Search (39 results, page 2 of 2)

0.003881862 = product of:
  0.011645585 = sum of:
    0.011645585 = product of:
      0.034936756 = sum of:
        0.034936756 = weight(_text_:k in 2866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034936756 = score(doc=2866,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15658903 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0438652 = queryNorm
            0.22311112 = fieldWeight in 2866, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2866)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Classification

OKH (FH K)

GHBS

OKH (FH K)

0.0034311134 = product of:
  0.01029334 = sum of:
    0.01029334 = product of:
      0.03088002 = sum of:
        0.03088002 = weight(_text_:k in 215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03088002 = score(doc=215,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15658903 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0438652 = queryNorm
            0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 215, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=215)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Content

Enthält die Beiträge: Part 1: Beyond stand-alone indexes: embedded indexing: WRIGHT; J.C.: The world of embedded indexing; MONCRIEF, L.: Indexing computer-related documents - Part 2: Beyond the book: Web indexing: WALKER, D.: Subject-oriented Web indexing; BROCCOLI, K. u. G.V. RAVENSWAAY: Web indexing - anchors away; MAISLIN, S.: Ripping out the pages; ROWLAND, M.J.: Plunging in: Creating a Web site index for an online newsletter - Part 3: Special topics in computer-based indexing: ROWLAND, M.J.: <Meta> tags; WOODS. X.B.: Envisioning the word: Multimedia CD-ROM indexing; HOLBERT, S.: How to index Windows-based online help - Part 4: Beyond traditional marketing - selling yourself in hyperspace: ROWLAND, M.J.: Web site design for indexers; RICE, R.: Putting sample indexes on your Web site; CONNOLLY, D.A.: The many uses of Email discussion lists

0.0034311134 = product of:
  0.01029334 = sum of:
    0.01029334 = product of:
      0.03088002 = sum of:
        0.03088002 = weight(_text_:k in 2357) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03088002 = score(doc=2357,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15658903 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0438652 = queryNorm
            0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 2357, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2357)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Footnote

Rez. in: ZfBB 51(2004) H.3, S.189 (K. Peters): "Jahrtausendelang war es Aufgabe der Bibliotheken, Werke in körperlicher Form, d.h. als Tontafeln, Buch, CD-ROM etc., zugänglich zu machen. Urheberrechtlich gesehen handelt es sich bei dieser Art von Werknutzung um Verbreiten. Das bibliothekarische Verbreitungsrecht ist eine relativ unproblematische Rechtsmaterie. Für den Praktiker reicht es im Allgemeinen zu wissen, dass urheberrechtlich geschützte Materialien, die der Bibliotheksträger im seriösen Handel gekauft hat, frei, also ohne dass eine Lizenz des Rechtsinhabers eingeholt werden müsste, ausgeliehen werden dürfen. Wesentlich schwieriger ist das Recht der Verkörperung von Werken durch Bibliotheken oder mit Hilfe von Bibliotheken, mit anderen Worten: das Recht der Bibliothekskopie. Was die Bibliothekskopie in analoger Form angeht, dürften die wichtigsten Fragen durch das drei Jahrzehnte währende Bemühen der bibliothekarischen Rechtskommissionen beantwortet sein. Auch das infolge der Urheberrechtsnovelle vom 10. September 2003 (insbesondere § 53 Absatz 2 Satz 3 Urheberrechtsgesetz) aufgetretene Problem der digitalen Bibliothekskopie dürfte mit Hilfe der den Bibliotheksjuristen seit langem bestens vertrauten Prinzipien des Vervielfältigungsrechts kurzfristig eine praktikable Lösung finden. ... Wie es bei einer Darstellung, die das Internet zum Gegenstand hat, nicht anders sein kann, ist das Handbuch, das den Rechtsstand vom Sommer 2002 wiedergibt, mittlerweile bereits in einigen Punkten überholt. Der Bibliothekar muss sich insbesondere über die Auswirkungen der Urheberrechtsnovelle vom September 2003 (§ 52a UrhG - öffentliche Zugänglichmachung für Unterricht und Forschung) vorerst an anderer Stelle kundig machen. Eine Überarbeitung des Handbuchs würde dankbare Käufer und Leser finden."

0.0033966291 = product of:
  0.010189887 = sum of:
    0.010189887 = product of:
      0.03056966 = sum of:
        0.03056966 = weight(_text_:k in 3586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03056966 = score(doc=3586,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15658903 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0438652 = queryNorm
            0.19522223 = fieldWeight in 3586, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3586)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Classification

TVK (FH K)

GHBS

TVK (FH K)

0.0033317097 = product of:
  0.009995129 = sum of:
    0.009995129 = product of:
      0.029985385 = sum of:
        0.029985385 = weight(_text_:29 in 4321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029985385 = score(doc=4321,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15430406 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0438652 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4321, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4321)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

24. 6.2018 11:29:52

0.0033017385 = product of:
  0.009905215 = sum of:
    0.009905215 = product of:
      0.029715646 = sum of:
        0.029715646 = weight(_text_:22 in 1883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029715646 = score(doc=1883,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15360846 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0438652 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1883, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1883)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

22. 8.2009 19:50:27

0.0033017385 = product of:
  0.009905215 = sum of:
    0.009905215 = product of:
      0.029715646 = sum of:
        0.029715646 = weight(_text_:22 in 5135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029715646 = score(doc=5135,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15360846 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0438652 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5135, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5135)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

22. 3.2008 16:18:27

0.0027448907 = product of:
  0.008234672 = sum of:
    0.008234672 = product of:
      0.024704017 = sum of:
        0.024704017 = weight(_text_:k in 1972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024704017 = score(doc=1972,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15658903 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0438652 = queryNorm
            0.15776339 = fieldWeight in 1972, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1972)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.0026413908 = product of:
  0.007924172 = sum of:
    0.007924172 = product of:
      0.023772515 = sum of:
        0.023772515 = weight(_text_:22 in 6123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023772515 = score(doc=6123,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15360846 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0438652 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 6123, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6123)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

22.10.2006 10:22:33

0.0026413908 = product of:
  0.007924172 = sum of:
    0.007924172 = product of:
      0.023772515 = sum of:
        0.023772515 = weight(_text_:22 in 2426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023772515 = score(doc=2426,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15360846 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0438652 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2426, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2426)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.0026413908 = product of:
  0.007924172 = sum of:
    0.007924172 = product of:
      0.023772515 = sum of:
        0.023772515 = weight(_text_:22 in 2428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023772515 = score(doc=2428,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15360846 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0438652 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2428, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2428)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.0026413908 = product of:
  0.007924172 = sum of:
    0.007924172 = product of:
      0.023772515 = sum of:
        0.023772515 = weight(_text_:22 in 2667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023772515 = score(doc=2667,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15360846 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0438652 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2667, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2667)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

22. 2.2009 12:33:37

0.0024261638 = product of:
  0.007278491 = sum of:
    0.007278491 = product of:
      0.021835472 = sum of:
        0.021835472 = weight(_text_:k in 2917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021835472 = score(doc=2917,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15658903 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0438652 = queryNorm
            0.13944446 = fieldWeight in 2917, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2917)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Classification

TZL (FH K)

GHBS

TZL (FH K)

0.002058668 = product of:
  0.006176004 = sum of:
    0.006176004 = product of:
      0.018528013 = sum of:
        0.018528013 = weight(_text_:k in 3885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018528013 = score(doc=3885,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15658903 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0438652 = queryNorm
            0.118322544 = fieldWeight in 3885, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3885)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Footnote

Connected not only poses the "problem of connection," but also seeks, through Shaviro's scattered mode of critical analysis, to pose new ways of intervening in and viewing connections of all sorts. It does not work. Most of the time, Shaviro's efforts to il illuminate the "connections" never rise above a random, technophilic pastiche, lacking any powerful synthesis but often overflowing with the academic version of New Age babble. (It is ironic that Shaviro is concerned with the "problem of connection," because Connected is largely inaccessible to readers who have not read the novels of Samuel Delany, Philip K. Dick, William Gibson, and several other science fiction novelists, or seen the films in The Matrix series.) For example, Shaviro thinks that everything "flows." He writes: In postmodern society, everything flows. There are flows of commodities, flows of expressions, flows of embodiment, and flows of affect. The organizing material of each flow is a universal equivalent: money, information, DNA, or LSD. But how are these flows related among themselves? Strictly speaking, they should interchangeable. All the equivalents should themselves be mutually equivalent. (p. 193) This is, of course, patent nonsense. More to the point, it is one of many passages in Conneeted that has the ring of authority, but little else. In the midst of rising concerns over computer security, personal privacy, and freedom of expression, how much significance should we assign to Shaviro's assertion that the user's relationship to the network is like the junkie's need for heroin, as described by William Burroughs in The Naked Lunch? Or the claim that Microsoft's design for the "Horne of the Future" is part of a middle-class plot to repress itself sexually? Or the recommendation that a novel of the future in which copyright violators are put to death is a harbinger of things to come? In the end, a generous reading might conclude that Connected is an experimental meditation an the relevance of science fiction, whereas a less generous view would be that the author's misguided preoccupation with literary effect resulted in a book that never makes an effective case for the writers we are supposed to take so seriously."

0.0016658548 = product of:
  0.0049975645 = sum of:
    0.0049975645 = product of:
      0.0149926925 = sum of:
        0.0149926925 = weight(_text_:29 in 4818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0149926925 = score(doc=4818,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15430406 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0438652 = queryNorm
            0.097163305 = fieldWeight in 4818, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4818)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

22.10.2005 19:29:16

0.0016508693 = product of:
  0.0049526077 = sum of:
    0.0049526077 = product of:
      0.014857823 = sum of:
        0.014857823 = weight(_text_:22 in 3992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014857823 = score(doc=3992,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15360846 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0438652 = queryNorm
            0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 3992, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3992)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

22. 3.2004 14:46:50

0.0013724454 = product of:
  0.004117336 = sum of:
    0.004117336 = product of:
      0.012352008 = sum of:
        0.012352008 = weight(_text_:k in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012352008 = score(doc=1795,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15658903 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0438652 = queryNorm
            0.078881696 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.0013326838 = product of:
  0.0039980514 = sum of:
    0.0039980514 = product of:
      0.011994153 = sum of:
        0.011994153 = weight(_text_:29 in 3993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011994153 = score(doc=3993,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15430406 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0438652 = queryNorm
            0.07773064 = fieldWeight in 3993, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3993)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Footnote

Rez. in: JASIST 56(2005) no.11, S.1237-1238 (E. Yakel): "This book provides the profession with a cogent, thorough, and thoughtful introduction to digital reference. Janes not only provides the breadth of coverage expected in an introduction, but also depth into this important topic. Janes' approach is managerial or administrative, providing guidelines for reference work that can be applied in different settings. Janes creates a decision-making framework to help reference librarians make decisions concerning how, to what extent, and in what cases digital reference services will be delivered. In this way, Janes avoids dictating a "one-size-fits-all" model. This approach is the major strength of the book. Library administrators and heads of reference services will find the administrative approach welcome by helping them think through which digital reference policies and methods will best target core constituencies and their institutional environments. However, the book deserves a broader audience as professors will find that the book fits nicely in a general reference course. For all readers, the book is readable and engaging and also challenging and questioning. The book begins with a history of reference work, nicely positioning digital reference in this tradition and noting the changes wrought by the digital age. By doing this, the author establishes both continuity and change in reference work as well as the values surrounding this activity. These values are largely those from the library community and Support people's access to information as well as activities that support the use of information. Janes closes this chapter by noting that the continuing changes in demographics, technology, and connectivity will impact reference work in ways that are not yet imaginable. This introduction sets the tone for the rest of the book. Janes defines digital reference service as "the use of digital technologies and resources to provide direct, professional assistance to people who are seeking information, wherever and whenever they need it" (p. 29). This definition covers a lot of ground. Examples include everything from a public library answering email queries to commercial ask-an-expert services. While the primary audience is librarians, Janes continually reminds readers that many others perform reference activities an the World Wide Web. Furthermore, he cautions readers that there are larger forces shaping this activity in the world that need to acknowledged. In building a framework for decision-making, Janes outlines the types of digital reference service. This discussion covers the communieations modes, such as e-mail, chat, Web forms, etc. It also analyzes the modalities by which reference service is delivered: synchronous/ asynchronous. Using these two dimensions (communication method and synchronous/asynchronous), Janes presents the variety of contexts in which digital reference can take place and then outlines the strengths and weaknesses of each of these. This translates into a decision-making framework by which readers analyze their particular setting and then select the modes and modalities that world be most effective. This is a powerful device and demonstrates the many options (and perhaps also the obstacles) for providing digital reference service.

9.905215E-4 = product of:
  0.0029715644 = sum of:
    0.0029715644 = product of:
      0.008914693 = sum of:
        0.008914693 = weight(_text_:22 in 4344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008914693 = score(doc=4344,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15360846 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0438652 = queryNorm
            0.058035173 = fieldWeight in 4344, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01171875 = fieldNorm(doc=4344)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Footnote

Chapter 2 (Technology and People) focuses an several theories of technological acceptance and diffusion. Unfortunately, Bruce's presentation is somewhat confusing as he moves from one theory to next, never quite connecting them into a logical sequence or coherent whole. Two theories are of particular interest to Bruce: the Theory of Diffusion of Innovations and the Theory of Planned Behavior. The Theory of Diffusion of Innovations is an "information-centric view of technology acceptance" in which technology adopters are placed in the information flows of society from which they learn about innovations and "drive innovation adoption decisions" (p. 20). The Theory of Planned Behavior maintains that the "performance of a behavior is a joint function of intentions and perceived behavioral control" (i.e., how muck control a person thinks they have) (pp. 22-23). Bruce combines these two theories to form the basis for the Technology Acceptance Model. This model posits that "an individual's acceptance of information technology is based an beliefs, attitudes, intentions, and behaviors" (p. 24). In all these theories and models echoes a recurring theme: "individual perceptions of the innovation or technology are critical" in terms of both its characteristics and its use (pp. 24-25). From these, in turn, Bruce derives a predictive theory of the role personal perceptions play in technology adoption: Personal Innovativeness of Information Technology Adoption (PIITA). Personal inventiveness is defined as "the willingness of an individual to try out any new information technology" (p. 26). In general, the PIITA theory predicts that information technology will be adopted by individuals that have a greater exposure to mass media, rely less an the evaluation of information technology by others, exhibit a greater ability to cope with uncertainty and take risks, and requires a less positive perception of an information technology prior to its adoption. Chapter 3 (A Focus an Usings) introduces the User-Centered Paradigm (UCP). The UCP is characteristic of the shift of emphasis from technology to users as the driving force behind technology and research agendas for Internet development [for a dissenting view, see Andrew Dillion's (2003) challenge to the utility of user-centerness for design guidance]. It entails the "broad acceptance of the user-oriented perspective across a range of disciplines and professional fields," such as business, education, cognitive engineering, and information science (p. 34).