Search (160 results, page 8 of 8)

  • × theme_ss:"Inhaltsanalyse"
  1. Todd, R.J.: Subject access: what's it all about? : some research findings (1993) 0.00
    0.001073034 = product of:
      0.005901687 = sum of:
        0.0031240587 = weight(_text_:a in 8193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0031240587 = score(doc=8193,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 8193, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8193)
        0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 8193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027776284 = score(doc=8193,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 8193, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8193)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 19(1993) nos. 3/4, S.259-267
    Type
    a
  2. Svenonius, E.: Access to nonbook materials : the limits of subject indexing for visual and aural languages (1994) 0.00
    0.001073034 = product of:
      0.005901687 = sum of:
        0.0031240587 = weight(_text_:a in 8263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0031240587 = score(doc=8263,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 8263, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8263)
        0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 8263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027776284 = score(doc=8263,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 8263, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8263)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 45(1994) no.8, S.600-606
    Type
    a
  3. Andersen, J.: ¬The concept of genre : when, how, and why? (2001) 0.00
    0.001073034 = product of:
      0.005901687 = sum of:
        0.0031240587 = weight(_text_:a in 639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0031240587 = score(doc=639,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 639, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=639)
        0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027776284 = score(doc=639,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 639, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=639)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 28(2001) no.4, S.203-204
    Type
    a
  4. Hoover, L.: ¬A beginners' guide for subject analysis of theses and dissertations in the hard sciences (2005) 0.00
    0.0010612715 = product of:
      0.005836993 = sum of:
        0.0033818933 = weight(_text_:a in 5740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0033818933 = score(doc=5740,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 5740, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5740)
        0.0024550997 = weight(_text_:s in 5740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0024550997 = score(doc=5740,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 5740, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5740)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    This guide, for beginning catalogers with humanities or social sciences backgrounds, provides assistance in subject analysis (based on Library of Congress Subject Headings) of theses and dissertations (T/Ds) that are produced by graduate students in university departments in the hard sciences (physical sciences and engineering). It is aimed at those who have had little or no experience in cataloging, especially of this type of material, and for those who desire to supplement local mentoring resources for subject analysis in the hard sciences. Theses and dissertations from these departments present a special challenge because they are the results of current research representing specific new concepts with which the cataloger may not be familiar. In fact, subject headings often have not yet been created for the specific concept(s) being researched. Additionally, T/D authors often use jargon/terminology specific to their department. Catalogers often have many other duties in addition to subject analysis of T/Ds in the hard sciences, yet they desire to provide optimal access through accurate, thorough subject analysis. Tips are provided for determining the content of the T/D, strategic searches on WorldCat for possible subject headings, evaluating the relevancy of these subject headings for final selection, and selecting appropriate subdivisions where needed. Lists of basic reference resources are also provided.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 41(2005) no.1, S.133-161
    Type
    a
  5. Jens-Erik Mai, J.-E.: ¬The role of documents, domains and decisions in indexing (2004) 0.00
    0.0010558002 = product of:
      0.005806901 = sum of:
        0.0044180867 = weight(_text_:a in 2653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0044180867 = score(doc=2653,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 2653, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2653)
        0.0013888142 = weight(_text_:s in 2653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0013888142 = score(doc=2653,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 2653, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2653)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    The paper demonstrates that indexing is a complex phenomenon and presents a domain centered approach to indexing. The indexing process is analysed using the Means-Ends Analysis, a tool developed for the Cognitive Work Analysis framework. A Means-Ends Analysis of indexing provides a holistic understanding of indexing and Shows the importance of understanding the users' activities when indexing. The paper presents a domain-centered approach to indexing that includes an analysis of the users' activities and the paper outlines that approach to indexing.
    Content
    1. Introduction The document at hand is often regarded as the most important entity for analysis in the indexing situation. The indexer's focus is directed to the "entity and its faithful description" (Soergel, 1985, 227) and the indexer is advised to "stick to the text and the author's claims" (Lancaster, 2003, 37). The indexer's aim is to establish the subject matter based an an analysis of the document with the goal of representing the document as truthfully as possible and to ensure the subject representation's validity by remaining neutral and objective. To help indexers with their task they are guided towards particular and important attributes of the document that could help them determine the document's subject matter. The exact attributes the indexer is recommended to examine varies, but typical examples are: the title, the abstract, the table of contents, chapter headings, chapter subheadings, preface, introduction, foreword, the text itself, bibliographical references, index entries, illustrations, diagrams, and tables and their captions. The exact recommendations vary according to the type of document that is being indexed (monographs vs. periodical articles, for instance). It is clear that indexers should provide faithful descriptions, that indexers should represent the author's claims, and that the document's attributes are helpful points of analysis. However, indexers need much more guidance when determining the subject than simply the documents themselves. One approach that could be taken to handle the Situation is a useroriented approach in which it is argued that the indexer should ask, "how should I make this document ... visible to potential users? What terms should I use to convey its knowledge to those interested?" (Albrechtsen, 1993, 222). The basic idea is that indexers need to have the users' information needs and terminology in mind when determining the subject matter of documents as well as when selecting index terms.
    Pages
    S.207-213
    Type
    a
  6. Sauperl, A.: Catalogers' common ground and shared knowledge (2004) 0.00
    0.001025653 = product of:
      0.005641091 = sum of:
        0.0039050733 = weight(_text_:a in 2069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0039050733 = score(doc=2069,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 2069, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2069)
        0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 2069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0017360178 = score(doc=2069,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2069, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2069)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    The problem of multiple interpretations of meaning in the indexing process has been mostly avoided by information scientists. Among the few who have addressed this question are Clare Beghtol and Jens Erik Mai. Their findings and findings of other researchers in the area of information science, social psychology, and psycholinguistics indicate that the source of the problem might lie in the background and culture of each indexer or cataloger. Are the catalogers aware of the problem? A general model of the indexing process was developed from observations and interviews of 12 catalogers in three American academic libraries. The model is illustrated with a hypothetical cataloger's process. The study with catalogers revealed that catalogers are aware of the author's, the user's, and their own meaning, but do not try to accommodate them all. On the other hand, they make every effort to build common ground with catalog users by studying documents related to the document being cataloged, and by considering catalog records and subject headings related to the subject identified in the document being cataloged. They try to build common ground with other catalogers by using cataloging tools and by inferring unstated rules of cataloging from examples in the catalogs.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 55(2004) no.1, S.55-63
    Type
    a
  7. Bednarek, M.: Intellectual access to pictorial information (1993) 0.00
    9.812339E-4 = product of:
      0.005396786 = sum of:
        0.0033135647 = weight(_text_:a in 5631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0033135647 = score(doc=5631,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 5631, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5631)
        0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 5631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0020832212 = score(doc=5631,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 5631, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5631)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    Visual materials represent a significantly different type of communication to textual materials and therefore present distinct challenges for the process of retrieval, especially if by retireval we mean intellectual access to the content of images. This paper outlines the special characteristics of visual materials, focusing on their pontential complexity and subjectivity, and the methods used and explored for gaining access to visual materials as reported in the literature. It concludes that methods of access to visual materials are dominated by the relative mature systems developed for textual materials and that access methods based on visual communication are still largely in the developmental or prototype stage. Although reported research on user requirements in the retrieval of visual information is noticeably lacking, the results of at least one study indicate that the visually-based retrieval methods of structured and unstructered browsing seem to be preferred for visula materials and that effective retrieval methods are ultimately related to characteristics of the enquirer and the visual information sought
    Source
    Australian library journal. 42(1993) no.1, S.33-46
    Type
    a
  8. Chu, C.M.; O'Brien, A.: Subject analysis : the critical first stage in indexing (1993) 0.00
    9.812339E-4 = product of:
      0.005396786 = sum of:
        0.0033135647 = weight(_text_:a in 6472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0033135647 = score(doc=6472,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 6472, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6472)
        0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 6472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0020832212 = score(doc=6472,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 6472, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6472)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 19(1993), S.439-454
    Type
    a
  9. Beghtol, C.: Stories : applications of narrative discourse analysis to issues in information storage and retrieval (1997) 0.00
    9.3890476E-4 = product of:
      0.005163976 = sum of:
        0.0027335514 = weight(_text_:a in 5844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027335514 = score(doc=5844,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 5844, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5844)
        0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 5844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0024304248 = score(doc=5844,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 5844, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5844)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 24(1997) no.2, S.64-71
    Type
    a
  10. Lassak, L.: ¬Ein Versuch zur Repräsentation von Charakteren der Kinder- und Jugendbuchserie "Die drei ???" in einer Datenbank (2017) 0.00
    9.3890476E-4 = product of:
      0.005163976 = sum of:
        0.0027335514 = weight(_text_:a in 1784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027335514 = score(doc=1784,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 1784, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1784)
        0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 1784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0024304248 = score(doc=1784,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 1784, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1784)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Footnote
    Masterarbeit zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Master of Arts (M. A.)
    Pages
    120 S
  11. Caldera-Serrano, J.: Thematic description of audio-visual information on television (2010) 0.00
    8.047755E-4 = product of:
      0.004426265 = sum of:
        0.0023430442 = weight(_text_:a in 3953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0023430442 = score(doc=3953,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 3953, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3953)
        0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 3953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0020832212 = score(doc=3953,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3953, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3953)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Source
    Aslib proceedings. 62(2010) no.2, S.202-209
    Type
    a
  12. Bi, Y.: Sentiment classification in social media data by combining triplet belief functions (2022) 0.00
    8.047755E-4 = product of:
      0.004426265 = sum of:
        0.0023430442 = weight(_text_:a in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0023430442 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
        0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0020832212 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(2022) no.7, S.968-991
    Type
    a
  13. Wersig, G.: Inhaltsanalyse : Einführung in ihre Systematik und Literatur (1968) 0.00
    6.312792E-4 = product of:
      0.006944071 = sum of:
        0.006944071 = weight(_text_:s in 2386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006944071 = score(doc=2386,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.24024783 = fieldWeight in 2386, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=2386)
      0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    
    Pages
    45 S
  14. Computergestützte Inhaltsanalyse in der empirischen Sozialforschung (1983) 0.00
    5.0502334E-4 = product of:
      0.0055552567 = sum of:
        0.0055552567 = weight(_text_:s in 1877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0055552567 = score(doc=1877,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 1877, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1877)
      0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    
    Pages
    314 S
  15. Gervereau, L.: Voir, comprendre, analyser les images (1994) 0.00
    5.0502334E-4 = product of:
      0.0055552567 = sum of:
        0.0055552567 = weight(_text_:s in 8758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0055552567 = score(doc=8758,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 8758, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=8758)
      0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    
    Pages
    191 S
  16. Mayring, P.: Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse : Grundlagen und Techniken (1990) 0.00
    4.4638177E-4 = product of:
      0.0049101994 = sum of:
        0.0049101994 = weight(_text_:s in 34) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0049101994 = score(doc=34,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.16988087 = fieldWeight in 34, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=34)
      0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    
    Abstract
    "Inhaltsanalyse will: Kommunikation analysieren, fixierte Kommunikation analysieren, dabei systematisch vorgehen, das heißt regelgeleitet vorgehen, das heißt auch theoriegeleitet vorgehen, mit dem Ziel, Rückschlüsse auf bestimmte Aspekte der Kommunikation zu ziehen" (S.11)
    Pages
    118 S
  17. Ackermann, A.: Zur Rolle der Inhaltsanalyse bei der Sacherschließung : theoretischer Anspruch und praktische Wirklichkeit in der RSWK (2001) 0.00
    2.682585E-4 = product of:
      0.0014754217 = sum of:
        7.810147E-4 = weight(_text_:a in 2061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          7.810147E-4 = score(doc=2061,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.025478978 = fieldWeight in 2061, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2061)
        6.944071E-4 = weight(_text_:s in 2061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          6.944071E-4 = score(doc=2061,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.024024783 = fieldWeight in 2061, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2061)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Pages
    68 S. + Anlagen.
  18. Piekara, F.H.: Wie idiosynkratisch ist Wissen? : Individuelle Unterschiede im Assoziieren und bei der Anlage und Nutzung von Informationssystemen (1988) 0.00
    2.5251167E-4 = product of:
      0.0027776284 = sum of:
        0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 2537) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027776284 = score(doc=2537,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2537, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2537)
      0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    
    Pages
    359 S
  19. Früh, W.: Inhaltsanalyse (2001) 0.00
    1.8938375E-4 = product of:
      0.0020832212 = sum of:
        0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 1751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0020832212 = score(doc=1751,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 1751, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1751)
      0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    
    Pages
    283 S
  20. Scholz, O.R.: Bild, Darstellung, Zeichen : Philosophische Theorien bildlicher Darstellung (2004) 0.00
    1.578198E-4 = product of:
      0.0017360178 = sum of:
        0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 1436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0017360178 = score(doc=1436,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 1436, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1436)
      0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    
    Pages
    XII, 220 S

Authors

Languages

  • e 133
  • d 24
  • f 2
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 139
  • m 13
  • x 5
  • el 3
  • d 2
  • s 1
  • More… Less…