Search (27 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"International bedeutende Universalklassifikationen"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Lloyd, G.A.: ¬The Universal Decimal Classification as an international switching language (1972) 0.08 
    0.07839601 = product of:
  0.15679201 = sum of:
    0.106154054 = weight(_text_:et in 1269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.106154054 = score(doc=1269,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043643 = queryNorm
        0.5183982 = fieldWeight in 1269, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1269)
    0.050637968 = product of:
      0.101275936 = sum of:
        0.101275936 = weight(_text_:al in 1269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.101275936 = score(doc=1269,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043643 = queryNorm
            0.5063471 = fieldWeight in 1269, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1269)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Subject retrieval in the seventies: new directions. Proc. of an Int. Symp. ... College Park, May 14-15, 1971. Ed.: H.H. Wellisch et al
  2. Svanberg, M.: Dewey in Sweden : leaving SAB after 87 years (2011) 0.08 
    0.07839601 = product of:
  0.15679201 = sum of:
    0.106154054 = weight(_text_:et in 1804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.106154054 = score(doc=1804,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043643 = queryNorm
        0.5183982 = fieldWeight in 1804, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1804)
    0.050637968 = product of:
      0.101275936 = sum of:
        0.101275936 = weight(_text_:al in 1804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.101275936 = score(doc=1804,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043643 = queryNorm
            0.5063471 = fieldWeight in 1804, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1804)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Subject access: preparing for the future. Conference on August 20 - 21, 2009 in Florence, the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section sponsored an IFLA satellite conference entitled "Looking at the Past and Preparing for the Future". Eds.: P. Landry et al
  3. Martel, C.: Classification: a brief conspectus of present day library practice (1985) 0.06 
    0.06424952 = product of:
  0.08566603 = sum of:
    0.022949224 = weight(_text_:c in 3623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022949224 = score(doc=3623,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043643 = queryNorm
        0.1524436 = fieldWeight in 3623, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3623)
    0.042461623 = weight(_text_:et in 3623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042461623 = score(doc=3623,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043643 = queryNorm
        0.20735928 = fieldWeight in 3623, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3623)
    0.020255188 = product of:
      0.040510375 = sum of:
        0.040510375 = weight(_text_:al in 3623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040510375 = score(doc=3623,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043643 = queryNorm
            0.20253885 = fieldWeight in 3623, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3623)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)
    Source
    Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al
  4. McIlwaine, I.: Knowledge classifications, bibliographic classifications and the Internet (1998) 0.06 
    0.06271681 = product of:
  0.12543362 = sum of:
    0.084923245 = weight(_text_:et in 63) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.084923245 = score(doc=63,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043643 = queryNorm
        0.41471857 = fieldWeight in 63, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=63)
    0.040510375 = product of:
      0.08102075 = sum of:
        0.08102075 = weight(_text_:al in 63) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08102075 = score(doc=63,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043643 = queryNorm
            0.4050777 = fieldWeight in 63, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=63)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Structures and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 5th International ISKO-Conference, Lille, 25.-29.8.1998. Ed.: W. Mustafa el Hadi et al
  5. Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997) 0.03 
    0.034775272 = product of:
  0.069550544 = sum of:
    0.04589845 = weight(_text_:c in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04589845 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043643 = queryNorm
        0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
    0.023652097 = product of:
      0.047304194 = sum of:
        0.047304194 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047304194 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15283036 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043643 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
  6. Dewey, M.: Decimal classification and relativ index : introduction (1985) 0.03 
    0.031358406 = product of:
  0.06271681 = sum of:
    0.042461623 = weight(_text_:et in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042461623 = score(doc=3628,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043643 = queryNorm
        0.20735928 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
    0.020255188 = product of:
      0.040510375 = sum of:
        0.040510375 = weight(_text_:al in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040510375 = score(doc=3628,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043643 = queryNorm
            0.20253885 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al
  7. Hopwood, H.V.: Dewey expanded (1985) 0.03 
    0.031358406 = product of:
  0.06271681 = sum of:
    0.042461623 = weight(_text_:et in 3629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042461623 = score(doc=3629,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043643 = queryNorm
        0.20735928 = fieldWeight in 3629, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3629)
    0.020255188 = product of:
      0.040510375 = sum of:
        0.040510375 = weight(_text_:al in 3629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040510375 = score(doc=3629,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043643 = queryNorm
            0.20253885 = fieldWeight in 3629, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3629)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al
  8. Cabral, L.: ¬Le developpement des partenariats : la realization de la 21e édition en langue francaise de la Classification Décimale Dewey (1998) 0.03 
    0.026538514 = product of:
  0.106154054 = sum of:
    0.106154054 = weight(_text_:et in 6060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.106154054 = score(doc=6060,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043643 = queryNorm
        0.5183982 = fieldWeight in 6060, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6060)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Documentation et bibliothèques. 44(1998) no.3, S.129-132
  9. Chan, L.M.; Hodges, T.L.: Library of Congress Classification (LCC) (2009) 0.03 
    0.026081456 = product of:
  0.05216291 = sum of:
    0.03442384 = weight(_text_:c in 3842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03442384 = score(doc=3842,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043643 = queryNorm
