-
Hjoerland, B.: Subject representation and information seeking : contributions to a theory based on the theory of knowledge (1993)
0.01
0.0077671995 = product of:
0.031068798 = sum of:
0.015619429 = weight(_text_:of in 7555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015619429 = score(doc=7555,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 7555, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7555)
0.01544937 = product of:
0.03089874 = sum of:
0.03089874 = weight(_text_:on in 7555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03089874 = score(doc=7555,freq=2.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.34020463 = fieldWeight in 7555, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7555)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
-
Ahmad, N.: Newspaper indexing : an international overview (1991)
0.01
0.0074534733 = product of:
0.029813893 = sum of:
0.022089208 = weight(_text_:of in 3633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022089208 = score(doc=3633,freq=16.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 3633, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3633)
0.007724685 = product of:
0.01544937 = sum of:
0.01544937 = weight(_text_:on in 3633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01544937 = score(doc=3633,freq=2.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 3633, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3633)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Comprehensiveness and consistency in newspaper indexing depend on the effectiveness of subject analysis of the news items. Discusses indexing skills required in order to identify indexable concepts. Describes practical aspects of conceptual analysis, crystalises criteria and methods for the indexing of news stories, and eludicates reasons form providing multiple subject-entries for certain news items. Suggests rules for news analysis and speedy and accurate allocation of subject headings, and illustrates the technique of dealing with complex and diversified news headings reported at intervals. As the headlines do not always indicate the real subject of a news story, the identification of indexable concepts can become arduous and cumbersome. Discusses the methods, skills and capability needed to tackle such problems
-
Chen, H.; Ng, T.: ¬An algorithmic approach to concept exploration in a large knowledge network (automatic thesaurus consultation) : symbolic branch-and-bound search versus connectionist Hopfield Net Activation (1995)
0.01
0.007409825 = product of:
0.0296393 = sum of:
0.016396983 = weight(_text_:of in 2203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016396983 = score(doc=2203,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 2203, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2203)
0.013242318 = product of:
0.026484637 = sum of:
0.026484637 = weight(_text_:on in 2203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026484637 = score(doc=2203,freq=8.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.29160398 = fieldWeight in 2203, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2203)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Presents a framework for knowledge discovery and concept exploration. In order to enhance the concept exploration capability of knowledge based systems and to alleviate the limitation of the manual browsing approach, develops 2 spreading activation based algorithms for concept exploration in large, heterogeneous networks of concepts (eg multiple thesauri). One algorithm, which is based on the symbolic AI paradigma, performs a conventional branch-and-bound search on a semantic net representation to identify other highly relevant concepts (a serial, optimal search process). The 2nd algorithm, which is absed on the neural network approach, executes the Hopfield net parallel relaxation and convergence process to identify 'convergent' concepts for some initial queries (a parallel, heuristic search process). Tests these 2 algorithms on a large text-based knowledge network of about 13.000 nodes (terms) and 80.000 directed links in the area of computing technologies
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 46(1995) no.5, S.348-369
-
Svenonius, E.; McGarry, D.: Objectivity in evaluating subject heading assignment (1993)
0.01
0.007096852 = product of:
0.028387409 = sum of:
0.017463053 = weight(_text_:of in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017463053 = score(doc=5612,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
0.010924355 = product of:
0.02184871 = sum of:
0.02184871 = weight(_text_:on in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02184871 = score(doc=5612,freq=4.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.24056101 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Recent papers have called attention to discrepancies in the assignment of LCSH. While philosophical arguments can be made that subject analysis, if not a logical impossibility, at least is point-of-view dependent, subject headings continue to be assigned and continue to be useful. The hypothesis advanced in the present project is that to a considerable degree there is a clear-cut right and wrong to LCSH subject heading assignment. To test the hypothesis, it was postulated that the assignment of a subject heading is correct if it is supported by textual warrant (at least 20% of the book being cataloged is on the topic) and is constructed in accordance with the LoC Subject Cataloging Manual: Subject Headings. A sample of 100 books on scientific subjects was used to test the hypothesis
-
Beghtol, C.: ¬The classification of fiction : the development of a system based on theoretical principles (1994)
0.01
0.006713625 = product of:
0.0268545 = sum of:
0.019129815 = weight(_text_:of in 3413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019129815 = score(doc=3413,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 3413, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3413)
0.007724685 = product of:
0.01544937 = sum of:
0.01544937 = weight(_text_:on in 3413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01544937 = score(doc=3413,freq=2.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 3413, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3413)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- The work is an adaptation of the author's dissertation and has the following chapters: (1) background and introduction; (2) a problem in classification theory; (3) previous fiction analysis theories and systems and 'The left hand of darkness'; (4) fiction warrant and critical warrant; (5) experimental fiction analysis system (EFAS); (6) application and evaluation of EFAS. Appendix 1 gives references to fiction analysis systems and appendix 2 lists EFAS coding sheets
