Search (104 results, page 3 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Inhaltsanalyse"
  1. Renouf, A.: Making sense of text : automated approaches to meaning extraction (1993) 0.00 
    0.0036244236 = product of:
  0.025370965 = sum of:
    0.025370965 = weight(_text_:information in 7111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025370965 = score(doc=7111,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 7111, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7111)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Imprint
    Oxford : Learned Information
    Source
    Online information 93: 17th International Online Meeting Proceedings, London, 7.-9.12.1993. Ed. by D.I. Raitt et al
  2. Green, R.: ¬The role of relational structures in indexing for the humanities (1997) 0.00 
    0.0032612407 = product of:
  0.022828683 = sum of:
    0.022828683 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022828683 = score(doc=474,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11384433 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 474, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=474)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    The paper is divided into 3 parts. The 1st develops a framework for evaluating the indexing needs of the humanities with reference to 4 sets of contrasts: user (need)-oriented vs. document-oriented indexing; subject indexing vs. attribute indexing; scientific writing vs. humanistic writing; and topical relevance vs. logical relevance vs. evidential relevance vs. aesthetic relevance. The indexing needs for the humanities range broadly across these contrasts. The 2nd part establishes the centrality of relationships to the communication of indexable matter and examines the advantages and disadvantages of means used for their expression inboth natural languages and indexing languages. The use of relational structure, such as a frame, is shown to represent perhaps the best available option. The 3rd part illustrates where the use of relational structures in humanities indexing would help meet some of the needs previously identified. Although not a panacea, the adoption of frame-based indexing in the humanities might substantially improve the retrieval of its literature
  3. Farrow, J.: Indexing as a cognitive process (1994) 0.00 
    0.002928977 = product of:
  0.020502837 = sum of:
    0.020502837 = weight(_text_:information in 1257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020502837 = score(doc=1257,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 1257, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1257)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.53, [=Suppl.16]
  4. Kremer-Marietti, A.: Thematic analysis (1986) 0.00 
    0.002928977 = product of:
  0.020502837 = sum of:
    0.020502837 = weight(_text_:information in 1273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020502837 = score(doc=1273,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 1273, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1273)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.41, [=Suppl.6]
  5. Baxendale, P.: Content analysis, specification and control (1966) 0.00 
    0.002928977 = product of:
  0.020502837 = sum of:
    0.020502837 = weight(_text_:information in 218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020502837 = score(doc=218,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 218, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=218)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 1(1966), S.71-106
  6. Sharp, J.R.: Content analysis, specification, and control (1967) 0.00 
    0.002928977 = product of:
  0.020502837 = sum of:
    0.020502837 = weight(_text_:information in 226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020502837 = score(doc=226,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 226, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=226)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 2(1967), S.87-122
  7. Taulbee, O.E.: Content analysis, specification, and control (1968) 0.00 
    0.002928977 = product of:
  0.020502837 = sum of:
    0.020502837 = weight(_text_:information in 232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020502837 = score(doc=232,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 232, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=232)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 3(1968), S.105-136
  8. Fairthorne, R.A.: Content analysis, specification, and control (1969) 0.00 
    0.002928977 = product of:
  0.020502837 = sum of:
    0.020502837 = weight(_text_:information in 238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020502837 = score(doc=238,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 238, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=238)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 4(1969), S.73-110
  9. Berinstein, P.: Moving multimedia : the information value in images (1997) 0.00 
    0.002928977 = product of:
  0.020502837 = sum of:
    0.020502837 = weight(_text_:information in 2489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020502837 = score(doc=2489,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 2489, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2489)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Considers the role of pictures in information communication, comparing the way it conveys information with text. Categorises the purposes of images as conveyors of information: the instructional image, the documentary image, the location image, the graphical representation of numbers, the concepts image, the image making the unseen visible, the image as a surrogate for an object or document, the decorative image, the image as a statement, the strong image and the emotional image. Gives examples of how the value of images is being recognised and of how they can be used well
  10. Shaw, R.: Information organization and the philosophy of history (2013) 0.00 
    0.0028653587 = product of:
  0.02005751 = sum of:
    0.02005751 = weight(_text_:information in 946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02005751 = score(doc=946,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.3035872 = fieldWeight in 946, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=946)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    The philosophy of history can help articulate problems relevant to information organization. One such problem is "aboutness": How do texts relate to the world? In response to this problem, philosophers of history have developed theories of colligation describing how authors bind together phenomena under organizing concepts. Drawing on these ideas, I present a theory of subject analysis that avoids the problematic illusion of an independent "landscape" of subjects. This theory points to a broad vision of the future of information organization and some specific challenges to be met.
