Search (45 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Inhaltsanalyse"
  1. Raieli, R.: ¬The semantic hole : enthusiasm and caution around multimedia information retrieval (2012) 0.04 
    0.036276832 = sum of:
  0.017408768 = product of:
    0.12186137 = sum of:
      0.12186137 = weight(_text_:visual in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12186137 = score(doc=4888,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.2084343 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.291659 = idf(docFreq=604, maxDocs=44218)
            0.039389215 = queryNorm
          0.58465123 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            5.291659 = idf(docFreq=604, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
    0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  0.018868066 = product of:
    0.037736133 = sum of:
      0.037736133 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.037736133 = score(doc=4888,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.13793433 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.039389215 = queryNorm
          0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper centres on the tools for the management of new digital documents, which are not only textual, but also visual-video, audio or multimedia in the full sense. Among the aims is to demonstrate that operating within the terms of generic Information Retrieval through textual language only is limiting, and it is instead necessary to consider ampler criteria, such as those of MultiMedia Information Retrieval, according to which, every type of digital document can be analyzed and searched by the proper elements of language for its proper nature. MMIR is presented as the organic complex of the systems of Text Retrieval, Visual Retrieval, Video Retrieval, and Audio Retrieval, each of which has an approach to information management that handles the concrete textual, visual, audio, or video content of the documents directly, here defined as content-based. In conclusion, the limits of this content-based objective access to documents is underlined. The discrepancy known as the semantic gap is that which occurs between semantic-interpretive access and content-based access. Finally, the integration of these conceptions is explained, gathering and composing the merits and the advantages of each of the approaches and of the systems to access to information.
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:02:10
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Enser, P.G.B.: Visual image retrieval. In: Annual review of information science and technology. 42(2008), S.3-42.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.1, S.13-22
  2. Sauperl, A.: Subject determination during the cataloging process : the development of a system based on theoretical principles (2002) 0.04 
    0.035866443 = sum of:
  0.008422945 = product of:
    0.058960613 = sum of:
      0.058960613 = weight(_text_:author's in 2293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.058960613 = score(doc=2293,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.26470158 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.039389215 = queryNorm
          0.22274372 = fieldWeight in 2293, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2293)
    0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  0.027443498 = sum of:
    0.011433414 = weight(_text_:m in 2293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011433414 = score(doc=2293,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.098018035 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039389215 = queryNorm
        0.11664603 = fieldWeight in 2293, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2293)
    0.016010085 = weight(_text_:22 in 2293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016010085 = score(doc=2293,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13793433 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039389215 = queryNorm
        0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 2293, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2293)
    Date
    27. 9.2005 14:22:19
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 30(2003) no.2, S.114-115 (M. Hudon); "This most interesting contribution to the literature of subject cataloguing originates in the author's doctoral dissertation, prepared under the direction of jerry Saye at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. In seven highly readable chapters, Alenka Sauperl develops possible answers to her principal research question: How do cataloguers determine or identify the topic of a document and choose appropriate subject representations? Specific questions at the source of this research an a process which has not been a frequent object of study include: Where do cataloguers look for an overall sense of what a document is about? How do they get an overall sense of what a document is about, especially when they are not familiar with the discipline? Do they consider only one or several possible interpretations? How do they translate meanings in appropriate and valid class numbers and subject headings? Using a strictly qualitative methodology, Dr. Sauperl's research is a study of twelve cataloguers in reallife situation. The author insists an the holistic rather than purely theoretical understanding of the process she is targeting. Participants in the study were professional cataloguers, with at least one year experience in their current job at one of three large academic libraries in the Southeastern United States. All three libraries have a large central cataloguing department, and use OCLC sources and the same automated system; the context of cataloguing tasks is thus considered to be reasonably comparable. All participants were volunteers in this study which combined two datagathering techniques: the think-aloud method and time-line interviews. A model of the subject cataloguing process was first developed from observations of a group of six cataloguers who were asked to independently perform original cataloguing an three nonfiction, non-serial items selected from materials regularly assigned to them for processing. The model was then used for follow-up interviews. Each participant in the second group of cataloguers was invited to reflect an his/her work process for a recent challenging document they had catalogued. Results are presented in 12 stories describing as many personal approaches to subject cataloguing. From these stories a summarization is offered and a theoretical model of subject cataloguing is developed which, according to the author, represents a realistic approach to subject cataloguing. Stories alternate comments from the researcher and direct quotations from the observed or interviewed cataloguers. Not surprisingly, the participants' stories reveal similarities in the sequence and accomplishment of several tasks in the process of subject cataloguing. Sauperl's proposed model, described in Chapter 5, includes as main stages: 1) Examination of the book and subject identification; 2) Search for subject headings; 3) Classification. Chapter 6 is a hypothetical Gase study, using the proposed model to describe the various stages of cataloguing a hypothetical resource. ...