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization 21(1994) no.3, S.165-167 (W. Bies); JASIS 46(1995) no.5, S.389-390 (E.G. Bierbaum); Canadian journal of information and library science 20(1995) nos.3/4, S.52-53 (L. Rees-Potter)
-
Chu, C.M.; O'Brien, A.: Subject analysis : the critical first stage in indexing (1993)
0.01
0.00667582 = product of:
0.02670328 = sum of:
0.02008212 = weight(_text_:of in 6472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02008212 = score(doc=6472,freq=18.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.3109903 = fieldWeight in 6472, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6472)
0.006621159 = product of:
0.013242318 = sum of:
0.013242318 = weight(_text_:on in 6472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013242318 = score(doc=6472,freq=2.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.14580199 = fieldWeight in 6472, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6472)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Studies of indexing neglect the first stage of the process, that is, subject analysis. In this study, novice indexers were asked to analyse three short, popular journal articles; to express the general subject as well as the primary and secondary topics in natural laguage statements; to state what influenced the analysis and to comment on the ease or difficulty of this process. The factors which influenced the process were: the subject discipline concerned, factual vs. subjective nature of the text, complexity of the subject, clarity of text, possible support offered by bibliographic apparatus such as title, etc. The findings showed that with the social science and science texts, the general subject could be determined with ease, while this was more difficult with the humanities text. Clear evidence emerged of the importance of bibliographical apparatus in defining the general subject. There was varying difficulty in determining the primary and secondarx topics
- Source
- Journal of information science. 19(1993), S.439-454
-
Todd, R.J.: Academic indexing : what's it all about? (1992)
0.01
0.0066697467 = product of:
0.026678987 = sum of:
0.017850775 = weight(_text_:of in 3011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017850775 = score(doc=3011,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 3011, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3011)
0.008828212 = product of:
0.017656423 = sum of:
0.017656423 = weight(_text_:on in 3011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017656423 = score(doc=3011,freq=2.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 3011, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3011)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- While the literature identifies some broad approaches to subject analysis there is little supporting empirical evidence and few attempts to explicate any specifiable procedures. A productive step forward with indexing research would be to begin by examining how indexers actually undertake the process of subject analysis and to explore systematically factors that guide and influence this process. This would shed some light on a theory of subject analysis, clarify some of the central concepts of indexing, and provide an intelligent knowledge-base for effective, academic indexing practice
-
Amac, T.: Linguistic context analysis : a new approach to communication evaluation (1997)
0.01
0.0063886913 = product of:
0.025554765 = sum of:
0.018933605 = weight(_text_:of in 2576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018933605 = score(doc=2576,freq=16.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 2576, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2576)
0.006621159 = product of:
0.013242318 = sum of:
0.013242318 = weight(_text_:on in 2576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013242318 = score(doc=2576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.14580199 = fieldWeight in 2576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2576)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Argues that the integration of computational psycholinguistics can improve corporate communication, and thus become a new strategic tool. An electronic dictionary was created of basic, neutral and negative connotations for nouns, verbs and adjectives appearing in press releases and other communication media, which can be updated with client specific words. The focus on negative messages has the objective of detecting who, why and how publics are criticized, to learn from the vocabulary of opinion leaders and to improve issues management proactively. Suggests a new form of analysis called 'computational linguistic context analysis' (CLCA) by analyzing nominal groups of negative words, rather than monitoring content analysis in the traditional way. Concludes that CLCA can be used to analyze large quantities of press cuttings about a company and could, theoretically, be used to analyze the structure, language and style of a particular journalist to whom it is planned to send a press release or article
-
Studwell, W.E.: Subject suggestions 6 : some concerns relating to quantity of subjects (1990)
0.01
0.006071859 = product of:
0.024287436 = sum of:
0.0154592255 = weight(_text_:of in 466) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0154592255 = score(doc=466,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 466, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=466)
0.008828212 = product of:
0.017656423 = sum of:
0.017656423 = weight(_text_:on in 466) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017656423 = score(doc=466,freq=2.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 466, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=466)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- The number of subject headings for any individual bibliographic record is discussed. Four policy proposals are presented: how many different persons, places, and organisations should be used; how many uses of the same person, place, organisation, or topic should be allowed; an overall policy on secondary headings; how many subjects should be as a general policy.
-
Wilkinson, C.L.: Intellectual level as a search enhancement in the online environment : summation and implications (1990)
0.01
0.006071859 = product of:
0.024287436 = sum of:
0.0154592255 = weight(_text_:of in 479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0154592255 = score(doc=479,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 479, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=479)
0.008828212 = product of:
0.017656423 = sum of:
0.017656423 = weight(_text_:on in 479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017656423 = score(doc=479,freq=2.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 479, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=479)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- This paper summarizes the papers presented by the members of the panel on "The Concept of Intellectual Level in Cataloging and Classification." The implication of adding intellectual level to the MARC record and creating intellectual level indexes in online catalogs are discussed. Conclusion is reached that providing intellectual level will not only be costly but may perhaps even be a disservice to library users.
-
Andersson, R.; Holst, E.: Indexes and other depictions of fictions : a new model for analysis empirically tested (1996)
0.00
0.0040219906 = product of:
0.016087962 = sum of:
0.009466803 = weight(_text_:of in 473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009466803 = score(doc=473,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.14660224 = fieldWeight in 473, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=473)
0.006621159 = product of:
0.013242318 = sum of:
0.013242318 = weight(_text_:on in 473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013242318 = score(doc=473,freq=2.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.14580199 = fieldWeight in 473, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=473)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- In this study descriptions of a novel by 100 users at 2 Swedish public libraries, Malmö and Molndal, Mar-Apr 95, were compared to the index terms used for the novels at these libraries. Describes previous systems for fiction indexing, the 2 libraries, and the users interviewed. Compares the AMP system with their own model. The latter operates with terms under the headings phenomena, frame and author's intention. The similarities between the users' and indexers' descriptions were sufficiently close to make it possible to retrieve fiction in accordance with users' wishes in Molndal, and would have been in Malmö, had more books been indexed with more terms. Sometimes the similarities were close enough for users to retrieve fiction on their own
-
Schlapfer, K.: ¬The information content of images (1995)
0.00
0.0033470204 = product of:
0.026776163 = sum of:
0.026776163 = weight(_text_:of in 521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026776163 = score(doc=521,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.41465378 = fieldWeight in 521, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=521)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Reviews the methods of calculating the information content of images, with particular reference to the information content of printed and photographic images; and printed and television images
-
Farrow, J.: All in the mind : concept analysis in indexing (1995)
0.00
0.003155601 = product of:
0.025244808 = sum of:
0.025244808 = weight(_text_:of in 2926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025244808 = score(doc=2926,freq=16.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 2926, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2926)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- The indexing process consists of the comprehension of the document to be indexed, followed by the production of a set of index terms. Differences between academic indexing and back-of-the-book indexing are discussed. Text comprehension is a branch of human information processing, and it is argued that the model of text comprehension and production debeloped by van Dijk and Kintsch can form the basis for a cognitive process model of indexing. Strategies for testing such a model are suggested
-
Berinstein, P.: Moving multimedia : the information value in images (1997)
0.00
0.0029517945 = product of:
0.023614356 = sum of:
0.023614356 = weight(_text_:of in 2489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023614356 = score(doc=2489,freq=14.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.36569026 = fieldWeight in 2489, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2489)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Considers the role of pictures in information communication, comparing the way it conveys information with text. Categorises the purposes of images as conveyors of information: the instructional image, the documentary image, the location image, the graphical representation of numbers, the concepts image, the image making the unseen visible, the image as a surrogate for an object or document, the decorative image, the image as a statement, the strong image and the emotional image. Gives examples of how the value of images is being recognised and of how they can be used well
-
Molina, M.P.: Interdisciplinary approaches to the concept and practice of written documentary content analysis (WTDCA) (1994)
0.00
0.0029286426 = product of:
0.02342914 = sum of:
0.02342914 = weight(_text_:of in 6147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02342914 = score(doc=6147,freq=18.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 6147, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6147)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Content analysis, restricted within the limits of written textual documents (WTDCA), is a field which is greatly in need of extensive interdisciplinary research. This would clarify certain concepts, especially those concerned with 'text', as a new central nucleus of semiotic research, and 'content', or the informative power of text. The objective reality (syntax) of the written document should be, in the cognitve process that all content analysis entails, interpreted (semantically and pragmatically) in an intersubjective manner with regard to the context, the analyst's knowledge base and the documentary objectives. The contributions of sociolinguistics (textual), logic (formal) and psychology (cognitive) are fundamental to the conduct of these activities. The criteria used to validate the results obtained complete the necessary conceptual reference panorama
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 50(1994) no.2, S.111-133
-
Svenonius, E.: Access to nonbook materials : the limits of subject indexing for visual and aural languages (1994)
0.00
0.0027328306 = product of:
0.021862645 = sum of:
0.021862645 = weight(_text_:of in 8263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021862645 = score(doc=8263,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 8263, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8263)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- An examination of some nonbook materials with respect to an aboutness model of indexing leads to the conclusion that there are instances that defy subject indexing. These occur not so much because of the nature of the medium per se but because it is being used for nondocumentary purposes, or, when being used for such purposes, the subject referenced is nonlexical
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 45(1994) no.8, S.600-606
-
Jörgensen, C.: ¬The applicability of selected classification systems to image attributes (1996)
0.00
0.0025828204 = product of:
0.020662563 = sum of:
0.020662563 = weight(_text_:of in 5175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020662563 = score(doc=5175,freq=14.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 5175, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5175)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Recent research investigated image attributes as reported by participants in describing, sorting, and searching tasks with images and defined 46 specific image attributes which were then organized into 12 major classes. Attributes were also grouped as being 'perceptual' (directly stimulated by visual percepts), 'interpretive' (requiring inference from visual percepts), and 'reactive' (cognitive and affective responses to the images). This research describes the coverage of two image indexing and classification systems and one general classification system in relation to the previous findings and analyzes the extent to which components of these systems are capable of describing the range of image attributes as revealed by the previous research
- Source
- Knowledge organization and change: Proceedings of the Fourth International ISKO Conference, 15-18 July 1996, Library of Congress, Washington, DC. Ed.: R. Green
-
Farrow, J.: Indexing as a cognitive process (1994)
0.00
0.002231347 = product of:
0.017850775 = sum of:
0.017850775 = weight(_text_:of in 1257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017850775 = score(doc=1257,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 1257, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1257)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.53, [=Suppl.16]
-
Dooley, J.M.: Subject indexing in context : subject cataloging of MARC AMC format archical records (1992)
0.00
0.002231347 = product of:
0.017850775 = sum of:
0.017850775 = weight(_text_:of in 2199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017850775 = score(doc=2199,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 2199, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2199)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Integration of archival materials catalogued in the USMARC AMC format into online catalogues has given a new urgency to the need for direct subject access. Offers a broad definition of the concepts to be considered under the subject access heading, including not only topical subjects but also proper names, forms of material, time periods, geographic places, occupations, and functions. It is both necessary and possible to provide more consistent subject access to archives and manuscripts than currently is being achieved. Describes current efforts that are under way in the profession to address this need
-
Wellisch, H.H.: Aboutness and selection of topics (1996)
0.00
0.002231347 = product of:
0.017850775 = sum of:
0.017850775 = weight(_text_:of in 6150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017850775 = score(doc=6150,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 6150, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6150)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
