-
Lawrence, S.; Giles, C.L.: Searching the World Wide Web (1998)
0.23
0.23356919 = product of:
0.5449948 = sum of:
0.0893517 = weight(_text_:world in 4102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0893517 = score(doc=4102,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.67947143 = fieldWeight in 4102, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4102)
0.11873166 = weight(_text_:wide in 4102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11873166 = score(doc=4102,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.7832548 = fieldWeight in 4102, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4102)
0.064414024 = weight(_text_:web in 4102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064414024 = score(doc=4102,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 4102, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4102)
0.0893517 = weight(_text_:world in 4102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0893517 = score(doc=4102,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.67947143 = fieldWeight in 4102, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4102)
0.11873166 = weight(_text_:wide in 4102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11873166 = score(doc=4102,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.7832548 = fieldWeight in 4102, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4102)
0.064414024 = weight(_text_:web in 4102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064414024 = score(doc=4102,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 4102, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4102)
0.42857143 = coord(6/14)
-
Lawrence, S.; Giles, C.L.: Searching the World Wide Web (1998)
0.23
0.23356919 = product of:
0.5449948 = sum of:
0.0893517 = weight(_text_:world in 6428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0893517 = score(doc=6428,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.67947143 = fieldWeight in 6428, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6428)
0.11873166 = weight(_text_:wide in 6428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11873166 = score(doc=6428,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.7832548 = fieldWeight in 6428, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6428)
0.064414024 = weight(_text_:web in 6428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064414024 = score(doc=6428,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 6428, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6428)
0.0893517 = weight(_text_:world in 6428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0893517 = score(doc=6428,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.67947143 = fieldWeight in 6428, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6428)
0.11873166 = weight(_text_:wide in 6428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11873166 = score(doc=6428,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.7832548 = fieldWeight in 6428, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6428)
0.064414024 = weight(_text_:web in 6428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064414024 = score(doc=6428,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 6428, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6428)
0.42857143 = coord(6/14)
-
Lu, G.; Williams, B.; You, C.: ¬An effective World Wide Web image search engine (2001)
0.20
0.20437305 = product of:
0.47687045 = sum of:
0.07818274 = weight(_text_:world in 5655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07818274 = score(doc=5655,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.5945375 = fieldWeight in 5655, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5655)
0.10389021 = weight(_text_:wide in 5655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10389021 = score(doc=5655,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.685348 = fieldWeight in 5655, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5655)
0.056362275 = weight(_text_:web in 5655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056362275 = score(doc=5655,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 5655, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5655)
0.07818274 = weight(_text_:world in 5655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07818274 = score(doc=5655,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.5945375 = fieldWeight in 5655, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5655)
0.10389021 = weight(_text_:wide in 5655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10389021 = score(doc=5655,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.685348 = fieldWeight in 5655, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5655)
0.056362275 = weight(_text_:web in 5655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056362275 = score(doc=5655,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 5655, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5655)
0.42857143 = coord(6/14)
-
Ardo, A.; Lundberg, S.: ¬A regional distributed WWW search and indexing service : the DESIRE way (1998)
0.13
0.13329476 = product of:
0.26658952 = sum of:
0.03350689 = weight(_text_:world in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03350689 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.25480178 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.04452437 = weight(_text_:wide in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04452437 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.04831052 = weight(_text_:web in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04831052 = score(doc=4190,freq=8.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.03350689 = weight(_text_:world in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03350689 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.25480178 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.04452437 = weight(_text_:wide in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04452437 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.04831052 = weight(_text_:web in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04831052 = score(doc=4190,freq=8.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.013905983 = product of:
