Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Internet"
  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Dijk, J: ¬The digital divide (2020) 0.02
    0.021185858 = product of:
      0.042371716 = sum of:
        0.042371716 = product of:
          0.12711515 = sum of:
            0.12711515 = weight(_text_:21st in 68) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12711515 = score(doc=68,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.33400252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.058177955 = queryNorm
                0.3805814 = fieldWeight in 68, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=68)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    What is the digital divide? -- Research and theory of the digital divide -- Motivation and attitude -- Physical access -- Digital and 21st-century skills usage inequality -- Outcomes -- Social and digital inequality -- Solutions to soften the digital divide.
  2. Schrenk, P.: Gesamtnote 1 für Signal - Telegram-Defizite bei Sicherheit und Privatsphäre : Signal und Telegram im Test (2022) 0.02
    0.01576462 = product of:
      0.03152924 = sum of:
        0.03152924 = product of:
          0.06305848 = sum of:
            0.06305848 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06305848 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20372929 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.058177955 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2022 14:01:14
  3. Ding, J.: Can data die? : why one of the Internet's oldest images lives on wirhout its subjects's consent (2021) 0.01
    0.008827442 = product of:
      0.017654885 = sum of:
        0.017654885 = product of:
          0.05296465 = sum of:
            0.05296465 = weight(_text_:21st in 423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05296465 = score(doc=423,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.33400252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.058177955 = queryNorm
                0.1585756 = fieldWeight in 423, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=423)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In the 21st century, the image has remained a common sight in classrooms and on TV, including a feature on Silicon Valley in 2014. Pushback towards the use of the image also grew in the 2010s leading up to 2019, when the Losing Lena documentary was released. Forsén shares her side of the story and asks for her image to be retired: "I retired from modelling a long time ago. It's time I retired from tech, too. We can make a simple change today that creates a lasting change for tomorrow. Let's commit to losing me." After the film's release, many of my female colleagues shared stories about their own encounters with the image throughout their careers. When one of the only women this well referenced, respected, and remembered in your field is known for a nude photo that was taken of her and is now used without her consent, it inevitably shapes the perception of the position of women in tech and the value of our contributions. The film called on the engineering community to stop their spread of the image and use alternatives instead. This led to efforts to remove the image from textbooks and production code and a slow, but noticeable decline in the image's use for research.