Search (28 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Inhaltsanalyse"
  1. Früh, W.: Inhaltsanalyse (2001) 0.03
    0.03174123 = product of:
      0.095223695 = sum of:
        0.0847765 = weight(_text_:forschung in 1751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0847765 = score(doc=1751,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1858777 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.45608753 = fieldWeight in 1751, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1751)
        0.0104471985 = product of:
          0.031341594 = sum of:
            0.031341594 = weight(_text_:29 in 1751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031341594 = score(doc=1751,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13440257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038207654 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1751, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1751)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    BK
    70.03 Methoden, Techniken und Organisation der sozialwissenschaftlichen Forschung
    Classification
    70.03 Methoden, Techniken und Organisation der sozialwissenschaftlichen Forschung
    Date
    24. 3.2008 12:29:34
  2. Hjoerland, B.: ¬The concept of 'subject' in information science (1992) 0.01
    0.011128641 = product of:
      0.06677184 = sum of:
        0.06677184 = weight(_text_:propose in 2247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06677184 = score(doc=2247,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19617504 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.3403687 = fieldWeight in 2247, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2247)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents a theoretical investigation of the concept of 'subject' or 'subject matter' in library and information science. Most conceptions of 'subject' in the literature are not explicit but implicit. Various indexing and classification theories, including automatic indexing and citation indexing, have their own more or less implicit concepts of subject. This fact puts the emphasis on making the implicit theorie of 'subject matter' explicit as the first step. ... The different conceptions of 'subject' can therefore be classified into epistemological positions, e.g. 'subjective idealism' (or the empiric/positivistic viewpoint), 'objective idealism' (the rationalistic viewpoint), 'pragmatism' and 'materialism/realism'. The third and final step is to propose a new theory of subject matter based on an explicit theory of knowledge. In this article this is done from the point of view of a realistic/materialistic epistemology. From this standpoint the subject of a document is defined as the epistemological potentials of that document
  3. Clavier, V.; Paganelli, C.: Including authorial stance in the indexing of scientific documents (2012) 0.01
    0.011128641 = product of:
      0.06677184 = sum of:
        0.06677184 = weight(_text_:propose in 320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06677184 = score(doc=320,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19617504 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.3403687 = fieldWeight in 320, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=320)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    This article argues that authorial stance should be taken into account in the indexing of scientific documents. Authorial stance has been widely studied in linguistics and is a typical feature of scientific writing that reveals the uniqueness of each author's perspective, their scientific contribution, and their thinking. We argue that authorial stance guides the reading of scientific documents and that it can be used to characterize the knowledge contained in such documents. Our research has previously shown that people reading dissertations are interested both in a topic and in a document's authorial stance. Now, we would like to propose a two-tiered indexing system. Dissertations would first be divided into paragraphs; then, each information unit would be defined by topic and by the markers of authorial stance present in the document.
  4. Fremery, W. De; Buckland, M.K.: Context, relevance, and labor (2022) 0.01
    0.011128641 = product of:
      0.06677184 = sum of:
        0.06677184 = weight(_text_:propose in 4240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06677184 = score(doc=4240,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19617504 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.3403687 = fieldWeight in 4240, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4240)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Since information science concerns the transmission of records, it concerns context. The transmission of documents ensures their arrival in new contexts. Documents and their copies are spread across times and places. The amount of labor required to discover and retrieve relevant documents is also formulated by context. Thus, any serious consideration of communication and of information technologies quickly leads to a concern with context, relevance, and labor. Information scientists have developed many theories of context, relevance, and labor but not a framework for organizing them and describing their relationship with one another. We propose the words context and relevance can be used to articulate a useful framework for considering the diversity of approaches to context and relevance in information science, as well as their relations with each other and with labor.
  5. Lebrecht, H.: Methoden und Probleme der Bilderschließung am Beispiel des verteilten digitalen Bildarchivs Prometheus (2003) 0.01
    0.008325839 = product of:
      0.049955033 = sum of:
        0.049955033 = weight(_text_:forschung in 2508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049955033 = score(doc=2508,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1858777 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.26875216 = fieldWeight in 2508, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2508)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Die Erschließung von Bildern ist ein Gebiet, welches aufgrund der speziellen Eigenschaften des Mediums Bild von der Texterschließung zu unterscheiden ist. In Museen, Archiven, Universitäten und anderen Einrichtungen werden Bildsammlungen schon länger erschlossen. Viele Sammlungen bleiben jedoch unangetastet, da es für die Bilderschließung noch immer an passend zugeschnittenen Erschließungsinstrumenten und Erschließungsmethoden mangelt. Es existieren keine allgemeingültigen Standards, auch deshalb, weil die zu verzeichnenden Sammlungen vielen verschiedenen Instituten unterschiedlicher Wissenschaftsfächer angehören und sie dort unterschiedlichen Zwecken dienen. Diese Arbeit beginnt mit einer Einführung zur Kommunikationstheorie, um damit das Bewusstsein über die Komplexität der von Bildern vermittelten, visuellen Informationen zu schärfen. Anschließend werden Bildsammlungen typologisch sortiert, bevor im einzelnen auf die Theorie der Formal- und Inhaltserschließung von Bildern eingegangen wird. Dabei werden verschiedene Erschließungsinstrumente und -methoden, jeweils unter Einbindung von Beispielen, vorgestellt und ihre Anwendbarkeit für die Bilderschließung beurteilt. Der zweite Teil der Arbeit ist an das Projekt "Prometheus - Das verteilte digitale Bildarchiv für Forschung und Lehre" gebunden. Über Prometheus werden heterogen erschlossene, digitalisierte Bildbestände unter einer gemeinsamen Retrievaloberfläche verfügbar gemacht. Nach einer Einführung in das Projekt, die intendierten Ziele und die Vorstel lung der Techniken, welche das Retrieval über autonom erstellte Datenbanken ermöglichen, werden praktizierte Erschließungsmethoden einzelner, an Prometheus beteiligter Institute, beispielhaft dargestellt. Die sich zuvor in den verschiedenen Kapiteln andeutenden oder schon festgestellten Problematiken der Bilderschließung werden zum Schluss noch einmal zusammengefasst und diskutiert, wobei sie verschiedenen Ebenen, weshalb sie auftreten und worauf sie sich auswirken, zugeordnet werden können.
  6. Lebrecht, H.: Methoden und Probleme der Bilderschließung (2003) 0.01
    0.008325839 = product of:
      0.049955033 = sum of:
        0.049955033 = weight(_text_:forschung in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049955033 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1858777 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.26875216 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Die Erschließung von Bildern ist ein Gebiet, welches aufgrund der speziellen Eigenschaften des Mediums Bild von der Texterschließung zu unterscheiden ist. In Museen, Archiven, Universitäten und anderen Einrichtungen werden Bildsammlungen schon länger erschlossen. Viele Sammlungen bleiben jedoch unangetastet, da es für die Bilderschließung noch immer an passend zugeschnittenen Erschließungsinstrumenten und Erschließungsmethoden mangelt. Es existieren keine allgemeingültigen Standards, auch deshalb, weil die zu verzeichnenden Sammlungen vielen verschiedenen Instituten unterschiedlicher Wissenschaftsfächer angehören und sie dort unterschiedlichen Zwecken dienen. Diese Arbeit beginnt mit einer Einführung zur Kommunikationstheorie, um damit das Bewusstsein über die Komplexität der von Bildern vermittelten, visuellen Informationen zu schärfen. Anschließend werden Bildsammlungen typologisch sortiert, bevor im einzelnen auf die Theorie der Formal- und Inhaltserschließung von Bildern eingegangen wird. Dabei werden verschiedene Erschließungsinstrumente und -methoden, jeweils unter Einbindung von Beispielen, vorgestellt und ihre Anwendbarkeit für die Bilderschließung beurteilt. Der zweite Teil der Arbeit ist an das Projekt "Prometheus - Das verteilte digitale Bildarchiv für Forschung und Lehre" gebunden. Über Prometheus werden heterogen erschlossene, digitalisierte Bildbestände unter einer gemeinsamen Retrievaloberfläche verfügbar gemacht. Nach einer Einführung in das Projekt, die intendierten Ziele und die Vorstel lung der Techniken, welche das Retrieval über autonom erstellte Datenbanken ermöglichen, werden praktizierte Erschließungsmethoden einzelner, an Prometheus beteiligter Institute, beispielhaft dargestellt. Die sich zuvor in den verschiedenen Kapiteln andeutenden oder schon festgestellten Problematiken der Bilderschließung werden zum Schluss noch einmal zusammengefasst und diskutiert, wobei sie verschiedenen Ebenen, weshalb sie auftreten und worauf sie sich auswirken, zugeordnet werden können.
  7. Scholz, O.R.: Bild, Darstellung, Zeichen : Philosophische Theorien bildlicher Darstellung (2004) 0.01
    0.008325839 = product of:
      0.049955033 = sum of:
        0.049955033 = weight(_text_:forschung in 1436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049955033 = score(doc=1436,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1858777 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.26875216 = fieldWeight in 1436, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1436)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Bilder prägen zunehmend alle öffentlichen und privaten Lebensbereiche. Dieser "Bilderflut" steht eine große praktische und theoretische Inkompetenz gegenüber. Was sind Bilder? Wie stellen Bilder dar? Was heißt es, Bilder zu verstehen? Das Buch verbindet eine Untersuchung dieser Fragen mit einem kritischen Durchgang durch prominente Bildtheorien und arbeitet schrittweise eine Gebrauchstheorie bildhafter Darstellungen aus. In den kritischen Teilen zeigt sich: Ob ein Gegenstand als Bild fungiert, liegt weder allein in seinen inneren Eigenschaften noch in Ähnlichkeitsbeziehungen zu dargestellten Realitäten noch allein in seiner kausalen und intentionalen Entstehungsgeschichte begründet. Positiv ergibt sich: Etwas ist nur dann ein Bild, wenn es als Element eines analogen Zeichensystems im Rahmen besondere sozial geregelter Handlungs- und Interaktionsmuster ("Bildspiele") verwendet und verstanden wird. Das Buch, das sich seit seinem ersten Erscheinen im Jahre 1991 in Forschung und Lehre bew ährt hat, wurde für die Neuauflage vollständig überarbeitet und auf den neuesten Stand gebracht. Es richtet sich an alle, die mit Bildern und dem Verstehen von Bildern zu tun haben.
  8. Laffal, J.: ¬A concept analysis of Jonathan Swift's 'Tale of a tub' and 'Gulliver's travels' (1995) 0.00
    0.004924857 = product of:
      0.029549142 = sum of:
        0.029549142 = product of:
          0.088647425 = sum of:
            0.088647425 = weight(_text_:29 in 6362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.088647425 = score(doc=6362,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13440257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038207654 = queryNorm
                0.6595664 = fieldWeight in 6362, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6362)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    8. 3.1997 10:05:29
    Source
    Computers and the humanities. 29(1995) no.5, S.339-361
  9. Martindale, C.; McKenzie, D.: On the utility of content analysis in author attribution : 'The federalist' (1995) 0.00
    0.004924857 = product of:
      0.029549142 = sum of:
        0.029549142 = product of:
          0.088647425 = sum of:
            0.088647425 = weight(_text_:29 in 822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.088647425 = score(doc=822,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13440257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038207654 = queryNorm
                0.6595664 = fieldWeight in 822, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=822)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    8. 3.1997 10:05:29
    Source
    Computers and the humanities. 29(1995) no.4, S.259-270
  10. Gardin, J.C.: Document analysis and linguistic theory (1973) 0.00
    0.0046431995 = product of:
      0.027859196 = sum of:
        0.027859196 = product of:
          0.08357759 = sum of:
            0.08357759 = weight(_text_:29 in 2387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08357759 = score(doc=2387,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13440257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038207654 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 2387, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2387)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 29(1973) no.2, S.137-168
  11. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980) 0.00
    0.0028758943 = product of:
      0.017255366 = sum of:
        0.017255366 = product of:
          0.051766098 = sum of:
            0.051766098 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051766098 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13379669 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038207654 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:44
  12. Bade, D.: ¬The creation and persistence of misinformation in shared library catalogs : language and subject knowledge in a technological era (2002) 0.00
    0.0023111575 = product of:
      0.013866945 = sum of:
        0.013866945 = product of:
          0.020800417 = sum of:
            0.0104471985 = weight(_text_:29 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0104471985 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13440257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038207654 = queryNorm
                0.07773064 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
            0.010353219 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010353219 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13379669 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038207654 = queryNorm
                0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Footnote
    Arguing that catalogers need to work both quickly and accurately, Bade maintains that employing specialists is the most efficient and effective way to achieve this outcome. Far less compelling than these arguments are Bade's concluding remarks, in which he offers meager suggestions for correcting the problems as he sees them. Overall, this essay is little more than a curmudgeon's diatribe. Addressed primarily to catalogers and library administrators, the analysis presented is too superficial to assist practicing catalogers or cataloging managers in developing solutions to any systemic problems in current cataloging practice, and it presents too little evidence of pervasive problems to convince budget-conscious library administrators of a need to alter practice or to increase their investment in local cataloging operations. Indeed, the reliance upon anecdotal evidence and the apparent nit-picking that dominate the essay might tend to reinforce a negative image of catalogers in the minds of some. To his credit, Bade does provide an important reminder that it is the intellectual contributions made by thousands of erudite catalogers that have made shared cataloging a successful strategy for improving cataloging efficiency. This is an important point that often seems to be forgotten in academic libraries when focus centers an cutting costs. Had Bade focused more narrowly upon the issue of deintellectualization of cataloging and written a carefully structured essay to advance this argument, this essay might have been much more effective." - KO 29(2002) nos.3/4, S.236-237 (A. Sauperl)
  13. Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992) 0.00
    0.0023007155 = product of:
      0.013804292 = sum of:
        0.013804292 = product of:
          0.041412875 = sum of:
            0.041412875 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041412875 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13379669 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038207654 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:08
  14. Hauff-Hartig, S.: Automatische Transkription von Videos : Fernsehen 3.0: Automatisierte Sentimentanalyse und Zusammenstellung von Kurzvideos mit hohem Aufregungslevel KI-generierte Metadaten: Von der Technologiebeobachtung bis zum produktiven Einsatz (2021) 0.00
    0.0023007155 = product of:
      0.013804292 = sum of:
        0.013804292 = product of:
          0.041412875 = sum of:
            0.041412875 = weight(_text_:22 in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041412875 = score(doc=251,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13379669 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038207654 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
  15. Raieli, R.: ¬The semantic hole : enthusiasm and caution around multimedia information retrieval (2012) 0.00
    0.0020335645 = product of:
      0.0122013865 = sum of:
        0.0122013865 = product of:
          0.03660416 = sum of:
            0.03660416 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03660416 = score(doc=4888,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13379669 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038207654 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:02:10
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.1, S.13-22
  16. Hjoerland, B.: Towards a theory of aboutness, subject, topicality, theme, domain, field, content ... and relevance (2001) 0.00
    0.0020313996 = product of:
      0.012188397 = sum of:
        0.012188397 = product of:
          0.036565192 = sum of:
            0.036565192 = weight(_text_:29 in 6032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036565192 = score(doc=6032,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13440257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038207654 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 6032, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6032)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    29. 9.2001 14:03:14
  17. Chen, H.: ¬An analysis of image queries in the field of art history (2001) 0.00
    0.0020313996 = product of:
      0.012188397 = sum of:
        0.012188397 = product of:
          0.036565192 = sum of:
            0.036565192 = weight(_text_:29 in 5187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036565192 = score(doc=5187,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13440257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038207654 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5187, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5187)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Chen arranged with an Art History instructor to require 20 medieval art images in papers received from 29 students. Participants completed a self administered presearch and postsearch questionnaire, and were interviewed after questionnaire analysis, in order to collect both the keywords and phrases they planned to use, and those actually used. Three MLIS student reviewers then mapped the queries to Enser and McGregor's four categories, Jorgensen's 12 classes, and Fidel's 12 feature data and object poles providing a degree of match on a seven point scale (one not at all to 7 exact). The reviewers give highest scores to Enser and McGregor;'s categories. Modifications to both the Enser and McGregor and Jorgensen schemes are suggested
  18. Marshall, L.: Specific and generic subject headings : increasing subject access to library materials (2003) 0.00
    0.0020313996 = product of:
      0.012188397 = sum of:
        0.012188397 = product of:
          0.036565192 = sum of:
            0.036565192 = weight(_text_:29 in 5497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036565192 = score(doc=5497,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13440257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038207654 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5497, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5497)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    30. 7.2006 14:29:04
  19. Shatford, S.: Analyzing the subject of a picture : a theoretical approach (1986) 0.00
    0.0020313996 = product of:
      0.012188397 = sum of:
        0.012188397 = product of:
          0.036565192 = sum of:
            0.036565192 = weight(_text_:29 in 354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036565192 = score(doc=354,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13440257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038207654 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 354, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=354)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    7. 1.2007 13:00:29
  20. Greisdorf, H.; O'Connor, B.: Modelling what users see when they look at images : a cognitive viewpoint (2002) 0.00
    0.0017411998 = product of:
      0.0104471985 = sum of:
        0.0104471985 = product of:
          0.031341594 = sum of:
            0.031341594 = weight(_text_:29 in 4471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031341594 = score(doc=4471,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13440257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038207654 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4471, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4471)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 58(2002) no.1, S.6-29

Languages

  • e 23
  • d 5

Types

  • a 22
  • m 4
  • x 2
  • el 1
  • More… Less…