Search (33 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Inhaltsanalyse"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980) 0.06
    0.06452808 = product of:
      0.12905616 = sum of:
        0.12905616 = sum of:
          0.05842106 = weight(_text_:classification in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05842106 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
          0.0706351 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0706351 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:44
  2. Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992) 0.06
    0.061301984 = product of:
      0.12260397 = sum of:
        0.12260397 = sum of:
          0.06609589 = weight(_text_:classification in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06609589 = score(doc=5830,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
          0.056508083 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056508083 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:08
    Source
    Classification research for knowledge representation and organization. Proc. 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991. Ed. by N.J. Williamson u. M. Hudon
  3. Weimer, K.H.: ¬The nexus of subject analysis and bibliographic description : the case of multipart videos (1996) 0.04
    0.03871685 = product of:
      0.0774337 = sum of:
        0.0774337 = sum of:
          0.03505264 = weight(_text_:classification in 6525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03505264 = score(doc=6525,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 6525, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6525)
          0.04238106 = weight(_text_:22 in 6525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04238106 = score(doc=6525,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6525, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6525)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.5-18
  4. Pejtersen, A.M.: ¬A new approach to the classification of fiction (1982) 0.03
    0.025297062 = product of:
      0.050594125 = sum of:
        0.050594125 = product of:
          0.10118825 = sum of:
            0.10118825 = weight(_text_:classification in 7240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10118825 = score(doc=7240,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.6094458 = fieldWeight in 7240, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7240)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Universal classification I: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982. Ed. I. Dahlberg
  5. Pejtersen, A.M.: Fiction and library classification (1978) 0.02
    0.023368426 = product of:
      0.04673685 = sum of:
        0.04673685 = product of:
          0.0934737 = sum of:
            0.0934737 = weight(_text_:classification in 722) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0934737 = score(doc=722,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 722, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=722)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Beghtol, C.: Bibliographic classification theory and text linguistics : aboutness, analysis, intertextuality and the cognitive act of classifying documents (1986) 0.02
    0.023368426 = product of:
      0.04673685 = sum of:
        0.04673685 = product of:
          0.0934737 = sum of:
            0.0934737 = weight(_text_:classification in 1346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0934737 = score(doc=1346,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 1346, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1346)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  7. Bland, R.N.: ¬The concept of intellectual level in cataloging and classification (1983) 0.02
    0.023368426 = product of:
      0.04673685 = sum of:
        0.04673685 = product of:
          0.0934737 = sum of:
            0.0934737 = weight(_text_:classification in 321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0934737 = score(doc=321,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 321, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=321)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper traces the history of the concept of intellectual level in cataloging and classification in the United States. Past cataloging codes, subject-heading practice, and classification systems have provided library users with little systematic information concerning the intellectual level or intended audience of works. Reasons for this omission are discussed, and arguments are developed to show that this kind of information would be a useful addition to the catalog record of the present and the future.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 4(1983) no.1, S.53-63
  8. Vieira, L.: Modèle d'analyse pur une classification du document iconographique (1999) 0.02
    0.020654965 = product of:
      0.04130993 = sum of:
        0.04130993 = product of:
          0.08261986 = sum of:
            0.08261986 = weight(_text_:classification in 6320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08261986 = score(doc=6320,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.49761042 = fieldWeight in 6320, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6320)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Analyse model for a classification of iconographic documents
  9. Jörgensen, C.: ¬The applicability of selected classification systems to image attributes (1996) 0.02
    0.017707944 = product of:
      0.035415888 = sum of:
        0.035415888 = product of:
          0.070831776 = sum of:
            0.070831776 = weight(_text_:classification in 5175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070831776 = score(doc=5175,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.42661208 = fieldWeight in 5175, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5175)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Recent research investigated image attributes as reported by participants in describing, sorting, and searching tasks with images and defined 46 specific image attributes which were then organized into 12 major classes. Attributes were also grouped as being 'perceptual' (directly stimulated by visual percepts), 'interpretive' (requiring inference from visual percepts), and 'reactive' (cognitive and affective responses to the images). This research describes the coverage of two image indexing and classification systems and one general classification system in relation to the previous findings and analyzes the extent to which components of these systems are capable of describing the range of image attributes as revealed by the previous research
  10. Wyllie, J.: Concept indexing : the world beyond the windows (1990) 0.02
    0.01752632 = product of:
      0.03505264 = sum of:
        0.03505264 = product of:
          0.07010528 = sum of:
            0.07010528 = weight(_text_:classification in 2977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07010528 = score(doc=2977,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 2977, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2977)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper argues that the realisation of the electronic hypermedia of the future depends on integrating the technology of free text retrieval with the classification-based discipline of content analysis
  11. Wilkinson, C.L.: Intellectual level as a search enhancement in the online environment : summation and implications (1990) 0.02
    0.016523972 = product of:
      0.033047944 = sum of:
        0.033047944 = product of:
          0.06609589 = sum of:
            0.06609589 = weight(_text_:classification in 479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06609589 = score(doc=479,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 479, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=479)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper summarizes the papers presented by the members of the panel on "The Concept of Intellectual Level in Cataloging and Classification." The implication of adding intellectual level to the MARC record and creating intellectual level indexes in online catalogs are discussed. Conclusion is reached that providing intellectual level will not only be costly but may perhaps even be a disservice to library users.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 11(1990) no.1, S.89-97
  12. Bi, Y.: Sentiment classification in social media data by combining triplet belief functions (2022) 0.02
    0.015178238 = product of:
      0.030356476 = sum of:
        0.030356476 = product of:
          0.060712952 = sum of:
            0.060712952 = weight(_text_:classification in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060712952 = score(doc=613,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.3656675 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Sentiment analysis is an emerging technique that caters for semantic orientation and opinion mining. It is increasingly used to analyze online reviews and posts for identifying people's opinions and attitudes to products and events in order to improve business performance of companies and aid to make better organizing strategies of events. This paper presents an innovative approach to combining the outputs of sentiment classifiers under the framework of belief functions. It consists of the formulation of sentiment classifier outputs in the triplet evidence structure and the development of general formulas for combining triplet functions derived from sentiment classification results via three evidential combination rules along with comparative analyses. The empirical studies have been conducted on examining the effectiveness of our method for sentiment classification individually and in combination, and the results demonstrate that the best combined classifiers by our method outperforms the best individual classifiers over five review datasets.
  13. Shatford, S.: Analyzing the subject of a picture : a theoretical approach (1986) 0.01
    0.014458476 = product of:
      0.028916951 = sum of:
        0.028916951 = product of:
          0.057833903 = sum of:
            0.057833903 = weight(_text_:classification in 354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057833903 = score(doc=354,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 354, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=354)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper suggests a theoretical basis for identifying and classifying the kinds of subjects a picture may have, using previously developed principles of cataloging and classification, and concepts taken from the philosophy of art, from meaning in language, and from visual perception. The purpose of developing this theoretical basis is to provide the reader with a means for evaluating, adapting, and applying presently existing indexing languages, or for devising new languages for pictorial materials; this paper does not attempt to invent or prescribe a particular indexing language.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 6(1986) no.3, S.39-62
  14. Short, M.: Text mining and subject analysis for fiction; or, using machine learning and information extraction to assign subject headings to dime novels (2019) 0.01
    0.014458476 = product of:
      0.028916951 = sum of:
        0.028916951 = product of:
          0.057833903 = sum of:
            0.057833903 = weight(_text_:classification in 5481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057833903 = score(doc=5481,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 5481, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5481)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes multiple experiments in text mining at Northern Illinois University that were undertaken to improve the efficiency and accuracy of cataloging. It focuses narrowly on subject analysis of dime novels, a format of inexpensive fiction that was popular in the United States between 1860 and 1915. NIU holds more than 55,000 dime novels in its collections, which it is in the process of comprehensively digitizing. Classification, keyword extraction, named-entity recognition, clustering, and topic modeling are discussed as means of assigning subject headings to improve their discoverability by researchers and to increase the productivity of digitization workflows.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 57(2019) no.5, S.315-336
  15. Holley, R.M.; Joudrey, D.N.: Aboutness and conceptual analysis : a review (2021) 0.01
    0.014458476 = product of:
      0.028916951 = sum of:
        0.028916951 = product of:
          0.057833903 = sum of:
            0.057833903 = weight(_text_:classification in 703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057833903 = score(doc=703,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 703, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=703)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2020.1856992. Teil eines Themenheftes: Cataloging and Classification: Back to Basics
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 59(2021) no.2/3, S.159-185
  16. Hauff-Hartig, S.: Automatische Transkription von Videos : Fernsehen 3.0: Automatisierte Sentimentanalyse und Zusammenstellung von Kurzvideos mit hohem Aufregungslevel KI-generierte Metadaten: Von der Technologiebeobachtung bis zum produktiven Einsatz (2021) 0.01
    0.014127021 = product of:
      0.028254041 = sum of:
        0.028254041 = product of:
          0.056508083 = sum of:
            0.056508083 = weight(_text_:22 in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056508083 = score(doc=251,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
  17. Fairthorne, R.A.: Temporal structure in bibliographic classification (1985) 0.01
    0.013144738 = product of:
      0.026289476 = sum of:
        0.026289476 = product of:
          0.052578952 = sum of:
            0.052578952 = weight(_text_:classification in 3651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052578952 = score(doc=3651,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.3166773 = fieldWeight in 3651, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3651)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper, presented at the Ottawa Conference an the Conceptual Basis of the Classification of Knowledge, in 1971, is one of Fairthorne's more perceptive works and deserves a wide audience, especially as it breaks new ground in classification theory. In discussing the notion of discourse, he makes a "distinction between what discourse mentions and what discourse is about" [emphasis added], considered as a "fundamental factor to the relativistic nature of bibliographic classification" (p. 360). A table of mathematical functions, for example, describes exactly something represented by a collection of digits, but, without a preface, this table does not fit into a broader context. Some indication of the author's intent ls needed to fit the table into a broader context. This intent may appear in a title, chapter heading, class number or some other aid. Discourse an and discourse about something "cannot be determined solely from what it mentions" (p. 361). Some kind of background is needed. Fairthorne further develops the theme that knowledge about a subject comes from previous knowledge, thus adding a temporal factor to classification. "Some extra textual criteria are needed" in order to classify (p. 362). For example, "documents that mention the same things, but are an different topics, will have different ancestors, in the sense of preceding documents to which they are linked by various bibliographic characteristics ... [and] ... they will have different descendants" (p. 363). The classifier has to distinguish between documents that "mention exactly the same thing" but are not about the same thing. The classifier does this by classifying "sets of documents that form their histories, their bibliographic world lines" (p. 363). The practice of citation is one method of performing the linking and presents a "fan" of documents connected by a chain of citations to past work. The fan is seen as the effect of generations of documents - each generation connected to the previous one, and all ancestral to the present document. Thus, there are levels in temporal structure-that is, antecedent and successor documents-and these require that documents be identified in relation to other documents. This gives a set of documents an "irrevocable order," a loose order which Fairthorne calls "bibliographic time," and which is "generated by the fact of continual growth" (p. 364). He does not consider "bibliographic time" to be an equivalent to physical time because bibliographic events, as part of communication, require delay. Sets of documents, as indicated above, rather than single works, are used in classification. While an event, a person, a unique feature of the environment, may create a class of one-such as the French Revolution, Napoleon, Niagara Falls-revolutions, emperors, and waterfalls are sets which, as sets, will subsume individuals and make normal classes.
    The fan of past documents may be seen across time as a philosophical "wake," translated documents as a sideways relationship and future documents as another fan spreading forward from a given document (p. 365). The "overlap of reading histories can be used to detect common interests among readers," (p. 365) and readers may be classified accordingly. Finally, Fairthorne rejects the notion of a "general" classification, which he regards as a mirage, to be replaced by a citation-type network to identify classes. An interesting feature of his work lies in his linkage between old and new documents via a bibliographic method-citations, authors' names, imprints, style, and vocabulary - rather than topical (subject) terms. This is an indirect method of creating classes. The subject (aboutness) is conceived as a finite, common sharing of knowledge over time (past, present, and future) as opposed to the more common hierarchy of topics in an infinite schema assumed to be universally useful. Fairthorne, a mathematician by training, is a prolific writer an the foundations of classification and information. His professional career includes work with the Royal Engineers Chemical Warfare Section and the Royal Aircraft Establishment (RAE). He was the founder of the Computing Unit which became the RAE Mathematics Department.
    Footnote
    Original in: Ottawa Conference on the Conceptual Basis of the Classification of Knowledge, Ottawa, 1971. Ed.: Jerzy A Wojceichowski. Pullach: Verlag Dokumentation 1974. S.404-412.
  18. Raieli, R.: ¬The semantic hole : enthusiasm and caution around multimedia information retrieval (2012) 0.01
    0.012486639 = product of:
      0.024973279 = sum of:
        0.024973279 = product of:
          0.049946558 = sum of:
            0.049946558 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049946558 = score(doc=4888,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:02:10
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.1, S.13-22
  19. Nohr, H.: ¬The training of librarians in content analysis : some thoughts on future necessities (1991) 0.01
    0.011684213 = product of:
      0.023368426 = sum of:
        0.023368426 = product of:
          0.04673685 = sum of:
            0.04673685 = weight(_text_:classification in 5149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04673685 = score(doc=5149,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 5149, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5149)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    International classification. 18(1991) no.3, S.153-157
  20. Studwell, W.E.: Subject suggestions 6 : some concerns relating to quantity of subjects (1990) 0.01
    0.011684213 = product of:
      0.023368426 = sum of:
        0.023368426 = product of:
          0.04673685 = sum of:
            0.04673685 = weight(_text_:classification in 466) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04673685 = score(doc=466,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 466, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=466)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 10(1990) no.4, S.99-104