    Series
    Advances in information science
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.6, S.1092-1103
  11. Lebrecht, H.: Methoden und Probleme der Bilderschließung am Beispiel des verteilten digitalen Bildarchivs Prometheus (2003) 0.00 
    0.0027177006 = product of:
  0.019023903 = sum of:
    0.019023903 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019023903 = score(doc=2508,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11384433 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 2508, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2508)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Die Erschließung von Bildern ist ein Gebiet, welches aufgrund der speziellen Eigenschaften des Mediums Bild von der Texterschließung zu unterscheiden ist. In Museen, Archiven, Universitäten und anderen Einrichtungen werden Bildsammlungen schon länger erschlossen. Viele Sammlungen bleiben jedoch unangetastet, da es für die Bilderschließung noch immer an passend zugeschnittenen Erschließungsinstrumenten und Erschließungsmethoden mangelt. Es existieren keine allgemeingültigen Standards, auch deshalb, weil die zu verzeichnenden Sammlungen vielen verschiedenen Instituten unterschiedlicher Wissenschaftsfächer angehören und sie dort unterschiedlichen Zwecken dienen. Diese Arbeit beginnt mit einer Einführung zur Kommunikationstheorie, um damit das Bewusstsein über die Komplexität der von Bildern vermittelten, visuellen Informationen zu schärfen. Anschließend werden Bildsammlungen typologisch sortiert, bevor im einzelnen auf die Theorie der Formal- und Inhaltserschließung von Bildern eingegangen wird. Dabei werden verschiedene Erschließungsinstrumente und -methoden, jeweils unter Einbindung von Beispielen, vorgestellt und ihre Anwendbarkeit für die Bilderschließung beurteilt. Der zweite Teil der Arbeit ist an das Projekt "Prometheus - Das verteilte digitale Bildarchiv für Forschung und Lehre" gebunden. Über Prometheus werden heterogen erschlossene, digitalisierte Bildbestände unter einer gemeinsamen Retrievaloberfläche verfügbar gemacht. Nach einer Einführung in das Projekt, die intendierten Ziele und die Vorstel lung der Techniken, welche das Retrieval über autonom erstellte Datenbanken ermöglichen, werden praktizierte Erschließungsmethoden einzelner, an Prometheus beteiligter Institute, beispielhaft dargestellt. Die sich zuvor in den verschiedenen Kapiteln andeutenden oder schon festgestellten Problematiken der Bilderschließung werden zum Schluss noch einmal zusammengefasst und diskutiert, wobei sie verschiedenen Ebenen, weshalb sie auftreten und worauf sie sich auswirken, zugeordnet werden können.
