmten Wert zu. Der Aufbau der Datensammlung sowie die verwendeten Indikatoren werden näher beschrieben. 2 Methoden werden vorgestellt, mit denen in Anwendung der JCR eine Menge von Kernzeitschriften für ein Fachgebiet ermittelt werden kann. Probleme der Zuverlässigkeit bei der Sammlung und Verarbeitung der Zitierdaten durch die JCR werden dargestellt. Die Anwendbarkeit einer Zitatenanalyse für den Bestandsaufbau bei Fachzeitschriften wird untersucht. Sie kann zur Entscheidungsfindung beitragen, andere Methoden aber nicht ersetzen
  18. Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005) 0.00 
    0.0042310245 = product of:
  0.02961717 = sum of:
    0.02961717 = product of:
      0.05923434 = sum of:
        0.05923434 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05923434 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12758285 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036433198 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    20. 1.2007 17:02:22
  19. Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014) 0.00 
    0.0042310245 = product of:
  0.02961717 = sum of:
    0.02961717 = product of:
      0.05923434 = sum of:
        0.05923434 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05923434 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12758285 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036433198 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    18. 3.2014 19:13:22
  20. Harter, S.P.; Cheng, Y.-R.: Colinked descriptors : improving vocabulary selection for end-user searching (1996) 0.00 
    0.0040437244 = product of:
  0.02830607 = sum of:
    0.02830607 = product of:
      0.05661214 = sum of:
        0.05661214 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 4216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05661214 = score(doc=4216,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17639054 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036433198 = queryNorm
            0.3209477 = fieldWeight in 4216, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4216)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 115
  • d 14
  • m 1
  • ro 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 126
  • s 3
  • el 2
  • m 2
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications