Search (20 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Inhaltsanalyse"
  1. BS 6529: Recommendations for examining documents, determining their subjects and selecting indexing terms (1984) 0.03
    0.02523924 = product of:
      0.17667468 = sum of:
        0.17667468 = weight(_text_:standards in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17667468 = score(doc=1155,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18121246 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04065836 = queryNorm
            0.9749588 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Editor
    British Standards Institution
    Imprint
    London : British Standards Institution
  2. Tibbo, H.R.: Abstracting across the disciplines : a content analysis of abstracts for the natural sciences, the social sciences, and the humanities with implications for abstracting standards and online information retrieval (1992) 0.02
    0.020396387 = product of:
      0.1427747 = sum of:
        0.1427747 = weight(_text_:standards in 2536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1427747 = score(doc=2536,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.18121246 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04065836 = queryNorm
            0.78788567 = fieldWeight in 2536, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2536)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on a comparison of the "content categories" listed in the ANSI/ISO abstracting standards to actual content found in abstracts from the sciences, social sciences, and the humanities. The preliminary findings question the fundamental concept underlying these standards, namely, that any one set of standards and generalized instructions can describe and elicit the optimal configuration for abstracts from all subject areas
  3. Studwell, W.E.: Subject suggestions 6 : some concerns relating to quantity of subjects (1990) 0.01
    0.012782155 = product of:
      0.08947508 = sum of:
        0.08947508 = product of:
          0.17895016 = sum of:
            0.17895016 = weight(_text_:policy in 466) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17895016 = score(doc=466,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.21800333 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04065836 = queryNorm
                0.82085973 = fieldWeight in 466, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=466)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    The number of subject headings for any individual bibliographic record is discussed. Four policy proposals are presented: how many different persons, places, and organisations should be used; how many uses of the same person, place, organisation, or topic should be allowed; an overall policy on secondary headings; how many subjects should be as a general policy.
  4. Marsh, E.E.; White, M.D.: ¬A taxonomy of relationships between images and text (2003) 0.01
    0.012479308 = product of:
      0.08735515 = sum of:
        0.08735515 = weight(_text_:government in 4444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08735515 = score(doc=4444,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23146805 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6930003 = idf(docFreq=404, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04065836 = queryNorm
            0.37739617 = fieldWeight in 4444, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6930003 = idf(docFreq=404, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4444)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    The paper establishes a taxonomy of image-text relationships that reflects the ways that images and text interact. It is applicable to all subject areas and document types. The taxonomy was developed to answer the research question: how does an illustration relate to the text with which it is associated, or, what are the functions of illustration? Developed in a two-stage process - first, analysis of relevant research in children's literature, dictionary development, education, journalism, and library and information design and, second, subsequent application of the first version of the taxonomy to 954 image-text pairs in 45 Web pages (pages with educational content for children, online newspapers, and retail business pages) - the taxonomy identifies 49 relationships and groups them in three categories according to the closeness of the conceptual relationship between image and text. The paper uses qualitative content analysis to illustrate use of the taxonomy to analyze four image-text pairs in government publications and discusses the implications of the research for information retrieval and document design.
  5. Chen, H.; Ng, T.: ¬An algorithmic approach to concept exploration in a large knowledge network (automatic thesaurus consultation) : symbolic branch-and-bound search versus connectionist Hopfield Net Activation (1995) 0.01
    0.008614214 = product of:
      0.060299497 = sum of:
        0.060299497 = weight(_text_:networks in 2203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060299497 = score(doc=2203,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19231078 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04065836 = queryNorm
            0.31355235 = fieldWeight in 2203, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2203)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a framework for knowledge discovery and concept exploration. In order to enhance the concept exploration capability of knowledge based systems and to alleviate the limitation of the manual browsing approach, develops 2 spreading activation based algorithms for concept exploration in large, heterogeneous networks of concepts (eg multiple thesauri). One algorithm, which is based on the symbolic AI paradigma, performs a conventional branch-and-bound search on a semantic net representation to identify other highly relevant concepts (a serial, optimal search process). The 2nd algorithm, which is absed on the neural network approach, executes the Hopfield net parallel relaxation and convergence process to identify 'convergent' concepts for some initial queries (a parallel, heuristic search process). Tests these 2 algorithms on a large text-based knowledge network of about 13.000 nodes (terms) and 80.000 directed links in the area of computing technologies
  6. From information to knowledge : conceptual and content analysis by computer (1995) 0.01
    0.007178512 = product of:
      0.05024958 = sum of:
        0.05024958 = weight(_text_:networks in 5392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05024958 = score(doc=5392,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19231078 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04065836 = queryNorm
            0.26129362 = fieldWeight in 5392, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5392)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Content
    SCHMIDT, K.M.: Concepts - content - meaning: an introduction; DUCHASTEL, J. et al.: The SACAO project: using computation toward textual data analysis; PAQUIN, L.-C. u. L. DUPUY: An approach to expertise transfer: computer-assisted text analysis; HOGENRAAD, R., Y. BESTGEN u. J.-L. NYSTEN: Terrorist rhetoric: texture and architecture; MOHLER, P.P.: On the interaction between reading and computing: an interpretative approach to content analysis; LANCASHIRE, I.: Computer tools for cognitive stylistics; MERGENTHALER, E.: An outline of knowledge based text analysis; NAMENWIRTH, J.Z.: Ideography in computer-aided content analysis; WEBER, R.P. u. J.Z. Namenwirth: Content-analytic indicators: a self-critique; McKINNON, A.: Optimizing the aberrant frequency word technique; ROSATI, R.: Factor analysis in classical archaeology: export patterns of Attic pottery trade; PETRILLO, P.S.: Old and new worlds: ancient coinage and modern technology; DARANYI, S., S. MARJAI u.a.: Caryatids and the measurement of semiosis in architecture; ZARRI, G.P.: Intelligent information retrieval: an application in the field of historical biographical data; BOUCHARD, G., R. ROY u.a.: Computers and genealogy: from family reconstitution to population reconstruction; DEMÉLAS-BOHY, M.-D. u. M. RENAUD: Instability, networks and political parties: a political history expert system prototype; DARANYI, S., A. ABRANYI u. G. KOVACS: Knowledge extraction from ethnopoetic texts by multivariate statistical methods; FRAUTSCHI, R.L.: Measures of narrative voice in French prose fiction applied to textual samples from the enlightenment to the twentieth century; DANNENBERG, R. u.a.: A project in computer music: the musician's workbench
  7. Lebrecht, H.: Methoden und Probleme der Bilderschließung am Beispiel des verteilten digitalen Bildarchivs Prometheus (2003) 0.01
    0.0063738707 = product of:
      0.044617094 = sum of:
        0.044617094 = weight(_text_:standards in 2508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044617094 = score(doc=2508,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18121246 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04065836 = queryNorm
            0.24621427 = fieldWeight in 2508, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2508)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Die Erschließung von Bildern ist ein Gebiet, welches aufgrund der speziellen Eigenschaften des Mediums Bild von der Texterschließung zu unterscheiden ist. In Museen, Archiven, Universitäten und anderen Einrichtungen werden Bildsammlungen schon länger erschlossen. Viele Sammlungen bleiben jedoch unangetastet, da es für die Bilderschließung noch immer an passend zugeschnittenen Erschließungsinstrumenten und Erschließungsmethoden mangelt. Es existieren keine allgemeingültigen Standards, auch deshalb, weil die zu verzeichnenden Sammlungen vielen verschiedenen Instituten unterschiedlicher Wissenschaftsfächer angehören und sie dort unterschiedlichen Zwecken dienen. Diese Arbeit beginnt mit einer Einführung zur Kommunikationstheorie, um damit das Bewusstsein über die Komplexität der von Bildern vermittelten, visuellen Informationen zu schärfen. Anschließend werden Bildsammlungen typologisch sortiert, bevor im einzelnen auf die Theorie der Formal- und Inhaltserschließung von Bildern eingegangen wird. Dabei werden verschiedene Erschließungsinstrumente und -methoden, jeweils unter Einbindung von Beispielen, vorgestellt und ihre Anwendbarkeit für die Bilderschließung beurteilt. Der zweite Teil der Arbeit ist an das Projekt "Prometheus - Das verteilte digitale Bildarchiv für Forschung und Lehre" gebunden. Über Prometheus werden heterogen erschlossene, digitalisierte Bildbestände unter einer gemeinsamen Retrievaloberfläche verfügbar gemacht. Nach einer Einführung in das Projekt, die intendierten Ziele und die Vorstel lung der Techniken, welche das Retrieval über autonom erstellte Datenbanken ermöglichen, werden praktizierte Erschließungsmethoden einzelner, an Prometheus beteiligter Institute, beispielhaft dargestellt. Die sich zuvor in den verschiedenen Kapiteln andeutenden oder schon festgestellten Problematiken der Bilderschließung werden zum Schluss noch einmal zusammengefasst und diskutiert, wobei sie verschiedenen Ebenen, weshalb sie auftreten und worauf sie sich auswirken, zugeordnet werden können.
  8. Lebrecht, H.: Methoden und Probleme der Bilderschließung (2003) 0.01
    0.0063738707 = product of:
      0.044617094 = sum of:
        0.044617094 = weight(_text_:standards in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044617094 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18121246 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04065836 = queryNorm
            0.24621427 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Die Erschließung von Bildern ist ein Gebiet, welches aufgrund der speziellen Eigenschaften des Mediums Bild von der Texterschließung zu unterscheiden ist. In Museen, Archiven, Universitäten und anderen Einrichtungen werden Bildsammlungen schon länger erschlossen. Viele Sammlungen bleiben jedoch unangetastet, da es für die Bilderschließung noch immer an passend zugeschnittenen Erschließungsinstrumenten und Erschließungsmethoden mangelt. Es existieren keine allgemeingültigen Standards, auch deshalb, weil die zu verzeichnenden Sammlungen vielen verschiedenen Instituten unterschiedlicher Wissenschaftsfächer angehören und sie dort unterschiedlichen Zwecken dienen. Diese Arbeit beginnt mit einer Einführung zur Kommunikationstheorie, um damit das Bewusstsein über die Komplexität der von Bildern vermittelten, visuellen Informationen zu schärfen. Anschließend werden Bildsammlungen typologisch sortiert, bevor im einzelnen auf die Theorie der Formal- und Inhaltserschließung von Bildern eingegangen wird. Dabei werden verschiedene Erschließungsinstrumente und -methoden, jeweils unter Einbindung von Beispielen, vorgestellt und ihre Anwendbarkeit für die Bilderschließung beurteilt. Der zweite Teil der Arbeit ist an das Projekt "Prometheus - Das verteilte digitale Bildarchiv für Forschung und Lehre" gebunden. Über Prometheus werden heterogen erschlossene, digitalisierte Bildbestände unter einer gemeinsamen Retrievaloberfläche verfügbar gemacht. Nach einer Einführung in das Projekt, die intendierten Ziele und die Vorstel lung der Techniken, welche das Retrieval über autonom erstellte Datenbanken ermöglichen, werden praktizierte Erschließungsmethoden einzelner, an Prometheus beteiligter Institute, beispielhaft dargestellt. Die sich zuvor in den verschiedenen Kapiteln andeutenden oder schon festgestellten Problematiken der Bilderschließung werden zum Schluss noch einmal zusammengefasst und diskutiert, wobei sie verschiedenen Ebenen, weshalb sie auftreten und worauf sie sich auswirken, zugeordnet werden können.
  9. Sauperl, A.: Subject cataloging process of Slovenian and American catalogers (2005) 0.01
    0.0063738707 = product of:
      0.044617094 = sum of:
        0.044617094 = weight(_text_:standards in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044617094 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18121246 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04065836 = queryNorm
            0.24621427 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - An empirical study has shown that the real process of subject cataloging does not correspond entirely to theoretical descriptions in textbooks and international standards. The purpose of this is paper is to address the issue of whether it be possible for catalogers who have not received formal training to perform subject cataloging in a different way to their trained colleagues. Design/methodology/approach - A qualitative study was conducted in 2001 among five Slovenian public library catalogers. The resulting model is compared to previous findings. Findings - First, all catalogers attempted to determine what the book was about. While the American catalogers tried to understand the topic and the author's intent, the Slovenian catalogers appeared to focus on the topic only. Slovenian and American academic library catalogers did not demonstrate any anticipation of possible uses that users might have of the book, while this was important for American public library catalogers. All catalogers used existing records to build new ones and/or to search for subject headings. The verification of subject representation with the indexing language was the last step in the subject cataloging process of American catalogers, often skipped by Slovenian catalogers. Research limitations/implications - The small and convenient sample limits the findings. Practical implications - Comparison of subject cataloging processes of Slovenian and American catalogers, two different groups, is important because they both contribute to OCLC's WorldCat database. If the cataloging community is building a universal catalog and approaches to subject description are different, then the resulting subject representations might also be different. Originality/value - This is one of the very few empirical studies of subject cataloging and indexing.
  10. Bös, K.: Aspektorientierte Inhaltserschließung von Romanen und Bildern : ein Vergleich der Ansätze von Annelise Mark Pejtersen und Sara Shatford (2012) 0.01
    0.0063738707 = product of:
      0.044617094 = sum of:
        0.044617094 = weight(_text_:standards in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044617094 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18121246 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04065836 = queryNorm
            0.24621427 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Für die inhaltliche Erschließung von Sach- und Fachliteratur stehen heutzutage etablierte Verfahren und Standards zur Verfügung. Anders verhält es sich dagegen mit der Erschließung von Schöner Literatur und Bildern. Beide Medien sind sehr verschieden und haben doch eines gemeinsam. Sie lassen sich mit den Regeln für Sach- und Fachliteratur nicht zufriedenstellend inhaltlich erschließen. Dieses Problem erkannten in den 1970er und 80er Jahren beide Autoren, deren Methoden ich hier verglichen habe. Annelise Mark Pejtersen bemühte sich um eine Lösung für die Schöne Literatur und wählte dabei einen empirischen Ansatz. Sara Shatford versuchte durch theoretische Überlegungen eine Lösung für Bilder zu erarbeiten. Der empirische wie der theoretische Ansatz führten zu Methoden, die das jeweilige Medium unter verschiedenen Aspekten betrachten. Diese Aspekten basieren in beiden Fällen auf denselben Fragen. Dennoch unterscheiden sie sich stark voneinander sowohl im Hinblick auf die Inhalte, die sie aufnehmen können, als auch hinsichtlich ihrer Struktur. Eine Anwendung einer der Methoden auf das jeweils andere Medium erscheint daher nicht sinnvoll. In dieser Arbeit werden die Methoden von Pejtersen und Shatford zunächst einzeln erläutert. Im Anschluss werden die Aspekte beider Methoden vergleichend gegenübergestellt. Dazu werden ausgewählte Beispiele mit beiden Methoden erschlossen. Abschließend wird geprüft, ob die wechselseitige Erschließung, wie sie im Vergleich angewendet wurde, in der Praxis sinnvoll ist und ob es Medien gibt, deren Erschließung mit beiden Methoden interessant wäre.
  11. Hjoerland, B.: Subject (of documents) (2016) 0.00
    0.004612363 = product of:
      0.03228654 = sum of:
        0.03228654 = product of:
          0.06457308 = sum of:
            0.06457308 = weight(_text_:policy in 3182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06457308 = score(doc=3182,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21800333 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04065836 = queryNorm
                0.29620224 = fieldWeight in 3182, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3182)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents and discusses the concept "subject" or subject matter (of documents) as it has been examined in library and information science (LIS) for more than 100 years. Different theoretical positions are outlined and it is found that the most important distinction is between document-oriented views versus request-oriented views. The document-oriented view conceive subject as something inherent in documents, whereas the request-oriented view (or the policy based view) understand subject as an attribution made to documents in order to facilitate certain uses of them. Related concepts such as concepts, aboutness, topic, isness and ofness are also briefly presented. The conclusion is that the most fruitful way of defining "subject" (of a document) is the documents informative or epistemological potentials, that is, the documents potentials of informing users and advance the development of knowledge.
  12. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980) 0.00
    0.0039347475 = product of:
      0.027543232 = sum of:
        0.027543232 = product of:
          0.055086464 = sum of:
            0.055086464 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055086464 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14237864 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04065836 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:44
  13. Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992) 0.00
    0.0031477981 = product of:
      0.022034585 = sum of:
        0.022034585 = product of:
          0.04406917 = sum of:
            0.04406917 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04406917 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14237864 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04065836 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:08
  14. Hauff-Hartig, S.: Automatische Transkription von Videos : Fernsehen 3.0: Automatisierte Sentimentanalyse und Zusammenstellung von Kurzvideos mit hohem Aufregungslevel KI-generierte Metadaten: Von der Technologiebeobachtung bis zum produktiven Einsatz (2021) 0.00
    0.0031477981 = product of:
      0.022034585 = sum of:
        0.022034585 = product of:
          0.04406917 = sum of:
            0.04406917 = weight(_text_:22 in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04406917 = score(doc=251,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14237864 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04065836 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
  15. Raieli, R.: ¬The semantic hole : enthusiasm and caution around multimedia information retrieval (2012) 0.00
    0.0027822866 = product of:
      0.019476006 = sum of:
        0.019476006 = product of:
          0.03895201 = sum of:
            0.03895201 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03895201 = score(doc=4888,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14237864 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04065836 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:02:10
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.1, S.13-22
  16. Weimer, K.H.: ¬The nexus of subject analysis and bibliographic description : the case of multipart videos (1996) 0.00
    0.0023608485 = product of:
      0.01652594 = sum of:
        0.01652594 = product of:
          0.03305188 = sum of:
            0.03305188 = weight(_text_:22 in 6525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03305188 = score(doc=6525,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14237864 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04065836 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6525, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6525)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.5-18
  17. Chen, S.-J.; Lee, H.-L.: Art images and mental associations : a preliminary exploration (2014) 0.00
    0.0023608485 = product of:
      0.01652594 = sum of:
        0.01652594 = product of:
          0.03305188 = sum of:
            0.03305188 = weight(_text_:22 in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03305188 = score(doc=1416,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14237864 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04065836 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  18. White, M.D.; Marsh, E.E.: Content analysis : a flexible methodology (2006) 0.00
    0.0023608485 = product of:
      0.01652594 = sum of:
        0.01652594 = product of:
          0.03305188 = sum of:
            0.03305188 = weight(_text_:22 in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03305188 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14237864 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04065836 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Library trends. 55(2006) no.1, S.22-45
  19. Sauperl, A.: Subject determination during the cataloging process : the development of a system based on theoretical principles (2002) 0.00
    0.0011804242 = product of:
      0.00826297 = sum of:
        0.00826297 = product of:
          0.01652594 = sum of:
            0.01652594 = weight(_text_:22 in 2293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01652594 = score(doc=2293,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14237864 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04065836 = queryNorm
                0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 2293, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2293)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    27. 9.2005 14:22:19
  20. Bade, D.: ¬The creation and persistence of misinformation in shared library catalogs : language and subject knowledge in a technological era (2002) 0.00
    7.8694953E-4 = product of:
      0.0055086464 = sum of:
        0.0055086464 = product of:
          0.011017293 = sum of:
            0.011017293 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011017293 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14237864 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04065836 = queryNorm
                0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05