Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

0.013868858 = product of:
  0.027737716 = sum of:
    0.027737716 = product of:
      0.055475432 = sum of:
        0.055475432 = weight(_text_:i in 3003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055475432 = score(doc=3003,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16640453 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04411889 = queryNorm
            0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 3003, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3003)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This article describes the difference between cataloging images and cataloging books, the obstacles to including subject data in image cataloging records and how these obstacles can be overcome to make image collections more accessible. I call for participants to help create a subject authority reference resource for non-Western art. This article is an expanded and revised version of a presentation for the 2016 Joint ARLIS/VRA conference in Seattle.

0.013208066 = product of:
  0.026416132 = sum of:
    0.026416132 = product of:
      0.13208066 = sum of:
        0.13208066 = weight(_text_:author's in 320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13208066 = score(doc=320,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2964857 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04411889 = queryNorm
            0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 320, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=320)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This article argues that authorial stance should be taken into account in the indexing of scientific documents. Authorial stance has been widely studied in linguistics and is a typical feature of scientific writing that reveals the uniqueness of each author's perspective, their scientific contribution, and their thinking. We argue that authorial stance guides the reading of scientific documents and that it can be used to characterize the knowledge contained in such documents. Our research has previously shown that people reading dissertations are interested both in a topic and in a document's authorial stance. Now, we would like to propose a two-tiered indexing system. Dissertations would first be divided into paragraphs; then, each information unit would be defined by topic and by the markers of authorial stance present in the document.

0.012135251 = product of:
  0.024270503 = sum of:
    0.024270503 = product of:
      0.048541006 = sum of:
        0.048541006 = weight(_text_:i in 946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048541006 = score(doc=946,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16640453 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04411889 = queryNorm
            0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 946, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=946)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The philosophy of history can help articulate problems relevant to information organization. One such problem is "aboutness": How do texts relate to the world? In response to this problem, philosophers of history have developed theories of colligation describing how authors bind together phenomena under organizing concepts. Drawing on these ideas, I present a theory of subject analysis that avoids the problematic illusion of an independent "landscape" of subjects. This theory points to a broad vision of the future of information organization and some specific challenges to be met.

0.010566828 = product of:
  0.021133656 = sum of:
    0.021133656 = product of:
      0.04226731 = sum of:
        0.04226731 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04226731 = score(doc=4888,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15449683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04411889 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 1.2012 13:02:10

Source

Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.1, S.13-22

0.00896625 = product of:
  0.0179325 = sum of:
    0.0179325 = product of:
      0.035865 = sum of:
        0.035865 = weight(_text_:22 in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035865 = score(doc=1416,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15449683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04411889 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik