Search (439 results, page 1 of 22)

0.069909394 = product of:
  0.13981879 = sum of:
    0.12569106 = weight(_text_:logic in 1849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12569106 = score(doc=1849,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2358082 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039102852 = queryNorm
        0.5330224 = fieldWeight in 1849, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1849)
    0.014127724 = product of:
      0.04238317 = sum of:
        0.04238317 = weight(_text_:22 in 1849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04238317 = score(doc=1849,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13693152 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039102852 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1849, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1849)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

This article explores the reasons why librarians should be at the heart of Internet site development. There are two distinct ways in which librarians can most effectively contribute to this medium. The first is by getting involved in information architecture. This new discipline requires skills such as expertise in search techniques and navigational logic, and generally involves the librarian working closely with graphic designers to create a firm foundation for the site. The second area is the role librarians can play in the structuring of the data which drives the site (data management).

Date

21. 1.2007 14:22:02

0.043693364 = product of:
  0.08738673 = sum of:
    0.0785569 = weight(_text_:logic in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0785569 = score(doc=5562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2358082 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039102852 = queryNorm
        0.333139 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
    0.008829828 = product of:
      0.026489483 = sum of:
        0.026489483 = weight(_text_:22 in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026489483 = score(doc=5562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13693152 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039102852 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

For my segment of this program I'd like to focus on some basic qualities of classification schemes. These qualities are critical to our ability to truly organize knowledge for access. As I see it, there are at least five qualities of note. The first one of these properties that I want to talk about is "authoritative." By this I mean standardized, but I mean more than standardized with a built in consensus-building process. A classification scheme constructed by a collaborative, consensus-building process carries the approval, and the authority, of the discipline groups that contribute to it and that it affects... The next property of classification systems is "expandable," living, responsive, with a clear locus of responsibility for its continuous upkeep. The worst thing you can do with a thesaurus, or a classification scheme, is to finish it. You can't ever finish it because it reflects ongoing intellectual activity... The third property is "intuitive." That is, the system has to be approachable, it has to be transparent, or at least capable of being transparent. It has to have an underlying logic that supports the classification scheme but doesn't dominate it... The fourth property is "organized and logical." I advocate very strongly, and agree with Lois Chan, that classification must be based on a rule-based structure, on somebody's world-view of the syndetic structure... The fifth property is "universal" by which I mean the classification scheme needs be useable by any specific system or application, and be available as a language for multiple purposes.

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1995) no.2, S.19-22

0.031422764 = product of:
  0.12569106 = sum of:
    0.12569106 = weight(_text_:logic in 3965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12569106 = score(doc=3965,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2358082 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039102852 = queryNorm
        0.5330224 = fieldWeight in 3965, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3965)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The paper proposes 2 query languages for semistructured data G-Fixpoint and G-While whose expressive power is comparable to Fixpoint and While respectively. These languages are multi-sorted like logic languages integrating fixpoint path expressions

0.031422764 = product of:
  0.12569106 = sum of:
    0.12569106 = weight(_text_:logic in 4735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12569106 = score(doc=4735,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2358082 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039102852 = queryNorm
        0.5330224 = fieldWeight in 4735, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4735)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The proliferation of electronic databases and reduced library collections require researchers to be familiar with an increasing range of bibliographical resources. To assist users in searching multiple databases the PICA network in the Netherlands has developed PiCarta as a single information source. The servie enables users to access bibliographical databases and electronic journals using Boolean logic, fuzzy operators, and subject weighting. The system is, however, dependent upon indexing methods used in original sources

0.027494917 = product of:
  0.10997967 = sum of:
    0.10997967 = weight(_text_:logic in 399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10997967 = score(doc=399,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2358082 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039102852 = queryNorm
        0.4663946 = fieldWeight in 399, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=399)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Computer based systems can produce enourmous retrieval sets even when good search logic is used. Sometimes this is desirable, more often it is not. Appropriate filters can limit search results, but they represent only a partial solution. Simple ranking techniques are needed that are both effective and easily understood by the humans doing the searching. Optimal search output, whether from a traditional database or the Internet, will result when intuitive interfaces are designed that inspire confidence while making the necessary mathematics transparent. Weighted term searching using powers of 2, a technique proposed early in the history of information retrieval, can be simplifies and used in combination with modern graphics and textual input to achieve these results

0.023567071 = product of:
  0.094268285 = sum of:
    0.094268285 = weight(_text_:logic in 7398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.094268285 = score(doc=7398,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2358082 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039102852 = queryNorm
        0.3997668 = fieldWeight in 7398, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7398)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Verity Search 97 software will index and search e-mail, attachments, folders and documents on local and network disk drives. The Internet may be searched via the same front end and changes to particular documents or pages may be monitored. Documents may be viewed in their native formats including ASCII, HTML, PDF and popular word processors, with highlighted search terms. Agents may be launched into the Internet to retrieve information according to a user-specified profile. The software can index about 700 MB an hour. Describes the search technology which includes fuzzy logic and natural language. The Web version of Personal Search 97 works with Netscape Navigator or Microsoft Internet Explorer, while the Exchange version will work regardless of any attachment to an Exchange server. Search 97 Personal improves online time and access time and allows searches to be refined offline

0.019639226 = product of:
  0.0785569 = sum of:
    0.0785569 = weight(_text_:logic in 2062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0785569 = score(doc=2062,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2358082 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039102852 = queryNorm
        0.333139 = fieldWeight in 2062, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2062)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Network Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks, which exhaust server resources and network bandwidth, can casee the target servers to be unable to provide proper services to the legitimate users and in some cases render the target systems inoperable and/or the target networks inaccessible. DoS attacks have now become a serious and common security threat to the Internet community. Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) has long been incorporated in various authentication protocols to facilitate verifying the identities of the communicating parties. The use of PKI has, however, an inherent problem as it involves expensive computational operations such as modular exponentiation. An improper deployment of the publickey operations in a protocol could create an opportunity for DoS attackers to exhaust the server's resources. This paper presents a public-key based authentication and key establishment protocol coupled with a sophisticated client puzzle, which together provide a versatile solution for possible DoS attacks and various other common attacks during an authentication process. Besides authentication, the protocol also supports a joint establishment of a session key by both the client and the server, which protects the session communications after the mutual authentication. The proposed protocol has been validated using a formal logic theory and has been shown, through security analysis, to be able to resist, besides DoS attacks, various other common attacks.

0.019639226 = product of:
  0.0785569 = sum of:
    0.0785569 = weight(_text_:logic in 2093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0785569 = score(doc=2093,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2358082 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039102852 = queryNorm
        0.333139 = fieldWeight in 2093, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2093)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

This paper deals with the problem of modeling Web information resources using expert knowledge and personalized user information for improved Web searching capabilities. We propose a "Web information space" model, which is composed of Web-based information resources (HTML/XML [Hypertext Markup Language/Extensible Markup Language] documents an the Web), expert advice repositories (domain-expert-specified metadata for information resources), and personalized information about users (captured as user profiles that indicate users' preferences about experts as well as users' knowledge about topics). Expert advice, the heart of the Web information space model, is specified using topics and relationships among topics (called metalinks), along the lines of the recently proposed topic maps. Topics and metalinks constitute metadata that describe the contents of the underlying HTML/XML Web resources. The metadata specification process is semiautomated, and it exploits XML DTDs (Document Type Definition) to allow domain-expert guided mapping of DTD elements to topics and metalinks. The expert advice is stored in an object-relational database management system (DBMS). To demonstrate the practicality and usability of the proposed Web information space model, we created a prototype expert advice repository of more than one million topics/metalinks for DBLP (Database and Logic Programming) Bibliography data set. We also present a query interface that provides sophisticated querying fa cilities for DBLP Bibliography resources using the expert advice repository.

