Search (21 results, page 1 of 2)

0.028348261 = product of:
  0.113393046 = sum of:
    0.113393046 = weight(_text_:digitale in 68) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.113393046 = score(doc=68,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.16578908 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03213747 = queryNorm
        0.68395966 = fieldWeight in 68, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=68)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

RSWK

Digitale Revolution
Digitale Spaltung

Subject

Digitale Revolution
Digitale Spaltung

0.014321019 = product of:
  0.057284076 = sum of:
    0.057284076 = weight(_text_:digitale in 344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057284076 = score(doc=344,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.16578908 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03213747 = queryNorm
        0.3455238 = fieldWeight in 344, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.158747 = idf(docFreq=690, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=344)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Digitale Revolution: Chance oder Gefahr für die Demokratie? Einst galten das Internet und die sozialen Medien als Chance auf unbegrenzten Zugang zu Wissen - und damit als Basis für eine neue Hochphase der demokratischen Debattenkultur. Doch stattdessen sind wir heute mit Hass im Netz, Fake-News und Verschwörungstheorien konfrontiert. Rechte Parteien und Organisationen wie die AfD, Pegida und die Identitäre Bewegung können fast ungehindert ihre Ideologien verbreiten. Doch dabei handelt es sich nicht um eine reine »Online-Radikalisierung«. Das beweist die Welle rechtsmotivierter Gewalt wie die Anschläge von Halle und Hanau und eine wachsende Akzeptanz rechter Positionen in der Bevölkerung. Maik Fielitz und Holger Marcks analysieren diese Entwicklung und gehen den Ursachen auf den Grund: Die Rolle der sozialen Medien beim Erstarken des Ultranationalismus und rechts motivierter Straftaten Die Manipulationstechniken der Rechtsextremen: Verwirrung stiften, Ängste schüren und Mehrheitsverhältnisse verzerren Rechtsextreme Kommunikation im Internet: Verschwörungstheorien, Bedrohungsmythen, Lügen und Hassbotschaften Die sozialen Medien als digitaler Brandbeschleuniger: Fakten, Hintergründe und Analysen Selbstregulation oder politische Eingriffe? Auswege aus der digitalen Hasskultur Die autoritäre Revolte stellt eine große Herausforderung für Demokratien und offene Gesellschaften dar. Wie können wir rechtsextremen Tendenzen begegnen? Politik aber auch Internetkonzerne sind aufgerufen, zu handeln. Wie lässt sich der »digitale Faschismus« bändigen, ohne unser Recht auf freie Meinungsäußerung einzuschränken? Diese Fragen diskutieren Maik Fielitz und Holger Marcks intensiv. Sie untersuchen die manipulativen Strategien und psychologischen Tricks der rechtsextremen Akteure und zeigen mögliche Auswege aus der Misere. Ihr Sachbuch ist ein wichtiger Beitrag zur politischen Debatte!
Die sozialen Medien haben sich zu einem Raum des Hasses und der Unwahrheit entwickelt. Ohne diese digitalen Brandbeschleuniger sind die rechtsextremen Wahlerfolge ebenso wenig zu verstehen wie die jüngste Welle rechter Gewalt. Maik Fielitz und Holger Marcks gehen dieser Entwicklung und ihren Ursachen auf den Grund. Sie zeigen, mit welchen manipulativen Techniken rechtsextreme Akteure in den sozialen Medien versuchen, Ängste zu verstärken, Verwirrung zu stiften und Mehrheitsverhältnisse zu verzerren. Dass ihr Wirken dabei eine solche Dynamik entfalten kann, hat wiederum mit der Funktionsweise der sozialen Medien selbst zu tun. Denn sie begünstigen die Entstehung und Verbreitung von Bedrohungsmythen, die der führungslosen Masse der Wutbürger eine Richtung geben. Wie aber ließe sich dieser "digitale Faschismus" bändigen, ohne die Werte der offenen Gesellschaft in Mitleidenschaft zu ziehen? "Das Ergebnis ihrer Recherche ist so besorgniserregend, dass die Forscher die Rechten als "die neuen Gatekeeper" bezeichnen. So kursierten etwa in den Wochen nach der Kölner Silvesternacht fünf Mal mehr muslimfeindliche Posts als üblich. Gravierender noch: Rechte Sprache und Sprachbilder seien inzwischen Bestandteil des öffentlichen Diskurses. Plötzlich sei etwa viel von "Nafris" die Rede gewesen - eine Polizeibezeichnung für Nordafrikaner" (deutschlandfunkkultur.de)

0.0063568843 = product of:
  0.025427537 = sum of:
    0.025427537 = weight(_text_:information in 153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025427537 = score(doc=153,freq=30.0), product of:
        0.056416616 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03213747 = queryNorm
        0.4507101 = fieldWeight in 153, product of:
          5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
            30.0 = termFreq=30.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=153)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Information grounds emerge as people share information with others in a common place. Many studies have investigated the emergence of information grounds in public places. This study pays attention to the emergence, peak, and abeyance of an online information ground. It investigates a Facebook group used by youth for sharing information when misinformation spread wildly during the 2011 violence in Ambon, Indonesia. The findings demonstrate change and continuity in an online information ground; it became an information hub when reaching a peak cycle, and an information repository when entering into abeyance. Despite this period of nonactivity, the friendships and collective memories resulting from information ground interactions last over time and can be used for reactivating the online information ground when new needs emerge. Illuminating the lifecycles of an online information ground, the findings have potential to explain the dynamic of users' interactions with others and with information in quotidian spaces.

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 72(2021) no.3, S.302-314

0.0046905214 = product of:
  0.018762086 = sum of:
    0.018762086 = weight(_text_:information in 1052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018762086 = score(doc=1052,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.056416616 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03213747 = queryNorm
        0.3325631 = fieldWeight in 1052, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1052)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Experiences of time and temporalities in contemporary life are analysed, with Floridi's conception of the infosphere as a central concept. The effects of instantaneous communication and digital information are shown to result not simply in the obvious acceleration of many aspects of life, but in multiple temporalities. The informational spaces of Floridi's hyperhistorical time form a new time-based society, with our informational activities expressed in linear, cyclic, re-cyclic, and iterative processes. Examples from the information sciences, particularly information seeking and "slow information," are given, and an outline model for time literacy is presented.

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.10, S.1159-1169

Theme

Information

0.0038686767 = product of:
  0.015474707 = sum of:
    0.015474707 = weight(_text_:information in 5837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015474707 = score(doc=5837,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.056416616 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03213747 = queryNorm
        0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 5837, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5837)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to develop an in-depth understanding of the underlying dynamics of an emergent shared information practice within a Facebook group, and the resources the group develops to sustain this practice. Design/methodology/approach In-depth semi-structured interviews were carried out with twenty members from the group. The findings are based on comparative analysis combined with narrative analysis and were interpreted using theories of situated learning and Community of Practice. Findings The study shows that although members of this multicultural mothers group endorsed different, sometimes opposing parenting practices, the group had to find common ground when sharing information. Managing these challenges was key to maintaining the group as an open information resource for all members. The group produced a shared repertoire of resources to maintain its activities, including norms, rules, shared understandings, and various monitoring activities. The shared online practice developed by the community is conceptualised in this article as an information practice requiring shared, community-specific understandings of what, when, and how information can or should be sought or shared in ways that are valued in this specific community. The findings show that this shared information practice is not static but continually evolves as members negotiate what is, or not, important for the group. Originality/value The research provides novel insights into the underlying dynamics of the emergence, management, and sustainability of a shared information practice within a contemporary mothers group on Facebook.

0.0037905138 = product of:
  0.015162055 = sum of:
    0.015162055 = weight(_text_:information in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015162055 = score(doc=113,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.056416616 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03213747 = queryNorm
        0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

In this article we report on an experiment that tested how useful library-based guidelines are for measuring the integrity of information in the era of fake news. We found that the usefulness of these guidelines depends on at least three factors: weighting indicators (criteria), clear instructions, and context-specificity.

0.0036188157 = product of:
  0.014475263 = sum of:
    0.014475263 = weight(_text_:information in 5962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014475263 = score(doc=5962,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.056416616 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03213747 = queryNorm
        0.256578 = fieldWeight in 5962, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5962)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The rapid and wide dissemination of up-to-date, localized information is a central issue during disasters. Being attributed to the original 140-character length, Twitter provides its users with quick-posting and easy-forwarding features that facilitate the timely dissemination of warnings and alerts. However, a concern arises with respect to the terseness of tweets that restricts the amount of information conveyed in a tweet and thus increases a tweet's uncertainty. We tackle such concerns by proposing entropy as a measure for a tweet's uncertainty. Based on the perspectives of Uncertainty Reduction Theory (URT), we theorize that the more uncertain information of a disaster tweet, the higher the entropy, which will lead to a lower retweet count. By leveraging the statistical and predictive analyses, we provide evidence supporting that entropy validly and reliably assesses the uncertainty of a tweet. This study contributes to improving our understanding of information propagation on Twitter during disasters. Academically, we offer a new variable of entropy to measure a tweet's uncertainty, an important factor influencing disaster tweets' retweeting. Entropy plays a critical role to better comprehend URLs and emoticons as a means to convey information. Practically, this research suggests a set of guidelines for effectively crafting disaster messages on Twitter.

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.10, S.1145-1161

0.0033166995 = product of:
  0.013266798 = sum of:
    0.013266798 = weight(_text_:information in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013266798 = score(doc=5775,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.056416616 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03213747 = queryNorm
        0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Twitter is utilized by many, including professional businesses and organizations; however, there are very few studies on how other entities interact with these organizations in the Twittersphere. This article presents a study that investigates tweets related to 5 major library and information science (LIS) professional organizations in the United States. This study applies a systematic tweets analysis framework, including descriptive analytics, network analytics, and co-word analysis of hashtags. The findings shed light on user engagement with LIS professional organizations and the trending discussion topics on Twitter, which is valuable for enabling more successful social media use and greater influence.

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.4, S.491-496

0.0030949414 = product of:
  0.0123797655 = sum of:
    0.0123797655 = weight(_text_:information in 5858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0123797655 = score(doc=5858,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.056416616 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03213747 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 5858, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5858)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

In this article we report on an experiment that tested how useful library-based guidelines are for measuring the integrity of information in the era of fake news. We found that the usefulness of these guidelines depends on at least three factors: weighting indicators (criteria), clear instructions, and context-specificity.

0.0028428852 = product of:
  0.011371541 = sum of:
    0.011371541 = weight(_text_:information in 549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011371541 = score(doc=549,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.056416616 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03213747 = queryNorm
        0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 549, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=549)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The spread of misinformation on social media has become a major societal issue during recent years. In this work, we used the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic as a case study to systematically investigate factors associated with the spread of multi-topic misinformation related to one event on social media based on the heuristic-systematic model. Among factors related to systematic processing of information, we discovered that the topics of a misinformation story matter, with conspiracy theories being the most likely to be retweeted. As for factors related to heuristic processing of information, such as when citizens look up to their leaders during such a crisis, our results demonstrated that behaviors of a political leader, former US President Donald J. Trump, may have nudged people's sharing of COVID-19 misinformation. Outcomes of this study help social media platform and users better understand and prevent the spread of misinformation on social media.

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(2022) no.5, S.726-737

0.0027355675 = product of:
  0.01094227 = sum of:
    0.01094227 = weight(_text_:information in 1089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01094227 = score(doc=1089,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.056416616 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03213747 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1089, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1089)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The extant literature demonstrates that the age-related digital divide prevents older adults from enhancing their quality of life. To bridge this gap and promote active aging, this study explores the interplay between social networks and older adults' use of information and communication technology (ICT). Using an action-oriented field research approach, we offered technical help (29 help sessions) to older adult participants recruited from western China. Then, we conducted content analysis to examine the obtained video, audio, and text data. Our results show that, first, different types of social networks significantly influence older adults' ICT use in terms of digital skills, engagement, and attitudes; however, these effects vary from person to person. In particular, our results highlight the crucial role of a stable and long-term supportive social network in learning and mastering ICT for older residents. Second, technical help facilitates the building and reinforcing of such a social network for the participants. Our study has strong implications in that policymakers can foster the digital inclusion of older people through supportive social networks.

Content

Beitrag in: JASIST special issue on ICT4D and intersections with the information field. Vgl.: https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.24700.

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.12, S.1437-1448

0.0019148974 = product of:
  0.0076595894 = sum of:
    0.0076595894 = weight(_text_:information in 5866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0076595894 = score(doc=5866,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.056416616 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03213747 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 5866, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5866)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 71(2020) H.2/3, S.95-106

0.0016413406 = product of:
  0.006565362 = sum of:
    0.006565362 = weight(_text_:information in 5965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006565362 = score(doc=5965,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.056416616 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03213747 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5965, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5965)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.10, S.1205-1217

0.0016413406 = product of:
  0.006565362 = sum of:
    0.006565362 = weight(_text_:information in 408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006565362 = score(doc=408,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.056416616 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03213747 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 408, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=408)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 72(2021) no.11, S.1323-1336

0.0015474707 = product of:
  0.0061898828 = sum of:
    0.0061898828 = weight(_text_:information in 550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0061898828 = score(doc=550,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.056416616 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03213747 = queryNorm
        0.10971737 = fieldWeight in 550, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=550)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

LCSH

Information society

Subject

Information society

0.0013677838 = product of:
  0.005471135 = sum of:
    0.005471135 = weight(_text_:information in 5763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005471135 = score(doc=5763,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.056416616 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03213747 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5763, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5763)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.4, S.423-435

0.0013677838 = product of:
  0.005471135 = sum of:
    0.005471135 = weight(_text_:information in 5945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005471135 = score(doc=5945,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.056416616 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03213747 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5945, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5945)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.8, S.902-915

0.0013677838 = product of:
  0.005471135 = sum of:
    0.005471135 = weight(_text_:information in 449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005471135 = score(doc=449,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.056416616 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03213747 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 449, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=449)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(2022) no.1, S.136-139

0.0013677838 = product of:
  0.005471135 = sum of:
    0.005471135 = weight(_text_:information in 558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005471135 = score(doc=558,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.056416616 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03213747 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 558, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=558)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(2022) no.5, S.738-751

0.0013677838 = product of:
  0.005471135 = sum of:
    0.005471135 = weight(_text_:information in 1115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005471135 = score(doc=1115,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.056416616 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03213747 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 1115, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1115)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)