Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Inhaltsanalyse"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Schulzki-Haddouti, C.; Brückner, A.: ¬Die Suche nach dem Sinn : Automatische Inhaltsanalyse nicht nur für Geheimdienste (2001) 0.03
    0.031771053 = product of:
      0.12708421 = sum of:
        0.03501747 = weight(_text_:software in 3133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03501747 = score(doc=3133,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.43831247 = fieldWeight in 3133, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3133)
        0.010929758 = weight(_text_:und in 3133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010929758 = score(doc=3133,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 3133, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3133)
        0.03501747 = weight(_text_:software in 3133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03501747 = score(doc=3133,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.43831247 = fieldWeight in 3133, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3133)
        0.01110204 = weight(_text_:der in 3133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01110204 = score(doc=3133,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.2467987 = fieldWeight in 3133, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3133)
        0.03501747 = weight(_text_:software in 3133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03501747 = score(doc=3133,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.43831247 = fieldWeight in 3133, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3133)
      0.25 = coord(5/20)
    
    Abstract
    Die Geheimdienste stehen vor einer Informationsflut, die sie mit herkömmlichen Mitteln nicht bewältigen können. Neue Möglichkeiten, die in Software-Projekten unter BND-Beteiligung entstanden, sollen das Defizit beseitigen und beliebig verknüpfte Informationen der analyse zugänglich machen
  2. Mai, J.-E.: Deconstructing the indexing process (2000) 0.02
    0.020578332 = product of:
      0.13718888 = sum of:
        0.045729626 = weight(_text_:23 in 4696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045729626 = score(doc=4696,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.63357824 = fieldWeight in 4696, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4696)
        0.045729626 = weight(_text_:23 in 4696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045729626 = score(doc=4696,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.63357824 = fieldWeight in 4696, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4696)
        0.045729626 = weight(_text_:23 in 4696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045729626 = score(doc=4696,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.63357824 = fieldWeight in 4696, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4696)
      0.15 = coord(3/20)
    
    Source
    Advances in librarianship. 23(2000), S.269-298
  3. Andersen, J.: ¬The concept of genre : when, how, and why? (2001) 0.01
    0.010289166 = product of:
      0.06859444 = sum of:
        0.022864813 = weight(_text_:23 in 639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022864813 = score(doc=639,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 639, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=639)
        0.022864813 = weight(_text_:23 in 639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022864813 = score(doc=639,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 639, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=639)
        0.022864813 = weight(_text_:23 in 639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022864813 = score(doc=639,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 639, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=639)
      0.15 = coord(3/20)
    
    Date
    23. 6.2002 12:41:35
  4. Mai, J.-E.: Analysis in indexing : document and domain centered approaches (2005) 0.01
    0.009003021 = product of:
      0.060020134 = sum of:
        0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 1024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02000671 = score(doc=1024,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 1024, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1024)
        0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 1024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02000671 = score(doc=1024,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 1024, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1024)
        0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 1024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02000671 = score(doc=1024,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 1024, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1024)
      0.15 = coord(3/20)
    
    Date
    26.12.2007 20:23:24
  5. Miene, A.; Hermes, T.; Ioannidis, G.: Wie kommt das Bild in die Datenbank? : Inhaltsbasierte Analyse von Bildern und Videos (2002) 0.00
    0.0033443365 = product of:
      0.033443365 = sum of:
        0.018548414 = weight(_text_:und in 213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018548414 = score(doc=213,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 213, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=213)
        0.01489495 = weight(_text_:der in 213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01489495 = score(doc=213,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.3311152 = fieldWeight in 213, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=213)
      0.1 = coord(2/20)
    
    Abstract
    Die verfügbare multimediale Information nimmt stetig zu, nicht zuletzt durch die Tag für Tag wachsende Zahl an neuer Information im Internet. Damit man dieser Flut Herr werden und diese Information wieder abrufbar machen kann, muss sie annotiert und geeignet in Datenbanken abgelegt werden. Hier besteht das Problem der manuellen Annotation, das einerseits durch die Ermüdung aufgrund der Routinearbeit und andererseits durch die Subjektivität des Annotierenden zu Fehlern in der Annotation führen kann. Unterstützende Systeme, die dem Dokumentar genau diese Routinearbeit abnehmen, können hier bis zu einem gewissen Grad Abhilfe schaffen. Die wissenschaftliche Erschließung von beispielsweise filmbeiträgen wird der Dokumentar zwar immer noch selbst machen müssen und auch sollen, aber die Erkennung und Dokumentation von sog. Einstellungsgrenzen kann durchaus automatisch mit Unterstützung eines Rechners geschehen. In diesem Beitrag zeigen wir anhand von Projekten, die wir durchgeführt haben, wie weit diese Unterstützung des Dokumentars bei der Annotation von Bildern und Videos gehen kann
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 53(2002) H.1, S.15-21
  6. Hoover, L.: ¬A beginners' guide for subject analysis of theses and dissertations in the hard sciences (2005) 0.00
    0.0022938591 = product of:
      0.02293859 = sum of:
        0.0068830615 = product of:
          0.013766123 = sum of:
            0.013766123 = weight(_text_:29 in 5740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013766123 = score(doc=5740,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.070840135 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5740, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5740)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.016055528 = product of:
          0.032111056 = sum of:
            0.032111056 = weight(_text_:engineering in 5740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032111056 = score(doc=5740,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10819342 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.29679304 = fieldWeight in 5740, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5740)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1 = coord(2/20)
    
    Abstract
    This guide, for beginning catalogers with humanities or social sciences backgrounds, provides assistance in subject analysis (based on Library of Congress Subject Headings) of theses and dissertations (T/Ds) that are produced by graduate students in university departments in the hard sciences (physical sciences and engineering). It is aimed at those who have had little or no experience in cataloging, especially of this type of material, and for those who desire to supplement local mentoring resources for subject analysis in the hard sciences. Theses and dissertations from these departments present a special challenge because they are the results of current research representing specific new concepts with which the cataloger may not be familiar. In fact, subject headings often have not yet been created for the specific concept(s) being researched. Additionally, T/D authors often use jargon/terminology specific to their department. Catalogers often have many other duties in addition to subject analysis of T/Ds in the hard sciences, yet they desire to provide optimal access through accurate, thorough subject analysis. Tips are provided for determining the content of the T/D, strategic searches on WorldCat for possible subject headings, evaluating the relevancy of these subject headings for final selection, and selecting appropriate subdivisions where needed. Lists of basic reference resources are also provided.
    Date
    29. 9.2008 19:08:38
  7. Hjoerland, B.: Towards a theory of aboutness, subject, topicality, theme, domain, field, content ... and relevance (2001) 0.00
    4.818143E-4 = product of:
      0.009636286 = sum of:
        0.009636286 = product of:
          0.019272571 = sum of:
            0.019272571 = weight(_text_:29 in 6032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019272571 = score(doc=6032,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.070840135 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 6032, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6032)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Date
    29. 9.2001 14:03:14
  8. Chen, H.: ¬An analysis of image queries in the field of art history (2001) 0.00
    4.818143E-4 = product of:
      0.009636286 = sum of:
        0.009636286 = product of:
          0.019272571 = sum of:
            0.019272571 = weight(_text_:29 in 5187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019272571 = score(doc=5187,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.070840135 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5187, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5187)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Abstract
    Chen arranged with an Art History instructor to require 20 medieval art images in papers received from 29 students. Participants completed a self administered presearch and postsearch questionnaire, and were interviewed after questionnaire analysis, in order to collect both the keywords and phrases they planned to use, and those actually used. Three MLIS student reviewers then mapped the queries to Enser and McGregor's four categories, Jorgensen's 12 classes, and Fidel's 12 feature data and object poles providing a degree of match on a seven point scale (one not at all to 7 exact). The reviewers give highest scores to Enser and McGregor;'s categories. Modifications to both the Enser and McGregor and Jorgensen schemes are suggested
  9. Marshall, L.: Specific and generic subject headings : increasing subject access to library materials (2003) 0.00
    4.818143E-4 = product of:
      0.009636286 = sum of:
        0.009636286 = product of:
          0.019272571 = sum of:
            0.019272571 = weight(_text_:29 in 5497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019272571 = score(doc=5497,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.070840135 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5497, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5497)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Date
    30. 7.2006 14:29:04
  10. Greisdorf, H.; O'Connor, B.: Modelling what users see when they look at images : a cognitive viewpoint (2002) 0.00
    4.1298367E-4 = product of:
      0.008259674 = sum of:
        0.008259674 = product of:
          0.016519347 = sum of:
            0.016519347 = weight(_text_:29 in 4471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016519347 = score(doc=4471,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.070840135 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4471, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4471)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 58(2002) no.1, S.6-29
  11. Garcia Jiménez, A.; Valle Gastaminza, F. del: From thesauri to ontologies: a case study in a digital visual context (2004) 0.00
    3.441531E-4 = product of:
      0.0068830615 = sum of:
        0.0068830615 = product of:
          0.013766123 = sum of:
            0.013766123 = weight(_text_:29 in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013766123 = score(doc=2657,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.070840135 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2004 16:20:55
  12. Jens-Erik Mai, J.-E.: ¬The role of documents, domains and decisions in indexing (2004) 0.00
    2.7532244E-4 = product of:
      0.005506449 = sum of:
        0.005506449 = product of:
          0.011012898 = sum of:
            0.011012898 = weight(_text_:29 in 2653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011012898 = score(doc=2653,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.070840135 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 2653, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2653)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2004 15:13:08
  13. White, M.D.; Marsh, E.E.: Content analysis : a flexible methodology (2006) 0.00
    2.7284576E-4 = product of:
      0.005456915 = sum of:
        0.005456915 = product of:
          0.016370745 = sum of:
            0.016370745 = weight(_text_:22 in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016370745 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07052079 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Source
    Library trends. 55(2006) no.1, S.22-45