Search (47 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Inhaltsanalyse"
  1. White, M.D.; Marsh, E.E.: Content analysis : a flexible methodology (2006) 0.04 
    0.039703824 = sum of:
  0.018211987 = product of:
    0.07284795 = sum of:
      0.07284795 = weight(_text_:authors in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07284795 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.021491839 = product of:
    0.042983677 = sum of:
      0.042983677 = weight(_text_:22 in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042983677 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Content analysis is a highly flexible research method that has been widely used in library and information science (LIS) studies with varying research goals and objectives. The research method is applied in qualitative, quantitative, and sometimes mixed modes of research frameworks and employs a wide range of analytical techniques to generate findings and put them into context. This article characterizes content analysis as a systematic, rigorous approach to analyzing documents obtained or generated in the course of research. It briefly describes the steps involved in content analysis, differentiates between quantitative and qualitative content analysis, and shows that content analysis serves the purposes of both quantitative research and qualitative research. The authors draw on selected LIS studies that have used content analysis to illustrate the concepts addressed in the article. The article also serves as a gateway to methodological books and articles that provide more detail about aspects of content analysis discussed only briefly in the article.
    Source
    Library trends. 55(2006) no.1, S.22-45
  2. Hauff-Hartig, S.: Automatische Transkription von Videos : Fernsehen 3.0: Automatisierte Sentimentanalyse und Zusammenstellung von Kurzvideos mit hohem Aufregungslevel KI-generierte Metadaten: Von der Technologiebeobachtung bis zum produktiven Einsatz (2021) 0.04 
    0.03709051 = product of:
  0.07418102 = sum of:
    0.07418102 = sum of:
      0.016869452 = weight(_text_:d in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.016869452 = score(doc=251,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.16792654 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
      0.057311572 = weight(_text_:22 in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.057311572 = score(doc=251,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
    Language
    d
  3. Hoover, L.: ¬A beginners' guide for subject analysis of theses and dissertations in the hard sciences (2005) 0.02 
    0.022631973 = sum of:
  0.015176657 = product of:
    0.060706627 = sum of:
      0.060706627 = weight(_text_:authors in 5740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.060706627 = score(doc=5740,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 5740, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5740)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.0074553154 = product of:
    0.014910631 = sum of:
      0.014910631 = weight(_text_:d in 5740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.014910631 = score(doc=5740,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.1484275 = fieldWeight in 5740, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5740)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This guide, for beginning catalogers with humanities or social sciences backgrounds, provides assistance in subject analysis (based on Library of Congress Subject Headings) of theses and dissertations (T/Ds) that are produced by graduate students in university departments in the hard sciences (physical sciences and engineering). It is aimed at those who have had little or no experience in cataloging, especially of this type of material, and for those who desire to supplement local mentoring resources for subject analysis in the hard sciences. Theses and dissertations from these departments present a special challenge because they are the results of current research representing specific new concepts with which the cataloger may not be familiar. In fact, subject headings often have not yet been created for the specific concept(s) being researched. Additionally, T/D authors often use jargon/terminology specific to their department. Catalogers often have many other duties in addition to subject analysis of T/Ds in the hard sciences, yet they desire to provide optimal access through accurate, thorough subject analysis. Tips are provided for determining the content of the T/D, strategic searches on WorldCat for possible subject headings, evaluating the relevancy of these subject headings for final selection, and selecting appropriate subdivisions where needed. Lists of basic reference resources are also provided.
  4. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980) 0.02 
    0.017909866 = product of:
  0.03581973 = sum of:
    0.03581973 = product of:
      0.07163946 = sum of:
        0.07163946 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07163946 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052875843 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:44
  5. Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992) 0.01 
    0.014327893 = product of:
  0.028655786 = sum of:
    0.028655786 = product of:
      0.057311572 = sum of:
        0.057311572 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057311572 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052875843 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:08
  6. Raieli, R.: ¬The semantic hole : enthusiasm and caution around multimedia information retrieval (2012) 0.01 
    0.012664188 = product of:
  0.025328375 = sum of:
    0.025328375 = product of:
      0.05065675 = sum of:
        0.05065675 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05065675 = score(doc=4888,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052875843 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:02:10
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.1, S.13-22
  7. Weimer, K.H.: ¬The nexus of subject analysis and bibliographic description : the case of multipart videos (1996) 0.01 
    0.010745919 = product of:
  0.021491839 = sum of:
    0.021491839 = product of:
      0.042983677 = sum of:
        0.042983677 = weight(_text_:22 in 6525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042983677 = score(doc=6525,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052875843 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6525, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6525)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.5-18
  8. Chen, S.-J.; Lee, H.-L.: Art images and mental associations : a preliminary exploration (2014) 0.01 
    0.010745919 = product of:
  0.021491839 = sum of:
    0.021491839 = product of:
      0.042983677 = sum of:
        0.042983677 = weight(_text_:22 in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042983677 = score(doc=1416,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052875843 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  9. Shaw, R.: Information organization and the philosophy of history (2013) 0.01 
    0.010623659 = product of:
  0.021247318 = sum of:
    0.021247318 = product of:
      0.08498927 = sum of:
        0.08498927 = weight(_text_:authors in 946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08498927 = score(doc=946,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052875843 = queryNorm
            0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 946, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=946)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The philosophy of history can help articulate problems relevant to information organization. One such problem is "aboutness": How do texts relate to the world? In response to this problem, philosophers of history have developed theories of colligation describing how authors bind together phenomena under organizing concepts. Drawing on these ideas, I present a theory of subject analysis that avoids the problematic illusion of an independent "landscape" of subjects. This theory points to a broad vision of the future of information organization and some specific challenges to be met.
  10. Wersig, G.: Inhaltsanalyse : Einführung in ihre Systematik und Literatur (1968) 0.01 
    0.010543408 = product of:
  0.021086816 = sum of:
    0.021086816 = product of:
      0.04217363 = sum of:
        0.04217363 = weight(_text_:d in 2386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04217363 = score(doc=2386,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052875843 = queryNorm
            0.41981634 = fieldWeight in 2386, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=2386)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
  11. Bade, D.: ¬The creation and persistence of misinformation in shared library catalogs : language and subject knowledge in a technological era (2002) 0.01 
    0.0092726275 = product of:
  0.018545255 = sum of:
    0.018545255 = sum of:
      0.004217363 = weight(_text_:d in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.004217363 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.041981634 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
      0.014327893 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.014327893 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  12. Rorissa, A.; Iyer, H.: Theories of cognition and image categorization : what category labels reveal about basic level theory (2008) 0.01 
    0.009105993 = product of:
  0.018211987 = sum of:
    0.018211987 = product of:
      0.07284795 = sum of:
        0.07284795 = weight(_text_:authors in 1958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07284795 = score(doc=1958,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052875843 = queryNorm
            0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 1958, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1958)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Information search and retrieval interactions usually involve information content in the form of document collections, information retrieval systems and interfaces, and the user. To fully understand information search and retrieval interactions between users' cognitive space and the information space, researchers need to turn to cognitive models and theories. In this article, the authors use one of these theories, the basic level theory. Use of the basic level theory to understand human categorization is both appropriate and essential to user-centered design of taxonomies, ontologies, browsing interfaces, and other indexing tools and systems. Analyses of data from two studies involving free sorting by 105 participants of 100 images were conducted. The types of categories formed and category labels were examined. Results of the analyses indicate that image category labels generally belong to superordinate to the basic level, and are generic and interpretive. Implications for research on theories of cognition and categorization, and design of image indexing, retrieval and browsing systems are discussed.
  13. Hildebrandt, B.; Moratz, R.; Rickheit, G.; Sagerer, G.: Kognitive Modellierung von Sprach- und Bildverstehen (1996) 0.01 
    0.008946379 = product of:
  0.017892757 = sum of:
    0.017892757 = product of:
      0.035785515 = sum of:
        0.035785515 = weight(_text_:d in 7292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035785515 = score(doc=7292,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052875843 = queryNorm
            0.356226 = fieldWeight in 7292, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7292)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
    Source
    Natural language processing and speech technology: Results of the 3rd KONVENS Conference, Bielefeld, October 1996. Ed.: D. Gibbon
  14. Computergestützte Inhaltsanalyse in der empirischen Sozialforschung (1983) 0.01 
    0.008434726 = product of:
  0.016869452 = sum of:
    0.016869452 = product of:
      0.033738904 = sum of:
        0.033738904 = weight(_text_:d in 1877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033738904 = score(doc=1877,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052875843 = queryNorm
            0.33585307 = fieldWeight in 1877, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1877)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
  15. Allen, B.; Reser, D.: Content analysis in library and information science research (1990) 0.01 
    0.008434726 = product of:
  0.016869452 = sum of:
    0.016869452 = product of:
      0.033738904 = sum of:
        0.033738904 = weight(_text_:d in 7510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033738904 = score(doc=7510,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052875843 = queryNorm
            0.33585307 = fieldWeight in 7510, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7510)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  16. Klüver, J.; Kier, R.: Rekonstruktion und Verstehen : ein Computer-Programm zur Interpretation sozialwissenschaftlicher Texte (1994) 0.01 
    0.008434726 = product of:
  0.016869452 = sum of:
    0.016869452 = product of:
      0.033738904 = sum of:
        0.033738904 = weight(_text_:d in 6830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033738904 = score(doc=6830,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052875843 = queryNorm
            0.33585307 = fieldWeight in 6830, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6830)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
  17. Hauser, E.; Tennis, J.T.: Episemantics: aboutness as aroundness (2019) 0.01 
    0.0075883283 = product of:
  0.015176657 = sum of:
    0.015176657 = product of:
      0.060706627 = sum of:
        0.060706627 = weight(_text_:authors in 5640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060706627 = score(doc=5640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052875843 = queryNorm
            0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 5640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5640)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Aboutness ranks amongst our field's greatest bugbears. What is a work about? How can this be known? This mirrors debates within the philosophy of language, where the concept of representation has similarly evaded satisfactory definition. This paper proposes that we abandon the strong sense of the word aboutness, which seems to promise some inherent relationship between work and subject, or, in philosophical terms, between word and world. Instead, we seek an etymological reset to the older sense of aboutness as "in the vicinity, nearby; in some place or various places nearby; all over a surface." To distinguish this sense in the context of information studies, we introduce the term episemantics. The authors have each independently applied this term in slightly different contexts and scales (Hauser 2018a; Tennis 2016), and this article presents a unified definition of the term and guidelines for applying it at the scale of both words and works. The resulting weak concept of aboutness is pragmatic, in Star's sense of a focus on consequences over antecedents, while reserving space for the critique and improvement of aboutness determinations within various contexts and research programs. The paper finishes with a discussion of the implication of the concept of episemantics and methodological possibilities it offers for knowledge organization research and practice. We draw inspiration from Melvil Dewey's use of physical aroundness in his first classification system and ask how aroundness might be more effectively operationalized in digital environments.
  18. Hjoerland, B.: Subject representation and information seeking : contributions to a theory based on the theory of knowledge (1993) 0.01 
    0.007380385 = product of:
  0.01476077 = sum of:
    0.01476077 = product of:
      0.02952154 = sum of:
        0.02952154 = weight(_text_:d in 7555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02952154 = score(doc=7555,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052875843 = queryNorm
            0.29387143 = fieldWeight in 7555, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7555)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    d
  19. Krause, J.: Principles of content analysis for information retrieval systems : an overview (1996) 0.01 
    0.007380385 = product of:
  0.01476077 = sum of:
    0.01476077 = product of:
      0.02952154 = sum of:
        0.02952154 = weight(_text_:d in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02952154 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052875843 = queryNorm
            0.29387143 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
  20. Martindale, C.; McKenzie, D.: On the utility of content analysis in author attribution : 'The federalist' (1995) 0.01 
    0.0063260444 = product of:
  0.012652089 = sum of:
    0.012652089 = product of:
      0.025304178 = sum of:
        0.025304178 = weight(_text_:d in 822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025304178 = score(doc=822,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052875843 = queryNorm
            0.2518898 = fieldWeight in 822, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=822)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Authors

Years

Languages

  • d 24
  • e 22
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 31
  • m 8
  • x 5
  • d 2
  • el 2
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications