Search (31 results, page 2 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Internet"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Wätjen, H.-J.: Automatisches Sammeln, Klassifizieren und Indexieren von wissenschaftlich relevanten Informationsressourcen im deutschen World Wide Web : das DFG-Projekt GERHARD (1998) 0.00
    0.0010462549 = product of:
      0.007323784 = sum of:
        0.007323784 = product of:
          0.03661892 = sum of:
            0.03661892 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03661892 = score(doc=3066,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 3066, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3066)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  2. Day, M.; Koch, T.: ¬The role of classification schemes in Internet resource description and discovery : DESIRE - Development of a European Service for Information on Research and Education. Specification for resource description methods, part 3 (1997) 0.00
    0.0010462549 = product of:
      0.007323784 = sum of:
        0.007323784 = product of:
          0.03661892 = sum of:
            0.03661892 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03661892 = score(doc=3067,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 3067, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3067)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  3. Shafer, K.E.: Evaluating Scorpion results (1998) 0.00
    0.0010462549 = product of:
      0.007323784 = sum of:
        0.007323784 = product of:
          0.03661892 = sum of:
            0.03661892 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03661892 = score(doc=1569,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 1569, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1569)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Scorpion is a research project at OCLC that builds tools for automatic subject assignment by combining library science and information retrieval techniques. A thesis of Scorpion is that the Dewey Decimal Classification (Dewey) can be used to perform automatic subject assignment for electronic items.
  4. Chan, L.M.; Lin, X.; Zeng, M.: Structural and multilingual approaches to subject access on the Web (1999) 0.00
    8.3700387E-4 = product of:
      0.0058590267 = sum of:
        0.0058590267 = product of:
          0.029295133 = sum of:
            0.029295133 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029295133 = score(doc=162,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Zu den großen Herausforderungen einer sinnvollen Suche im WWW gehören die riesige Menge des Verfügbaren und die Sparchbarrieren. Verfahren, die die Web-Ressourcen im Hinblick auf ein effizienteres Retrieval inhaltlich strukturieren, werden daher ebenso dringend benötigt wie Programme, die mit der Sprachvielfalt umgehen können. Im folgenden Vortrag werden wir einige Ansätze diskutieren, die zur Bewältigung der beiden Probleme derzeit unternommen werden
  5. Alfaro, L.de: How (much) to trust Wikipedia (2008) 0.00
    8.0203614E-4 = product of:
      0.0056142528 = sum of:
        0.0056142528 = product of:
          0.028071264 = sum of:
            0.028071264 = weight(_text_:system in 2138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028071264 = score(doc=2138,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.24605882 = fieldWeight in 2138, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2138)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    The Wikipedia is a collaborative encyclopedia: anyone can contribute to its articles simply by clicking on an "edit'' button. The open nature of the Wikipedia has been key to its success, but has a flip side: if anyone can edit, how can readers know whether to trust its content? To help answer this question, we have developed a reputation system for Wikipedia authors, and a trust system for Wikipedia text. Authors gain reputation when their contributions are long-lived, and they lose reputation when their contributions are undone in short order. Each word in the Wikipedia is assigned a value of trust that depends on the reputation of its author, as well as on the reputation of the authors that subsequently revised the text where the word appears. To validate our algorithms, we show that reputation and trust have good predictive value: higher-reputation authors are more likely to give lasting contributions, and higher-trust text is less likely to be edited. The trust can be visualized via an intuitive coloring of the text background. The coloring provides an effective way of spotting attempts to tamper with Wikipedia information. A trust-colored version of the entire English Wikipedia can be browsed at http://trust.cse.ucsc.edu/
  6. Networked knowledge organization systems (2001) 0.00
    6.2775286E-4 = product of:
      0.00439427 = sum of:
        0.00439427 = product of:
          0.02197135 = sum of:
            0.02197135 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02197135 = score(doc=6473,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 6473, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6473)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Knowledge Organization Systems can comprise thesauri and other controlled lists of keywords, ontologies, classification systems, clustering approaches, taxonomies, gazetteers, dictionaries, lexical databases, concept maps/spaces, semantic road maps, etc. These schemas enable knowledge structuring and management, knowledge-based data processing and systematic access to knowledge structures in individual collections and digital libraries. Used as interactive information services on the Internet they have an increased potential to support the description, discovery and retrieval of heterogeneous information resources and to contribute to an overall resource discovery infrastructure
  7. Koch, T.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: DDC and knowledge organization in the digital library : Research and development. Demonstration pages (1999) 0.00
    6.2775286E-4 = product of:
      0.00439427 = sum of:
        0.00439427 = product of:
          0.02197135 = sum of:
            0.02197135 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02197135 = score(doc=942,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 942, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=942)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  8. Van de Sompel, H.; Hochstenbach, P.: Reference linking in a hybrid library environment : part 2: SFX, a generic linking solution (1999) 0.00
    5.6712516E-4 = product of:
      0.003969876 = sum of:
        0.003969876 = product of:
          0.01984938 = sum of:
            0.01984938 = weight(_text_:system in 1241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01984938 = score(doc=1241,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.17398985 = fieldWeight in 1241, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1241)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    This is the second part of two articles about reference linking in hybrid digital libraries. The first part, Frameworks for Linking described the current state-of-the-art and contrasted various approaches to the problem. It identified static and dynamic linking solutions, as well as open and closed linking frameworks. It also included an extensive bibliography. The second part describes our work at the University of Ghent to address these issues. SFX is a generic linking system that we have developed for our own needs, but its underlying concepts can be applied in a wide range of digital libraries. This is a description of the approach to the creation of extended services in a hybrid library environment that has been taken by the Library Automation team at the University of Ghent. The ongoing research has been grouped under the working title Special Effects (SFX). In order to explain the SFX-concepts in a comprehensive way, the discussion will start with a brief description of pre-SFX experiments. Thereafter, the basics of the SFX-approach are explained briefly, in combination with concrete implementation choices taken for the Elektron SFX-linking experiment. Elektron was the name of a modest digital library collaboration between the Universities of Ghent, Louvain and Antwerp.
