Search (442 results, page 1 of 23)

0.08327709 = product of:
  0.16655418 = sum of:
    0.16655418 = product of:
      0.33310837 = sum of:
        0.33310837 = weight(_text_:deutsch in 5210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.33310837 = score(doc=5210,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32015407 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
              0.054394815 = queryNorm
            1.0404627 = fieldWeight in 5210, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5210)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.07286746 = product of:
  0.14573492 = sum of:
    0.14573492 = product of:
      0.29146984 = sum of:
        0.29146984 = weight(_text_:deutsch in 3100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.29146984 = score(doc=3100,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32015407 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
              0.054394815 = queryNorm
            0.9104049 = fieldWeight in 3100, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3100)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

http://www.heise.de/tp/deutsch/inhalt/co/8553/1.html

0.062457822 = product of:
  0.124915645 = sum of:
    0.124915645 = product of:
      0.24983129 = sum of:
        0.24983129 = weight(_text_:deutsch in 6914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24983129 = score(doc=6914,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32015407 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
              0.054394815 = queryNorm
            0.78034705 = fieldWeight in 6914, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6914)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.05204818 = product of:
  0.10409636 = sum of:
    0.10409636 = product of:
      0.20819272 = sum of:
        0.20819272 = weight(_text_:deutsch in 4965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20819272 = score(doc=4965,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32015407 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
              0.054394815 = queryNorm
            0.6502892 = fieldWeight in 4965, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4965)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

http://www.heise.de/tp/deutsch/special/sam/6970/1.html

0.046862505 = product of:
  0.09372501 = sum of:
    0.09372501 = sum of:
      0.062457822 = weight(_text_:deutsch in 6481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.062457822 = score(doc=6481,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32015407 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054394815 = queryNorm
          0.19508676 = fieldWeight in 6481, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=6481)
      0.03126719 = weight(_text_:22 in 6481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03126719 = score(doc=6481,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.19048138 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054394815 = queryNorm
          0.16414827 = fieldWeight in 6481, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=6481)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Nimmt man noch hinzu, daß 35 Prozent (hochgerechnet 22 Millionen Bürger) glauben, Kinder, die den Umgang mit dem Internet nicht beherrschen, seien auch - was immer das heißen mag - privat benachteiligt, dann läßt sich bemerken, daß das Internet für viele offenbar bereits mindestens den Stellenwert der früheren Alphabetisierung einnimmt. Man könnte gar vermuten, daß diese mitsamt anderen Grundkenntnissen hintan gesetzt wird, wenn die Hälfte der Haushalte mit des Satz übereinstimmt, daß die Kinder so früh wie möglich ans Internet herangeflihrt werden müßten. Aber, wie gesagt, bei Befragungen, die nur bestimmte Meinungen abhaken, fallen Zwischentöne und reflektierte Meinungen schlicht unter den Tisch. Bei 34 Prozent der Haushalte herrscht die Meinung vor, daß die Schulen für die Internetkompetenz genug machen, 74 Prozent sehen Eltern oder ältere Geschwister in der Pflicht, dem Web-Nachwuchs die notwendigen Fertigkeiten nahezubringen. Wie auch immer, so scheint die Intemetnutzung bereits ziemlich hoch zu sein. 25 Prozent der 6- bis 18-Jährigen gehen mehrmals im Monat, 30 Prozent mehrmals in der Woche, 9 Prozent mehrmals täglich ins Internet, wobei bei den unter 14-Jährigen schon 47 Prozent mehrmals wöchentlich online sind. Nur 26 Prozent haben nach der Befragung noch keine Erfahrung mit dem Internet, was sich aber bei 9 Prozent noch in diesem Jahr ändern soll. Lediglich 15,8 Prozent der Befragten gaben an, dass eine Internetnutzung "nicht geplant" sei. Für den Standort Deutschland ist erfreulich, daß sich 83 Prozent der Kinder und Jugendlichen "regelmäßig" über das Internet "gezielt" Informationen beschaffen, auch wenn wir nicht genau wissen, um welche Art der Informationen es sich dabei handelt. Bei der Befragung ging es um spezielle Interessen (Sport, Hobby etc.), was dann schon wahrscheinlicher klingt.

Date

21. 6.2005 21:22:09

Footnote

Vgl. auch: http://heise-online.de/tp/deutsch/inhalt/te/9149/1.html und zur Studie: http://www.aolpresse.de/aol/studien.shtml

0.041689582 = product of:
  0.083379164 = sum of:
    0.083379164 = product of:
      0.16675833 = sum of:
        0.16675833 = weight(_text_:22 in 6569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16675833 = score(doc=6569,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19048138 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.054394815 = queryNorm
            0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 6569, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6569)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 2.1997 19:50:29

Source

Cogito. 1997, H.1, S.22-23

0.036848735 = product of:
  0.07369747 = sum of:
    0.07369747 = product of:
      0.14739494 = sum of:
        0.14739494 = weight(_text_:22 in 3204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14739494 = score(doc=3204,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19048138 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.054394815 = queryNorm
            0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 3204, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3204)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

RRZK-Kompass. 1995, Nr.65, S.21-22

0.036478385 = product of:
  0.07295677 = sum of:
    0.07295677 = product of:
      0.14591354 = sum of:
        0.14591354 = weight(_text_:22 in 8727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14591354 = score(doc=8727,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19048138 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.054394815 = queryNorm
            0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 8727, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8727)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

5. 8.2001 12:22:47

Source

Information outlook. 3(1999) no.2, S.18-22

0.036478385 = product of:
  0.07295677 = sum of:
    0.07295677 = product of:
      0.14591354 = sum of:
        0.14591354 = weight(_text_:22 in 7131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14591354 = score(doc=7131,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19048138 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.054394815 = queryNorm
            0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 7131, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7131)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

18. 1.1997 12:15:22

Source

Kölner Stadtanzeiger. Nr.69 vom 22/23.3.1997, S.MZ7

0.036478385 = product of:
  0.07295677 = sum of:
    0.07295677 = product of:
      0.14591354 = sum of:
        0.14591354 = weight(_text_:22 in 44) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14591354 = score(doc=44,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19048138 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.054394815 = queryNorm
            0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 44, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=44)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

5. 9.1997 19:22:27

Source

Rundfunk und Geschichte. 22(1996) H.2/3, S.184-193

0.03643373 = product of:
  0.07286746 = sum of:
    0.07286746 = product of:
      0.14573492 = sum of:
        0.14573492 = weight(_text_:deutsch in 159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14573492 = score(doc=159,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32015407 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
              0.054394815 = queryNorm
            0.45520246 = fieldWeight in 159, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=159)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Bis Ende der 70-er Jahre erschloss sich der Begriff der Dromologie allenfalls für Altsprachler. Das änderte sich mit den Arbeiten des 1932 geborenen Geschwindigkeitsforschers Paul Virilio, der mit seinen Texten 'Fahren, fahren, fahren' und 'Geschwindigkeit und Politik' für Furore sorgte. Erste Texte auf Deutsch erschienen von ihm auch bald in der FR. In seinem Buch 'Krieg und Kino' entdeckte Virilio überaschende Parallelen zwischen der Entwicklung der Kriegstechnik und der Cinematographie. Virilios Denken fasziniert durch die überaschende Verknüpfung von Technologie, Wissensgeschichte und Philosophie

0.035009023 = sum of:
  0.029481713 = product of:
    0.088445134 = sum of:
      0.088445134 = weight(_text_:object's in 4344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.088445134 = score(doc=4344,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.5387876 = queryWeight, product of:
            9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054394815 = queryNorm
          0.16415584 = fieldWeight in 4344, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01171875 = fieldNorm(doc=4344)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.00552731 = product of:
    0.01105462 = sum of:
      0.01105462 = weight(_text_:22 in 4344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.01105462 = score(doc=4344,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19048138 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054394815 = queryNorm
          0.058035173 = fieldWeight in 4344, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01171875 = fieldNorm(doc=4344)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Chapter 2 (Technology and People) focuses an several theories of technological acceptance and diffusion. Unfortunately, Bruce's presentation is somewhat confusing as he moves from one theory to next, never quite connecting them into a logical sequence or coherent whole. Two theories are of particular interest to Bruce: the Theory of Diffusion of Innovations and the Theory of Planned Behavior. The Theory of Diffusion of Innovations is an "information-centric view of technology acceptance" in which technology adopters are placed in the information flows of society from which they learn about innovations and "drive innovation adoption decisions" (p. 20). The Theory of Planned Behavior maintains that the "performance of a behavior is a joint function of intentions and perceived behavioral control" (i.e., how muck control a person thinks they have) (pp. 22-23). Bruce combines these two theories to form the basis for the Technology Acceptance Model. This model posits that "an individual's acceptance of information technology is based an beliefs, attitudes, intentions, and behaviors" (p. 24). In all these theories and models echoes a recurring theme: "individual perceptions of the innovation or technology are critical" in terms of both its characteristics and its use (pp. 24-25). From these, in turn, Bruce derives a predictive theory of the role personal perceptions play in technology adoption: Personal Innovativeness of Information Technology Adoption (PIITA). Personal inventiveness is defined as "the willingness of an individual to try out any new information technology" (p. 26). In general, the PIITA theory predicts that information technology will be adopted by individuals that have a greater exposure to mass media, rely less an the evaluation of information technology by others, exhibit a greater ability to cope with uncertainty and take risks, and requires a less positive perception of an information technology prior to its adoption. Chapter 3 (A Focus an Usings) introduces the User-Centered Paradigm (UCP). The UCP is characteristic of the shift of emphasis from technology to users as the driving force behind technology and research agendas for Internet development [for a dissenting view, see Andrew Dillion's (2003) challenge to the utility of user-centerness for design guidance]. It entails the "broad acceptance of the user-oriented perspective across a range of disciplines and professional fields," such as business, education, cognitive engineering, and information science (p. 34).
The UCP's effect an business practices is focused mainly in the management and marketing areas. Marketing experienced a shift from "product-oriented operations" with its focus an "selling the products' features" and customer contact only at the point of sale toward more service-Centered business practice ("customer Jemand orientation") and the development of one-to-one customer relationships (pp. 35-36). For management, the adoption of the UCP caused a shift from "mechanistic, bureaucratic, top-down organizational structures" to "flatter, inclusive, and participative" ones (p. 37). In education, practice shifted from the teachercentered model where the "teacher is responsible for and makes all the decisions related to the learning environment" to a learnercentered model where the student is "responsible for his or her own learning" and the teacher focuses an "matching learning events to the individual skills, aptitudes, and interests of the individual learner" (pp. 38-39). Cognitive engineering saw the rise of "user-Centered design" and human factors that were concerned with applying "scientific knowledge of humans to the design of man-machine interface systems" (p. 44). The UCP had a great effect an Information Science in the "design of information systems" (p. 47). Previous to UCP's explicit proposed by Brenda Dervin and M. Nilan in 1986, systems design was dominated by the "physical of system oriented paradigm" (p. 48). The physical paradigm held a positivistic and materialistic view of technology and (passive) human interaction as exemplified by the 1953 Cranfield tests of information retrieval mechanisms. Instead, the UCP focuses an "users rather than systems" by making the perceptions of individual information users the "centerpiece consideration for information service and system design" (pp. 47-48). Bruce briefly touches an the various schools of thought within user-oriented paradigm, such as the cognitive/self studies approach with its emphasis is an an individual's knowledge structures or model of the world [e.g., Belkin (1990)], the cognitve/context studies approach that focuses an "context in explaining variations in information behavior" [e.g., Savolainen (1995) and Dervin's (1999) sensemaking], and the social constructionism/discourse analytic theory with its focus an that language, not mental/knowledge constructs, as the primary shaper of the world as a system of intersubjective meanings [e.g., Talja 1996], (pp. 53-54). Drawing from the rich tradition of user oriented research, Bruce attempts to gain a metatheoretical understanding of the Internet as a phenomena by combining Dervin's (1996) "micromoments of human usings" with the French philosopher Bruno Latour's (1999) "conception of Circulating reference" to form what 1 term the Metatheory of Circulating Usings (pp. ix, 56, 60). According to Bruce, Latour's concept is designed to bridge "the gap between mind and object" by engaging in a "succession of finely grained transformations that construct and transfer truth about the object" through a chain of "microtranslations" from "matter to form," thereby connecting mind and object (p. 56). The connection works as long as the chain remains unbroken. The nature of this chain of "information producing translations" are such that as one moves away from the object, one experiences a "reduction" of the object's "locality, particularity, materiality, multiplicity and continuity," while simultaneously gaining the "amplification" of its "compatibility, standardization, text, calculation, circulation, and relative universality" (p. 57).

