-
Raieli, R.: ¬The semantic hole : enthusiasm and caution around multimedia information retrieval (2012)
0.04
0.03961276 = product of:
0.07922552 = sum of:
0.07922552 = sum of:
0.030676214 = weight(_text_:r in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030676214 = score(doc=4888,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1677509 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.050676074 = queryNorm
0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
0.048549302 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048549302 = score(doc=4888,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17745897 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050676074 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2012 13:02:10
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.1, S.13-22
-
Clavier, V.; Paganelli, C.: Including authorial stance in the indexing of scientific documents (2012)
0.02
0.018963898 = product of:
0.037927795 = sum of:
0.037927795 = product of:
0.15171118 = sum of:
0.15171118 = weight(_text_:author's in 320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15171118 = score(doc=320,freq=2.0), product of:
0.340551 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.050676074 = queryNorm
0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 320, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=320)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article argues that authorial stance should be taken into account in the indexing of scientific documents. Authorial stance has been widely studied in linguistics and is a typical feature of scientific writing that reveals the uniqueness of each author's perspective, their scientific contribution, and their thinking. We argue that authorial stance guides the reading of scientific documents and that it can be used to characterize the knowledge contained in such documents. Our research has previously shown that people reading dissertations are interested both in a topic and in a document's authorial stance. Now, we would like to propose a two-tiered indexing system. Dissertations would first be divided into paragraphs; then, each information unit would be defined by topic and by the markers of authorial stance present in the document.
-
Shaw, R.: Information organization and the philosophy of history (2013)
0.01
0.010736675 = product of:
0.02147335 = sum of:
0.02147335 = product of:
0.0429467 = sum of:
0.0429467 = weight(_text_:r in 946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0429467 = score(doc=946,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1677509 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.050676074 = queryNorm
0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 946, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=946)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Chen, S.-J.; Lee, H.-L.: Art images and mental associations : a preliminary exploration (2014)
0.01
0.010298862 = product of:
0.020597724 = sum of:
0.020597724 = product of:
0.04119545 = sum of:
0.04119545 = weight(_text_:22 in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04119545 = score(doc=1416,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17745897 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050676074 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Arastoopoor, S.; Fattahi, R.: Users' perception of aboutness and ofness in images : an approach to subject indexing based on Ervin Panofsky's theory and users'' view (2012)
0.01
0.0076690535 = product of:
0.015338107 = sum of:
0.015338107 = product of:
0.030676214 = sum of:
0.030676214 = weight(_text_:r in 872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030676214 = score(doc=872,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1677509 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.050676074 = queryNorm
0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 872, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=872)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Hjoerland, B.: Subject (of documents) (2016)
0.01
0.0076690535 = product of:
0.015338107 = sum of:
0.015338107 = product of:
0.030676214 = sum of:
0.030676214 = weight(_text_:r in 3182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030676214 = score(doc=3182,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1677509 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.050676074 = queryNorm
0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 3182, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3182)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Contents: 1. Introduction; 2. Theoretical views: 2.1 Charles Ammi Cutter (1837-1903), 2.2 S. R. Ranganathan (1892-1972), 2.3 Patrick Wilson (1927-2003), 2.4 "Content oriented" versus "request oriented" views, 2.5 Issues of subjectivity and objectivity, 2.6 The subject knowledge view, 2.7 Other views and definitions; 3. Related concepts: 3.1 Words versus concepts versus subjects, 3.2 Aboutness, 3.3 Topic, 3.4 Isness, 3.5 Ofness, 3.6 Theme.
