-
Solomon, P.: Access to fiction for children : a user-based assessment of options and opportunities (1997)
0.04
0.035642873 = product of:
0.089107186 = sum of:
0.05648775 = weight(_text_:context in 5845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05648775 = score(doc=5845,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.32054642 = fieldWeight in 5845, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5845)
0.03261943 = weight(_text_:system in 5845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03261943 = score(doc=5845,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 5845, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5845)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Reports on a study of children's intentions, purposes, search terms, strategies, successes and breakdowns in accessing fiction. Data was gathered using naturalistic methods of persistent, intensive observation and questioning with children in several school library media centres in the USA, including 997 OPAC transactions. Analyzes the data and highlights aspects of the broader context of the system which may help in development of mechanisms for electronic access
-
Andersson, R.; Holst, E.: Indexes and other depictions of fictions : a new model for analysis empirically tested (1996)
0.03
0.032712005 = product of:
0.08178001 = sum of:
0.0538205 = weight(_text_:index in 473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0538205 = score(doc=473,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.28967714 = fieldWeight in 473, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=473)
0.027959513 = weight(_text_:system in 473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027959513 = score(doc=473,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 473, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=473)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- In this study descriptions of a novel by 100 users at 2 Swedish public libraries, Malmö and Molndal, Mar-Apr 95, were compared to the index terms used for the novels at these libraries. Describes previous systems for fiction indexing, the 2 libraries, and the users interviewed. Compares the AMP system with their own model. The latter operates with terms under the headings phenomena, frame and author's intention. The similarities between the users' and indexers' descriptions were sufficiently close to make it possible to retrieve fiction in accordance with users' wishes in Molndal, and would have been in Malmö, had more books been indexed with more terms. Sometimes the similarities were close enough for users to retrieve fiction on their own
-
Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992)
0.03
0.027233064 = product of:
0.06808266 = sum of:
0.05272096 = weight(_text_:system in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05272096 = score(doc=5830,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.3936941 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
0.015361699 = product of:
0.046085097 = sum of:
0.046085097 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046085097 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This paper examnines various isues that arise in establishing a theoretical basis for an experimental fiction analysis system. It analyzes the warrants of fiction and of works about fiction. From this analysis, it derives classificatory requirements for a fiction system. Classificatory techniques that may contribute to the specification of data elements in fiction are suggested
- Date
- 5. 8.2006 13:22:08
-
Farrow, J.: All in the mind : concept analysis in indexing (1995)
0.01
0.014352133 = product of:
0.07176066 = sum of:
0.07176066 = weight(_text_:index in 2926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07176066 = score(doc=2926,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18579477 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.3862362 = fieldWeight in 2926, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2926)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- The indexing process consists of the comprehension of the document to be indexed, followed by the production of a set of index terms. Differences between academic indexing and back-of-the-book indexing are discussed. Text comprehension is a branch of human information processing, and it is argued that the model of text comprehension and production debeloped by van Dijk and Kintsch can form the basis for a cognitive process model of indexing. Strategies for testing such a model are suggested
-
Amac, T.: Linguistic context analysis : a new approach to communication evaluation (1997)
0.01
0.013694699 = product of:
0.068473496 = sum of:
0.068473496 = weight(_text_:context in 2576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068473496 = score(doc=2576,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.38856095 = fieldWeight in 2576, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2576)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Argues that the integration of computational psycholinguistics can improve corporate communication, and thus become a new strategic tool. An electronic dictionary was created of basic, neutral and negative connotations for nouns, verbs and adjectives appearing in press releases and other communication media, which can be updated with client specific words. The focus on negative messages has the objective of detecting who, why and how publics are criticized, to learn from the vocabulary of opinion leaders and to improve issues management proactively. Suggests a new form of analysis called 'computational linguistic context analysis' (CLCA) by analyzing nominal groups of negative words, rather than monitoring content analysis in the traditional way. Concludes that CLCA can be used to analyze large quantities of press cuttings about a company and could, theoretically, be used to analyze the structure, language and style of a particular journalist to whom it is planned to send a press release or article
-
Dooley, J.M.: Subject indexing in context : subject cataloging of MARC AMC format archical records (1992)
0.01
0.0129114855 = product of:
0.064557426 = sum of:
0.064557426 = weight(_text_:context in 2199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064557426 = score(doc=2199,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.36633876 = fieldWeight in 2199, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2199)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Molina, M.P.: Interdisciplinary approaches to the concept and practice of written documentary content analysis (WTDCA) (1994)
0.01
0.01129755 = product of:
0.05648775 = sum of:
0.05648775 = weight(_text_:context in 6147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05648775 = score(doc=6147,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17622331 = queryWeight, product of:
4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.32054642 = fieldWeight in 6147, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.14465 = idf(docFreq=1904, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6147)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Content analysis, restricted within the limits of written textual documents (WTDCA), is a field which is greatly in need of extensive interdisciplinary research. This would clarify certain concepts, especially those concerned with 'text', as a new central nucleus of semiotic research, and 'content', or the informative power of text. The objective reality (syntax) of the written document should be, in the cognitve process that all content analysis entails, interpreted (semantically and pragmatically) in an intersubjective manner with regard to the context, the analyst's knowledge base and the documentary objectives. The contributions of sociolinguistics (textual), logic (formal) and psychology (cognitive) are fundamental to the conduct of these activities. The criteria used to validate the results obtained complete the necessary conceptual reference panorama
-
Laffal, J.: ¬A concept analysis of Jonathan Swift's 'Tale of a tub' and 'Gulliver's travels' (1995)
0.01
0.0065765786 = product of:
0.03288289 = sum of:
0.03288289 = product of:
0.098648675 = sum of:
0.098648675 = weight(_text_:29 in 6362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098648675 = score(doc=6362,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.6595664 = fieldWeight in 6362, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6362)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 8. 3.1997 10:05:29
- Source
- Computers and the humanities. 29(1995) no.5, S.339-361
-
Martindale, C.; McKenzie, D.: On the utility of content analysis in author attribution : 'The federalist' (1995)
0.01
0.0065765786 = product of:
0.03288289 = sum of:
0.03288289 = product of:
0.098648675 = sum of:
0.098648675 = weight(_text_:29 in 822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098648675 = score(doc=822,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.6595664 = fieldWeight in 822, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=822)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 8. 3.1997 10:05:29
- Source
- Computers and the humanities. 29(1995) no.4, S.259-270
-
Rowe, N.C.: Inferring depictions in natural-language captions for efficient access to picture data (1994)
0.01
0.006523886 = product of:
0.03261943 = sum of:
0.03261943 = weight(_text_:system in 7296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03261943 = score(doc=7296,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 7296, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7296)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Multimedia data can require significant examination time to find desired features ('content analysis'). An alternative is using natural-language captions to describe the data, and matching captions to English queries. But it is hard to include everything in the caption of a complicated datum, so significant content analysis may still seem required. We discuss linguistic clues in captions, both syntactic and semantic, that can simplify or eliminate content analysis. We introduce the notion of content depiction and ruled for depiction inference. Our approach is implemented in an expert system which demonstrated significant increases in recall in experiments
-
Taylor, S.L.: Integrating natural language understanding with document structure analysis (1994)
0.01
0.006523886 = product of:
0.03261943 = sum of:
0.03261943 = weight(_text_:system in 1794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03261943 = score(doc=1794,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 1794, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1794)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Document understanding, the interpretation of a document from its image form, is a technology area which benefits greatly from the integration of natural language processing with image processing. Develops a prototype of an Intelligent Document Understanding System (IDUS) which employs several technologies: image processing, optical character recognition, document structure analysis and text understanding in a cooperative fashion. Discusses those areas of research during development of IDUS where it is found that the most benefit from the integration of natural language processing and image processing occured: document structure analysis, OCR correction, and text analysis. Discusses 2 applications which are supported by IDUS: text retrieval and automatic generation of hypertext links
-
Jörgensen, C.: ¬The applicability of selected classification systems to image attributes (1996)
0.01
0.006523886 = product of:
0.03261943 = sum of:
0.03261943 = weight(_text_:system in 5175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03261943 = score(doc=5175,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 5175, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5175)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Recent research investigated image attributes as reported by participants in describing, sorting, and searching tasks with images and defined 46 specific image attributes which were then organized into 12 major classes. Attributes were also grouped as being 'perceptual' (directly stimulated by visual percepts), 'interpretive' (requiring inference from visual percepts), and 'reactive' (cognitive and affective responses to the images). This research describes the coverage of two image indexing and classification systems and one general classification system in relation to the previous findings and analyzes the extent to which components of these systems are capable of describing the range of image attributes as revealed by the previous research
-
Weimer, K.H.: ¬The nexus of subject analysis and bibliographic description : the case of multipart videos (1996)
0.00
0.0023042548 = product of:
0.011521274 = sum of:
0.011521274 = product of:
0.03456382 = sum of:
0.03456382 = weight(_text_:22 in 6525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03456382 = score(doc=6525,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04251826 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6525, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6525)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.5-18