0.031228911 = product of:
  0.062457822 = sum of:
    0.062457822 = product of:
      0.124915645 = sum of:
        0.124915645 = weight(_text_:deutsch in 5489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.124915645 = score(doc=5489,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32015407 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
              0.054394815 = queryNorm
            0.39017352 = fieldWeight in 5489, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5489)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Enthält die Beiträge: FRÜHWALD, W.: Vor uns die Cyber-Sintflut; POSTMAN, N.: Die große Verführung (Interview); HEUSER, U.J.: Die fragmentierte Gesellschaft; BARLOW, J.P.: Das Netz ist mein Gehirn (Interview); SICHTERMANN, B.: Hundert Kanäle und kein Ende; POLATSCHEK, K.: Es war einmal ein Denkwerkzeug; ZIMMER, D.E.: Begegnung mit dem Deutsch von morgen; RANDOW, G. von: Hyperschlaue Schreibmaschine; ZIMMER, D.E.: Die Bibliothek der Zukunft; GASCHKE, S.: Frauen und Technik; KRUSE, K.: Guten Tag, liebes Monster; RANDOW, G. von: Der Strom des Lebens; DWORSCHAK, M.: Wer sucht, wird fündig; POLATSCHEK, K.: Tod der elektronischen Zeitung!; MECKEL, M.: Schlwusenwärter in Digitalien; LÜTGE, G.: Räuber im Netz; SIEGELE, L.: Cash für den Cyberspace; SIEGELE, L.: Einkaufen, wo es Freude macht; DWORSCHAK, M.: Zauberreich aus Bits und Bytes; DWORSCHAK, M.: Arbeitsgemeinschaft Höllenpfuhl; BORK, H.: China: Surfer an der Leine; TENBROCK, C.: Vereinigte Staaten: Amerika online; BLUME, G. u. U.J. HEUSER: Japan: Fahrt ins Blaue; PROISSL, W.: Frankreich: Gefangen im eigenen Netz

0.031228911 = product of:
  0.062457822 = sum of:
    0.062457822 = product of:
      0.124915645 = sum of:
        0.124915645 = weight(_text_:deutsch in 4413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.124915645 = score(doc=4413,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32015407 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
              0.054394815 = queryNorm
            0.39017352 = fieldWeight in 4413, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4413)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Das dünnbesiedelte Norwegen ist in vielerlei Hinsicht interessant. Traditionellerweise haben die Norweger eine enge Bindung zu den Massenmedien. Nowegische Zeitungen befriedigen dabei eher den lokalen bis regionalen Informationsbedarf. Im Gegensatz dazu deckt das Fernsehen den nationalen und internationalen Informationsbedarf ab. Beide Medien fördern eine passive Haltung der Rezipienten. Mit dem Aufkommen des Internets und vor allem mit der Verfügbarkeit von webbasierten Diensten gibt es nunmehr einen aktiven internationalen Trend bei den Norwegern zu beobachten. Dabei ist zu fragen, ob damit der Abschied von der Provinzialität eingeläutet wird, oder handelt es sich nur um die Reflexion eines Pseudo-Arguments. Im Folgenden wollen wir kurz auf den norwegischen Zeitungsmarkt eingehen und ausführlicher den Bereich der webbasierten Internet-Dienste unter die Lupe nehmen. Als Nebeneffekt geben wir auch eine Antwort auf die Frage: Wie funktioniert der deutsch-skandinavische Informationstransfer?

0.029478988 = product of:
  0.058957975 = sum of:
    0.058957975 = product of:
      0.11791595 = sum of:
        0.11791595 = weight(_text_:22 in 4122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11791595 = score(doc=4122,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19048138 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.054394815 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4122, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4122)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 4.1996 20:07:57

0.029478988 = product of:
  0.058957975 = sum of:
    0.058957975 = product of:
      0.11791595 = sum of:
        0.11791595 = weight(_text_:22 in 4514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11791595 = score(doc=4514,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19048138 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.054394815 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4514, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4514)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Audiovisual librarian. 22(1996) no.2, S.108-110

0.029478988 = product of:
  0.058957975 = sum of:
    0.058957975 = product of:
      0.11791595 = sum of:
        0.11791595 = weight(_text_:22 in 4913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11791595 = score(doc=4913,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19048138 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.054394815 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4913, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4913)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

23. 8.1996 12:51:22

0.029478988 = product of:
  0.058957975 = sum of:
    0.058957975 = product of:
      0.11791595 = sum of:
        0.11791595 = weight(_text_:22 in 4931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11791595 = score(doc=4931,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19048138 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.054394815 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4931, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4931)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

17. 7.1996 9:33:22

0.029478988 = product of:
  0.058957975 = sum of:
    0.058957975 = product of:
      0.11791595 = sum of:
        0.11791595 = weight(_text_:22 in 5280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11791595 = score(doc=5280,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19048138 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.054394815 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5280, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5280)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

21. 9.1996 16:03:22

0.029478988 = product of:
  0.058957975 = sum of:
    0.058957975 = product of:
      0.11791595 = sum of:
        0.11791595 = weight(_text_:22 in 5837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11791595 = score(doc=5837,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19048138 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.054394815 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5837, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5837)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

30.11.1996 13:22:37