    Type
    m
  3. Bednarek, M.: Intellectual access to pictorial information (1993) 0.04 
    0.03572021 = sum of:
  0.027635565 = product of:
    0.19344895 = sum of:
      0.19344895 = weight(_text_:visual in 5631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19344895 = score(doc=5631,freq=14.0), product of:
          0.2084343 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.291659 = idf(docFreq=604, maxDocs=44218)
            0.039389215 = queryNorm
          0.9281051 = fieldWeight in 5631, product of:
            3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
              14.0 = termFreq=14.0
            5.291659 = idf(docFreq=604, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5631)
    0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  0.008084645 = product of:
    0.01616929 = sum of:
      0.01616929 = weight(_text_:m in 5631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.01616929 = score(doc=5631,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.098018035 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
            0.039389215 = queryNorm
          0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 5631, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5631)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Visual materials represent a significantly different type of communication to textual materials and therefore present distinct challenges for the process of retrieval, especially if by retireval we mean intellectual access to the content of images. This paper outlines the special characteristics of visual materials, focusing on their pontential complexity and subjectivity, and the methods used and explored for gaining access to visual materials as reported in the literature. It concludes that methods of access to visual materials are dominated by the relative mature systems developed for textual materials and that access methods based on visual communication are still largely in the developmental or prototype stage. Although reported research on user requirements in the retrieval of visual information is noticeably lacking, the results of at least one study indicate that the visually-based retrieval methods of structured and unstructered browsing seem to be preferred for visula materials and that effective retrieval methods are ultimately related to characteristics of the enquirer and the visual information sought
  4. Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992) 0.03 
    0.032126307 = product of:
  0.064252615 = sum of:
    0.064252615 = sum of:
      0.021559052 = weight(_text_:m in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.021559052 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.098018035 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
            0.039389215 = queryNorm
          0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
      0.042693563 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042693563 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13793433 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.039389215 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:08
    Source
    Classification research for knowledge representation and organization. Proc. 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991. Ed. by N.J. Williamson u. M. Hudon
  5. Beghtol, C.: ¬The classification of fiction : the development of a system based on theoretical principles (1994) 0.03 
    0.029085625 = sum of:
  0.019653538 = product of:
    0.13757476 = sum of:
      0.13757476 = weight(_text_:author's in 3413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13757476 = score(doc=3413,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.26470158 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.039389215 = queryNorm
          0.51973534 = fieldWeight in 3413, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3413)
    0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  0.009432086 = product of:
    0.018864172 = sum of:
      0.018864172 = weight(_text_:m in 3413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.018864172 = score(doc=3413,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.098018035 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
            0.039389215 = queryNorm
          0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 3413, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3413)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The work is an adaptation of the author's dissertation and has the following chapters: (1) background and introduction; (2) a problem in classification theory; (3) previous fiction analysis theories and systems and 'The left hand of darkness'; (4) fiction warrant and critical warrant; (5) experimental fiction analysis system (EFAS); (6) application and evaluation of EFAS. Appendix 1 gives references to fiction analysis systems and appendix 2 lists EFAS coding sheets
    Type
    m
  6. Wersig, G.: Inhaltsanalyse : Einführung in ihre Systematik und Literatur (1968) 0.01 
    0.013474409 = product of:
  0.026948817 = sum of:
    0.026948817 = product of:
      0.053897634 = sum of:
        0.053897634 = weight(_text_:m in 2386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053897634 = score(doc=2386,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.098018035 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039389215 = queryNorm
            0.54987466 = fieldWeight in 2386, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=2386)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    m
  7. Krippendorff, K.: Content analysis : an introduction to its methodology (1985) 0.01 
    0.013474409 = product of:
  0.026948817 = sum of:
    0.026948817 = product of:
      0.053897634 = sum of:
        0.053897634 = weight(_text_:m in 7511) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053897634 = score(doc=7511,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.098018035 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039389215 = queryNorm
            0.54987466 = fieldWeight in 7511, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=7511)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    m
  8. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980) 0.01 
    0.013341738 = product of:
  0.026683476 = sum of:
    0.026683476 = product of:
      0.05336695 = sum of:
        0.05336695 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05336695 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13793433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039389215 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:44
  9. Computergestützte Inhaltsanalyse in der empirischen Sozialforschung (1983) 0.01 
    0.010779526 = product of:
  0.021559052 = sum of:
    0.021559052 = product of:
      0.043118104 = sum of:
        0.043118104 = weight(_text_:m in 1877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043118104 = score(doc=1877,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.098018035 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039389215 = queryNorm
            0.4398997 = fieldWeight in 1877, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1877)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    m
  10. Gervereau, L.: Voir, comprendre, analyser les images (1994) 0.01 
    0.010779526 = product of:
  0.021559052 = sum of:
    0.021559052 = product of:
      0.043118104 = sum of:
        0.043118104 = weight(_text_:m in 8758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043118104 = score(doc=8758,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.098018035 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039389215 = queryNorm
            0.4398997 = fieldWeight in 8758, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=8758)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    m
  11. Hauff-Hartig, S.: Automatische Transkription von Videos : Fernsehen 3.0: Automatisierte Sentimentanalyse und Zusammenstellung von Kurzvideos mit hohem Aufregungslevel KI-generierte Metadaten: Von der Technologiebeobachtung bis zum produktiven Einsatz (2021) 0.01 
    0.010673391 = product of:
  0.021346781 = sum of:
    0.021346781 = product of:
      0.042693563 = sum of:
        0.042693563 = weight(_text_:22 in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042693563 = score(doc=251,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13793433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039389215 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
  12. Merrill, W.S.: Code for classifiers : principles governing the consistent placing of books in a system of classification (1969) 0.01 
    0.009432086 = product of:
  0.018864172 = sum of:
    0.018864172 = product of:
      0.037728343 = sum of:
        0.037728343 = weight(_text_:m in 1640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037728343 = score(doc=1640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.098018035 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039389215 = queryNorm
            0.38491225 = fieldWeight in 1640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1640)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    m
  13. Garcia Jiménez, A.; Valle Gastaminza, F. del: From thesauri to ontologies: a case study in a digital visual context (2004) 0.01 
    0.008704384 = product of:
  0.017408768 = sum of:
    0.017408768 = product of:
      0.12186137 = sum of:
        0.12186137 = weight(_text_:visual in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12186137 = score(doc=2657,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.2084343 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.291659 = idf(docFreq=604, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039389215 = queryNorm
            0.58465123 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.291659 = idf(docFreq=604, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In this paper a framework for the construction and organization of knowledge organization and representation languages in the context of digital photograph collections is presented. It analyses exigencies of photographs as documentary objects, as well as several models of indexing, different proposals of languages and a theoretical revision of ontologies in this research field, in relation to visual documents. In considering the photograph as an analysis object, it is appropriate to study all its attributes: features, components or properties of an objeet that can be represented in an information processing system. The attributes which are related to visual features include cognitive and affective answers and elements that describe spatial, semantic, symbolic or emotional features about a photograph. In any case, it is necessary to treat: a) morphological and material attributes (emulsion, state of preservation); b) biographical attributes: (school or trend, publication or exhibition); c) attributes of content: what and how a photograph says something; d) relational attributes: visual documents establish relationships with other documents that can be analysed in order to understand them.
  14. Jörgensen, C.: ¬The applicability of selected classification systems to image attributes (1996) 0.01 
    0.0086169 = product of:
  0.0172338 = sum of:
    0.0172338 = product of:
      0.1206366 = sum of:
        0.1206366 = weight(_text_:visual in 5175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1206366 = score(doc=5175,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2084343 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.291659 = idf(docFreq=604, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039389215 = queryNorm
            0.57877517 = fieldWeight in 5175, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.291659 = idf(docFreq=604, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5175)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Recent research investigated image attributes as reported by participants in describing, sorting, and searching tasks with images and defined 46 specific image attributes which were then organized into 12 major classes. Attributes were also grouped as being 'perceptual' (directly stimulated by visual percepts), 'interpretive' (requiring inference from visual percepts), and 'reactive' (cognitive and affective responses to the images). This research describes the coverage of two image indexing and classification systems and one general classification system in relation to the previous findings and analyzes the extent to which components of these systems are capable of describing the range of image attributes as revealed by the previous research
  15. Andersson, R.; Holst, E.: Indexes and other depictions of fictions : a new model for analysis empirically tested (1996) 0.01 
    0.008422945 = product of:
  0.01684589 = sum of:
    0.01684589 = product of:
      0.117921226 = sum of:
        0.117921226 = weight(_text_:author's in 473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.117921226 = score(doc=473,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26470158 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039389215 = queryNorm
            0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 473, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=473)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In this study descriptions of a novel by 100 users at 2 Swedish public libraries, Malmö and Molndal, Mar-Apr 95, were compared to the index terms used for the novels at these libraries. Describes previous systems for fiction indexing, the 2 libraries, and the users interviewed. Compares the AMP system with their own model. The latter operates with terms under the headings phenomena, frame and author's intention. The similarities between the users' and indexers' descriptions were sufficiently close to make it possible to retrieve fiction in accordance with users' wishes in Molndal, and would have been in Malmö, had more books been indexed with more terms. Sometimes the similarities were close enough for users to retrieve fiction on their own
  16. Clavier, V.; Paganelli, C.: Including authorial stance in the indexing of scientific documents (2012) 0.01 
    0.008422945 = product of:
  0.01684589 = sum of:
    0.01684589 = product of:
      0.117921226 = sum of:
        0.117921226 = weight(_text_:author's in 320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.117921226 = score(doc=320,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26470158 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039389215 = queryNorm
            0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 320, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=320)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article argues that authorial stance should be taken into account in the indexing of scientific documents. Authorial stance has been widely studied in linguistics and is a typical feature of scientific writing that reveals the uniqueness of each author's perspective, their scientific contribution, and their thinking. We argue that authorial stance guides the reading of scientific documents and that it can be used to characterize the knowledge contained in such documents. Our research has previously shown that people reading dissertations are interested both in a topic and in a document's authorial stance. Now, we would like to propose a two-tiered indexing system. Dissertations would first be divided into paragraphs; then, each information unit would be defined by topic and by the markers of authorial stance present in the document.
  17. Bade, D.: ¬The creation and persistence of misinformation in shared library catalogs : language and subject knowledge in a technological era (2002) 0.01 
    0.008031577 = product of:
  0.016063154 = sum of:
    0.016063154 = sum of:
      0.005389763 = weight(_text_:m in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.005389763 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.098018035 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
            0.039389215 = queryNorm
          0.054987464 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
            0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
      0.010673391 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.010673391 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13793433 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.039389215 = queryNorm
          0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Type
    m
  18. Weimer, K.H.: ¬The nexus of subject analysis and bibliographic description : the case of multipart videos (1996) 0.01 
    0.008005043 = product of:
  0.016010085 = sum of:
    0.016010085 = product of:
      0.03202017 = sum of:
        0.03202017 = weight(_text_:22 in 6525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03202017 = score(doc=6525,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13793433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039389215 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6525, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6525)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.5-18
  19. Chen, S.-J.; Lee, H.-L.: Art images and mental associations : a preliminary exploration (2014) 0.01 
    0.008005043 = product of:
  0.016010085 = sum of:
    0.016010085 = product of:
      0.03202017 = sum of:
        0.03202017 = weight(_text_:22 in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03202017 = score(doc=1416,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13793433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039389215 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  20. White, M.D.; Marsh, E.E.: Content analysis : a flexible methodology (2006) 0.01 
    0.008005043 = product of:
  0.016010085 = sum of:
    0.016010085 = product of:
      0.03202017 = sum of:
        0.03202017 = weight(_text_:22 in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03202017 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13793433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039389215 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Library trends. 55(2006) no.1, S.22-45

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 35
  • d 9
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 30
  • m 13
  • el 2
  • s 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications