Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

0.019915972 = product of:
  0.039831944 = sum of:
    0.039831944 = product of:
      0.07966389 = sum of:
        0.07966389 = weight(_text_:f in 4707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07966389 = score(doc=4707,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22612704 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056733362 = queryNorm
            0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 4707, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4707)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira

0.0176034 = product of:
  0.0352068 = sum of:
    0.0352068 = product of:
      0.0704136 = sum of:
        0.0704136 = weight(_text_:f in 2667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0704136 = score(doc=2667,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22612704 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056733362 = queryNorm
            0.31138954 = fieldWeight in 2667, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2667)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Sentiment analysis on Twitter has attracted much attention recently due to its wide applications in both, commercial and public sectors. In this paper we present SentiCircles, a lexicon-based approach for sentiment analysis on Twitter. Different from typical lexicon-based approaches, which offer a fixed and static prior sentiment polarities of words regardless of their context, SentiCircles takes into account the co-occurrence patterns of words in different contexts in tweets to capture their semantics and update their pre-assigned strength and polarity in sentiment lexicons accordingly. Our approach allows for the detection of sentiment at both entity-level and tweet-level. We evaluate our proposed approach on three Twitter datasets using three different sentiment lexicons to derive word prior sentiments. Results show that our approach significantly outperforms the baselines in accuracy and F-measure for entity-level subjectivity (neutral vs. polar) and polarity (positive vs. negative) detections. For tweet-level sentiment detection, our approach performs better than the state-of-the-art SentiStrength by 4-5% in accuracy in two datasets, but falls marginally behind by 1% in F-measure in the third dataset.

0.013588095 = product of:
  0.02717619 = sum of:
    0.02717619 = product of:
      0.05435238 = sum of:
        0.05435238 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05435238 = score(doc=4888,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19867057 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056733362 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 1.2012 13:02:10

Source

Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.1, S.13-22

0.012447483 = product of:
  0.024894966 = sum of:
    0.024894966 = product of:
      0.04978993 = sum of:
        0.04978993 = weight(_text_:f in 2669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04978993 = score(doc=2669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22612704 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056733362 = queryNorm
            0.22018565 = fieldWeight in 2669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2669)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.011529881 = product of:
  0.023059761 = sum of:
    0.023059761 = product of:
      0.046119522 = sum of:
        0.046119522 = weight(_text_:22 in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046119522 = score(doc=1416,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19867057 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056733362 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.011398701 = product of:
  0.022797402 = sum of:
    0.022797402 = product of:
      0.09118961 = sum of:
        0.09118961 = weight(_text_:authors in 946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09118961 = score(doc=946,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25863686 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056733362 = queryNorm
            0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 946, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=946)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The philosophy of history can help articulate problems relevant to information organization. One such problem is "aboutness": How do texts relate to the world? In response to this problem, philosophers of history have developed theories of colligation describing how authors bind together phenomena under organizing concepts. Drawing on these ideas, I present a theory of subject analysis that avoids the problematic illusion of an independent "landscape" of subjects. This theory points to a broad vision of the future of information organization and some specific challenges to be met.

0.008141929 = product of:
  0.016283859 = sum of:
    0.016283859 = product of:
      0.065135434 = sum of:
        0.065135434 = weight(_text_:authors in 5640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.065135434 = score(doc=5640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25863686 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056733362 = queryNorm
            0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 5640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5640)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Aboutness ranks amongst our field's greatest bugbears. What is a work about? How can this be known? This mirrors debates within the philosophy of language, where the concept of representation has similarly evaded satisfactory definition. This paper proposes that we abandon the strong sense of the word aboutness, which seems to promise some inherent relationship between work and subject, or, in philosophical terms, between word and world. Instead, we seek an etymological reset to the older sense of aboutness as "in the vicinity, nearby; in some place or various places nearby; all over a surface." To distinguish this sense in the context of information studies, we introduce the term episemantics. The authors have each independently applied this term in slightly different contexts and scales (Hauser 2018a; Tennis 2016), and this article presents a unified definition of the term and guidelines for applying it at the scale of both words and works. The resulting weak concept of aboutness is pragmatic, in Star's sense of a focus on consequences over antecedents, while reserving space for the critique and improvement of aboutness determinations within various contexts and research programs. The paper finishes with a discussion of the implication of the concept of episemantics and methodological possibilities it offers for knowledge organization research and practice. We draw inspiration from Melvil Dewey's use of physical aroundness in his first classification system and ask how aroundness might be more effectively operationalized in digital environments.