        0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 3842, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3842)
    0.017739072 = product of:
      0.035478145 = sum of:
        0.035478145 = weight(_text_:22 in 3842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035478145 = score(doc=3842,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15283036 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043643 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3842, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3842)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The Library of Congress Classification (LCC), originally designed for classifying the Library's own collection, is now used in a wide range of libraries, both in the United States and abroad. This entry recounts its history and development from its genesis to the present time, leading up to an explanation of LCC structure, tables, and notation. It then considers the system's potential for wider application in the online age, through speculation on using LCC as a tool for (a) partitioning large files; (b) generating domain-specific taxonomies; and (c) integrating classification and controlled subject terms for improved retrieval in the online public access catalog (OPAC) and the Internet. Finally, analyzing both its strong and relatively weak features, it addresses the question of whether in its current state LCC is in all respects ready for playing such roles
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:22:42
  10. Lorenz, B.: ¬Die DDC im Umfeld der Entwicklung dezimaler Klassifikationen (2008) 0.01 
    0.013269257 = product of:
  0.053077027 = sum of:
    0.053077027 = weight(_text_:et in 2152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053077027 = score(doc=2152,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043643 = queryNorm
        0.2591991 = fieldWeight in 2152, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2152)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The decimal system is one system of a number of possible systems of ordering - and a very symbolic also. The ordering in ten chapters, themes, numbers, etc. you can find often in history. Indeed Dewey is not the genius-founder of decimal classification (against a number of authors)! For ordering and structuring separate schemes within a classification DDC creates a number of important negative solutions, e.g. in the main classes the 'lost' of physics and of medicine as special schemes: Nearly a catastrophe in the times of STM! And against an enormous tradition like Leibniz 1646 - 1716) et alii! Compare Bliss: The Bliss-Classification gives space for 6 numbers »sciences« in a context of 26 classes. Therefore the result in short: DDC (and UDC of course!) are »flowers« of the past, of the first decades of century 20! As a fact the Decimal Classification within the tradition of Melvil Dewey is not a final work: See the increasing number of newly constructed decimal classifications during the years 80 and 90 of the 20th century! Nevertheless DDC is a very great (problem and) solution in its development, internationality, reception - and edge-stone for many thinkers and librarians throughout the world - and an important example for modern translational work! Magda Heiner-Freiling has given to us a great stone for the edifice of Modern DDC: Requiescat in pace!
  11. Higgins, C.: Library of Congress Classification : Teddy Roosevelt's world in numbers? (2012) 0.01 
    0.011474612 = product of:
  0.04589845 = sum of:
    0.04589845 = weight(_text_:c in 1905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04589845 = score(doc=1905,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043643 = queryNorm
        0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 1905, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1905)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  12. McIlwaine, I.C.; Mitchell, J.S.: ¬The new ecumenism : exploration of a DDC / UDC view of religion (2006) 0.01 
    0.010040285 = product of:
  0.04016114 = sum of:
    0.04016114 = weight(_text_:c in 229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04016114 = score(doc=229,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043643 = queryNorm
        0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 229, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=229)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
  13. Salah, A.A.; Gao, C.; Suchecki, K.; Scharnhorst, A.; Smiraglia, R.P.: ¬The evolution of classification systems : ontogeny of the UDC (2012) 0.01 
    0.010040285 = product of:
  0.04016114 = sum of:
    0.04016114 = weight(_text_:c in 825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04016114 = score(doc=825,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043643 = queryNorm
        0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 825, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=825)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  14. Beghtol, C.: Knowledge domains : multidisciplinarity and bibliographic classification systems (1998) 0.01 
    0.00860596 = product of:
  0.03442384 = sum of:
    0.03442384 = weight(_text_:c in 2028) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03442384 = score(doc=2028,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043643 = queryNorm
        0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 2028, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2028)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  15. Zins, C.; Santos, P.L.V.A.C.: Mapping the knowledge covered by library classification systems (2011) 0.01 
    0.00860596 = product of:
  0.03442384 = sum of:
    0.03442384 = weight(_text_:c in 4449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03442384 = score(doc=4449,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043643 = queryNorm
        0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 4449, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4449)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  16. Mitchell, J.S.: DDC 22: Dewey in the world, the world in Dewey (2004) 0.01 
    0.008263703 = product of:
  0.033054814 = sum of:
    0.033054814 = product of:
      0.06610963 = sum of:
        0.06610963 = weight(_text_:22 in 2644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06610963 = score(doc=2644,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.15283036 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043643 = queryNorm
            0.43256867 = fieldWeight in 2644, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2644)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    In 2003, OCLC published Dewey Decimal Classification and Relative Index, Edition 22 (DDC 22), in print and Web versions. The changes and updates in the new edition reflect a modern view of knowledge structures and address the general needs of Dewey users. The content of DDC 22 has been shaped by a number of social, geopolitical, and technical trends. The World Wide Web has provided a vehicle for more frequent distribution of updates to the DDC, and a medium for direct communication with Dewey users around the world. In addition to updating the system itself, other strategies are needed to accommodate the needs of the global Dewey user community. Translation of the system is one approach; another is mapping. Mapping terminology to the DDC is a strategy for supporting effective local implementation of the system while maintaining the internal cohesiveness of the DDC. This paper explores the usefulness of mapping terminology from English-language general subject headings lists produced outside the U.S.
    Object
    DDC-22
  17. Heiner-Freiling, M.: DDC Deutsch 22 : formale, terminologische und inhaltliche Aspekte einer deutschen DDC-Ausgabe (2001) 0.01 
    0.007316995 = product of:
  0.02926798 = sum of:
    0.02926798 = product of:
      0.05853596 = sum of:
        0.05853596 = weight(_text_:22 in 6993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05853596 = score(doc=6993,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15283036 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043643 = queryNorm
            0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 6993, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6993)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Es werden die Überlegungen im Zusammenhang mit der Einführung der Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation im deutschen Sprachraum dargestellt, wobei die künftige deutsche DDC-Ausgabe auf der Basis der 22. Auflage der Original-DDC im Mittelpunkt steht. Dringlich für eine deutsche Ausgabe sind neben Korrekturen und Expansionen für deutsche Sachverhalte, etwa im Bereich der geografischen Hilfstafel, die Schaffung eines deutschen Begriffsinventars für das Instrumentarium der DDC selbst und eine Integration der Terminologie der Schlagwortnormdatei, soweit das mit der Struktur einer Klassifikation vereinbar ist. Daneben kommt der über eine reine Übersetzung hinausgehenden Anpassung der Beispiele und Registereinträge der DDC an die Suchgewohnheiten deutschsprachiger Benutzer eine erhebliche Bedeutung zu.
  18. Gödert, W.: ¬"Die Welt ist groß - Wir bringen Ordnung in diese Welt" : Das DFG-Projekt DDC Deutsch (2002) 0.01 
    0.0059130243 = product of:
  0.023652097 = sum of:
    0.023652097 = product of:
      0.047304194 = sum of:
        0.047304194 = weight(_text_:22 in 1095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047304194 = score(doc=1095,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15283036 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043643 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1095, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1095)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    In diesem Beitrag wird die Zielsetzung und die geplante Durchführung des Projektes DDC Deutsch zur Herstellung einer deutschen Version der 22. Ausgabe der Dewey Decimal Classification näher beschrieben. Es werden Gründe für die Durchführung des Vorhabens diskutiert und der erwartete spätere Nutzen beschrieben.
  19. Junger, U.: Basisinformationen zur Universellen Dezimalklassifikation (UDK) (2018) 0.01 
    0.0059130243 = product of:
  0.023652097 = sum of:
    0.023652097 = product of:
      0.047304194 = sum of:
        0.047304194 = weight(_text_:22 in 4337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047304194 = score(doc=4337,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15283036 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043643 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4337, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4337)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    7. 7.2018 17:22:00
  20. Slavic, A.: Use of the Universal Decimal Classification : a world-wide survey (2008) 0.01 
    0.005737306 = product of:
  0.022949224 = sum of:
    0.022949224 = weight(_text_:c in 1736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022949224 = score(doc=1736,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043643 = queryNorm
        0.1524436 = fieldWeight in 1736, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1736)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to present a general overview with up-to-date information on the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) use worldwide. Design/methodology/approach - The research combined e-mail interviews with LIS professionals in 208 countries, literature research and information obtained from UDC distributors/publishers (AENOR, BSI, UDC Consortium). The following categorisation of UDC use was offered: A - dominant system; B - used in some kind of libraries only; or C - rarely used. Findings - The paper finds that, of the 208 countries contacted and researched through the literature in 2004-2006, the UDC was found to be used in 124 (60 per cent) of these. In 34 (28 per cent) of the countries researched (in Europe, Asia and Africa), UDC is the main classification system used across national information networks. In 45 (36 per cent) of the countries it is used in certain kinds of libraries. In the remaining 45 (36 per cent) of the countries it is used rarely, in only a few libraries or information centres. Research limitations/implications - It was beyond the scope of this research to provide any information regarding the actual number of institutions using UDC in a given country or to give an estimate of the size and number of document collections organised by it. Although a decline in UDC use since the 1980s was reported from a number of countries, it was not possible to measure this accurately. Practical implications - The interest shown for using UDC in the organisation of digital collections, information exchange and cross domain and cross collection resource discovery depends on accurate knowledge of its actual usage worldwide. This gives a measure of its global importance and verifies its credentials as an indexing standard. This research, which attempted wider and more systematic coverage than previous surveys, should help clarify the status of UDC and its potential use in the networked environment. Originality/value - The paper provides up-to-date information on the presence of the UDC system across countries and languages.

Authors

Years

Languages

Themes