Search (384 results, page 1 of 20)

  • × theme_ss:"Internet"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Wisniewski, P.; Xu, H.; Lipford, H.; Bello-Ogunu, E.: Facebook apps and tagging : the trade-off between personal privacy and engaging with friends (2015) 0.06 
    0.05830541 = product of:
  0.11661082 = sum of:
    0.11661082 = product of:
      0.23322164 = sum of:
        0.23322164 = weight(_text_:tagging in 2165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23322164 = score(doc=2165,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.78275037 = fieldWeight in 2165, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2165)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The use of social network sites offers many potential social benefits, but also raises privacy concerns and challenges for users. The trade-off users have to make between using sites such as Facebook to connect with their friends versus protecting their personal privacy is not well understood. Furthermore, very little behavioral research has focused on how personal privacy concerns are related to information disclosures made by one's friends. Our survey study of 116 Facebook users shows that engaging with friends through tagging activity and third-party application use is associated with higher levels of personal Facebook usage and a stronger emotional attachment to Facebook. However, users who have high levels of personal privacy concern and perceive a lack of effectiveness in Facebook's privacy policies tend to engage less frequently in tagging and app activities with friends, respectively. Our model and results explore illustrate the complexity of the trade-off between privacy concerns, engaging with friends through tagging and apps, and Facebook usage.
  2. Dillon, M.; Handley, J.C.; Weibel, S.L.: ADAPT: Automated Document Architecture Processing and Tagging (2001) 0.05 
    0.048587844 = product of:
  0.09717569 = sum of:
    0.09717569 = product of:
      0.19435138 = sum of:
        0.19435138 = weight(_text_:tagging in 1024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19435138 = score(doc=1024,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.652292 = fieldWeight in 1024, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1024)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  3. Bar-Ilan, J.; Zhitomirsky-Geffet, M.; Miller, Y.; Shoham, S.: ¬The effects of background information and social interaction on image tagging (2010) 0.05 
    0.048587844 = product of:
  0.09717569 = sum of:
    0.09717569 = product of:
      0.19435138 = sum of:
        0.19435138 = weight(_text_:tagging in 3453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19435138 = score(doc=3453,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.652292 = fieldWeight in 3453, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3453)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In this article, we describe the results of an experiment designed to understand the effects of background information and social interaction on image tagging. The participants in the experiment were asked to tag 12 preselected images of Jewish cultural heritage. The users were partitioned into three groups: the first group saw only the images with no additional information whatsoever, the second group saw the images plus a short, descriptive title, and the third group saw the images, the titles, and the URL of the page in which the image appeared. In the first stage of the experiment, each user tagged the images without seeing the tags provided by the other users. In the second stage, the users saw the tags assigned by others and were encouraged to interact. Results show that after the social interaction phase, the tag sets converged and the popular tags became even more popular. Although in all cases the total number of assigned tags increased after the social interaction phase, the number of distinct tags decreased in most cases. When viewing the image only, in some cases the users were not able to correctly identify what they saw in some of the pictures, but they overcame the initial difficulties after interaction. We conclude from this experiment that social interaction may lead to convergence in tagging and that the wisdom of the crowds helps overcome the difficulties due to the lack of information.
    Theme
    Social tagging
  4. Quasthoff, M.; Sack, H.; Meinel, C.: Nutzerfreundliche Internet-Sicherheit durch tag-basierte Zugriffskontrolle (2008) 0.04 
    0.04207831 = product of:
  0.08415662 = sum of:
    0.08415662 = product of:
      0.16831324 = sum of:
        0.16831324 = weight(_text_:tagging in 2899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16831324 = score(doc=2899,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.5649015 = fieldWeight in 2899, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2899)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Die unter dem Schlagwort "Web 2.0" zusammengefassten Technologien des Social Web beweisen eindrucksvoll, wie erfolgreich kollaboratives Arbeiten in intuitiv zu bedienenden Systemen sein kann. Das Social Web ist von keiner zentralen Autorität gesteuert; Nutzer können sich in vielen Social Web Sites in jeweils neuen Gruppen zusammenfinden und gemeinsam Inhalte erstellen und austauschen. Solche kollaborativen Prozesse haben längst Einzug gehalten in Unternehmen, um Projekte zu koordinieren, zu dokumentieren und umzusetzen. Dort existieren jedoch strenge Vorgaben, wer welche Informationen sehen und verändern darf. Das behindert den spontanen Umgang mit der neuen Technik und verlangt den Einsatz der aus anderen Informationssystemen bekannten Methoden, Informationen vor unberechtigtem Zugriff zu schützen. In diesem Artikel wird der Einsatz der durch Social Tagging gewonnenen Informationen zum Festlegen von Richtlinien zur Zugriffskontrolle beleuchtet. Viele funktionale und deskriptive Tags geben Aufschluss auf den gewünschten Personenkreis, der auf die zugrunde liegende Ressource zugreifen können soll. Die vorgeschlagene Architektur basiert auf Semantic Web Regeln, mit deren Hilfe Tags in Sicherheitsrichtlinien übersetzt werden.
    Footnote
    Beitrag der Tagung "Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation" am 21.-22.02.2008 am Institut für Wissensmedien (IWM) in Tübingen.
    Source
    Good tags - bad tags: Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation. Hrsg.: B. Gaiser, u.a
  5. Lutz, H.: Back to business : was CompuServe Unternehmen bietet (1997) 0.04 
    0.038679294 = product of:
  0.07735859 = sum of:
    0.07735859 = product of:
      0.15471718 = sum of:
        0.15471718 = weight(_text_:22 in 6569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15471718 = score(doc=6569,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 6569, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6569)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 2.1997 19:50:29
    Source
    Cogito. 1997, H.1, S.22-23
  6. Veittes, M.: Electronic Book (1995) 0.03 
    0.03418799 = product of:
  0.06837598 = sum of:
    0.06837598 = product of:
      0.13675196 = sum of:
        0.13675196 = weight(_text_:22 in 3204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13675196 = score(doc=3204,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 3204, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3204)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    RRZK-Kompass. 1995, Nr.65, S.21-22
  7. Nanfito, N.: ¬The indexed Web : engineering tools for cataloging, storing and delivering Web based documents (1999) 0.03 
    0.033844385 = product of:
  0.06768877 = sum of:
    0.06768877 = product of:
      0.13537754 = sum of:
        0.13537754 = weight(_text_:22 in 8727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13537754 = score(doc=8727,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 8727, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8727)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    5. 8.2001 12:22:47
    Source
    Information outlook. 3(1999) no.2, S.18-22
  8. Verkommt das Internet zur reinen Glotze? : Fertige Informationspakete gegen individuelle Suche: das neue 'Push-Prinzip' im Internet ist heftig umstritten (1997) 0.03 
    0.033844385 = product of:
  0.06768877 = sum of:
    0.06768877 = product of:
      0.13537754 = sum of:
        0.13537754 = weight(_text_:22 in 7131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13537754 = score(doc=7131,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 7131, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7131)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    18. 1.1997 12:15:22
    Source
    Kölner Stadtanzeiger. Nr.69 vom 22/23.3.1997, S.MZ7
  9. Filk, C.: Online, Internet und Digitalkultur : eine Bibliographie zur jüngsten Diskussion um die Informationsgesellschaft (1996) 0.03 
    0.033844385 = product of:
  0.06768877 = sum of:
    0.06768877 = product of:
      0.13537754 = sum of:
        0.13537754 = weight(_text_:22 in 44) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13537754 = score(doc=44,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 44, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=44)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    5. 9.1997 19:22:27
    Source
    Rundfunk und Geschichte. 22(1996) H.2/3, S.184-193
  10. Angus, E.; Thelwall, M.; Stuart, D.: General patterns of tag usage among university groups in Flickr (2008) 0.03 
    0.029152704 = product of:
  0.05830541 = sum of:
    0.05830541 = product of:
      0.11661082 = sum of:
        0.11661082 = weight(_text_:tagging in 2554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11661082 = score(doc=2554,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.39137518 = fieldWeight in 2554, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2554)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this research is to investigate general patterns of tag usage and determines the usefulness of the tags used within university image groups to the wider Flickr community. There has been a significant rise in the use of Web 2.0 social network web sites and online applications in recent years. One of the most popular is Flickr, an online image management application. Design/methodology/approach - This study uses a webometric data collection, classification and informetric analysis. Findings - The results show that members of university image groups tend to tag in a manner that is of use to users of the system as a whole rather than merely for the tag creator. Originality/value - This paper gives a valuable insight into the tagging practices of image groups in Flickr.
  11. Antin, J.; Earp, M.: With a little help from my friends : self-interested and prosocial behavior on MySpace Music (2010) 0.03 
    0.029152704 = product of:
  0.05830541 = sum of:
    0.05830541 = product of:
      0.11661082 = sum of:
        0.11661082 = weight(_text_:tagging in 3458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11661082 = score(doc=3458,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.39137518 = fieldWeight in 3458, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3458)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Theme
    Social tagging
  12. Johnson, E.H.: S R Ranganathan in the Internet age (2019) 0.03 
    0.029152704 = product of:
  0.05830541 = sum of:
    0.05830541 = product of:
      0.11661082 = sum of:
        0.11661082 = weight(_text_:tagging in 5406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11661082 = score(doc=5406,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.39137518 = fieldWeight in 5406, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5406)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    S R Ranganathan's ideas have influenced library classification since the inception of his Colon Classification in 1933. His address at Elsinore, "Library Classification Through a Century", was his grand vision of the century of progress in classification from 1876 to 1975, and looked to the future of faceted classification as the means to provide a cohesive system to organize the world's information. Fifty years later, the internet and its achievements, social ecology, and consequences present a far more complicated picture, with the library as he knew it as a very small part and the problems that he confronted now greatly exacerbated. The systematic nature of Ranganathan's canons, principles, postulates, and devices suggest that modern semantic algorithms could guide automatic subject tagging. The vision presented here is one of internet-wide faceted classification and retrieval, implemented as open, distributed facets providing unified faceted searching across all web sites.
  13. Deider, C.: Was kostet Surfen im Internet via T-Online? (1996) 0.03 
    0.027350392 = product of:
  0.054700784 = sum of:
    0.054700784 = product of:
      0.10940157 = sum of:
        0.10940157 = weight(_text_:22 in 4122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10940157 = score(doc=4122,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4122, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4122)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 4.1996 20:07:57
  14. Wilson, D.N.: Citing electronic sites (1996) 0.03 
    0.027350392 = product of:
  0.054700784 = sum of:
    0.054700784 = product of:
      0.10940157 = sum of:
        0.10940157 = weight(_text_:22 in 4514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10940157 = score(doc=4514,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4514, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4514)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Audiovisual librarian. 22(1996) no.2, S.108-110
  15. Karisch, K.-H.: Briefe von der Front : fünf Nächte im Global Village der Rechtsradikalen (1996) 0.03 
    0.027350392 = product of:
  0.054700784 = sum of:
    0.054700784 = product of:
      0.10940157 = sum of:
        0.10940157 = weight(_text_:22 in 4931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10940157 = score(doc=4931,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4931, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4931)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    17. 7.1996 9:33:22
  16. Tröger, B.: Geisteswissenschaftliche Fachinformationen im Internet : ein Bericht aus der Praxis (1996) 0.03 
    0.027350392 = product of:
  0.054700784 = sum of:
    0.054700784 = product of:
      0.10940157 = sum of:
        0.10940157 = weight(_text_:22 in 5280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10940157 = score(doc=5280,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5280, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5280)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    21. 9.1996 16:03:22
  17. Notess, G.R.: ¬The internet (1997) 0.03 
    0.027350392 = product of:
  0.054700784 = sum of:
    0.054700784 = product of:
      0.10940157 = sum of:
        0.10940157 = weight(_text_:22 in 7783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10940157 = score(doc=7783,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7783, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7783)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.59, [=Suppl.22]
  18. Kreimeier, K.: Exemplare (1999) 0.03 
    0.027350392 = product of:
  0.054700784 = sum of:
    0.054700784 = product of:
      0.10940157 = sum of:
        0.10940157 = weight(_text_:22 in 3911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10940157 = score(doc=3911,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3911, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3911)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    17. 7.1996 9:33:22
  19. Ulrich, P.S.: Collaborative Digital Reference Service : Weltweites Projekt (2001) 0.03 
    0.027350392 = product of:
  0.054700784 = sum of:
    0.054700784 = product of:
      0.10940157 = sum of:
        0.10940157 = weight(_text_:22 in 5649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10940157 = score(doc=5649,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5649, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5649)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 4.2002 17:30:22
  20. Ghilardi, F.J.M.: ¬The information center of the future : the professional's role (1994) 0.03 
    0.027350392 = product of:
  0.054700784 = sum of:
    0.054700784 = product of:
      0.10940157 = sum of:
        0.10940157 = weight(_text_:22 in 2504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10940157 = score(doc=2504,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2504, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2504)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    27.12.2015 18:22:38

Authors

Years

Languages

  • d 194
  • e 182
  • f 7
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

Themes