0.027811967 = sum of:
0.027811967 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027811967 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11980651 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(7/14)
- Abstract
- Creates an open, metadata aware system for distributed, collaborative WWW indexing. The system has 3 main components: a harvester (for collecting information), a database (for making the collection searchable), and a user interface (for making the information available). all components can be distributed across networked computers, thus supporting scalability. The system is metadata aware and thus allows searches on several fields including title, document author and URL. Nordic Web Index (NWI) is an application using this system to create a regional Nordic Web-indexing service. NWI is built using 5 collaborating service points within the Nordic countries. The NWI databases can be used to build additional services
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Footnote
- Contribution to a special issue devoted to the Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, held 14-18 April 1998, Brisbane, Australia
- Object
- Nordic Web Index
-
Drabenstott, K.M.: Web search strategies (2000)
0.12
0.12107019 = product of:
0.24214038 = sum of:
0.022337925 = weight(_text_:world in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022337925 = score(doc=1188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.16986786 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
0.029682916 = weight(_text_:wide in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029682916 = score(doc=1188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.1958137 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
0.064414024 = weight(_text_:web in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064414024 = score(doc=1188,freq=32.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
32.0 = termFreq=32.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
0.022337925 = weight(_text_:world in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022337925 = score(doc=1188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.16986786 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
0.029682916 = weight(_text_:wide in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029682916 = score(doc=1188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.1958137 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
0.064414024 = weight(_text_:web in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064414024 = score(doc=1188,freq=32.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
32.0 = termFreq=32.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
0.009270656 = product of:
0.018541312 = sum of:
0.018541312 = weight(_text_:22 in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018541312 = score(doc=1188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11980651 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(7/14)
- Abstract
- Surfing the World Wide Web used to be cool, dude, real cool. But things have gotten hot - so hot that finding something useful an the Web is no longer cool. It is suffocating Web searchers in the smoke and debris of mountain-sized lists of hits, decisions about which search engines they should use, whether they will get lost in the dizzying maze of a subject directory, use the right syntax for the search engine at hand, enter keywords that are likely to retrieve hits an the topics they have in mind, or enlist a browser that has sufficient functionality to display the most promising hits. When it comes to Web searching, in a few short years we have gone from the cool image of surfing the Web into the frying pan of searching the Web. We can turn down the heat by rethinking what Web searchers are doing and introduce some order into the chaos. Web search strategies that are tool-based-oriented to specific Web searching tools such as search en gines, subject directories, and meta search engines-have been widely promoted, and these strategies are just not working. It is time to dissect what Web searching tools expect from searchers and adjust our search strategies to these new tools. This discussion offers Web searchers help in the form of search strategies that are based an strategies that librarians have been using for a long time to search commercial information retrieval systems like Dialog, NEXIS, Wilsonline, FirstSearch, and Data-Star.
- Content
- "Web searching is different from searching commercial IR systems. We can learn from search strategies recommended for searching IR systems, but most won't be effective for Web searching. Web searchers need strate gies that let search engines do the job they were designed to do. This article presents six new Web searching strategies that do just that."
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
-
Koenemann, J.; Lindner, H.-G.; Thomas, C.: Unternehmensportale : Von Suchmaschinen zum Wissensmanagement (2000)
0.11
0.11219196 = product of:
0.26178125 = sum of:
0.03909137 = weight(_text_:world in 5233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03909137 = score(doc=5233,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.29726875 = fieldWeight in 5233, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5233)
0.051945105 = weight(_text_:wide in 5233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051945105 = score(doc=5233,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.342674 = fieldWeight in 5233, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5233)
0.039854147 = weight(_text_:web in 5233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039854147 = score(doc=5233,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 5233, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5233)
0.03909137 = weight(_text_:world in 5233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03909137 = score(doc=5233,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.29726875 = fieldWeight in 5233, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5233)
0.051945105 = weight(_text_:wide in 5233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051945105 = score(doc=5233,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.342674 = fieldWeight in 5233, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5233)
0.039854147 = weight(_text_:web in 5233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039854147 = score(doc=5233,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 5233, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5233)
0.42857143 = coord(6/14)
- Abstract
- Aufgabe des Wissensmanagements ist es, den Mitarbeitern im Unternehmen entscheidungs- und handlungsrelevante Informationen bereitzustellen und die Mitarbeiter bei der intelligenten Verarbeitung dieser Informationen zu unterstützen. Ein hierzu genutztes Werkzeug von wachsender Bedeutung sind Unternehmensportale. Wir beschreiben kurz die Entwicklung von Portalen im World Wide Web (WWW), um dann Web-Portale von verschiedenen Arten von Unternehmensportalen abzugrenzen. Wir zeigen erwartete Funktionalitäten auf und stellen ein 5-Schichten Modell einer Gesamtarchitektur für Portale dar, welche die wesentlichen Komponenten umfasst. Im Anschluss werden die Besonderheiten der organisatorischen Realisierung und im Ausblick der Übergang von Portalen zum ,ubiquitous personalized information supply", der überall verfügbaren und individuellen Informationsversorgung behandelt
-
Garnsey, M.R.: What distance learners should know about information retrieval on the World Wide Web (2002)
0.11
0.10829295 = product of:
0.25268355 = sum of:
0.03350689 = weight(_text_:world in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03350689 = score(doc=1626,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.25480178 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
0.04452437 = weight(_text_:wide in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04452437 = score(doc=1626,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
0.04831052 = weight(_text_:web in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04831052 = score(doc=1626,freq=8.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
0.03350689 = weight(_text_:world in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03350689 = score(doc=1626,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.25480178 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
0.04452437 = weight(_text_:wide in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04452437 = score(doc=1626,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
0.04831052 = weight(_text_:web in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04831052 = score(doc=1626,freq=8.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
0.42857143 = coord(6/14)
- Abstract
- The Internet can be a valuable tool allowing distance learners to access information not available locally. Search engines are the most common means of locating relevant information an the Internet, but to use them efficiently students should be taught the basics of searching and how to evaluate the results. This article briefly reviews how Search engines work, studies comparing Search engines, and criteria useful in evaluating the quality of returned Web pages. Research indicates there are statistical differences in the precision of Search engines, with AltaVista ranking high in several studies. When evaluating the quality of Web pages, standard criteria used in evaluating print resources is appropriate, as well as additional criteria which relate to the Web site itself. Giving distance learners training in how to use Search engines and how to evaluate the results will allow them to access relevant information efficiently while ensuring that it is of adequate quality.
-
Assadi, H.; Beauvisage, T.: ¬A comparative study of six french-speaking Web directories (2003)
0.05
0.05304851 = product of:
0.18566978 = sum of:
0.04452437 = weight(_text_:wide in 2723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04452437 = score(doc=2723,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 2723, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2723)
0.04831052 = weight(_text_:web in 2723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04831052 = score(doc=2723,freq=8.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 2723, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2723)
0.04452437 = weight(_text_:wide in 2723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04452437 = score(doc=2723,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 2723, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2723)
0.04831052 = weight(_text_:web in 2723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04831052 = score(doc=2723,freq=8.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 2723, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2723)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- This paper presents a comparative study of six French-language Web directories (MSN, Nomade, Open Directory, Voila, Voila Pages Perso, and Yahoo). The study focuses an the quantitative and qualitative aspects of the organization of these directories, and an the way in which they describe sites. It reveals a wide variety of structures, content and organizational principles. In this respect, Web directories do not correspond to classic theories of classification. They highlight the difficulty of proposing a structured representation of the heterogeneous content of the Web.
-
Schmitz, H.: Lücken im Netz : Die New York Times sperrt einen Text für Surfer in Großbritannien - der Anfang vom Ende des weltweiten Webs? (2006)
0.04
0.043794222 = product of:
0.102186516 = sum of:
0.016753444 = weight(_text_:world in 5987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016753444 = score(doc=5987,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.12740089 = fieldWeight in 5987, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5987)
0.022262186 = weight(_text_:wide in 5987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022262186 = score(doc=5987,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.14686027 = fieldWeight in 5987, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5987)
0.01207763 = weight(_text_:web in 5987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01207763 = score(doc=5987,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.108171105 = fieldWeight in 5987, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5987)
0.016753444 = weight(_text_:world in 5987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016753444 = score(doc=5987,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13150178 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.12740089 = fieldWeight in 5987, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5987)
0.022262186 = weight(_text_:wide in 5987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022262186 = score(doc=5987,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15158753 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.14686027 = fieldWeight in 5987, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5987)
0.01207763 = weight(_text_:web in 5987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01207763 = score(doc=5987,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.108171105 = fieldWeight in 5987, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5987)
0.42857143 = coord(6/14)
- Content
- Der jüngste Fall der New York Times zeigt: Geotargeting ermöglicht Zensur. Das hat das Blatt selbst erkannt und wiegelt ab. "Jeder Fall muss einzeln geprüft werden", sagt George Freeman, Vizepräsident des Verlags. Großbritannien sei ein Land, das die Pressefreiheit achte, und sein Haus wolle die Rechte eines solchen Landes respektieren. Unklar ist, wessen Rechte die New York Times zukünftig achten will. Wie verhielte sich das US-Blatt, wenn manche Staaten, etwa die Volksrepublik China, verlangen würden, regierungskritische Artikel für die eigenen Landesleute zu sperren? Der große Aufschrei wegen Google Groß war der Aufschrei, als Google im Januar eine chinesische Version seiner Suchmaschine startete, in der bestimmte Inhalte zu Themen wie Tibet nicht in den Ergebnislisten auftauchen. Von einem "schwarzen Tag für die Meinungsfreiheit in China" sprach die Journalistenorganisation Reporter ohne Grenzen. Die New York Times bezeichnete Googles Verhalten als "nicht gerade idealistisch". Der Suchmaschinenbetreiber arbeitet nicht nur in China so. Rainer Glück vom Chaos Computer Club sagt, Google passe stets "die gezeigten Suchergebnisse per Geotargeting an verschiedene nationale Gesichtspunkte an - und unterdrückt im Extremfall auch Suchergebnisse, wenn sie unter die mit dem entsprechenden Staat vereinbarten Regularien fallen." Um ihr Vorgehen zu verteidigen, zitiert die New York Times den Internet-Rechtsexperten Jonathan Zittrain von der Universität Oxford "Es ist bekannt, dass die Technik Inhalte geografisch beschränken kann. Zwar nicht hundertprozentig, aber effektiv genug. Und es ist anzunehmen, dass internationale Gerichte gewillt sind, diesen technischen Fortschritt bei der Rechtssprechung zu berücksichtigen." Sollte; das eintreffen, müssten Internet-seiten-Betreiber künftig viele Fachleute für internationales Recht beschäftigen, die sämtliche Inhalte darauf prüfen, ob sie in irgendeinem Land dieser Erde mit dem dortigen Recht in Konflikt stehen. So könnten Anbieter vielleicht auf die Idee kommen, ihre Seiten nur für die Länder zugänglich zu machen, mit deren Recht' sie sich auskennen. Es würden nationale Grenzen errichtet. Das Web wäre dann nicht mehr World Wide."
-
Eggeling, T.; Kroschel, A.: Alles finden im Web (2000)
0.02
0.02222018 = product of:
0.10369417 = sum of:
0.040258765 = weight(_text_:web in 4884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040258765 = score(doc=4884,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 4884, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4884)
0.040258765 = weight(_text_:web in 4884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040258765 = score(doc=4884,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 4884, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4884)
0.02317664 = product of:
0.04635328 = sum of:
0.04635328 = weight(_text_:22 in 4884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04635328 = score(doc=4884,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11980651 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4884, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4884)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Date
- 9. 7.2000 14:06:22
-
Spink, A.; Wolfram, D.; Jansen, B.J.; Saracevic, T.: Searching the Web : the public and their queries (2001)
0.02
0.018970415 = product of:
0.1327929 = sum of:
0.06639645 = weight(_text_:web in 6980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06639645 = score(doc=6980,freq=34.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.59466785 = fieldWeight in 6980, product of:
5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
34.0 = termFreq=34.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6980)
0.06639645 = weight(_text_:web in 6980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06639645 = score(doc=6980,freq=34.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.59466785 = fieldWeight in 6980, product of:
5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
34.0 = termFreq=34.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6980)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- In previous articles, we reported the state of Web searching in 1997 (Jansen, Spink, & Saracevic, 2000) and in 1999 (Spink, Wolfram, Jansen, & Saracevic, 2001). Such snapshot studies and statistics on Web use appear regularly (OCLC, 1999), but provide little information about Web searching trends. In this article, we compare and contrast results from our two previous studies of Excite queries' data sets, each containing over 1 million queries submitted by over 200,000 Excite users collected on 16 September 1997 and 20 December 1999. We examine how public Web searching changing during that 2-year time period. As Table 1 shows, the overall structure of Web queries in some areas did not change, while in others we see change from 1997 to 1999. Our comparison shows how Web searching changed incrementally and also dramatically. We see some moves toward greater simplicity, including shorter queries (i.e., fewer terms) and shorter sessions (i.e., fewer queries per user), with little modification (addition or deletion) of terms in subsequent queries. The trend toward shorter queries suggests that Web information content should target specific terms in order to reach Web users. Another trend was to view fewer pages of results per query. Most Excite users examined only one page of results per query, since an Excite results page contains ten ranked Web sites. Were users satisfied with the results and did not need to view more pages? It appears that the public continues to have a low tolerance of wading through retrieved sites. This decline in interactivity levels is a disturbing finding for the future of Web searching. Queries that included Boolean operators were in the minority, but the percentage increased between the two time periods. Most Boolean use involved the AND operator with many mistakes. The use of relevance feedback almost doubled from 1997 to 1999, but overall use was still small. An unusually large number of terms were used with low frequency, such as personal names, spelling errors, non-English words, and Web-specific terms, such as URLs. Web query vocabulary contains more words than found in large English texts in general. The public language of Web queries has its own and unique characteristics. How did Web searching topics change from 1997 to 1999? We classified a random sample of 2,414 queries from 1997 and 2,539 queries from 1999 into 11 categories (Table 2). From 1997 to 1999, Web searching shifted from entertainment, recreation and sex, and pornography, preferences to e-commerce-related topics under commerce, travel, employment, and economy. This shift coincided with changes in information distribution on the publicly indexed Web.
-
Fu, T.; Abbasi, A.; Chen, H.: ¬A focused crawler for Dark Web forums (2010)
0.02
0.017253757 = product of:
0.120776296 = sum of:
0.060388148 = weight(_text_:web in 3471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060388148 = score(doc=3471,freq=18.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.5408555 = fieldWeight in 3471, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3471)
0.060388148 = weight(_text_:web in 3471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060388148 = score(doc=3471,freq=18.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.5408555 = fieldWeight in 3471, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3471)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- The unprecedented growth of the Internet has given rise to the Dark Web, the problematic facet of the Web associated with cybercrime, hate, and extremism. Despite the need for tools to collect and analyze Dark Web forums, the covert nature of this part of the Internet makes traditional Web crawling techniques insufficient for capturing such content. In this study, we propose a novel crawling system designed to collect Dark Web forum content. The system uses a human-assisted accessibility approach to gain access to Dark Web forums. Several URL ordering features and techniques enable efficient extraction of forum postings. The system also includes an incremental crawler coupled with a recall-improvement mechanism intended to facilitate enhanced retrieval and updating of collected content. Experiments conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the human-assisted accessibility approach and the recall-improvement-based, incremental-update procedure yielded favorable results. The human-assisted approach significantly improved access to Dark Web forums while the incremental crawler with recall improvement also outperformed standard periodic- and incremental-update approaches. Using the system, we were able to collect over 100 Dark Web forums from three regions. A case study encompassing link and content analysis of collected forums was used to illustrate the value and importance of gathering and analyzing content from such online communities.
-
Jepsen, E.T.; Seiden, P.; Ingwersen, P.; Björneborn, L.; Borlund, P.: Characteristics of scientific Web publications : preliminary data gathering and analysis (2004)
0.02
0.016267 = product of:
0.11386899 = sum of:
0.056934495 = weight(_text_:web in 3091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056934495 = score(doc=3091,freq=16.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.5099235 = fieldWeight in 3091, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3091)
0.056934495 = weight(_text_:web in 3091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056934495 = score(doc=3091,freq=16.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.5099235 = fieldWeight in 3091, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3091)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Because of the increasing presence of scientific publications an the Web, combined with the existing difficulties in easily verifying and retrieving these publications, research an techniques and methods for retrieval of scientific Web publications is called for. In this article, we report an the initial steps taken toward the construction of a test collection of scientific Web publications within the subject domain of plant biology. The steps reported are those of data gathering and data analysis aiming at identifying characteristics of scientific Web publications. The data used in this article were generated based an specifically selected domain topics that are searched for in three publicly accessible search engines (Google, AlITheWeb, and AItaVista). A sample of the retrieved hits was analyzed with regard to how various publication attributes correlated with the scientific quality of the content and whether this information could be employed to harvest, filter, and rank Web publications. The attributes analyzed were inlinks, outlinks, bibliographic references, file format, language, search engine overlap, structural position (according to site structure), and the occurrence of various types of metadata. As could be expected, the ranked output differs between the three search engines. Apparently, this is caused by differences in ranking algorithms rather than the databases themselves. In fact, because scientific Web content in this subject domain receives few inlinks, both AItaVista and AlITheWeb retrieved a higher degree of accessible scientific content than Google. Because of the search engine cutoffs of accessible URLs, the feasibility of using search engine output for Web content analysis is also discussed.
-
Pharo, N.: Web information search strategies : a model for classifying Web interaction (1999)
0.02
0.016267 = product of:
0.11386899 = sum of:
0.056934495 = weight(_text_:web in 3831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056934495 = score(doc=3831,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.5099235 = fieldWeight in 3831, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3831)
0.056934495 = weight(_text_:web in 3831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056934495 = score(doc=3831,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.5099235 = fieldWeight in 3831, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3831)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
-
Bharat, K.: SearchPad : explicit capture of search context to support Web search (2000)
0.02
0.016103508 = product of:
0.11272455 = sum of:
0.056362275 = weight(_text_:web in 3432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056362275 = score(doc=3432,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 3432, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3432)
0.056362275 = weight(_text_:web in 3432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056362275 = score(doc=3432,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 3432, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3432)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
-
Zhang, D.; Dong, Y.: ¬An effective algorithm to rank Web resources (2000)
0.02
0.016103508 = product of:
0.11272455 = sum of:
0.056362275 = weight(_text_:web in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056362275 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
0.056362275 = weight(_text_:web in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056362275 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
-
Guarino, N.; Masolo, C.; Vetere, G.: OntoSeek : content-based access to the Web (1999)
0.02
0.016103508 = product of:
0.11272455 = sum of:
0.056362275 = weight(_text_:web in 6538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056362275 = score(doc=6538,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 6538, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6538)
0.056362275 = weight(_text_:web in 6538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056362275 = score(doc=6538,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 6538, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6538)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
-
Mansourian, I.: Web search efficacy : definition and implementation (2008)
0.02
0.015216384 = product of:
0.106514685 = sum of:
0.053257342 = weight(_text_:web in 2565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053257342 = score(doc=2565,freq=14.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.47698978 = fieldWeight in 2565, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2565)
0.053257342 = weight(_text_:web in 2565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053257342 = score(doc=2565,freq=14.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.47698978 = fieldWeight in 2565, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2565)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Purpose - This paper aims to report a number of factors that are perceived by web users as influential elements in their search procedure. The paper introduces a new conceptual measure called "web search efficacy" (hereafter WSE) to evaluate the performance of searches mainly based on users' perceptions. Design/methodology/approach - A rich dataset of a wider study was inductively re-explored to identify different categories that are perceived influential by web users on the final outcome of their searches. A selective review of the literature was carried out to discover to what extent previous research supports the findings of the current study. Findings - The analysis of the dataset led to the identification of five categories of influential factors. Within each group different factors have been recognized. Accordingly, the concept of WSE has been introduced. The five "Ss" which determine WSE are searcher's performance, search tool's performance, search strategy, search topic, and search situation. Research limitations/implications - The research body is scattered in different areas and it is difficult to carry out a comprehensive review. The WSE table, which is derived from the empirical data and was supported by previous research, can be employed for further research in various groups of web users. Originality/value - The paper contributes to the area of information seeking on the web by providing researchers with a new conceptual framework to evaluate the efficiency of each search session and identify the underlying factors on the final outcome of web searching.
-
Zutter, S.: Alles dreht sich um die Suche : Information Online Konferenz in Sydney, Australien (2005)
0.01
0.01468346 = product of:
0.06852281 = sum of:
0.028467247 = weight(_text_:web in 3423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028467247 = score(doc=3423,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 3423, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3423)
0.028467247 = weight(_text_:web in 3423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028467247 = score(doc=3423,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 3423, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3423)
0.01158832 = product of:
0.02317664 = sum of:
0.02317664 = weight(_text_:22 in 3423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02317664 = score(doc=3423,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11980651 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3423, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3423)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Mit über 1100 Delegierten und 85 Ausstellern stellte die zwölfte Information Online auch 2005 wieder die im Raum Asien und Pazifik größte und renommierteste regionale Fachmesse für den Informationsbereich dar. Alle zwei Jahre veranstaltet der australische Informationsberufe-Verband ALIA in Sydney die Tagung mit Fachreferenten aus Australien, Asien, Europa und USA. An drei bis fünf Tagen kommen hier Bibliothekare und Informationsspezialisten aus Australien und Neuseeland, Indien, Malaysien, Amerika, und Europa zusammen, um sich anhand von Vorträgen, Workshops, einer Fachausstellung und reichlich Gelegenheiten für informelles Networking einen Überblick über den sich rasant entwickelnden Markt des elektronischen Informationsmanagement und der Informationsversorgung zu verschaffen. 60 Referenten und neun Hauptredner (Angela Abell, Kate Andrews, Liesle Capper, Peter Crowe, Prof. Brian Fitzgerald, David Hawking, Mary Lee Kennedy, Hemant Manohar, Joan Frye Williams) lieferten Forschungsergebnisse, Fallstudien, Fortschrifttsberichte und programmatische Thesen aus den Themenbereichen Informationsarchitektur, Online Archive, Content Management Systeme, Urheberrecht und WWW, Web Services für Bibliotheken und Informationsstellen, Benutzungsschemata für Web-Technologien, Schnittstellen, Datenpool, Bibliotheksautomation, Referenzservice online, Metadaten für Informationssysteme und für Organisationen, Wissenschaftliches Publizieren, Open Access, Knowledge Management und intellektuelles Kapital, Benutzerpsychologie, Online lernen, Berufsbild Informationsspezialist. Ein Drittel der Beiträge beschäftigte sich mit Fragen rund um Information beziehungsweise Knowledge Discovery Search, Search und nochmals Search. Dreht sich angesichts der kommerziellen Erfolge von Google und Konsorten denn alles nur noch um die Websuche?
- Date
- 22. 5.2005 13:51:43
-
McKiernan, G.: Beyond bookmarks : a review of frameworks, features, and functionalities of schemes for organizing the Web (1998)
0.01
0.013803006 = product of:
0.09662104 = sum of:
0.04831052 = weight(_text_:web in 3181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04831052 = score(doc=3181,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 3181, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3181)
0.04831052 = weight(_text_:web in 3181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04831052 = score(doc=3181,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11165301 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03421255 = queryNorm
0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 3181, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3181)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