0.011783536 = product of:
  0.047134142 = sum of:
    0.047134142 = weight(_text_:logic in 3391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047134142 = score(doc=3391,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2358082 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039102852 = queryNorm
        0.1998834 = fieldWeight in 3391, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3391)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

Long Papers * Suggestions for OWL 3, Pascal Hitzler. * BestMap: Context-Aware SKOS Vocabulary Mappings in OWL 2, Rinke Hoekstra. * Mechanisms for Importing Modules, Bijan Parsia, Ulrike Sattler and Thomas Schneider. * A Syntax for Rules in OWL 2, Birte Glimm, Matthew Horridge, Bijan Parsia and Peter Patel-Schneider. * PelletSpatial: A Hybrid RCC-8 and RDF/OWL Reasoning and Query Engine, Markus Stocker and Evren Sirin. * The OWL API: A Java API for Working with OWL 2 Ontologies, Matthew Horridge and Sean Bechhofer. * From Justifications to Proofs for Entailments in OWL, Matthew Horridge, Bijan Parsia and Ulrike Sattler. * A Solution for the Man-Man Problem in the Family History Knowledge Base, Dmitry Tsarkov, Ulrike Sattler and Robert Stevens. * Towards Integrity Constraints in OWL, Evren Sirin and Jiao Tao. * Processing OWL2 ontologies using Thea: An application of logic programming, Vangelis Vassiliadis, Jan Wielemaker and Chris Mungall. * Reasoning in Metamodeling Enabled Ontologies, Nophadol Jekjantuk, Gerd Gröner and Jeff Z. Pan.

0.0110543175 = product of:
  0.04421727 = sum of:
    0.04421727 = product of:
      0.1326518 = sum of:
        0.1326518 = weight(_text_:bliss in 2631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1326518 = score(doc=2631,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27972588 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039102852 = queryNorm
            0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 2631, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2631)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.00998981 = product of:
  0.03995924 = sum of:
    0.03995924 = product of:
      0.11987772 = sum of:
        0.11987772 = weight(_text_:22 in 6569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11987772 = score(doc=6569,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13693152 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039102852 = queryNorm
            0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 6569, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6569)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 2.1997 19:50:29

Source

Cogito. 1997, H.1, S.22-23

0.00921193 = product of:
  0.03684772 = sum of:
    0.03684772 = product of:
      0.11054316 = sum of:
        0.11054316 = weight(_text_:bliss in 2476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11054316 = score(doc=2476,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27972588 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039102852 = queryNorm
            0.3951839 = fieldWeight in 2476, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2476)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Basic skills of classification and subject indexing have been little taught in British library schools since automation was introduced into libraries. However, development of the Internet as a major medium of publication has stretched the capability of search engines to cope with retrieval. Consequently, there has been interest in applying existing systems of knowledge organization to electronic resources. Unfortunately, the classification systems have been adopted without a full understanding of modern classification principles. Analytico-synthetic schemes have been used crudely, as in the case of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC). The fully faceted Bliss Bibliographical Classification, 2nd edition (BC2) with its potential as a tool for electronic resource retrieval is virtually unknown outside academic libraries

0.008829828 = product of:
  0.035319313 = sum of:
    0.035319313 = product of:
      0.10595793 = sum of:
        0.10595793 = weight(_text_:22 in 3204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10595793 = score(doc=3204,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13693152 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039102852 = queryNorm
            0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 3204, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3204)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

RRZK-Kompass. 1995, Nr.65, S.21-22

0.0087410845 = product of:
  0.034964338 = sum of:
    0.034964338 = product of:
      0.10489301 = sum of:
        0.10489301 = weight(_text_:22 in 8727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10489301 = score(doc=8727,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13693152 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039102852 = queryNorm
            0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 8727, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8727)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

5. 8.2001 12:22:47

Source

Information outlook. 3(1999) no.2, S.18-22

0.0087410845 = product of:
  0.034964338 = sum of:
    0.034964338 = product of:
      0.10489301 = sum of:
        0.10489301 = weight(_text_:22 in 7131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10489301 = score(doc=7131,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13693152 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039102852 = queryNorm
            0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 7131, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7131)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

18. 1.1997 12:15:22

Source

Kölner Stadtanzeiger. Nr.69 vom 22/23.3.1997, S.MZ7

0.0087410845 = product of:
  0.034964338 = sum of:
    0.034964338 = product of:
      0.10489301 = sum of:
        0.10489301 = weight(_text_:22 in 44) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10489301 = score(doc=44,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13693152 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039102852 = queryNorm
            0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 44, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=44)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

5. 9.1997 19:22:27

Source

Rundfunk und Geschichte. 22(1996) H.2/3, S.184-193

0.007855691 = product of:
  0.031422764 = sum of:
    0.031422764 = weight(_text_:logic in 442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031422764 = score(doc=442,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2358082 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039102852 = queryNorm
        0.1332556 = fieldWeight in 442, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=442)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Footnote

Rez. in: JASIST 58(2007) no.4, S.608-609 (K.D. Desouza): "Richard Rogers explores the distinctiveness of the World Wide Web as a politically contested space where information searchers may encounter multiple explanations of reality. Sources of information on the Web are in constant competition with each other for attention. The attention a source receives will determine its prominence, the ability to be a provider of leading information, and its inclusion in authoritative spaces. Rogers explores the politics behind evaluating sources that are collected and housed on authoritative spaces. Information politics on the Web can be looked at in terms of frontend or back-end politics. Front-end politics is concerned with whether sources on the Web pay attention to principles of inclusivity, fairness, and scope of representation in how information is presented, while back-end politics examines the logic behind how search engines or portals select and index information. Concerning front-end politics, Rogers questions the various versions of reality one can derive from examining information on the Web, especially when issues of information inclusivity and scope of representation are toiled with. In addition, Rogers is concerned with how back-end politics are being controlled by dominant forces of the market (i.e., the more an organization is willing to pay, the greater will be the site's visibility and prominence in authoritative spaces), regardless of whether the information presented on the site justifies such a placement. In the book, Rogers illustrates the issues involved in back-end and front-end politics (though heavily slanted on front-end politics) using vivid cases, all of which are derived from his own research. The main thrust is the exploration of how various "information instruments," defined as "a digital and analytical means of recording (capturing) and subsequently reading indications of states of defined information streams (p. 19)," help capture the politics of the Web. Rogers employs four specific instruments (Lay Decision Support System, Issue Barometer, Web Issue Index of Civil Society, and Election Issue Tracker), which are covered in detail in core chapters of the book (Chapter 2-Chapter 5). The book is comprised of six chapters, with Chapter 1 being the traditional introduction and Chapter 6 being a summary of the major concepts discussed.

0.007063862 = product of:
  0.028255448 = sum of:
    0.028255448 = product of:
      0.08476634 = sum of:
        0.08476634 = weight(_text_:22 in 4122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08476634 = score(doc=4122,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13693152 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039102852 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4122, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4122)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 4.1996 20:07:57

0.007063862 = product of:
  0.028255448 = sum of:
    0.028255448 = product of:
      0.08476634 = sum of:
        0.08476634 = weight(_text_:22 in 4514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08476634 = score(doc=4514,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13693152 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039102852 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4514, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4514)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Audiovisual librarian. 22(1996) no.2, S.108-110

0.007063862 = product of:
  0.028255448 = sum of:
    0.028255448 = product of:
      0.08476634 = sum of:
        0.08476634 = weight(_text_:22 in 4913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08476634 = score(doc=4913,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13693152 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039102852 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4913, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4913)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

23. 8.1996 12:51:22