  9. Van de Sompel, H.; Hochstenbach, P.: Reference linking in a hybrid library environment : part 1: frameworks for linking (1999) 0.00
    4.5370017E-4 = product of:
      0.003175901 = sum of:
        0.003175901 = product of:
          0.015879504 = sum of:
            0.015879504 = weight(_text_:system in 1244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015879504 = score(doc=1244,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.13919188 = fieldWeight in 1244, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1244)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    The creation of services linking related information entities is an area that is attracting an ever increasing interest in the ongoing development of the World Wide Web in general, and of research-related information systems in particular. Currently, both practice and theory point at linking services as being a major domain for innovation enabled by digital communication of content. Publishers, subscription agents, researchers and libraries are all looking into ways to create added value by linking related information entities, as such presenting the information within a broader context estimated to be relevant to the users of the information. This is the first of two articles in D-Lib Magazine on this topic. This first part describes the current state-of-the-art and contrasts various approaches to the problem. It identifies static and dynamic linking solutions as well as open and closed linking frameworks. It also includes an extensive bibliography. The second part, SFX, a Generic Linking Solution describes a system that we have developed for linking in a hybrid working environment. The creation of services linking related information entities is an area that is attracting an ever increasing interest in the ongoing development of the World Wide Web in general, and of research-related information systems in particular. Although most writings on electronic scientific communication have touted other benefits, such as the increase in communication speed, the possibility to exchange multimedia content and the absence of limitations on the length of research papers, currently both practice and theory point at linking services as being a major opportunity for improved communication of content. Publishers, subscription agents, researchers and libraries are all looking into ways to create added-value by linking related information entities, as such presenting the information within a broader context estimated to be relevant to the users of the information.
  10. Robbio, A. de; Maguolo, D.; Marini, A.: Scientific and general subject classifications in the digital world (2001) 0.00
    4.1850194E-4 = product of:
      0.0029295133 = sum of:
        0.0029295133 = product of:
          0.014647567 = sum of:
            0.014647567 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014647567 = score(doc=2,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.13368362 = fieldWeight in 2, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  11. Dodge, M.: What does the Internet look like, Jellyfish perhaps? : Exploring a visualization of the Internet by Young Hyun of CAIDA (2001) 0.00
    2.8356258E-4 = product of:
      0.001984938 = sum of:
        0.001984938 = product of:
          0.00992469 = sum of:
            0.00992469 = weight(_text_:system in 1554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00992469 = score(doc=1554,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.08699492 = fieldWeight in 1554, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1554)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Content
    What Is CAIDA? Association for Internet Data Analysis, started in 1997 and is based in the San Diego Supercomputer Center. CAIDA is led by KC Claffy along with a staff of serious Net techie researchers and grad students, and they are one of the worlds leading teams of academic researchers studying how the Internet works [6] . Their mission is "to provide a neutral framework for promoting greater cooperation in developing and deploying Internet measurement, analysis, and visualization tools that will support engineering and maintaining a robust, scaleable global Internet infrastructure." In addition to the Walrus visualization tool and the skitter monitoring system which we have touched on here, CAIDA has many other interesting projects mapping the infrastructure and operations of the global Internet. Two of my particular favorite visualization projects developed at CAIDA are MAPNET and Plankton [7] . MAPNET provides a useful interactive tool for mapping ISP backbones onto real-world geography. You can select from a range of commercial and research backbones and compare their topology of links overlaid on the same map. (The major problem with MAPNET is that is based on static database of ISP backbones links, which has unfortunately become obsolete over time.) Plankton, developed by CAIDA researchers Bradley Huffaker and Jaeyeon Jung, is an interactive tool for visualizing the topology and traffic on the global hierarchy of Web caches.