Search (160 results, page 1 of 8)

  • × theme_ss:"Inhaltsanalyse"
  1. White, M.D.; Marsh, E.E.: Content analysis : a flexible methodology (2006) 0.05 
    0.04892949 = sum of:
  0.017954903 = product of:
    0.07181961 = sum of:
      0.07181961 = weight(_text_:authors in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07181961 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23764841 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.030974586 = product of:
    0.046461876 = sum of:
      0.004084964 = weight(_text_:s in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.004084964 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
      0.042376913 = weight(_text_:22 in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042376913 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1825484 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
    0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Content analysis is a highly flexible research method that has been widely used in library and information science (LIS) studies with varying research goals and objectives. The research method is applied in qualitative, quantitative, and sometimes mixed modes of research frameworks and employs a wide range of analytical techniques to generate findings and put them into context. This article characterizes content analysis as a systematic, rigorous approach to analyzing documents obtained or generated in the course of research. It briefly describes the steps involved in content analysis, differentiates between quantitative and qualitative content analysis, and shows that content analysis serves the purposes of both quantitative research and qualitative research. The authors draw on selected LIS studies that have used content analysis to illustrate the concepts addressed in the article. The article also serves as a gateway to methodological books and articles that provide more detail about aspects of content analysis discussed only briefly in the article.
    Source
    Library trends. 55(2006) no.1, S.22-45
  2. Schlapfer, K.: ¬The information content of images (1995) 0.03 
    0.03208158 = product of:
  0.06416316 = sum of:
    0.06416316 = product of:
      0.09624474 = sum of:
        0.08807481 = weight(_text_:k in 521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08807481 = score(doc=521,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18609051 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052129436 = queryNorm
            0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 521, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=521)
        0.008169928 = weight(_text_:s in 521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008169928 = score(doc=521,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052129436 = queryNorm
            0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 521, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=521)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Professional printer. 39(1995) no.1, S.10-15
  3. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980) 0.03 
    0.025812155 = product of:
  0.05162431 = sum of:
    0.05162431 = product of:
      0.07743646 = sum of:
        0.0068082735 = weight(_text_:s in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0068082735 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052129436 = queryNorm
            0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
        0.07062819 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07062819 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1825484 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052129436 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:44
    Pages
    S.146-159
  4. Krippendorff, K.: Content analysis : an introduction to its methodology (1985) 0.02 
    0.024465226 = product of:
  0.04893045 = sum of:
    0.04893045 = product of:
      0.14679135 = sum of:
        0.14679135 = weight(_text_:k in 7511) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14679135 = score(doc=7511,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18609051 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052129436 = queryNorm
            0.7888169 = fieldWeight in 7511, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=7511)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  5. Knautz, K.; Dröge, E.; Finkelmeyer, S.; Guschauski, D.; Juchem, K.; Krzmyk, C.; Miskovic, D.; Schiefer, J.; Sen, E.; Verbina, J.; Werner, N.; Stock, W.G.: Indexieren von Emotionen bei Videos (2010) 0.02 
    0.022685101 = product of:
  0.045370203 = sum of:
    0.045370203 = product of:
      0.0680553 = sum of:
        0.062278293 = weight(_text_:k in 3637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062278293 = score(doc=3637,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18609051 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052129436 = queryNorm
            0.33466667 = fieldWeight in 3637, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3637)
        0.0057770116 = weight(_text_:s in 3637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0057770116 = score(doc=3637,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052129436 = queryNorm
            0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 3637, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3637)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 61(2010) H.4, S.221-236
  6. Shaw, R.: Information organization and the philosophy of history (2013) 0.02 
    0.022535985 = sum of:
  0.020947387 = product of:
    0.08378955 = sum of:
      0.08378955 = weight(_text_:authors in 946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08378955 = score(doc=946,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23764841 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 946, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=946)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.0015885972 = product of:
    0.0047657914 = sum of:
      0.0047657914 = weight(_text_:s in 946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0047657914 = score(doc=946,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 946, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=946)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The philosophy of history can help articulate problems relevant to information organization. One such problem is "aboutness": How do texts relate to the world? In response to this problem, philosophers of history have developed theories of colligation describing how authors bind together phenomena under organizing concepts. Drawing on these ideas, I present a theory of subject analysis that avoids the problematic illusion of an independent "landscape" of subjects. This theory points to a broad vision of the future of information organization and some specific challenges to be met.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.6, S.1092-1103
  7. Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992) 0.02 
    0.020649724 = product of:
  0.041299447 = sum of:
    0.041299447 = product of:
      0.06194917 = sum of:
        0.0054466184 = weight(_text_:s in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0054466184 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052129436 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
        0.05650255 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05650255 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1825484 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052129436 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:08
    Pages
    S.39-48
  8. Hauff-Hartig, S.: Automatische Transkription von Videos : Fernsehen 3.0: Automatisierte Sentimentanalyse und Zusammenstellung von Kurzvideos mit hohem Aufregungslevel KI-generierte Metadaten: Von der Technologiebeobachtung bis zum produktiven Einsatz (2021) 0.02 
    0.020649724 = product of:
  0.041299447 = sum of:
    0.041299447 = product of:
      0.06194917 = sum of:
        0.0054466184 = weight(_text_:s in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0054466184 = score(doc=251,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052129436 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
        0.05650255 = weight(_text_:22 in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05650255 = score(doc=251,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1825484 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052129436 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
  9. Hutchins, W.J.: ¬The concept of 'aboutness' in subject indexing (1978) 0.02 
    0.019372275 = product of:
  0.03874455 = sum of:
    0.03874455 = product of:
      0.058116823 = sum of:
        0.051376976 = weight(_text_:k in 1961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051376976 = score(doc=1961,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18609051 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052129436 = queryNorm
            0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 1961, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1961)
        0.006739847 = weight(_text_:s in 1961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006739847 = score(doc=1961,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052129436 = queryNorm
            0.118916616 = fieldWeight in 1961, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1961)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.93-97.
    Source
    Aslib proceedings. 30(1978), S.172-181
  10. Volpers, H.: Inhaltsanalyse (2013) 0.02 
    0.019372275 = product of:
  0.03874455 = sum of:
    0.03874455 = product of:
      0.058116823 = sum of:
        0.051376976 = weight(_text_:k in 1018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051376976 = score(doc=1018,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18609051 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052129436 = queryNorm
            0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 1018, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1018)
        0.006739847 = weight(_text_:s in 1018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006739847 = score(doc=1018,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052129436 = queryNorm
            0.118916616 = fieldWeight in 1018, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1018)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.412-424
    Source
    Handbuch Methoden der Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft: Bibliotheks-, Benutzerforschung, Informationsanalyse. Hrsg.: K. Umlauf, S. Fühles-Ubach u. M.S. Seadle
  11. Rorissa, A.; Iyer, H.: Theories of cognition and image categorization : what category labels reveal about basic level theory (2008) 0.02 
    0.019316558 = sum of:
  0.017954903 = product of:
    0.07181961 = sum of:
      0.07181961 = weight(_text_:authors in 1958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07181961 = score(doc=1958,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23764841 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 1958, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1958)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.0013616546 = product of:
    0.004084964 = sum of:
      0.004084964 = weight(_text_:s in 1958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.004084964 = score(doc=1958,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 1958, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1958)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Information search and retrieval interactions usually involve information content in the form of document collections, information retrieval systems and interfaces, and the user. To fully understand information search and retrieval interactions between users' cognitive space and the information space, researchers need to turn to cognitive models and theories. In this article, the authors use one of these theories, the basic level theory. Use of the basic level theory to understand human categorization is both appropriate and essential to user-centered design of taxonomies, ontologies, browsing interfaces, and other indexing tools and systems. Analyses of data from two studies involving free sorting by 105 participants of 100 images were conducted. The types of categories formed and category labels were examined. Results of the analyses indicate that image category labels generally belong to superordinate to the basic level, and are generic and interpretive. Implications for research on theories of cognition and categorization, and design of image indexing, retrieval and browsing systems are discussed.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.9, S.1383-1392
  12. Langridge, D.W.: Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Methoden (1994) 0.02 
    0.01843424 = product of:
  0.03686848 = sum of:
    0.03686848 = product of:
      0.055302717 = sum of:
        0.05189858 = weight(_text_:k in 3923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05189858 = score(doc=3923,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18609051 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052129436 = queryNorm
            0.2788889 = fieldWeight in 3923, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3923)
        0.0034041367 = weight(_text_:s in 3923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0034041367 = score(doc=3923,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052129436 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3923, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3923)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Classification
    BCAF (FH K)
    GHBS
    BCAF (FH K)
    Pages
    159 S
  13. Raieli, R.: ¬The semantic hole : enthusiasm and caution around multimedia information retrieval (2012) 0.02 
    0.018251948 = product of:
  0.036503896 = sum of:
    0.036503896 = product of:
      0.054755844 = sum of:
        0.004814176 = weight(_text_:s in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004814176 = score(doc=4888,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052129436 = queryNorm
            0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
        0.04994167 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04994167 = score(doc=4888,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1825484 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052129436 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:02:10
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Enser, P.G.B.: Visual image retrieval. In: Annual review of information science and technology. 42(2008), S.3-42.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.1, S.13-22
  14. Hoover, L.: ¬A beginners' guide for subject analysis of theses and dissertations in the hard sciences (2005) 0.02 
    0.016567145 = sum of:
  0.01496242 = product of:
    0.05984968 = sum of:
      0.05984968 = weight(_text_:authors in 5740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05984968 = score(doc=5740,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23764841 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 5740, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5740)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.0016047254 = product of:
    0.004814176 = sum of:
      0.004814176 = weight(_text_:s in 5740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.004814176 = score(doc=5740,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 5740, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5740)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This guide, for beginning catalogers with humanities or social sciences backgrounds, provides assistance in subject analysis (based on Library of Congress Subject Headings) of theses and dissertations (T/Ds) that are produced by graduate students in university departments in the hard sciences (physical sciences and engineering). It is aimed at those who have had little or no experience in cataloging, especially of this type of material, and for those who desire to supplement local mentoring resources for subject analysis in the hard sciences. Theses and dissertations from these departments present a special challenge because they are the results of current research representing specific new concepts with which the cataloger may not be familiar. In fact, subject headings often have not yet been created for the specific concept(s) being researched. Additionally, T/D authors often use jargon/terminology specific to their department. Catalogers often have many other duties in addition to subject analysis of T/Ds in the hard sciences, yet they desire to provide optimal access through accurate, thorough subject analysis. Tips are provided for determining the content of the T/D, strategic searches on WorldCat for possible subject headings, evaluating the relevancy of these subject headings for final selection, and selecting appropriate subdivisions where needed. Lists of basic reference resources are also provided.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 41(2005) no.1, S.133-161
  15. Hauser, E.; Tennis, J.T.: Episemantics: aboutness as aroundness (2019) 0.02 
    0.016097132 = sum of:
  0.01496242 = product of:
    0.05984968 = sum of:
      0.05984968 = weight(_text_:authors in 5640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05984968 = score(doc=5640,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23764841 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 5640, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5640)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.0011347122 = product of:
    0.0034041367 = sum of:
      0.0034041367 = weight(_text_:s in 5640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0034041367 = score(doc=5640,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052129436 = queryNorm
          0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 5640, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5640)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Aboutness ranks amongst our field's greatest bugbears. What is a work about? How can this be known? This mirrors debates within the philosophy of language, where the concept of representation has similarly evaded satisfactory definition. This paper proposes that we abandon the strong sense of the word aboutness, which seems to promise some inherent relationship between work and subject, or, in philosophical terms, between word and world. Instead, we seek an etymological reset to the older sense of aboutness as "in the vicinity, nearby; in some place or various places nearby; all over a surface." To distinguish this sense in the context of information studies, we introduce the term episemantics. The authors have each independently applied this term in slightly different contexts and scales (Hauser 2018a; Tennis 2016), and this article presents a unified definition of the term and guidelines for applying it at the scale of both words and works. The resulting weak concept of aboutness is pragmatic, in Star's sense of a focus on consequences over antecedents, while reserving space for the critique and improvement of aboutness determinations within various contexts and research programs. The paper finishes with a discussion of the implication of the concept of episemantics and methodological possibilities it offers for knowledge organization research and practice. We draw inspiration from Melvil Dewey's use of physical aroundness in his first classification system and ask how aroundness might be more effectively operationalized in digital environments.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 46(2019) no.8, S.590-595
  16. Chen, S.-J.; Lee, H.-L.: Art images and mental associations : a preliminary exploration (2014) 0.02 
    0.01605131 = product of:
  0.03210262 = sum of:
    0.03210262 = product of:
      0.048153926 = sum of:
        0.0057770116 = weight(_text_:s in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0057770116 = score(doc=1416,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052129436 = queryNorm
            0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
        0.042376913 = weight(_text_:22 in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042376913 = score(doc=1416,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1825484 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052129436 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.144-151
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  17. Weimer, K.H.: ¬The nexus of subject analysis and bibliographic description : the case of multipart videos (1996) 0.02 
    0.015487293 = product of:
  0.030974586 = sum of:
    0.030974586 = product of:
      0.046461876 = sum of:
        0.004084964 = weight(_text_:s in 6525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004084964 = score(doc=6525,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052129436 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 6525, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6525)
        0.042376913 = weight(_text_:22 in 6525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042376913 = score(doc=6525,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1825484 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052129436 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6525, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6525)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.5-18
  18. From information to knowledge : conceptual and content analysis by computer (1995) 0.02 
    0.015012078 = product of:
  0.030024156 = sum of:
    0.030024156 = product of:
      0.045036234 = sum of:
        0.03669784 = weight(_text_:k in 5392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03669784 = score(doc=5392,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18609051 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052129436 = queryNorm
            0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 5392, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5392)
        0.008338397 = weight(_text_:s in 5392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008338397 = score(doc=5392,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052129436 = queryNorm
            0.14712115 = fieldWeight in 5392, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5392)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    SCHMIDT, K.M.: Concepts - content - meaning: an introduction; DUCHASTEL, J. et al.: The SACAO project: using computation toward textual data analysis; PAQUIN, L.-C. u. L. DUPUY: An approach to expertise transfer: computer-assisted text analysis; HOGENRAAD, R., Y. BESTGEN u. J.-L. NYSTEN: Terrorist rhetoric: texture and architecture; MOHLER, P.P.: On the interaction between reading and computing: an interpretative approach to content analysis; LANCASHIRE, I.: Computer tools for cognitive stylistics; MERGENTHALER, E.: An outline of knowledge based text analysis; NAMENWIRTH, J.Z.: Ideography in computer-aided content analysis; WEBER, R.P. u. J.Z. Namenwirth: Content-analytic indicators: a self-critique; McKINNON, A.: Optimizing the aberrant frequency word technique; ROSATI, R.: Factor analysis in classical archaeology: export patterns of Attic pottery trade; PETRILLO, P.S.: Old and new worlds: ancient coinage and modern technology; DARANYI, S., S. MARJAI u.a.: Caryatids and the measurement of semiosis in architecture; ZARRI, G.P.: Intelligent information retrieval: an application in the field of historical biographical data; BOUCHARD, G., R. ROY u.a.: Computers and genealogy: from family reconstitution to population reconstruction; DEMÉLAS-BOHY, M.-D. u. M. RENAUD: Instability, networks and political parties: a political history expert system prototype; DARANYI, S., A. ABRANYI u. G. KOVACS: Knowledge extraction from ethnopoetic texts by multivariate statistical methods; FRAUTSCHI, R.L.: Measures of narrative voice in French prose fiction applied to textual samples from the enlightenment to the twentieth century; DANNENBERG, R. u.a.: A project in computer music: the musician's workbench
    Editor
    Nissan, E. u. K. Schmidt
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 23(1996) no.3, S.181-182 (O. Sechser)
    Pages
    X,319 S
    Type
    s
  19. Thelwall, M.; Buckley, K.; Paltoglou, G.: Sentiment strength detection for the social web (2012) 0.01 
    0.013367325 = product of:
  0.02673465 = sum of:
    0.02673465 = product of:
      0.040101975 = sum of:
        0.03669784 = weight(_text_:k in 4972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03669784 = score(doc=4972,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18609051 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052129436 = queryNorm
            0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 4972, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4972)
        0.0034041367 = weight(_text_:s in 4972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0034041367 = score(doc=4972,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052129436 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4972, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4972)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.1, S.163-173
  20. Bös, K.: Aspektorientierte Inhaltserschließung von Romanen und Bildern : ein Vergleich der Ansätze von Annelise Mark Pejtersen und Sara Shatford (2012) 0.01 
    0.013367325 = product of:
  0.02673465 = sum of:
    0.02673465 = product of:
      0.040101975 = sum of:
        0.03669784 = weight(_text_:k in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03669784 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18609051 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052129436 = queryNorm
            0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.0034041367 = weight(_text_:s in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0034041367 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052129436 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    52 S

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 133
  • d 24
  • f 2
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 139
  • m 13
  • x 5
  • el 3
  • d 2
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications