Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

0.014276439 = product of:
  0.028552879 = sum of:
    0.028552879 = product of:
      0.057105757 = sum of:
        0.057105757 = weight(_text_:22 in 4337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057105757 = score(doc=4337,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052685954 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4337, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4337)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

7. 7.2018 17:22:00

0.009011503 = product of:
  0.018023007 = sum of:
    0.018023007 = product of:
      0.036046013 = sum of:
        0.036046013 = weight(_text_:m in 1804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036046013 = score(doc=1804,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052685954 = queryNorm
            0.27493733 = fieldWeight in 1804, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1804)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.008922774 = product of:
  0.017845549 = sum of:
    0.017845549 = product of:
      0.035691097 = sum of:
        0.035691097 = weight(_text_:22 in 116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035691097 = score(doc=116,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052685954 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 116, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=116)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

3. 3.2016 18:59:22

0.007646514 = product of:
  0.015293028 = sum of:
    0.015293028 = product of:
      0.030586056 = sum of:
        0.030586056 = weight(_text_:m in 4378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030586056 = score(doc=4378,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052685954 = queryNorm
            0.23329206 = fieldWeight in 4378, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4378)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Der Grund für die Einführung der DDC war die Umstellung auf Freihand durch den damals bevorstehenden Umbau und Ausbau der Bibliothek. Durch die Errichtung von 3 Tiefgeschoßen war es möglich, das gesamte oberirdische Magazin für das Publikum zu öffnen, wodurch die Publikumsflächen von vorher weniger als 200 m**2 auf nun 2200 m**2 ausgeweitet werden konnten. Zur Ausgangssituation: Wir hatten damals eine Freihand-Bibliothek im Umfang von einigen tausend Nachschlagewerken im Lesesaal, die wir einige Jahre zuvor - nach einem Umbau des Lesesaals - grob nach der 3-stelligen DDC aufgestellt hatten. Aber im Grunde genommen war das Thema Freihand für uns vollkommenes Neuland.

0.007561077 = product of:
  0.015122154 = sum of:
    0.015122154 = product of:
      0.060488615 = sum of:
        0.060488615 = weight(_text_:authors in 3848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060488615 = score(doc=3848,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052685954 = queryNorm
            0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 3848, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3848)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The paper will look into different patterns of facet analysis used in the UDC schedules and how these affect the scheme presentation, the underlying data structure and the management of the classification scheme. From the very beginning, UDC was designed to represent the universe of knowledge as an integral whole allowing for subjects/concepts from all fields of knowledge to be combined, linked and the nature of their relationships made explicit. In Otlet's original design, the emphasis for his new type of classification was on the coordination of classmarks at the point of searching, i.e., post-coordination, which he firmly rooted in an expressive notational system. While some UDC classes exhibit various patterns of facet analytical theory proper, others, although used in an analytico-synthetic fashion, follow less canonical structural patterns. The authors highlight the lack of connection made throughout the various stages of UDC restructuring between: a) theoretical requirements of an overarching facet analytical theory as a founding principle guiding the construction of schedules; and, b) practical requirements for an analytico-synthetic classification in terms of notational presentation and data structure that enables its use in indexing and retrieval, as well as its management online.