Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

0.02274883 = product of:
  0.12891003 = sum of:
    0.023800978 = weight(_text_:und in 5870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023800978 = score(doc=5870,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.052480873 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023678783 = queryNorm
        0.4535172 = fieldWeight in 5870, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5870)
    0.05255453 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 5870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05255453 = score(doc=5870,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10666593 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023678783 = queryNorm
        0.4927021 = fieldWeight in 5870, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5870)
    0.05255453 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 5870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05255453 = score(doc=5870,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10666593 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023678783 = queryNorm
        0.4927021 = fieldWeight in 5870, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5870)
  0.1764706 = coord(3/17)

Abstract

Die meisten Web-Auftritte der Hosts waren bisher für den Retrieval-Laien gedacht. Im Hintergrund steht dabei das Ziel: mehr Nutzung durch einfacheres Retrieval. Dieser Ansatz steht aber im Konflikt mit der wachsenden Datenmenge und Dokumentgröße, die eigentlich ein immer ausgefeilteres Retrieval verlangen. Häufig wird von Information Professionals die Kritik geäußert, dass die Webanwendungen einen Verlust an Relevanz bringen. Wie weit der Nutzer tatsächlich einen Kompromiss zwischen Relevanz und Vollständigkeit eingehen muss, soll in diesem Beitrag anhand verschiedener Host-Rechner quantifiziert werden

Series

Tagungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis; 4

Source

Information Research & Content Management: Orientierung, Ordnung und Organisation im Wissensmarkt; 23. DGI-Online-Tagung der DGI und 53. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 8.-10.5.2001. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt

3.9311888E-4 = product of:
  0.006683021 = sum of:
    0.006683021 = product of:
      0.026732083 = sum of:
        0.026732083 = weight(_text_:quality in 6541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026732083 = score(doc=6541,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10704308 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5206327 = idf(docFreq=1307, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023678783 = queryNorm
            0.24973202 = fieldWeight in 6541, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.5206327 = idf(docFreq=1307, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6541)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.05882353 = coord(1/17)

Abstract

The growing number of networked information resources and services offers unprecedented opportunities for delivering high quality information to the computer desktop of a wide range of individuals. However, currently there is a reliance on a database retrieval model, in which endusers use keywords to search large collections of automatically indexed resources in order to find needed information. As an alternative to the database retrieval model, this paper outlines the classical digital library model, which is derived from traditional practices of library and information science professionals. These practices include the selection and organization of information resources for local populations of users and the integration of advanced information retrieval tools, such as databases and the Internet into these collections. To evaluate this model, library and information professionals and endusers involved with primary care medicine were asked to respond to a series of questions comparing their experiences with a digital library developed for the primary care population to their experiences with general Internet use. Preliminary results are reported