Search (147 results, page 1 of 8)

  • × theme_ss:"Inhaltsanalyse"
  1. Vieira, L.: Modèle d'analyse pur une classification du document iconographique (1999) 0.08 
    0.07751649 = product of:
  0.11627473 = sum of:
    0.0107438285 = weight(_text_:a in 6320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0107438285 = score(doc=6320,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051718395 = queryNorm
        0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 6320, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6320)
    0.1055309 = product of:
      0.2110618 = sum of:
        0.2110618 = weight(_text_:de in 6320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2110618 = score(doc=6320,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.22225924 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051718395 = queryNorm
            0.94961995 = fieldWeight in 6320, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6320)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Analyse model for a classification of iconographic documents
    Imprint
    Lille : Université Charles-de-Gaulle
    Source
    Organisation des connaissances en vue de leur intégration dans les systèmes de représentation et de recherche d'information. Ed.: J. Maniez, et al
    Type
    a
  2. Naves, M.M.L.: Analise de assunto : concepcoes (1996) 0.07 
    0.06599299 = product of:
  0.09898948 = sum of:
    0.0075970334 = weight(_text_:a in 607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0075970334 = score(doc=607,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051718395 = queryNorm
        0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 607, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=607)
    0.09139244 = product of:
      0.18278489 = sum of:
        0.18278489 = weight(_text_:de in 607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18278489 = score(doc=607,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.22225924 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051718395 = queryNorm
            0.822395 = fieldWeight in 607, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=607)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Source
    Revista de Biblioteconomia de Brasilia. 20(1996) no.2, S.215-226
    Type
    a
  3. Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Stuurman, P.: Tendenzen in de onderwerpsontsluiting : T.1: Inhoudsanalyse (1989) 0.06 
    0.056338318 = product of:
  0.08450747 = sum of:
    0.010635847 = weight(_text_:a in 1841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010635847 = score(doc=1841,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051718395 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 1841, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1841)
    0.07387163 = product of:
      0.14774325 = sum of:
        0.14774325 = weight(_text_:de in 1841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14774325 = score(doc=1841,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22225924 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051718395 = queryNorm
            0.66473395 = fieldWeight in 1841, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1841)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Type
    a
  4. White, M.D.; Marsh, E.E.: Content analysis : a flexible methodology (2006) 0.05 
    0.050000027 = sum of:
  0.017813329 = product of:
    0.071253315 = sum of:
      0.071253315 = weight(_text_:authors in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.071253315 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23577455 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051718395 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.011165313 = weight(_text_:a in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
    0.011165313 = score(doc=5589,freq=12.0), product of:
      0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
        1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
        0.051718395 = queryNorm
      0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
        3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
          12.0 = termFreq=12.0
        1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
        0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
  0.021021385 = product of:
    0.04204277 = sum of:
      0.04204277 = weight(_text_:22 in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04204277 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18110901 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051718395 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Content analysis is a highly flexible research method that has been widely used in library and information science (LIS) studies with varying research goals and objectives. The research method is applied in qualitative, quantitative, and sometimes mixed modes of research frameworks and employs a wide range of analytical techniques to generate findings and put them into context. This article characterizes content analysis as a systematic, rigorous approach to analyzing documents obtained or generated in the course of research. It briefly describes the steps involved in content analysis, differentiates between quantitative and qualitative content analysis, and shows that content analysis serves the purposes of both quantitative research and qualitative research. The authors draw on selected LIS studies that have used content analysis to illustrate the concepts addressed in the article. The article also serves as a gateway to methodological books and articles that provide more detail about aspects of content analysis discussed only briefly in the article.
    Source
    Library trends. 55(2006) no.1, S.22-45
    Type
    a
  5. Hildebrandt, B.; Moratz, R.; Rickheit, G.; Sagerer, G.: Kognitive Modellierung von Sprach- und Bildverstehen (1996) 0.05 
    0.048289984 = product of:
  0.07243498 = sum of:
    0.009116441 = weight(_text_:a in 7292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009116441 = score(doc=7292,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051718395 = queryNorm
        0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 7292, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7292)
    0.063318536 = product of:
      0.12663707 = sum of:
        0.12663707 = weight(_text_:de in 7292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12663707 = score(doc=7292,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22225924 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051718395 = queryNorm
            0.56977195 = fieldWeight in 7292, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7292)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Imprint
    Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter
    Type
    a
  6. Moraes, J.B.E. de: Aboutness in fiction : methodological perspectives for knowledge organization (2012) 0.03 
    0.033871617 = product of:
  0.050807424 = sum of:
    0.008595062 = weight(_text_:a in 856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008595062 = score(doc=856,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051718395 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 856, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=856)
    0.04221236 = product of:
      0.08442472 = sum of:
        0.08442472 = weight(_text_:de in 856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08442472 = score(doc=856,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22225924 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051718395 = queryNorm
            0.37984797 = fieldWeight in 856, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=856)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Source
    Categories, contexts and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Twelfth International ISKO Conference 6-9 August 2012, Mysore, India. Eds.: Neelameghan, A. u. K.S. Raghavan
    Type
    a
  7. Pozzi de Sousa, B.; Ortega, C.D.: Aspects regarding the notion of subject in the context of different theoretical trends : teaching approaches in Brazil (2018) 0.03 
    0.032193325 = product of:
  0.048289984 = sum of:
    0.0060776267 = weight(_text_:a in 4707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0060776267 = score(doc=4707,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051718395 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 4707, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4707)
    0.04221236 = product of:
      0.08442472 = sum of:
        0.08442472 = weight(_text_:de in 4707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08442472 = score(doc=4707,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22225924 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051718395 = queryNorm
            0.37984797 = fieldWeight in 4707, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4707)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Type
    a
  8. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980) 0.03 
    0.03051965 = product of:
  0.045779474 = sum of:
    0.0107438285 = weight(_text_:a in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0107438285 = score(doc=5835,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051718395 = queryNorm
        0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
    0.035035644 = product of:
      0.07007129 = sum of:
        0.07007129 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07007129 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18110901 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051718395 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:44
    Type
    a
  9. Volpers, H.: Inhaltsanalyse (2013) 0.03 
    0.028169159 = product of:
  0.042253736 = sum of:
    0.0053179236 = weight(_text_:a in 1018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0053179236 = score(doc=1018,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051718395 = queryNorm
        0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 1018, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1018)
    0.036935814 = product of:
      0.07387163 = sum of:
        0.07387163 = weight(_text_:de in 1018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07387163 = score(doc=1018,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22225924 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051718395 = queryNorm
            0.33236697 = fieldWeight in 1018, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1018)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Imprint
    Berlin : De Gruyter Saur
    Type
    a
  10. Clavier, V.; Paganelli, C.: Including authorial stance in the indexing of scientific documents (2012) 0.03 
    0.027901173 = product of:
  0.04185176 = sum of:
    0.010192491 = weight(_text_:a in 320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010192491 = score(doc=320,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051718395 = queryNorm
        0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 320, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=320)
    0.031659268 = product of:
      0.063318536 = sum of:
        0.063318536 = weight(_text_:de in 320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.063318536 = score(doc=320,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22225924 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051718395 = queryNorm
            0.28488597 = fieldWeight in 320, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=320)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This article argues that authorial stance should be taken into account in the indexing of scientific documents. Authorial stance has been widely studied in linguistics and is a typical feature of scientific writing that reveals the uniqueness of each author's perspective, their scientific contribution, and their thinking. We argue that authorial stance guides the reading of scientific documents and that it can be used to characterize the knowledge contained in such documents. Our research has previously shown that people reading dissertations are interested both in a topic and in a document's authorial stance. Now, we would like to propose a two-tiered indexing system. Dissertations would first be divided into paragraphs; then, each information unit would be defined by topic and by the markers of authorial stance present in the document.
    Content
    Beitrag aus: Selected Papers from the 8th ISKO-France Conference, 27-28 June 2011, Lille, Université Charles-De-Gaulle Lille 3. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_4_g.pdf.