  12. Lebrecht, H.: Methoden und Probleme der Bilderschließung (2003) 0.00 
    0.0027177006 = product of:
  0.019023903 = sum of:
    0.019023903 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019023903 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11384433 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Die Erschließung von Bildern ist ein Gebiet, welches aufgrund der speziellen Eigenschaften des Mediums Bild von der Texterschließung zu unterscheiden ist. In Museen, Archiven, Universitäten und anderen Einrichtungen werden Bildsammlungen schon länger erschlossen. Viele Sammlungen bleiben jedoch unangetastet, da es für die Bilderschließung noch immer an passend zugeschnittenen Erschließungsinstrumenten und Erschließungsmethoden mangelt. Es existieren keine allgemeingültigen Standards, auch deshalb, weil die zu verzeichnenden Sammlungen vielen verschiedenen Instituten unterschiedlicher Wissenschaftsfächer angehören und sie dort unterschiedlichen Zwecken dienen. Diese Arbeit beginnt mit einer Einführung zur Kommunikationstheorie, um damit das Bewusstsein über die Komplexität der von Bildern vermittelten, visuellen Informationen zu schärfen. Anschließend werden Bildsammlungen typologisch sortiert, bevor im einzelnen auf die Theorie der Formal- und Inhaltserschließung von Bildern eingegangen wird. Dabei werden verschiedene Erschließungsinstrumente und -methoden, jeweils unter Einbindung von Beispielen, vorgestellt und ihre Anwendbarkeit für die Bilderschließung beurteilt. Der zweite Teil der Arbeit ist an das Projekt "Prometheus - Das verteilte digitale Bildarchiv für Forschung und Lehre" gebunden. Über Prometheus werden heterogen erschlossene, digitalisierte Bildbestände unter einer gemeinsamen Retrievaloberfläche verfügbar gemacht. Nach einer Einführung in das Projekt, die intendierten Ziele und die Vorstel lung der Techniken, welche das Retrieval über autonom erstellte Datenbanken ermöglichen, werden praktizierte Erschließungsmethoden einzelner, an Prometheus beteiligter Institute, beispielhaft dargestellt. Die sich zuvor in den verschiedenen Kapiteln andeutenden oder schon festgestellten Problematiken der Bilderschließung werden zum Schluss noch einmal zusammengefasst und diskutiert, wobei sie verschiedenen Ebenen, weshalb sie auftreten und worauf sie sich auswirken, zugeordnet werden können.
  13. Hjoerland, B.: Subject representation and information seeking : contributions to a theory based on the theory of knowledge (1993) 0.00 
    0.002562855 = product of:
  0.017939983 = sum of:
    0.017939983 = weight(_text_:information in 7555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017939983 = score(doc=7555,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 7555, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7555)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  14. Sauperl, A.: Subject determination during the cataloging process : the development of a system based on theoretical principles (2002) 0.00 
    0.0025552511 = product of:
  0.008943379 = sum of:
    0.003844282 = weight(_text_:information in 2293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003844282 = score(doc=2293,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.058186423 = fieldWeight in 2293, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2293)
    0.0050990973 = product of:
      0.015297291 = sum of:
        0.015297291 = weight(_text_:22 in 2293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015297291 = score(doc=2293,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13179328 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 2293, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2293)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Date
    27. 9.2005 14:22:19
    Footnote
    This document will be particularly useful to subject cataloguing teachers and trainers who could use the model to design case descriptions and exercises. We believe it is an accurate description of the reality of subject cataloguing today. But now that we know how things are dope, the next interesting question may be: Is that the best way? Is there a better, more efficient, way to do things? We can only hope that Dr. Sauperl will soon provide her own view of methods and techniques that could improve the flow of work or address the cataloguers' concern as to the lack of feedback an their work. Her several excellent suggestions for further research in this area all build an bits and pieces of what is done already, and stay well away from what could be done by the various actors in the area, from the designers of controlled vocabularies and authority files to those who use these tools an a daily basis to index, classify, or search for information."
  15. Fremery, W. De; Buckland, M.K.: Context, relevance, and labor (2022) 0.00 
    0.0024560217 = product of:
  0.017192151 = sum of:
    0.017192151 = weight(_text_:information in 4240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017192151 = score(doc=4240,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 4240, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4240)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Since information science concerns the transmission of records, it concerns context. The transmission of documents ensures their arrival in new contexts. Documents and their copies are spread across times and places. The amount of labor required to discover and retrieve relevant documents is also formulated by context. Thus, any serious consideration of communication and of information technologies quickly leads to a concern with context, relevance, and labor. Information scientists have developed many theories of context, relevance, and labor but not a framework for organizing them and describing their relationship with one another. We propose the words context and relevance can be used to articulate a useful framework for considering the diversity of approaches to context and relevance in information science, as well as their relations with each other and with labor.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(2022) no.9, S.1268-1278
  16. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a computer-aided user-system dialogue based on an analysis of users' search behaviour (1984) 0.00 
    0.0021967327 = product of:
  0.015377128 = sum of:
    0.015377128 = weight(_text_:information in 1044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015377128 = score(doc=1044,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 1044, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1044)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Social science information studies. 4(1984), S.167-183
  17. Smith, P.J.; Normore, L.F.; Denning, R.; Johnson, W.P.: Computerized tools to support document analysis (1994) 0.00 
    0.0021967327 = product of:
  0.015377128 = sum of:
    0.015377128 = weight(_text_:information in 2990) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015377128 = score(doc=2990,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 2990, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2990)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Imprint
    Medford, NJ : Learned information
  18. Miene, A.; Hermes, T.; Ioannidis, G.: Wie kommt das Bild in die Datenbank? : Inhaltsbasierte Analyse von Bildern und Videos (2002) 0.00 
    0.0021967327 = product of:
  0.015377128 = sum of:
    0.015377128 = weight(_text_:information in 213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015377128 = score(doc=213,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 213, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=213)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Die verfügbare multimediale Information nimmt stetig zu, nicht zuletzt durch die Tag für Tag wachsende Zahl an neuer Information im Internet. Damit man dieser Flut Herr werden und diese Information wieder abrufbar machen kann, muss sie annotiert und geeignet in Datenbanken abgelegt werden. Hier besteht das Problem der manuellen Annotation, das einerseits durch die Ermüdung aufgrund der Routinearbeit und andererseits durch die Subjektivität des Annotierenden zu Fehlern in der Annotation führen kann. Unterstützende Systeme, die dem Dokumentar genau diese Routinearbeit abnehmen, können hier bis zu einem gewissen Grad Abhilfe schaffen. Die wissenschaftliche Erschließung von beispielsweise filmbeiträgen wird der Dokumentar zwar immer noch selbst machen müssen und auch sollen, aber die Erkennung und Dokumentation von sog. Einstellungsgrenzen kann durchaus automatisch mit Unterstützung eines Rechners geschehen. In diesem Beitrag zeigen wir anhand von Projekten, die wir durchgeführt haben, wie weit diese Unterstützung des Dokumentars bei der Annotation von Bildern und Videos gehen kann
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 53(2002) H.1, S.15-21
  19. Bland, R.N.: ¬The concept of intellectual level in cataloging and classification (1983) 0.00 
    0.0020710994 = product of:
  0.014497695 = sum of:
    0.014497695 = weight(_text_:information in 321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014497695 = score(doc=321,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 321, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=321)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    This paper traces the history of the concept of intellectual level in cataloging and classification in the United States. Past cataloging codes, subject-heading practice, and classification systems have provided library users with little systematic information concerning the intellectual level or intended audience of works. Reasons for this omission are discussed, and arguments are developed to show that this kind of information would be a useful addition to the catalog record of the present and the future.
  20. Hauff-Hartig, S.: Automatische Transkription von Videos : Fernsehen 3.0: Automatisierte Sentimentanalyse und Zusammenstellung von Kurzvideos mit hohem Aufregungslevel KI-generierte Metadaten: Von der Technologiebeobachtung bis zum produktiven Einsatz (2021) 0.00 
    0.0019425133 = product of:
  0.013597593 = sum of:
    0.013597593 = product of:
      0.040792778 = sum of:
        0.040792778 = weight(_text_:22 in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040792778 = score(doc=251,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13179328 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 93
  • d 11

Types

  • a 94
  • m 4
  • x 3
  • d 2
  • el 2
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications