Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Inhaltsanalyse"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Mai, J.-E.: Deconstructing the indexing process (2000) 0.02
    0.01963775 = product of:
      0.078551 = sum of:
        0.078551 = weight(_text_:j in 4696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.078551 = score(doc=4696,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044010527 = queryNorm
            0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 4696, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4696)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  2. Andersen, J.: ¬The concept of genre : when, how, and why? (2001) 0.01
    0.009818875 = product of:
      0.0392755 = sum of:
        0.0392755 = weight(_text_:j in 639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0392755 = score(doc=639,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044010527 = queryNorm
            0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 639, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=639)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  3. Mai, J.-E.: Analysis in indexing : document and domain centered approaches (2005) 0.01
    0.008591516 = product of:
      0.034366064 = sum of:
        0.034366064 = weight(_text_:j in 1024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034366064 = score(doc=1024,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044010527 = queryNorm
            0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 1024, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1024)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  4. Andersen, J.; Christensen, F.S.: Wittgenstein and indexing theory (2001) 0.01
    0.006136797 = product of:
      0.024547188 = sum of:
        0.024547188 = weight(_text_:j in 1590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024547188 = score(doc=1590,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044010527 = queryNorm
            0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 1590, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1590)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  5. Mai, J.-E.: Semiotics and indexing : an analysis of the subject indexing process (2001) 0.01
    0.006136797 = product of:
      0.024547188 = sum of:
        0.024547188 = weight(_text_:j in 4480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024547188 = score(doc=4480,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044010527 = queryNorm
            0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 4480, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4480)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  6. Jens-Erik Mai, J.-E.: ¬The role of documents, domains and decisions in indexing (2004) 0.00
    0.0049094376 = product of:
      0.01963775 = sum of:
        0.01963775 = weight(_text_:j in 2653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01963775 = score(doc=2653,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044010527 = queryNorm
            0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 2653, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2653)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  7. White, M.D.; Marsh, E.E.: Content analysis : a flexible methodology (2006) 0.00
    0.004472114 = product of:
      0.017888457 = sum of:
        0.017888457 = product of:
          0.035776913 = sum of:
            0.035776913 = weight(_text_:22 in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035776913 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15411738 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044010527 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Library trends. 55(2006) no.1, S.22-45
  8. Miene, A.; Hermes, T.; Ioannidis, G.: Wie kommt das Bild in die Datenbank? : Inhaltsbasierte Analyse von Bildern und Videos (2002) 0.00
    0.004068961 = product of:
      0.016275844 = sum of:
        0.016275844 = product of:
          0.032551687 = sum of:
            0.032551687 = weight(_text_:der in 213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032551687 = score(doc=213,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.098309256 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044010527 = queryNorm
                0.3311152 = fieldWeight in 213, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=213)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Die verfügbare multimediale Information nimmt stetig zu, nicht zuletzt durch die Tag für Tag wachsende Zahl an neuer Information im Internet. Damit man dieser Flut Herr werden und diese Information wieder abrufbar machen kann, muss sie annotiert und geeignet in Datenbanken abgelegt werden. Hier besteht das Problem der manuellen Annotation, das einerseits durch die Ermüdung aufgrund der Routinearbeit und andererseits durch die Subjektivität des Annotierenden zu Fehlern in der Annotation führen kann. Unterstützende Systeme, die dem Dokumentar genau diese Routinearbeit abnehmen, können hier bis zu einem gewissen Grad Abhilfe schaffen. Die wissenschaftliche Erschließung von beispielsweise filmbeiträgen wird der Dokumentar zwar immer noch selbst machen müssen und auch sollen, aber die Erkennung und Dokumentation von sog. Einstellungsgrenzen kann durchaus automatisch mit Unterstützung eines Rechners geschehen. In diesem Beitrag zeigen wir anhand von Projekten, die wir durchgeführt haben, wie weit diese Unterstützung des Dokumentars bei der Annotation von Bildern und Videos gehen kann
  9. Schulzki-Haddouti, C.; Brückner, A.: ¬Die Suche nach dem Sinn : Automatische Inhaltsanalyse nicht nur für Geheimdienste (2001) 0.00
    0.0030328245 = product of:
      0.012131298 = sum of:
        0.012131298 = product of:
          0.024262596 = sum of:
            0.024262596 = weight(_text_:der in 3133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024262596 = score(doc=3133,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.098309256 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044010527 = queryNorm
                0.2467987 = fieldWeight in 3133, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3133)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Die Geheimdienste stehen vor einer Informationsflut, die sie mit herkömmlichen Mitteln nicht bewältigen können. Neue Möglichkeiten, die in Software-Projekten unter BND-Beteiligung entstanden, sollen das Defizit beseitigen und beliebig verknüpfte Informationen der analyse zugänglich machen