    Type
    a
  11. Fremery, W. De; Buckland, M.K.: Context, relevance, and labor (2022) 0.03 
    0.027183807 = product of:
  0.04077571 = sum of:
    0.009116441 = weight(_text_:a in 4240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009116441 = score(doc=4240,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051718395 = queryNorm
        0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 4240, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4240)
    0.031659268 = product of:
      0.063318536 = sum of:
        0.063318536 = weight(_text_:de in 4240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.063318536 = score(doc=4240,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22225924 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051718395 = queryNorm
            0.28488597 = fieldWeight in 4240, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4240)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Since information science concerns the transmission of records, it concerns context. The transmission of documents ensures their arrival in new contexts. Documents and their copies are spread across times and places. The amount of labor required to discover and retrieve relevant documents is also formulated by context. Thus, any serious consideration of communication and of information technologies quickly leads to a concern with context, relevance, and labor. Information scientists have developed many theories of context, relevance, and labor but not a framework for organizing them and describing their relationship with one another. We propose the words context and relevance can be used to articulate a useful framework for considering the diversity of approaches to context and relevance in information science, as well as their relations with each other and with labor.
    Type
    a
  12. Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992) 0.03 
    0.02678918 = product of:
  0.040183768 = sum of:
    0.012155253 = weight(_text_:a in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012155253 = score(doc=5830,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051718395 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
    0.028028514 = product of:
      0.05605703 = sum of:
        0.05605703 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05605703 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18110901 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051718395 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This paper examnines various isues that arise in establishing a theoretical basis for an experimental fiction analysis system. It analyzes the warrants of fiction and of works about fiction. From this analysis, it derives classificatory requirements for a fiction system. Classificatory techniques that may contribute to the specification of data elements in fiction are suggested
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:08
    Type
    a
  13. Hauff-Hartig, S.: Automatische Transkription von Videos : Fernsehen 3.0: Automatisierte Sentimentanalyse und Zusammenstellung von Kurzvideos mit hohem Aufregungslevel KI-generierte Metadaten: Von der Technologiebeobachtung bis zum produktiven Einsatz (2021) 0.02 
    0.022737429 = product of:
  0.034106143 = sum of:
    0.0060776267 = weight(_text_:a in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0060776267 = score(doc=251,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051718395 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
    0.028028514 = product of:
      0.05605703 = sum of:
        0.05605703 = weight(_text_:22 in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05605703 = score(doc=251,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18110901 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051718395 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
    Type
    a
  14. Chen, S.-J.; Lee, H.-L.: Art images and mental associations : a preliminary exploration (2014) 0.02 
    0.020809252 = product of:
  0.031213876 = sum of:
    0.010192491 = weight(_text_:a in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010192491 = score(doc=1416,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051718395 = queryNorm
        0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
    0.021021385 = product of:
      0.04204277 = sum of:
        0.04204277 = weight(_text_:22 in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04204277 = score(doc=1416,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18110901 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051718395 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This paper reports on the preliminary findings of a study that explores mental associations made by novices viewing art images. In a controlled environment, 20 Taiwanese college students responded to the question "What does the painting remind you of?" after viewing each digitized image of 15 oil paintings by a famous Taiwanese artist. Rather than focusing on the representation or interpretation of art, the study attempted to solicit information about how non-experts are stimulated by art. This paper reports on the analysis of participant responses to three of the images, and describes a12-type taxonomy of association emerged from the analysis. While 9 of the types are derived and adapted from facets in the Art & Architecture Thesaurus, three new types - Artistic Influence Association, Reactive Association, and Prototype Association - are discovered. The conclusion briefly discusses both the significance of the findings and the implications for future research.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
    Type
    a
  15. Shaw, R.: Information organization and the philosophy of history (2013) 0.02 
    0.019995421 = product of:
  0.02999313 = sum of:
    0.020782216 = product of:
      0.08312886 = sum of:
        0.08312886 = weight(_text_:authors in 946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08312886 = score(doc=946,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23577455 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051718395 = queryNorm
            0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 946, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=946)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    0.009210914 = weight(_text_:a in 946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009210914 = score(doc=946,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051718395 = queryNorm
        0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 946, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=946)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The philosophy of history can help articulate problems relevant to information organization. One such problem is "aboutness": How do texts relate to the world? In response to this problem, philosophers of history have developed theories of colligation describing how authors bind together phenomena under organizing concepts. Drawing on these ideas, I present a theory of subject analysis that avoids the problematic illusion of an independent "landscape" of subjects. This theory points to a broad vision of the future of information organization and some specific challenges to be met.
    Type
    a
  16. Raieli, R.: ¬The semantic hole : enthusiasm and caution around multimedia information retrieval (2012) 0.02 
    0.019048305 = product of:
  0.028572457 = sum of:
    0.0037985167 = weight(_text_:a in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0037985167 = score(doc=4888,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051718395 = queryNorm
        0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
    0.02477394 = product of:
      0.04954788 = sum of:
        0.04954788 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04954788 = score(doc=4888,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18110901 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051718395 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:02:10
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.1, S.13-22
    Type
    a
  17. Weimer, K.H.: ¬The nexus of subject analysis and bibliographic description : the case of multipart videos (1996) 0.02 
    0.017053071 = product of:
  0.025579605 = sum of:
    0.0045582205 = weight(_text_:a in 6525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0045582205 = score(doc=6525,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051718395 = queryNorm
        0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 6525, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6525)
    0.021021385 = product of:
      0.04204277 = sum of:
        0.04204277 = weight(_text_:22 in 6525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04204277 = score(doc=6525,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18110901 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051718395 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6525, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6525)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.5-18
    Type
    a
  18. Rorissa, A.; Iyer, H.: Theories of cognition and image categorization : what category labels reveal about basic level theory (2008) 0.02 
    0.016173083 = product of:
  0.024259625 = sum of:
    0.017813329 = product of:
      0.071253315 = sum of:
        0.071253315 = weight(_text_:authors in 1958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.071253315 = score(doc=1958,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23577455 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051718395 = queryNorm
            0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 1958, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1958)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    0.006446297 = weight(_text_:a in 1958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006446297 = score(doc=1958,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051718395 = queryNorm
        0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 1958, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1958)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Information search and retrieval interactions usually involve information content in the form of document collections, information retrieval systems and interfaces, and the user. To fully understand information search and retrieval interactions between users' cognitive space and the information space, researchers need to turn to cognitive models and theories. In this article, the authors use one of these theories, the basic level theory. Use of the basic level theory to understand human categorization is both appropriate and essential to user-centered design of taxonomies, ontologies, browsing interfaces, and other indexing tools and systems. Analyses of data from two studies involving free sorting by 105 participants of 100 images were conducted. The types of categories formed and category labels were examined. Results of the analyses indicate that image category labels generally belong to superordinate to the basic level, and are generic and interpretive. Implications for research on theories of cognition and categorization, and design of image indexing, retrieval and browsing systems are discussed.
    Type
    a
  19. Hauser, E.; Tennis, J.T.: Episemantics: aboutness as aroundness (2019) 0.02 
    0.016099248 = product of:
  0.02414887 = sum of:
    0.014844441 = product of:
      0.059377763 = sum of:
        0.059377763 = weight(_text_:authors in 5640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059377763 = score(doc=5640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23577455 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051718395 = queryNorm
            0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 5640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5640)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    0.0093044285 = weight(_text_:a in 5640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0093044285 = score(doc=5640,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051718395 = queryNorm
        0.15602624 = fieldWeight in 5640, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5640)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Aboutness ranks amongst our field's greatest bugbears. What is a work about? How can this be known? This mirrors debates within the philosophy of language, where the concept of representation has similarly evaded satisfactory definition. This paper proposes that we abandon the strong sense of the word aboutness, which seems to promise some inherent relationship between work and subject, or, in philosophical terms, between word and world. Instead, we seek an etymological reset to the older sense of aboutness as "in the vicinity, nearby; in some place or various places nearby; all over a surface." To distinguish this sense in the context of information studies, we introduce the term episemantics. The authors have each independently applied this term in slightly different contexts and scales (Hauser 2018a; Tennis 2016), and this article presents a unified definition of the term and guidelines for applying it at the scale of both words and works. The resulting weak concept of aboutness is pragmatic, in Star's sense of a focus on consequences over antecedents, while reserving space for the critique and improvement of aboutness determinations within various contexts and research programs. The paper finishes with a discussion of the implication of the concept of episemantics and methodological possibilities it offers for knowledge organization research and practice. We draw inspiration from Melvil Dewey's use of physical aroundness in his first classification system and ask how aroundness might be more effectively operationalized in digital environments.
    Type
    a
  20. Fairthorne, R.A.: Temporal structure in bibliographic classification (1985) 0.01 
    0.014397475 = product of:
  0.021596212 = sum of:
    0.008906664 = product of:
      0.035626657 = sum of:
        0.035626657 = weight(_text_:authors in 3651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035626657 = score(doc=3651,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23577455 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051718395 = queryNorm
            0.15110476 = fieldWeight in 3651, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3651)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    0.012689548 = weight(_text_:a in 3651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012689548 = score(doc=3651,freq=62.0), product of:
        0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051718395 = queryNorm
        0.21279141 = fieldWeight in 3651, product of:
          7.8740077 = tf(freq=62.0), with freq of:
            62.0 = termFreq=62.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3651)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This paper, presented at the Ottawa Conference an the Conceptual Basis of the Classification of Knowledge, in 1971, is one of Fairthorne's more perceptive works and deserves a wide audience, especially as it breaks new ground in classification theory. In discussing the notion of discourse, he makes a "distinction between what discourse mentions and what discourse is about" [emphasis added], considered as a "fundamental factor to the relativistic nature of bibliographic classification" (p. 360). A table of mathematical functions, for example, describes exactly something represented by a collection of digits, but, without a preface, this table does not fit into a broader context. Some indication of the author's intent ls needed to fit the table into a broader context. This intent may appear in a title, chapter heading, class number or some other aid. Discourse an and discourse about something "cannot be determined solely from what it mentions" (p. 361). Some kind of background is needed. Fairthorne further develops the theme that knowledge about a subject comes from previous knowledge, thus adding a temporal factor to classification. "Some extra textual criteria are needed" in order to classify (p. 362). For example, "documents that mention the same things, but are an different topics, will have different ancestors, in the sense of preceding documents to which they are linked by various bibliographic characteristics ... [and] ... they will have different descendants" (p. 363). The classifier has to distinguish between documents that "mention exactly the same thing" but are not about the same thing. The classifier does this by classifying "sets of documents that form their histories, their bibliographic world lines" (p. 363). The practice of citation is one method of performing the linking and presents a "fan" of documents connected by a chain of citations to past work. The fan is seen as the effect of generations of documents - each generation connected to the previous one, and all ancestral to the present document. Thus, there are levels in temporal structure-that is, antecedent and successor documents-and these require that documents be identified in relation to other documents. This gives a set of documents an "irrevocable order," a loose order which Fairthorne calls "bibliographic time," and which is "generated by the fact of continual growth" (p. 364). He does not consider "bibliographic time" to be an equivalent to physical time because bibliographic events, as part of communication, require delay. Sets of documents, as indicated above, rather than single works, are used in classification. While an event, a person, a unique feature of the environment, may create a class of one-such as the French Revolution, Napoleon, Niagara Falls-revolutions, emperors, and waterfalls are sets which, as sets, will subsume individuals and make normal classes.
    The fan of past documents may be seen across time as a philosophical "wake," translated documents as a sideways relationship and future documents as another fan spreading forward from a given document (p. 365). The "overlap of reading histories can be used to detect common interests among readers," (p. 365) and readers may be classified accordingly. Finally, Fairthorne rejects the notion of a "general" classification, which he regards as a mirage, to be replaced by a citation-type network to identify classes. An interesting feature of his work lies in his linkage between old and new documents via a bibliographic method-citations, authors' names, imprints, style, and vocabulary - rather than topical (subject) terms. This is an indirect method of creating classes. The subject (aboutness) is conceived as a finite, common sharing of knowledge over time (past, present, and future) as opposed to the more common hierarchy of topics in an infinite schema assumed to be universally useful. Fairthorne, a mathematician by training, is a prolific writer an the foundations of classification and information. His professional career includes work with the Royal Engineers Chemical Warfare Section and the Royal Aircraft Establishment (RAE). He was the founder of the Computing Unit which became the RAE Mathematics Department.
    Footnote
    Original in: Ottawa Conference on the Conceptual Basis of the Classification of Knowledge, Ottawa, 1971. Ed.: Jerzy A Wojceichowski. Pullach: Verlag Dokumentation 1974. S.404-412.
    Source
    Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al
    Type
    a

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 131
  • d 14
  • f 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 139
  • m 4
  • el 3
  • x 2
  • d 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes