Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"International bedeutende Universalklassifikationen"
  • × theme_ss:"Universale Facettenklassifikationen"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Panigrahi, P.: Ranganathan and Dewey in hierarchical subject classification : some similarities (2015) 0.01
    0.00780627 = product of:
      0.027321944 = sum of:
        0.021165324 = product of:
          0.04233065 = sum of:
            0.04233065 = weight(_text_:p in 2789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04233065 = score(doc=2789,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03704574 = queryNorm
                0.31780142 = fieldWeight in 2789, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2789)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.006156619 = weight(_text_:a in 2789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006156619 = score(doc=2789,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 2789, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2789)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    S R Ranganathan and Melvil Dewey devised two types of classification schemes viz., faceted and enumerative. Ranganathan's faceted classification scheme is based on postulates, principles and canons. It has a strong theory. While working with the two schemes, similarities are observed. This paper tries to identify and present some relationships.
    Type
    a